User talk:Fma12/Archive 2

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

1 ≤ - Go to archive: - ≥ 3

File:Pony sports logo.png

File:Pony sports logo.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Sonsaz (talk) 10:12, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Bike athletic logo.png

File:Bike athletic logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Sreejith K (talk) 10:15, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Reusch textlogo.png

File:Reusch textlogo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Sreejith K (talk) 10:15, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Pony sports logo.png

File:Pony sports logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Sreejith K (talk) 10:22, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Re: Deletion request

No exactamente. Los logos están regidos Text-Logo cuando son interpretaciones del original y no guardan una exactitud. Por lo general, los logotipos tienen autor y tienen protegidos sus derechos. Y máxime cuando están copiados directamente de otro sitio de Internet son plagios. Un saludo, Sonsaz (talk) 23:09, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Ud. mismo lo ha dicho, si tienen autor tienen sus derechos protegidos, por lo que son plagios. Y más si los ha recogido directamente de otros sitios de Internet. Sonsaz (talk) 23:35, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Ud. las a plagiado de otro website. Creo que eso es plagio pese a que las modifique para quitarles el fondo. Sonsaz (talk) 23:44, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

File:CA Douglas Haig logo.png

File:CA Douglas Haig logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Funfood ␌ 23:33, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Source File:Direct tv channel.svg

Hi Fma12,

Could you elaborate on the source for File:Direct tv channel.svg? I can't find that SVG anywhere on the website. –Krinkle^talk 18:08, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

I've just uploaded the source information, giving credits for the SVG to the user who uploaded it on WP so I suppose he made the vector graphics image. Fma12 (talk) 18:49, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

I don't see anything there that suggests the following:

That he released it in the public-domain
(Or) That it is too simple for copyright

Which is strange, because you uploading it to Commons does imply that. Are you sure it shouldn't be deleted in favour of a low-resolution fair use upload to Wikipedia instead? –Krinkle^talk 18:54, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

The decision to upload it to Commons was mine, so there are many files in WP that are too simple to be copyrighted, therefore moved to Commons (in fact, I moved many files here from Wiki). I'm strongly convinced that DirecTV logo is simple enough to be placed here, but if you think different, you can nominate it for deletion and an administrator will decide about the issue. Fma12 (talk) 19:36, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

As an administrator I'm familiar with the nomination process. I've extended (edit) the file description to include the original upload log (optional for PD files, but recommended anyway) and corrected the source/author (Wikipedia is not a source, and Koman90 was the author of the SVG XML source code in this case, not DirecTV). Could you make sure the old file is deleted on English Wikipedia (by placing the NowCommons template)? Thanks, –Krinkle^talk 22:28, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

There's no problem, I'll put a "NowCommons" template on the logo from Wikipedia. Regards, Fma12 (talk) 23:23, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

TUSC token b0ff5c0f80760825ada91186d47decca

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Better source request for File:Weight Watchers logo.png

Thanks for uploading File:Weight Watchers logo.png. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the file because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact web page where you found the file, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the file itself. Please update the file description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the help desk or me at my talkpage. Thank you. Senator2029 03:53, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

Uniforms withs copyrighted logos

Hello, can yu see this Delete requests similars to Kit body ARGH11.png and Kit body ARGV11.png

All are nominated for the same reason.

Bye. --AleMaster23 (talk) 04:34, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

Hi, I've supporting your nominations. Unfortunately there are many jerseys with copyrighted logos at Commons, and some times administrators do not pay much attention to this. I hope my vote helps. Regards, Fma12 (talk) 13:20, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

RE:Offensive Nueva Chicago logo

Yes, I believe that this image should be removed immediately. AleMaster23 (talk) 20:16, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

FYI

I posed a question at Commons:Village_pump#Threshold_of_originality_question related to a file you uploaded.--Sphilbrick (talk) 18:24, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi, I've just left my point of view there. Fma12 (talk) 22:13, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Tastic Film Logo.png

