User talk:George Shuklin/archive1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Image:Win98se_serial_sticker.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Win98se_serial_sticker.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Sk-ru 01:42, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, George Shuklin!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

Для распознавания видов полезно включать изображения в категории, подобные Category:Unidentified plants или соответствующие категории для семейства/класса, например Category:Unknown Lepidoptera для бабочек.

EugeneZelenko 14:24, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Geocoding[edit]

Hello George Shuklin/archive1, at the Geocoding project we have noticed that you uploaded a number of pictures from one of the less covered regions on earth. Maybe you could consider adding coordinates to some of your images. They will show up on the WikiMiniAtlas and the Google Earth Commons-layer. You can find instructions on how to add coordinates to your images at Commons:Geocoding. Thank you in advance! The Geocoding team --EugeneZelenko 14:24, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: По-русски[edit]

  • Спасибо. А можно то же самое, но по-русски? Я совершенно не имею желания изучать английский интерфейс и англоязычное дерево каталогов. Если есть шаблон в стиле ру-вики "нет категорий" я с великим удовольствием буду им пользоваться. #!George Shuklin 19:00, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Пользовательский интерфейс по-русски можно. Частично это сделано, но как и во всяком Вики-проекте нужна помощь добровольцев. Если, например, Вы заметите не переведённый шаблон и переведёте его, то думаю, что от этого выиграют все.
Что касается категорий, то с этим - застарелая проблема. К сожалению, названия категорий пока только по-английски :-(.
Вместо шаблона нет категорий можно использовать инструмент OrphanImages. Другая дело, что категоризацией тоже кому-то надо заниматься, да и кто лучше автора знает где был сделан изображение, и что именно на нём изображено :-)
EugeneZelenko 14:14, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ангелы над окном Спасо-Преображенского собора.jpg[edit]

Hi, just as an FYI: If you upload an image twice and you want to delete the one with the wrong name, you can use {{badname|Image:name of file.ext}} to nominate it for speedy deletion. I have changed it for Image:Ангелы над окном Спасо-Преображенского собора.jpg. Kind regards, Deadstar 17:40, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Церковь Пантелеимона.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Image:Лужайка_в_Таврическом_парке.jpg[edit]

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 18:24, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • This becoming annoying. Once I fogot to type a license and such noise began -_-. Can I put a license once for all time being? I feel myself as a bot, printing same text again and again for EVERY photo. GRRRR. #!George Shuklin 18:28, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Фонтанка_(с_Пантелеймоновского_моста).jpg[edit]

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 19:30, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • This becoming super annoying. Once I fogot to type a license and such noise began -_-. Can I put a license once for all time being? I feel myself as a bot, printing same text again and again for EVERY photo. GRRRR. #!George Shuklin 19:40, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Газон_в_Летнем_саду.jpg[edit]

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 20:09, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

G.T.F.O. #!George Shuklin 20:41, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's probably not an appropriate response to a user that is trying to make things better here. I suggest that you review your contributions to find all your uploads and fix the licenses in one fell swoop. This link will find your most recent 500 images. special contribs - Imagespace only Sorry I do not speak Russian, or I would have replied in your preferred language. Hope that helps, thanks for your contributions. ++Lar: t/c 23:21, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Центральные_ворота_Летнего_Сада.jpg[edit]

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 19:34, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Привет[edit]

Если вы не заметили, этих раздражающих messeges из роботов. Поскольку вы предпочитаете читать русский, мне пришлось использовать Google переводчика. Наслаждайтесь. Yuval Y § Chat § 21:41, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ваше отношение. Yuval Y § Chat § 21:53, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Отношение к лицензиям? Разумеется. Они раздражают. Я бы предпочёл указать одну лицензию на длительное время, а не печатать каждый раз одно и то же. #!George Shuklin 21:57, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for droping the russian, but your attitude was starting to be quite annoying. Since I don't speak Russian, I had to translate from english to russian and vice versa, in order to get the proper translation, when I don't speak English as a native tongue. I don't like when people are writing banners on their talk page and acting like everyone have (must?) do as they prefer. Sometimes it's simpler to keep thinking of what you're about to do, than to get angry of those who try to help, even if they are bots. Yuval Y § Chat § 22:09, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
BTW, you can always make a templeate, with your details and licence. Yuval Y § Chat § 22:11, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Well. What do you want from me? I'm here not to typing lincence text. If I really must to doing a botwork, may be I'm better to find a different site? (or just go back to ru-wiki?). Why this feature do not builtin (A dropbox "use licence xxx as default")? N.B. What template your are talking about? #!George Shuklin 22:15, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The "Use licence xxx as default" sounds like a good idea, why don't you suggest it in the Village pump?
What I meant about template, was that you can make a page such as User:George Shuklin/tmp] and write there:

