User talk:Gnangarra/archive 5
Nov 2011 to Sep 2012[edit]
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! CHOGM 2011 protest gnangarra-11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Well done!!! SatuSuro (talk) 10:22, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Light painting gnangarra-1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Light painting gnangarra-1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 06:05, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
Good job[edit]
Nice job with the closes. I know it can't be fun to read all the poorly informed comments on both sides, but your valient attempt to divine consensus is appreciated. MBisanz talk 13:27, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
- thanks for the feedback. Gnangarra 04:08, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Germany women's national wheelchair basketball team 6880 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Thanks[edit]
Thanks for the nomination of quality picture. :) I should have her name around some place and will eventually get it categorised. (I was hoping the Germans could use the national team pics for their Paralympic articles.) --LauraHale (talk) 00:03, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
- your welcome, someone will use them they always do. Gnangarra 00:10, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Australia men wheelchair basketball v Great Britain 5825.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Confused about User:Gnangarra/K20D[edit]
Gnangarra, I am quite confused about User:Gnangarra/K20D. The way I read it, in the current format it says:
- Orange box says: "Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 Australia License"
- Little intro says: "the below license does not indicate the actual image license, the actual image license is as precribed above in an orange coloured box"
- Commons "below license" says: "Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 Australia License"
I do not think you can have it both ways. It is either "Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 Australia" or not, and in the current form it is quite confusing. I run into those when checking QI and featured pictures with no known licenses (surprisingly there is quite a lot of those and most of the time license was deleted somehow). There were no bots involved, and I am not aware or any "BOT required templates". One of the reasons to use standard template is that those templates are translated into 100's of languages, and since Commons is used by a lot of people that do not speak English, I do not think it is a good idea to hide the license in their language in a collapsed box. That defeats the purpose of localized license templates. Sorry, for changing things around but I was only trying to bring them up to the current "best practice" standards. --Jarekt (talk) 14:29, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
- There was no confusion before the template was added, I've reworded it to make it clearer. Gnangarra 15:45, 13 September 2012 (UTC)