User talk:Greatpatton

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Could you please explain on Image:Vs bez visp.png what is the area that is shown? Thanks in advance. - Andre Engels 01:25, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Purpose of Zug[edit]

Salut Greatpatton, Zug is meant for images concerning Zug Stadt, the capital of canton of Zug and not for everything concerning the canton itself. Although you described the coat of arms as "Zug Stadt" it shows the coat of arms of the canton of Zug (Image:Canton_zoug-drapeau.png), which is not the same. The coat of arms of Zug Stadt has a slight different blue and a castle on top (cp. [1]) The linked image was in de.wikipedia.org but had to be deleted because of copyright problems. As far as I know there is no free image of the coat of arms of Stadt Zug. Therefore Image:Canton_zoug-drapeau.png should be placed on a page for the canton of Zug, which has not yet been created and I don't know about the naming scheme on commons. --Baikonur 15:08, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)

This is not the coat of arm of the the city of Zug but the flag of the city of Zug which is the same as the flag of the canton with the héraldique (dont' know the english word) Argent a Bar Azure (in french). This is the same for instance as the city of Geneva where the flag of the city and the flag of the canton are the same. ref: FLOW Greatpatton 17:00, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Ah okay, I was irritated because the German word "Wappen" means coat of arms in English. The correct translation is "Flagge". I'll correct it in Zug. If you have a free image of the coat of arms of the city or know a source for it I would really appreciate it. --Baikonur 19:08, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Sorry, but I was looking for Flagge, but the only word that came to me was Wappen. ;-) (my german is not that good). I m currently redrawing all the flags (not the coat of arms) for all swiss Gemeinde see fr:Wikipédia:Projet, Blasons, communes et cantons suisses, with a free license. For each flag I have the vectorial file (.svg or .ai) from which it should not be difficult to draw the coat of arms, maybe we can team up between de: and fr: to do this job. Greatpatton 19:47, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Je viens d'élaborer un article sur les blasons français mais je ne parviens pas a trouver qu'el sont déjà les blasons français déja existant dans Wikicommons

Les liens Blason Blasons Héraldique sont désespérément vide y a t'il d'autres liens en français plus aproprier ?Merci d' avance pour me désembourber!

Répondez moi en Français s'il vous plait Merci encore!

--XOX 11:23, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Thoune[edit]

Salut Greatpatton

L'étoile dans le blason de la ville de thoune a en effet sept (7) et pas six bouts. On peut le voir sous http://www.thun.ch/images/Wappen_Stadt_Thun_RGB.tif

Salutations Mike

Oui tu as raison, j'ai fait une erreure je vais la corriger dès que possible. Greatpatton 20:47, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Image info[edit]

I have found some old uploads of yours that are missing license info and categorization, namely Image:Tessin-blason.jpg and Image:Paudex-blason.jpg (but there may be more). Please have a look and add the missing info! Thanks -- Duesentrieb 01:37, 9 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image deletion warning The image Image:Kilt.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion.

Thuresson 02:51, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Commons-l subscription[edit]

Hello Greatpatton,

as per Commons talk:Administrators, I am asking all admins to subscribe to commons-l, a mailing list for Wikimedia Commons policy and project discussion. Since many admins are only on Commons infrequently, this is a good way to alert people about important happenings. The mailing list is nominally multilingual, but predominantly English.

If you are already subscribed to commons-l, I apologize for bothering you, and you are free to ignore this message. If you don't want to use your regular e-mail account, feel free to leave me a message, and I can send you a GMail invite. Traffic on the mailing list is relatively low, and we do not expect admins to read all messages to the list, but it would be nice if you could check on it at least every few weeks. Thanks for your time,--Eloquence 23:03, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This image is a duplicate of Image:Coloradodunes.jpg. I tagged it accordingly and exchanged its only use in the fr-wikipedia against the other version. --h-stt !? 12:21, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Admin news[edit]

Hello,

If you consent for statistics to be published about your actions as an administrator, please sign here: Commons:Administrator permission for statistics. (I expect that most people will not have a problem with it unless you are especially concerned with privacy.)

Also, please be aware that we now have a Commons:Administrators' noticeboard. Please put it on your watchlist, if you haven't already!

cheers, pfctdayelise (translate?) 05:33, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Admin news[edit]

Hello,

If you consent for statistics to be published about your actions as an administrator, please sign here: Commons:Administrator permission for statistics. (I expect that most people will not have a problem with it unless you are especially concerned with privacy.)

Also, please be aware that we now have a Commons:Administrators' noticeboard. Please put it on your watchlist, if you haven't already!

cheers, pfctdayelise (translate?) 05:33, 7 September 2006 (UTC) P.S.: Pardon if this is a repeat (bot debugging...)[reply]

Image deletion warning Image:Täsch-drapeau.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

slady (o.o) 01:38, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Request removal of sysop access[edit]

Hi. I have requested the removal of your sysop access, at meta:Requests_for_permissions#Removal_of_access. Following Commons:Administrators#What_is_expected_from_an_administrator.3F, an administrator with less than 50 edits in 12 months is considered inactive and may have his/her sysop status revoked.

This is not a personal attack on you, but a way to make sure that those administrator's listed as such are available for administrative tasks. If you feel that you will again become active and need the sysop tools, you are of course welcome to apply for adminship again.

Fred Chess 13:46, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

removal of adminstatus[edit]

Hello, Greatpatton,

your adminstatus has been removed per request on metawiki due to inactivity. You can re-apply for admin through normal procedure. Effeietsanders 18:01, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Greatpatton!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 14:15, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please help replace this outdated license[edit]

Hello!

Thank you for donating images to the Wikimedia Commons. You have uploaded some images in the past with the license {{PD}}. While this was a license acceptable in the early days of Wikimedia, since January 2006, this license has been deprecated and since October 2008 no new uploads with this license was allowed.

The license on older images should be replaced with a better and more specific license/permissions and you can help by checking the images and adding {{PD-self}} if you are the author or one of the other templates that you can see in the template on the image page.

Thank you for your help. If you need help feel free to ask at Commons talk:Licensing or contact User:Zscout370.

The images we would like you to check are:

BotMultichillT 20:34, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Photo de la Chaux-de-Fonds[edit]

Salut, Greatpatton, j'ai reçu sur OTRS (ticket 2010061410037646) la réclamation d'une personne se disant être l'auteur de la photographie (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:La_chaux_de_fond1-ag.jpg?uselang=fr). Peux-tu me confirmer que c'est bien toi l'auteur de cette prise de vue ? Je n'en doute pas un instant mais cette personne affirme avoir été copié depuis Panoramio sous le nom « manto branco » et auteur as5242194... Céréales Killer (talk) 09:17, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Dictionaire des plantes suisses[edit]

Please take a look at fr:Discussion_utilisateur:Greatpatton#Dictionaire_des_plantes_suisses. --whym (talk) 14:41, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anwil-blason.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

109.238.80.47 12:46, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pratteln-blason.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gunnar (💬) 08:13, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Dompierre-drapeau.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 19:05, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dompierre-drapeau.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 08:47, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]