{{Information |Description={{{1}}} |Source=self-made |Date={{{2}}} |Author= [[User:George Shuklin|George Shuklin]] |Permission= {{self|cc-by-sa}} }}

That way you can write {{User:George Shuklin/tmp|name|date}} and all you'll have to do is to write the name and the date.
Best regards, Yuval Y § Chat § 22:26, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thinking again, the simplest way is to copy the {description} thingy I've wrote above, and edit the information about the picture. Yuval Y § Chat § 22:49, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please categorizing your pictures![edit]

Please take to categories your pictures, if you want to find these other users. (with russian names it is more important)

Take tag as Category:Buildings in Saint Petersburg

Thank you very much! --Beyond silence 18:50, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Use program named Commonist ([1]), it's makes it so much easier! --Beyond silence 22:22, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Is it know about all streets of Saint Petersburg? ^_~ #!George Shuklin 09:19, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Чернышевского 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Смольный собор 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Водонапорная башня.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Сфинкс.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}


Image Tagging Image:Порт_Артур._Внутренний_восточный_бассейн.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Порт_Артур._Внутренний_восточный_бассейн.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 18:17, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Image Tagging Image:Порт_Артур._Вход_в_гаварь_и_вид_на_Большой_рейд.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Порт_Артур._Вход_в_гаварь_и_вид_на_Большой_рейд.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 18:18, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Image Tagging Image:Порт_Артур._Железная_дорога_и_вокзал.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Порт_Артур._Железная_дорога_и_вокзал.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 18:18, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Image Tagging Image:Порт_Артур._Общий_вид.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Порт_Артур._Общий_вид.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 18:18, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Image Tagging Image:Порт_Артур._Углубленный_западный_бассейн.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Порт_Артур._Углубленный_западный_бассейн.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 18:18, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Про боты и шаблоны[edit]

Пожалуйста, не обижайтесь на ботов, это существа тупые (как и любая программа), и смысла за словами они видеть не умеют. Если Вам интересна философия на эту тему, очень рекомендую The Future Does Not Compute (Steve Talbott) или Bomba megabitowa (Stanisław Lem). Не знаю, есть ли переводы на русский.

Чтобы не возникало проблем, лучше заполнять поля {{Information}} так, чтобы бот был доволен. В случае изображений Порт-Артура фразу Из журнала "Нива" 1904 года стоит перенести из поля Description в поле Source.

Что касается авторства, то сканирование не делает Вас автором, т.е. в поле Author стоит написать настоящего автора (или неизвестен), а своё участие (отсканировано мною) можно добавить в поле Description.

Кстати, для облегчения участи ботов и стоит использовать шаблон для указания языка текста {{Ru}}. Возможно в будущем будет показываться только описание на языке, выбранном участником, и это шаблон поможет этого достичь.

EugeneZelenko 14:40, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Утюг.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Image:Памятник Энгельсу.jpg[edit]

Hi! Please, if you can write an English Description to the QI nomination then write it to the picture too, as I did. Thanks --Beyond silence 21:12, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Улица_Короленко.jpg[edit]

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. Siebrand 19:58, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

File:Памятник Энгельсу.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Памятник Энгельсу.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Смольный.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Улица Химиков.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Image:Причал_петропавловской_крепости.jpg[edit]

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. Siebrand 11:40, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.

FP[edit]

That is not very friendly, I'd even say it is 'plocho'. English is also a foreign language for me, and I do my best to write in a common language. I could write to you in Dutch, or French or even West-Vlaams, and you wouldn't understand a thing. I write in English as a courtesy to you. Spasiba tavarisj, for also answering in English. Lycaon 00:49, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Typing linceses, categories, etc take a lot of time. And this time is not a time of taking photo or editing it. I do this. Now, you want make me a translation to english for description (huge amount of time), or think about name during image saving (make a description, translate, found a main part). Categories is enough for image identification. Advanced service for non-russian speaking people is not my target (note: if i'm really need an image, i'm freely use a japanese name (and description) - and it's ok for international (i hope) project). #!George Shuklin 00:58, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Image Tagging Image:Алексеев_-_Вид_на_Михайловский_Замок_и_площадь_Коннетабля_в_Петербурге.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Алексеев_-_Вид_на_Михайловский_Замок_и_площадь_Коннетабля_в_Петербурге.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 09:35, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Image Tagging Image:Вуаль_Жан_Луи_-_Портрет_великой_княгини_Марии_Фёдоровны.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Вуаль_Жан_Луи_-_Портрет_великой_княгини_Марии_Фёдоровны.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 09:36, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Image:Белорусская_операция.jpg[edit]

Предупреждение
об удалении
изображения 		Image:Белорусская_операция.jpg был помещён в список запросов на удаление для того, чтобы сообщество могло обсудить, нужно ли сохранить его или нет. Мы были бы признательны, если бы вы высказали ваше мнение о нём на этой странице.