You recently closed the deletion request on this file as keep. At the time this was a decision one could not quarrel with except perhaps on trivial grounds. Today I believe the file is out of scope. There is no use made of the file, and it was uploaded as a part of a promotion campaign on enWikipedia for a non notable organisation whose article has now been deleted. It is also not realistically useful for education purposes. The rules suggest I need to talk to you prior to my making a decision on renomination for deletion. Please reply ether here or on my own talk page, but let me know you have replied since I visit Commons rarely. You can find me at this user ID on en Wikipedia. My signature there is different, however. Timtrent (talk) 17:18, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

You are wrong, I have just left my opinion there but I did not close the deletion request so I'm not an administrator. The deletion request was closed by Yann. I think you should write him for any doubt or questions you have. Regards, Fma12 (talk) 19:02, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

My apologies. I must have misread. Timtrent (talk) 14:37, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Surreal Barnstar
	(Y) xD Buen Trabajo0 Maik Gustavo Ovando (talk) 05:16, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

File:Oregon ducks football 1916.jpg

Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ magyar ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

Hello!

Thank you for uploading File:Oregon ducks football 1916.jpg to the Wikimedia Commons. I noticed that when you uploaded from another Wikimedia project, you left out some important information, or copied it incorrectly. In the future, please consider using CommonsHelper, a tool which automates the process of moving files over. Thank you,

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:22, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Caniggia 1986.jpg

File:Caniggia 1986.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Jespinos (talk) 16:12, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Se podría mudar esa y todas las fotos argentinas que no son aceptables (todas las que van entre 1971 y 1988) a wikipedia en español, si las aceptasen. Pero hasta donde sé ya se discutió eso algunas veces, y no se consiguió consenso. Y no es un tema en donde se pueda "ser valiente", para poder hacer eso hay que cambiar varias cosas por allá. Habilitar la subida de archivos, escribir o actualizar las políticas aplicables, las páginas de ayuda, los bots, los aspectos técnicos... o sea, un quilombo. Cambalachero (talk) 02:53, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Domino pizza logo.svg

File:Domino pizza logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Andy Dingley (talk) 23:51, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

File:ALBO.jpg

[removing automatic copyvio template]. Gunnex (talk) 21:44, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi --> [1]. I know :-) And for this I removed the automatic copyvio template from your talk page (the script automatically notifies also the last editor of the file). Gunnex (talk) 21:51, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

New York Giants Uniform

I'm glad to see someone taking on the NFL uniforms since Jonny Souel left us. I have one change, if you could find the time. The Giants alternate uniform is not a red jersey. It will be the same home blue jersey with white pants, with a similar stripe partern to the current home greys. If you don't have the time to make the changes, could you at least remove the red jersey, since they have not had that available since 2005? thanks.

Hi, thanks for the recognition. Don´t worry about the red jersey, I'll remove it from the image. By the way, I have new uniform in progress, coming soon. Thanks again, Fma12 (talk) 12:43, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Dallas Cowboys Uniform

The pants for the Cowboys white unis are inaccurate. The Cowboys wear metallic silver-blue color pants with the white jerseys seen here which is a different shade of silver from the pants worn with the blue jerseys seen here. Richiekim (talk) 00:15, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Well, I'll change the tone editing the image. Fma12 (talk) 01:38, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Saopaulo ac football 1904.jpg

Please verify the date of this photograph. Is it 1902 (as stated in the description) or 1904 (as stated in the file name)? Senator2029 21:08, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Done. By the way, either 1902 or 1904, it does not seem relevant so it is PD anyway. - Fma12 (talk) 11:55, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Deleting the AR-Gov template by mistake

Got your message. Very sorry about that. I think I only clicked on it to get some info on how templates worked (Argentina being more or less at the top of the list), and I did not realize I mistakenly deleted that template!----Lubiesque (talk) 14:43, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

DR

Another DR affecting many probably PD files has been initiated because of the Aboriginal flag case. I would appreciate if you add your voice to the DR as you did with the Australian road signs one. Fry1989 ^eh? 04:16, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:BA city legislat logo.png

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:BA city legislat logo.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ju Ta 08:41, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Mall of america logo13.png

File:Mall of america logo13.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

