User talk:Felistoria/archive

Kategorien

Vielen Dank für die schönen Bilder. Es wäre nett, wenn Du den einzelnen Bildern Kategorien zuordnen könntest. Einfach Bildbeschreibung editieren und category:Incunabula oder Bookbindung etc. reinschreiben, damit die auch gefunden werden können. Danke! --Historiograf 02:58, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

Category:Prints - so etwa? (Für Enzinas noch nix gefunden, ich will den zusammenhalten. Wie macht man das?)--Felistoria 16:45, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

Prints meint ja etwas anderes (prints ist Druckgrafik, nicht printed books). Zu Enzinas einen ARTIKEL anlegen, wie das geht, hoffte ich dir ja per Mail erklärt zu haben. Den Artikel kann man dann in eine passende Kategorie einhängen, indem man die reinschreibt. --Historiograf 22:21, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

Ich hatte dich doch darum gebeten, für die Inkunabeln die Kategorie Incunabula zu nutzen, die es ja nun schon gibt. Andere Kategorien schließt das nicht aus. --Historiograf 22:24, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

O gal, ich hatte printed books nicht gefunden. Und ich habe versucht so Unterkategorien zu machen, das aber nicht hingekriegt. Das mit dem Artikel, ja das hatte ich eben noch nicht richtig verstanden, aber ich lern's noch. So long --Felistoria 22:39, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

Ächz. Also:

• Ich habe den Abschnitt über Enzinas auf deiner Benutzerseite in meine Zwischenablage kopiert
• Ich schreibe hierhin Francisco de Enzinas
• Ich speichere ab und klicke auf den Link.
• Dann editiere ich den neuen Artikel und rufe aus der Windows-Zwischenablage den Inhalt ab
• Dann überlege ich mir, was ich bei [[Category:irgendwas mit Spanier oder so]] schreibe, überlass aber diesen Arbeitsschritt dir.
  

Und nun du --Historiograf 03:08, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

PS: Ich seh grad, ich hatte den Artikel ja schon mal angelegt. Versuchs doch bitte selbst mit Postincunabula, geht analog --Historiograf 03:09, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

Ach, immer ich. (Ich würd's so gerne mit Bleistift, Brieftaube und reitendem Boten probieren ...?:-) --Felistoria 16:09, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

So etwa? Und jetzt noch den Artikel Early printed books machen und dann da Ink.s und Postink.s 'reinkopieren? --Felistoria 17:03, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

Das ist doch fürs erste schon alles ganz triftig, sieht man davon ab, dass generell hier auf Commons ein wirres Durcheinander von Kategorien und Seiten herrscht. Ich habe die Kategorie Category:Early Printed Books erzeugt, indem ich auf die roten Links auf den Seiten Incunabula und Postincunabula (also genauer auf einen von beiden) geklickt habe und in das Editierfeld dann eine übergeordnete Kategorie (hier: Books) eingetragen hab. Damit wurde die Kategorie erzeugt. Als Mindestvorgabe wird es hier gern gesehen, wenn jedes Bild entweder von einer Seite benutzt wird oder zu einer (Sach-)Kategorie gehört (Lizenzen erzeugen automatisch Kategorien). Jede Seite sollte zu einer Sachkategorie gehören. Soweit so gut fürs erste. Wenn du ein bißchen von der Kategorie Books abwärts browst, wirst du schon erkennen, wo der Hase hier auf Commons im Pfeffer liegt. --Historiograf 18:22, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

Aha. Das machst auch besser Du - bin froh, wenn ich jetzt noch die Einbände hinkriege. Wie nenne ich das denn? Historical covers? Und dann übergeordnet "bookbinding" und darüber "books"? Na, eher Du hier antwortest, kannstes ja auch gleich machen ...hm? Und dann werde ich mir etwas für das "Heldenbuch" überlegen. Das müssen wir ja nun etwas prominent hinstellen, wenn ich da nach und nach die Seiten auffüllen soll, gell? Dankschön erstmal! --Felistoria 18:34, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

Na, guck mal hier, was Besseres fiel mir nicht ein. Und wo soll das Heldenbuch hin? --Felistoria 20:06, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