Этот запрос никоим образом не означает, что мы не ценим вклад автора изображения. Просто один из участников считает, что с этим изображением есть какая-то конкретная проблема, например нарушение авторских прав.
Если же файл собираются удалить из-за того, что он заменён лучшей версией, созданной на его основе, то мы просим вас взглянуть на это с такой стороны: хотя сам файл будет удалён, ваш труд, за который мы вам очень признательны, продолжит жить в новом файле.
В любом случае, пожалуйста, не воспринимайте этот запрос на удаление как связанный лично с вами, он ни в коем случает таковым не является. Спасибо!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Image:100-мм зенитная пушка КС-19 (6).jpg[edit]

Я всё-таки настаиваю, что на фотографии не 100-мм КС-19, а 85-мм 52-К. Сравните, например, с Category:100-mm air defense gun model 1947 (КS-19), Category:85-mm air defense gun model 1939 (52-К). Bukvoed 08:06, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Форма маршала артиллерии.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Вход в музей артиллерии.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 152-мм пушка Гиацинт-Б (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

привет привет[edit]

I just tried to type "Hello hello" in the title here.

No I did not pass! I worked too hard for the rest of this text. -- carol 15:35, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]


I used a web based translating software -- from the evil google no less!

I am more rude than the typically rude United States citizen and here is my proof: I honestly tried to obtain a Bachelor of Science (instead of Bachelor of Arts) degree from my university so that I would not have to learn another language. I have succeeded at one of those goals and failed at the other. I will leave it to the reader of the translation software to know which one was a success....

Your recent uploads were beautiful. I might not know the Русский язык or even the technical language that supersedes these national languages, but I do know the smell of those device and also how the knobs should feel while fine tuning them and the sound they make as they are moved to the desk of the person who understands the process that will make them work and be useful. Maybe the photograph is better than the museum exhibit in that fashion.

I tried to use a translating software to make the descriptions in English. It did not work well for me. Some of the English returned were not words that I recognized. I also tried to fit the information that you provided into the Information template. The template is aimed at English speaking natives, I see this now. If I had not been educated to be so rude as we are, I would apologize. Instead, I am familiar with the problem and tried to work with it. I put the translations within this very rude English template.

In United States, we are not even good with English and rude enough to be proud of this. I still like it here and I don't really know why sometimes.

I read your User page here on the Commons and I think that you understand enough English to understand that you should be legitimately upset. Can you fix the translations that I tried to make here?

Even if you can not or will not, thank you -- it was the smell of the photographs that reached out to me. Very nice aroma. -- carol 15:35, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thank you. I can speak and read (mostly read) English. But translating description is impossible for me (Too specific termins). Note: ультракоротковолновая means ultra short wave(ed). (Is it correct?). Currenly I just return from nex museum (railway), so other radio and telegraph equipment will be uploaded latter (about 150 unprocessed images). #!George Shuklin 15:59, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I have no idea about this stuff. I know it by the other senses, like smell and the sound of it working. I always thought that family would just be available so I tried to learn other things. Ultra short wave works for me, but will it work with an expert?
Even if you do not want to know what really bothered me the most recently, I am going to tell you. It was our Pioneer 10 (the one that did not explode) and Pioneer 11. It has bothered me for some time now. If I had the task of trying to figure out what that gold plate on it said, I would have given up and sold it for rent money, probably. This thing here. They sent that thing as a communication device for aliens to know us from. I can't figure out what it means beyond the picture of the naked man and woman and I really studied science with the intent to understand everything (being young and stupid like we all must be for a while).
You should be proud of sputnik. I don't know what your government thinks about it but there were a lot of people listening to that beep. Or so it has been told so here because I wasn't born yet, so I am proud for you and sputnik. I attended a college that built new science building because of that little guy. They probably could use a new building there and it would be nice if Russia could do that again for us or US even.
What reason is it like that? I enjoy the smell that I think your communication thingie has, how come others can't?
I should sleep now, I think. I have no problem using a portion of tomorrow for adding translations to the recently uploaded photographs. I am just sorry that I do not know Russian to see how silly the translation is. It should be people interacting and not person with software. Probably, I am the only person in the world who feels that way though. Any human being who submits another to that kind of turmoil and wrongness should spend double the amount of time with nothing but the same situation.
I really did grow up when the Russian threat made us consider what locally we thought would a potential target. I miss the cold war except for the war part. And the cold part too. It is easy to figure out what to be proud of when you consider what your enemy would want to remove first.
Your photographs, they smell great. I cannot express this enough. -- carol 17:12, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hello hello[edit]

Я просто пытался типа "Здравствуйте, привет" в названии выше.