188.33.57.177 01:21, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Category:Coats of arms of Córdoba Province

Hola. Te borré la categoría que creaste ayer, porque ya existía Category:Coats of arms of Córdoba Province (Argentina), que era para diferenciarla de las ciudades de Colombia y España, y de la provincia de España. Un fuerte abrazo. Allforrous (talk) 04:34, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

No hay problema alguno, yo no conocía la existencia de esa categoría específica para Córdoba (Argentina). Te agradezco por la deferencia. Otro abrazo ;) - Fma12 (talk) 22:16, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Melbourne Evening Herald flag (red).svg

This DR may be of interest to you. Fry1989 ^eh? 19:35, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

It is of course understandable you wish to read everything regarding the flag in question, the previous DR is here, and there is also relevant stuff here. As for the road signs, I've opened a unDR but LGA opposed it and it's been ignored by everyone else since. I'm keeping it open until I get some sort of conclusion, and if it isn't resolved before I have to leave on the 16th for vacation, I will re-open it when I return in January. Fry1989 ^eh? 22:33, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Atl chascomus logo.png

File:Atl chascomus logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:31, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Campeón Argentino Nacional 1974.jpg

File:Campeón Argentino Nacional 1974.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Ju Ta 22:24, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Cruyff perfumo 1974.jpg

File:Cruyff perfumo 1974.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Ju Ta 21:50, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Defensores belg 1972.jpg

File:Defensores belg 1972.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Ju Ta 22:41, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Real madrid logo 41.png

File:Real madrid logo 41.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Tbhotch™ 00:49, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Ariz Cardinals uniforms.png

File:Ariz Cardinals uniforms.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Tbhotch™ 01:13, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

URAA DRs

Hi, thx again for your help with the URAA related DRs. But I like to ask you to fix another 2 things:

Pls. include the date parameters on the file description pages like I corrected it i.e. here.
Pls. calculate the undeletion year correctly like I corrected it i.e. here. Copyright protected until end of i.e. 2066 means undelet it beginning of 2067 (not 2066).

I today corrected about 100 DR of you. Please try to do it correctly in future. Thx. and regards --Ju Ta 22:29, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi, thank you for the recognition. I'll do it as you indicated me, thanks also for the information. Regards, Fma12 (talk) 22:42, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Hello I received more than six emails with connection to F1 Carlos Reutemann and Niki Lauda, etc. However I cannot find your questions on my 'Talk' page? gillfoto

Gillfoto 21:32, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi, sorry but it was my mistake, I was just nominating some files with URAA problems, but it was not your case because the photos were clearly taken by you, so I withdrew all the requests immediately. Sorry for the misunderstood - Fma12 (talk) 23:16, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Copyright tag removal

I assume the part of this edit that removed the copyright tag was a mistake, for the image I found in Category:Media without a license: needs history check today. Please be more careful when editing such image details because it could well have been deleted for lack of a licence except that I reviewed the history, found the problem and fixed it. If you intentionally removed the licence then please tag it for deletion as missing a licence. You may want to review it. Ww2censor (talk) 10:57, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the message. I considered the OTRS permission a valid license itself (Then I realised of my mistake). Nevertheless I'll ask in the OTRS noticeboard about this license so I want to know how "strong" that permission is. Thanks again. - Fma12 (talk) 11:52, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Borrados

Hola. Vi que solicitaste el borrado de varias imágenes tomadas en Argentina que subí. La verdad es que no entiendo del todo lo del URAA y mi inglés no es lo suficientemente fuerte. Si me pudieses hacer un pequeño resumen sobre tema (para no volver a subir imágenes con problemas) te lo agradecería. Saludos. --Pablo 6213 (talk) 17:52, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Camp77.jpg

File:Camp77.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Gunnex (talk) 19:02, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Taringa Logo.png