Я использовал веб перевода программного обеспечения -- от зла google не меньше!

Я более грубый, чем обычно грубый гражданином Соединенных Штатов и в этом заключается мое доказательство: я честно пытался получить Бакалавр наук (вместо бакалавра искусств) степень моего университета с тем, что я бы не стал учиться на другом языке. Мне удалось на одной из этих целей, и не на других. Я оставлю его на читателя перевода программного обеспечения знать, что один успех ...

Последние добавления были красивые. Я мог бы не знать Русский язык или даже технического языка, что заменяет эти национальные языки, но я знаю запах этих устройств, а также ручки, как должен чувствовать себя при корректировки их и звука они делают, как они переехали в стойке в лицо, которое понимает процесс, который позволит им работать и быть полезным. Может быть, фотографию лучше, чем в музее выставки в том, что мода.

Я пытался использовать перевод программного обеспечения для представления описаний на английском языке. Это не хорошо для меня. Некоторые из английского вернулись не слова, которые я признала. Я также пытался соответствовать информации, что Вы предоставили информации в шаблон. Шаблона направлена на англоговорящих жителей, я вижу это сейчас. Если бы я не был образованные быть столь грубым, как мы, я хотел бы извиниться. Напротив, я знаком с проблемой и пытался работать с ним. Я ставлю переводы в этом очень грубый английский шаблон.

В Соединенных Штатах, мы даже не хорошим английским и грубый, чтобы он гордиться этим. Я до сих пор, как он здесь и я не знаем, почему иногда.

Я прочитал Ваше пользователя страницы здесь общин, и я думаю, что вы понимаете английский достаточно понять, что вы должны нарушить законные. Можете ли вы исправить перевод, что я пытался сделать здесь?

Даже если вы не можете или не будет, я благодарю Вас -- это запах фотографии, которые обращались ко мне. Очень красивый аромат. -- carol 15:35, 27 October 2007 (UTC) http://translate.google.com/translate_t?langpair=en%7Cru[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Грузовой паровоз ЛВ18-002 (ОР18-002) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Image:С. Г. Чириков - Александр Сергеевич Пушкин (акварель).jpg[edit]

Hi George,

See Commons:When_to_use_the_PD-Art_tag#When_should_the_.7B.7BPD-Art.7D.7D_tag_not_be_used.3F. When you take the photo yourself, do not use {{PD-art}}. You should use a free license and {{PD-old}}. --Kjetil r 20:01, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ф.Я.Алексеев - Москва. Вид от Лубянки на Владимирские ворота.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! С. Г. Чириков - Александр Сергеевич Пушкин (акварель).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Image:Тверская улица.jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 09:11, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

File:Проспект Смольного (2).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Проспект Смольного (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Dupe of Проезд Смольного (2).jpg — Rlevse • Talk • 23:36, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Невский 37.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Невский 37.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Motopark 19:48, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Нарвские ворота - центральная композиция (центральный фрагмент).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice colors. I like the match between the sky and the statue. --Manco Capac 10:20, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Нарвские ворота.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good job. It's a pity, that this cable can not be removed... --LC-de 17:40, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Furshtatskaya.jpg[edit]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Здравствуйте, George Shuklin/archive1!

Благодарим Вас за Ваш вклад в Викисклад (WikiCommons). Просим иметь в виду, что изображения, загруженные на Викисклад, желательно делать полезными для всех пользователей проектов Wikimedia. Это возможно в том случае, если другие пользователи смогут найти Ваши изображения.

Чтобы позволить другим найти изображения, загруженные Вами, изображения должны находиться в таком месте, которое можно найти при перемещении по структуре категорий. Это означает, что Вам рекомендуется класть изображения в подходящие темы, категории и/или возможные галереи (см. Commons:Categories). Инструмент CommonSense может помочь Вам найти подходящие категории для Ваших изображений.

К Вашим услугам удобный обзор Ваших изображений в виде галереи.

Суть в том, что изображения должны где-либо находится в общей структуре Викисклада. В настоящее время на Викискладе очень много неотсортированных изображений. Если Вы бы смогли помочь нам расположить эти изображения в такие места, где их возможно найти, сделайте это, пожалуйста!

Благодарим Вас. Pymouss Tchatcher - 16:33, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Портрет Менандра А 850 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok, quality, DOF is a little low and there is slight noise, but I think it still is a QI. --Dschwen 17:41, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Citrus reticulata in flowerpot.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Excellent quality! --CWii 16:13, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Тенерани - портрет графини С.Л. Шуваловой (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Image:Morrowind-with-visual-packs-screenshot.jpg deleted. Why?[edit]

You say about copyright violation, but, as was described in removed by you description, this screenshot was made by me and not violates others copyrights. Fix this, please. -- AVBf (talk) 08:02, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

дополнение: прочитал комментарий на своей странице. Жуть. Однако: "Вы не можете публиковать её под свободной лицензией без разрешения авторов (как игры, так и плагина)" - но ведь издатель ubisoft, а мне попадалось где-то в вики что-то о том, что с уби у вики особые отношения. "грузиться изображение должно в рувики (не на коммоз)" - я собственно в коммоз загрузил только потому, что у меня загрузка на ру-вики не работает. "в маленьком разрешении (в таком, которое будет использоваться в статье)" - это я могу сделать, хотя будет потеряна основная идея (возможность полноценно увидеть особенности визуального пака). "нужно обязательно наличие существенного текста, относящегося ИМЕННО к изображению (просто как иллюстрация не пойдёт)" - это как? "плюс надо оформить шаблон добросовестного использования" - это как?
  • Если грубо - автор игры кто? Именно им и принадлежит право на скриншоты. Это называется производная работа и это запрещено правилами коммонз. Скриншоты можно грузить только в локальные вики и только при условии обоснования добросовестного использования. Да, я знаю, что это дикие заморочки и чушь собачья, но закон об авторском праве придумывали не мы, и мы, наоборот, стараемся сделать энциклопедию, в которой бы не было заморочек с АП. Для этого все проблемные моменты с чужими АП (т.е. с правами разработчиков игры) тщательно выделяются (так, чтобы соответствовать и американскому, и русскому законодательству об АП и не мешать развивать свободное содержимое). #!08:30, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
Я не получил ответы на вопросы, что делать. Загрузка в ру-вики не работает, что такое "существенный текст" и какие шаблоны нужно оформить - также неясно. -- AVBf (talk) 08:45, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
В ру-вики загрзука работает. Вообще, давайте-ка с этим вопросом в ру-вики, обсуждать на коммонз загрузку изображений в рувики странно. #!George Shuklin (talk) 17:56, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
у меня не работало, писало что-то про администраторов. Хотя сейчас попробовал - вроде появилась осмысленная страничка загрузки. Уж не знаю, в чём там дело. Насчёт коммонза - я не в комонз, я на вашей страничке обсуждаю: "если тебе надо что-то от кого-то, сам приди к этому кому-то". Если вы считаете, что можно перенести обсуждение на мою страницу - не вопрос. -- AVBf (talk) 18:54, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
так что, всё в порядке с последней редакцией моих скринов? Если да, то я со спокойной душой сниму наблюдение с этой страницы и закрою топик на своей. Спасибо. -- AVBf (talk) 12:32, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

И ещё. Вот пример: Изображение:Стальная броня на лошади.jpg - никакого уменьшения размеров, никаких надписей, и тем не менее картинка спокойно представлена в вики. Дело в каком-то шаблоне? Простите за эмоции, но если так, то почему вместо пояснения, что и как сделать и что и как оформить, мой скриншот просто удалили?! Шаблон? Сколько угодно - только поясните, что за шаблон, куда его поместить и как он должен выглядеть. Загрузить в ру-вики? Сколько угодно - только поясните, как сделать, чтобы рувики принимала от меня картинки... Ну нельзя же так, не по человечески это... -- AVBf (talk) 12:37, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(изображение в ру-вики?) Оно выставлено к удалению. #!George Shuklin (talk) 17:56, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

не может быть! тогда придётся удалять (почти) все скриншоты в вики... тут что-то не так.