File:Taringa Logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Cube00 (talk) 06:11, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

problemas con nuevas categorias de estacion de trenes

Hola! vi que creaste las categorias "FFCC San Martin/Roca etc train stations". Me parece bien. Pero al mover fotos a estas categorias, en algunos casos se perdio informacion. Tal es el caso aca: File:Estación-Vedia-FCGSM.jpg. Esta foto ya no esta en la categoria "train stations in Buenos Aires Province" ni el subcategorias. En un caso del FFCC Roca tambien lo vi; pero no me acuerdo ahora, en cual. Saludos!--Geogast (talk) 21:54, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Hola, gracias por contactarte. La categoría de "rail transport in Argentina" era un gran desorden, lleno de archivos desparramados, y empecé a ordenar un poco, quedó mucho más prolijo pero aún no terminé de ordenar. Puede ser que entre la gran cantidad de archivos modificados, haya quedado (por error, claro) alguno afuera de la categoría "train stations ...". Saludos! - Fma12 (talk) 04:20, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Lo del desorden es cierto. Yo trabajé un montón en esto, también, principalmente para dejar cuantos mas archivos y categorias en las categorias "train stations in XY province" y "Ferrocarril General XY". Saludos entonces y buen trabajo ;-) --Geogast (talk) 08:27, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Image Source

Source

The source listed for Acdc_backinblack_cover.jpgimage is listed as http://m.ztopics.com/Back%20in%20Black/ which has links to a number of images. The source provided doesn't support free use. Can you please specify which source you copied the image from;

File:Acdc backinblack cover.jpg

File:Acdc backinblack cover.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Flatoitlikealizarddrinking (talk) 04:51, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

File:NFCS-Uniform-TB.png

I assume from the license you actually created the image your self. Well the Bucs changed their uniforms for 2014. As such a new uniform image is needed. Is there any chance you can create it? Here's the new primary logo on SportsLogos.net. And here is picture of the new unis. Thanks. CRRays Head90 | ^{We Believe!} 20:32, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Yes, you assume well, I created the image. I haven't noticed about the new Buccs uniform so I'll be working on the new one to replace the other. Thanks ! - Fma12 (talk) 19:32, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Comparing tags

Unfortunately (whether you're aware of it or not), {{PD-shape}} is rather clear and unambiguous, and therefore not problematic in the great majority of the files it applies to, while {{PD-textlogo}} has rather unclear boundaries, and is applied to a large number of dubious files, creating a great murky morass. The Cowboys image should not have "PD-textlogo" because 1) If it can be kept out of the PD-textlogo swampland, then it should be. 2) It contains no text... AnonMoos (talk) 02:45, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the explanation, but I'm still amazed by the fact that some people seem to live pending of changes on certain pages... - Fma12 (talk) 10:52, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

{{subst:Aviso referencias|Dominio público}} 181.15.120.130 17:20, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Por pedido de eliminación de fotos

Hola. Te comento que yo subí dos fotos, una de la Copa del Torneo Apertura 2006, y otra de la Copa Intercontinental ganada en el año 1968 por Estudiantes, ambas en la sede actual del club. Me gustaría saber por qué habría que borrarlas cuando las saqué yo mismo ambas fotos. Aguardo tu respuesta.

Hola, en la página de discusión podés dejar tu punto de vista. Te comento, los trofeos son considerados "esculturas" u objetos de arte, susceptibles de copyright, de acuerdo a Commons:Derivative works. Esto es, aunque saques una foto propia del mismo, el objeto en sí (trofeo) sigue estando bajo copyright de Conmebol, FIFA o AFA. Incluso nominé el dibujo que YO mismo hice de la Copa Argentina y que se utiliza en varios artículos. - Fma12 (talk) 20:41, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Copyright in Paso a Nivel de Virrey Avilés

Hi Fma12, I am Ariel Becker in Google+ and Panoramio. As you can see I left a comment in the original photo giving fully permission to use it here. Also, in the Panoramio copy of the photo.

Please let me know if this solves the issue or I need to perform other action in order to avoid the deletion.

Thanks!