Не путайте, пожалуйста, ру-вики и коммонз. Коммонз - место хранилища СВОБОДНЫХ изображений (т.е. таких, которые отданы их авторами под свободной лицензией - авторы игры не отдавали её под свободной лицензией, так что скриншот будет производной работой). В ру-вики есть некий бардак, который мы старательно приводим в порядок. #!George Shuklin (talk) 18:20, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
я не о том. "Приводим в порядок" - это значить убирать "несвободные изображения". Если считать скришноты таковыми (презумпция несвободности), то 90%, если не больше скриншотов в вики придётся выкинуть нафиг, потому что именно столько несвободных игр, а либо авторы игр (и прочие правообладатели) уже недоступны/неизвестны, либо связаться с авторами большая проблема (и кто меня допустит "до тела" правообладателей того же морровинда?). Разве это не маразм? Вики просто останется без скриншотов. Кстати, я не юрист и не знаток законов об авторском праве, но помнится мне, что цитировать авторское произведение можно свободно (а скриншот - это вроде как цитата). -- AVBf (talk) 18:47, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Существует механизм "добросовестного использования". Впрочем, может, вам проще задать вопрос на ru:Википедия:Форум/Авторское_Право? ГК РФ не в Википедии принимали. #!George Shuklin (talk) 19:37, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Создал указанную страничку (надеюсь, правильно). Будем ждать ответов. -- AVBf (talk) 20:21, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PS: а почему бюст назван портретом? -- AVBf (talk) 18:09, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Потому что это портрет. По-крайней мере на табличке в музее это "портрет". #!George Shuklin (talk) 18:20, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grech old russian censorship.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments ineteresting subject matter, well presented composition Gnangarra 12:10, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Subdivisions of Russia[edit]

Hello again. I am doing something with the different Russian categories here -- I am not so comfortable because I do not know the area so well. There are so many Krai and Oblast, and the spelling of them varies from one translation of them to another.

When I am finished with what I am doing, can I ask you to look them over? I think I am putting them into subdivisions that are similar to the Economic regions I saw on English wikipedia; but I also do not want English wikipedia telling Russian users here how to subdivide.

Did I mention that there are a lot of Krai and Oblast and other areas like that in Russia?

I have a bigoted joke that I cannot remove from my mind about Russia also. Is it safe to type the joke here? -- carol (talk) 10:27, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well... Thats hard... I just looking to ru-wiki to see difference between oblast and krai :) When you finish, I could anounce at ru-wiki at corresponding project. Hope, there are users, who now this. #!George Shuklin (talk) 20:55, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I saw in my brief look there that they have organized them into Krai and Oblast. I have no idea what that is useful for and I will not do anything to disemble this, I will just continue to wonder about its usefulness. With that, I am going to tell this joke that is on my mind so much since having to work with the huge landmass which is Russia and locate where a little plant is native to it on the maps in which a landmass the size of Russia is equal to a landmass the size of Lithuania.
I keep thinking that Russia needs so much area so that they can more easily land their rockets at "home". -- carol (talk) 00:24, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No, at really huge territory is a component of strategic weapon. If you look to all great war against Russia, you will find, that every army was defeated by climat and roads (Napoleon army frozen to death, Gitler army stoped in road dirty at summer and frozen at winter). Currently we develope new type of geoterritorial weapon, called "congestion" - currently testes at Moscow and St. Petersburg. #!George Shuklin (talk) 01:46, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It is a rude an uneducated joke (although there are some eras in Russian rocketry that might support it). It is very frustrating to be trying to manage how a more natural world works within a politically defined grid.
That huge territory is not easy to live in as well. There is another joke I heard about sending the armies back and forth across that area just because it is fun. Which, interestingly enough, is not so funny today.... -- carol (talk) 01:52, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Huge territory? No way. No free space, no place to live. Like Tokyo in peak hour. #!George Shuklin (talk) 03:19, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Heh. I just read an article about that meteor that fell there in 1909 that says differently, but I have some problems with the article so, no arguing. I am here now because of something funny I saw yesterday. Look at Category:Germany and compare it to Category:Austria. I just looked at it and did not investigate the history or anything else about it. Just looking at it, I assume that the categories have been managed by users from the countries they represent. They both speak the same language and they are located on the earth in almost the same place (especially if you compare the area of those two countries with the area of Russia) but look at the differences in the tidiness of the categories there. Yesterday, Austria was much worse, I tried to do what I could to help. I am thinking now that things like this are kind of a self-writing essay on the personality, potential and abilities of a group of people. The Austrians had "hiking" in the upperlevel of their country, for instance. The Germans have probably put it into a location that is more about culture or activities (I don't know where it "should" go, I am an observer to this).
I exchanged all of the maps for Russia a couple of days before the political change at the beginning of this year. It was excellent for experience and I learned a little about Russia, only had a few questions and had some advice for making the process easier. I considered it to be good advice, it was not taken though. No hurt feelings, just an experience whose benefits I was unable to pass along.
If I make the subdivisions for Russia based on the Economic zones, does that mean that a European mutt from the United States is more intelligent than a bunch of Russian wikipedia users or that the mutt was stupid enough to do it for them? -- carol (talk) 03:32, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Финляндский вокзал утром.jpg[edit]

I've nominated this image for Featured Picture status. Good luck! -- Korax1214 (talk) 02:30, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Крейсер Аврора (утро).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Could be improved with a little noise reduction but quality is ok --Simonizer 16:28, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Финляндский вокзал утром (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Great sky, but the picture ist tilt and can be improved with noise reduction --Simonizer 21:40, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed tilt. #!George Shuklin 14:34, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
ok now --Simonizer 14:53, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Кастрюля с ручкой.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Technically QI. I have been wondering about the Russian names since the swabs though.... -- carol 22:05, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Images for book[edit]

George, can I talk to you about using some of your photographs in a book on the Soviet space program? How can I contact you? DonPMitchell (talk) 02:48, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You can use my email nge_narod.ru. #!George Shuklin ( ) 08:22, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Троицкий мост ночью.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sharp with good framing of the reflections. Lights on the left are blown out, but I think that's unavoidable. TimVickers 20:47, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Major image loss[edit]

Hello,

A mistake from developer Tim Starling resulted in the accidental deletion of 496 full-resolution images. A list of the affected images at Wikimedia Commons was made by PatrícaR and can be found here. As one of your images was found on the list, I'm asking you if you could re-upload the image Piracetam.jpg from your hard disk, with the comment Restoring image, see [http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/commons-l/2008-September/004148.html].

Kind regards,
Kameraad Pjotr 13:46, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Неизвестный художник - портрет П.Д. Норова.jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 21:07, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image:Денисов - Скорбь (1904).jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 21:30, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Еловые лапы.jpg[edit]

Could you add the location of the photo, please? Thanks! [Google перевод] Не могли бы вы добавить местоположение фото, пожалуйста? Спасибо! - MPF (talk) 13:36, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please link images[edit]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello George Shuklin/archive1!

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. BotMultichillT (talk) 22:47, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bad exposition[edit]

I'm not sure I get why you think these images have bad exposure... It's a black pen with black ink on a slightly off-white paper. If I hold the pen up to the screen it matches is almost exactly. --J.smith (talk) 20:43, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

you are using an a auto exposition. Exposition calculated without checking of photo subject (AI till yet not created) - so, exposition setting by idea: must be white, must be black. In your photo, by idea paper must be white. But you are using flash, so there is a bright spots at markers (sorry, do not know translation for "блики"). Dump camera deside, that spot is white, and some part of marker is black. By opinion of camera all ok, but we know, that paper is white. It must be white as spot (or nearly). In this case you will got a clear image with well displayed shadows. Now in your pictures all content (except spotes) is in fist (dark) park of histogramm. To correct this error you must add +0.7 (+1, +1.3, even +2) expocorrection in flash (or camera). Comare your photos to this (f.e.): File:02-BICcristal2008-03-26.jpg (note: this image is not perfect, but has an fully correct exposition - we can easy see every part of photo subject and our view does not disturb by background texture). #!George Shuklin (talk) 02:19, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The paper is not white - it "off" white. I did not use flash. The exposure was not on automatic, it was on "Aperture priority" - a semiautomatic mode. Anyway, thanks for explaining your reasons. I'll need to modify my setup for next time. --J.smith (talk) 03:05, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If you are not using flash - correction must be the same - add some EV to exposition to make paper white or almost white (not a dark gray). #!George Shuklin (talk) 23:58, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Мышь 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Correct exposure and details. --ComputerHotline 13:33, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cryptic names[edit]

Could you please make me an example of a "cryptic" name I used? However, as a rule, Russian and Chinese and Japanese and greek alphabets... may not be used in titles, since the search engine cannot read them. You may use all of these these languages in the captions, though. Regards. --User:G.dallorto (talk) 00:02, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

this was an argument 'ad absurdum' to your edit: [2]. You say The name of this media object is misspelled, incomplete, misleading, cryptic, or does not conform to an established naming convention - but this is not true. Name is perfectly descriptive - more, than your version of english name. #!George Shuklin (talk) 01:17, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I DO NOT say anything, this is the formula that WikiCommons adds. I did not decide it. the readon for changin is not that it is cryptic, but that it does not conform to naming convention.