Canopus49 (talk) 23:38, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi Canopus, thanks for clearing me with that point. I wrongly marked it as a copyright violation because I hadn't see the permission given on your user page (which is accurate enough to dismiss any further action). I apologize for the mistake! Thank you, - Fma12 (talk) 00:49, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Don't worry, it's OK. From now on I'm going to leave a message on the photos I'm about to upload here, to avoid this. Thanks for the quick reply! --Canopus49 (talk) 00:59, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Foto de Menem

"Buenas, sobre la imagen Carlos Menem recibe a los Rolling Stones.jpg, que fue borrada tras una consulta de borrado donde un usuario argumentó que no era un trabajo propio, y por lo tanto tenía copyright. La imagen fue subida por la cuenta user:Vhbfoto, evidentemente una cuenta creada por el mismísmo Bugge (fotógrafo oficial de la presidencia). Hay varias cosas que así indican que sea así, y que demuestran que fue Bugge el que cargó las fotos:

Aunque algunas no las subió en su resolución completa pero en una mucho mayor a las que se encuentran en la web, por ejemplo, Nestor Kirchner - Asuncion.jpg, conserva sus datos EXIF, en los que se detalla el modelo de la cámara que Bugge declara utilizar y además "PRESIDENCIA DE LA NACIÓN" (y es posible certificar que fueron publicadas en el sitio de la Presidencia gracias a Internet Archive). Es decir, es el original de la foto, por lo que no fue tomada de otra página. La imagen File:Fernando De La Rua en el Salon Blanco.jpg, no tiene EXIF, pero es la resolución más alta que se encuentra de la foto.
Por otra parte, Vhbfoto es el nick que Bugge suele utilizar en diversos blogs personales, e incluso lo usó en su web oficial. Además, desde la cuenta solo se subieron fotos de la presidencia, casualmente, algunas de las que Bugge considera más representativas de su carrera.

No creo que quepa duda de que es Bugge y que fueron fotos publicadas por la Presidencia, incluso en el sitio web, por lo que son libres." Encima que nos quedamos sin imágenes para ilustrar los artículos sobre política argentina, nominas la imagen para borrar sin tomarte la molestia de investigar un poquito. A riesgo de ser bloqueado o que sé yo, te digo: hay que ser pelotudo. --Ginés90 (talk) 01:16, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Yo te voy a aclarar algunas cositas que dan a entender que el pelotudo en realidad, es otro: 1) Para que una persona acredite que posee el copyright de las fotos, existe en Commons Com:OTRS, leelo que mal no te va a venir. 2) Te "felicito" por las deducciones detectivescas y toda la logística previa que hiciste sobre el tema, ahora, si tenés tantas conclusiones y pruebas contundentes como argumentás, solicitá (con esas evidencias) que la imagen sea desbloqueada en Com:Undeletion requests. 3) Soy un tipo que trata con respeto a los demás, jamás le escribiría a nadie para insultarlo, pero tampoco voy a permitir que cualquier energúmeno como vos lo haga conmigo. Asi que te la hago corta, Si me vas a escribir y gastar caracteres para putearme, ahorrate el trabajo porque a menos que te disculpes por el "exabrupto", no pienso responderte más. ¿Claro? - Fma12 (talk) 01:27, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

PD: Wikipedia es una enciclopedia libre, no un banco de imágenes. Aclaro eso por el énfasis que ponés al decir "...Encima que nos quedamos sin imágenes para ilustrar los artículos sobre política argentina"... como si una foto de Menem con los Rolling Stones fuera tan relevante para "ilustrar la política argentina". - Fma12 (talk) 02:34, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

User talk:Fma12/Archive 2

Re: Deletion request

Source File:Direct tv channel.svg

TUSC token b0ff5c0f80760825ada91186d47decca

Better source request for File:Weight Watchers logo.png

Uniforms withs copyrighted logos

RE:Offensive Nueva Chicago logo

FYI

A barnstar for you!

New York Giants Uniform

Dallas Cowboys Uniform

Deleting the AR-Gov template by mistake

Copyright status: File:BA city legislat logo.png

URAA DRs

Copyright tag removal

Borrados

problemas con nuevas categorias de estacion de trenes

Image Source

Source

Comparing tags

Por pedido de eliminación de fotos

Copyright in Paso a Nivel de Virrey Avilés

Foto de Menem

Navigation menu

Search