Russian names[edit]

I have nothing against Russian names. But we are all here using English as a way to understand each other. In this very moment I am not speaking in Italian, you are not speaking in Russian, we are both communicating in English. Not in spite for each other's language, but simply because this is the easiest way to do it.
WikiCommons has chinese, corean, ethiopian, japanese, arabic, iranian... name it... users, each one with its own writing system/Alphabet. If you can find a way to allow each one to use its own alphabet without creating a chaos, please let me know.
Had I been changing the titles from Russian to my language, Italian, then I would have been guilty of an abuse, since Italian is not better to communicate internationally than Russian is. But I am adding English translation to your Cyrillic-only titles. Who is going to be harmed from this, please?
After I realized that not one or two images were uploaded with Russian names (the first ones, I had simply traslated) but scores and scores of them, I come to the decision to put them in two languages, English AND Russian, so that the uploader (apparently you) could satisfy his linguistic nationalism, and people could understand what the titles said after all. You don't like my translations? No problem, change/add them by yourself. In this way I am saving time and efforts, and you will be happier.
In my opinion, the solution of putting an anglish-and Russian title serves both purpose: your nationalism, and the need to make the title understandable to both people and BOTs.
Furthermore, please note I am only changing titles of Ancient Roman and Italian pieces of art, which most people do not sure espect to find out making a query in... Russian. The same applies whenever I find a title of such an image in Chinese or arabic, be sure. On the other hand, I think that if someone is interested in Russian art, s/he should make the effort to at least learn the Cyrillic alphabet. Therefore I have no intention to change cyrillic titles of Russian works of art. It is my opinion that if someone wants to make the works of art of her/his country better known, s/he should take an effort to help people read what s/he writes. For instance, I am always captioning in both Italian AND English all the images I upload. But you are free to keep your description as cryptical and impossible to understand as you like. From a theoretical point of view, anyone on WikiCommons is free to caption a photo in Latin, Ancient Greek or Mongolian. But keep in mind that most queries will be performed in English, as the solution that would yeld the bests results. Therefore, captioning images in Mongolian only, is simply silly, if you want people to find your image after all.
Please note that for the same reason we are renaming images that only bear a number as a title, for instance. We have nothing against numbers, exactly as we have nothing against Russian. Simply, numbers will not help in retracing the images that are being uploaded.
We have a whole category of images needing renaming http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Media_requiring_renaming

I suggest that if you think that my behaviour is uncorrect, we should then discuss the matter in the Village pump to take a decision that would satisfy everyone. Please feel free to pose yourself the question, so that I am sure your complaint be properly expressed. In this way we can understand which is the prevailing policy in Commons today, or which is the one we could adopt in the future. Best wishes--User:G.dallorto (talk) 22:43, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
P.S: See cases similar to yours here:

all listed for renaming.

I can perfectly use all listed above files (copypaste is simple). And I do not understand, why English titles shall apear instead russian names. I use commons only for needs of russian wiki (not others). I has nothing against use images in other projects - until this create any troubles. I has no interest in development of other language projects and do not want to make any service for this. Yes, I am sometime add english description (ok, ok, a little service, but no more). You can freely add description at any language. But, please, do not change filenames. If you continue to disciminate my language and your position will confirmed by administrators, I simply leave commons and continue to upload images directly to russian wiki. It simple: or we use russian names, or we do not use my images. dixi. #!George Shuklin (talk) 05:01, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Сотовый мёд.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A little soft on the bottom, but meets QI requirements --Ianare 17:09, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Обручев Николай Николаевич.jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 22:19, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Permission request[edit]

Dear George: The Howard Hughes Medical Institute (www.hhmi.org) is a scientific and philanthropic organization whose principal purpose is to conduct biomedical research and support science education. One of the Institute’s activities is an annual series of Holiday Lectures on Science. The lectures give students and teachers the opportunity to see presentations by Institute investigators and other prominent scientists. The 2010 Holiday Lectures, “Viral Outbreak: The Science of Emerging Disease,” will be given by Dr. Joseph DeRisi and Dr. Eva Harris. These free lectures will be delivered to a live audience and webcast live on December 2 and 3 and made available free as on demand streaming and podcast video and on a free educational DVD. The lectures may also be broadcast on various educational and public television channels.

Planned for inclusion in the project is a slide/s featuring an image of a mouse. We would like permission to use the image found here for that purpose: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:%D0%9C%D1%8B%D1%88%D1%8C_2.jpg. I see that it is licensed under the CC Attribution-Share Alike license, and we are able to give you attribution for the image in our credit roll, however, due to the fact that we also license published figures, and third-party footage and images in the project, we are bound by various license agreements for these resources not to distribute our work under a share-alike license. May I email you our official permission request privately? My email address is brickenj@hhmi.org. Thank you for your consideration.

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:George_Shuklin/archive1&oldid=44689249"