Du hast ja netterweise die Einbände nicht nur auf der Seite Old book bindung aufgelistet, sondern auch der Kategorie zugeordnet. "Deine" Seiten sollten aber nach ihrer Herkunft definiert werden, da sie nicht zu deinem Benutzernamensraum gehören. Jeder könnte da etwas eintragen, aber dann stellte sich tatsächlich die Frage, was denn bitteschön der Unterschied zwischen der Kategorie Bookbindung und der Seite Old book binding ist. Daher würde ich gern die Seiten mit deinen Bildern alle mit dem Zusatz (Christianeum) versehen also Seitentitel neu "Old book binding (Christianeum)". Das könnte ich (mit ein paar Edits mehr) per Verschieben bewerkstelligen. --Historiograf 21:36, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

Nö, noch nicht!! Bittet --Felistoria 23:06, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

Es ist ein Vorschlag, kein Hammer. Ich bitte aber das Argument zur Kenntnis zu nehmen. --Historiograf 23:25, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

Ganz gewiss. Nur in diesem Fall möchte ich mir den Zeitpunkt der Ortsbestimmung vorbehalten. Wir sprechen das ab, d'accord? --Felistoria 23:53, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

Tool

Kannte ich noch nicht Klick drauf --Historiograf 23:47, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

He, fein! Danke! Guck mal hier: User:Finanzer/gallery Gruß --Felistoria 17:32, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

schon längst gesehen ;-) --Historiograf 17:46, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

Oooch, nie kann man Dich überraschen ... ;-( --Felistoria 17:57, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

Dateiname

[1] Gruß --Historiograf 01:32, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

Rhinoceros

Bonjour. Je vous prie de m'excuser de vous écrire en français mais je ne parle pas l'allemand (je parle anglais et lis l'italien et le latin). Félicitations pour les images de rhinocéros que vous avez mises en ligne. Il y en a une qui retient particulièrement l'attention : [2]. Pouvez-vous en préciser la provenance ? De quel ouvrage est-elle tirée ? S'agit-il d'une gravure du XVIe siècle ? Merci d'avance. --83.112.234.72 10:00, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Soliman (Elephant)

Image:Galen01.jpg (erl.)

see Template:No tag message --> Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Orgullomoore 03:51, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Image:Reineke1752fehl.jpg(erl.)

---

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. Siebrand 18:26, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.

Kupferstich/ Holzdruck

Hallo Felistoria,

auf Reineke Fuchs ist ein Kaulbach-Bild zweimal vorhanden: Das eine wird einfach als "Kaulbach 1846" vorgestellt und ist laut Bildbeschreibung ein Kupferstich (ich hab es mal in die Category:Engraving geschubst), das andere ist (abgesehen vom erschreckend unspezifischen Namen) als "Holzdruck 1857" gekennzeichnet. Von der Technik hab ich keine Ahnung. Ich nehme mal an, dass die Bilder durch die verschiedene Drucktechnik für Kunstwissenschaftler nicht redundant sind? Hast Du eine Idee, in welche Kategorie (Herstellungstechnik "Holzdruck") man das Bild von 1857 stecken könnte? Und wie könnte man die Bilder untereinander sinnvoll verlinken? Gruß, Felistoria 18:26, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

Diese Nachricht stammt von Jonas Kork - wieso ist da mit meinem Namen unterschrieben? Sorry, Jonas, ich hab's so eilig gehabt und die Bildangaben nur hingeschludert;-). Das Bild mit den geschluderten Angaben habe ich selber gescannt aus dem origialen Werk von 1846, es ist in Kupfer gestochen. Das andere ist - nach den Angaben - offenbar aus Cottas Volksausgabe von 1857; das war eine Art Holzstichverfahren, entwickelt für den Massenbuchdruck und für die Presse, ist in WP nachzulesen unter "Holzschnitt". Wenn du den Hintergrund von Löwenmamis Bett mal ansiehst, kannst Du die Unterschiede ganz gut ausmachen. --Felistoria 18:26, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

Wieso meine vier Tilden nicht umgewandelt wurden, weiß ich auch nicht - offenbar wurden sie danach als Deine Unterschrift gewertet (vgl. auch die Uhrzeiten der Unterschriften, außerdem hier die diff). Zur Sache: wäre das dann w:Wood engraving? Gruß, --Jonas kork 18:59, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Nee, dass ist der "Holzstich", ein Tiefdruckverfahren in Holz, mit dem sich fotografische Effekte erzielen ließen. Das bei Cotta verwendete Verfahren war schon ein Schnitt für einen Hochdruck, die hatten aber so ein Kopierverfahren mit Gelantine, frag mich aber nicht, wie das geht;-); in WP ist das in "Holzschnitt" unter dem Abschnitt "Photoxylographie" erwähnt, aber 1857 haben die das noch nicht mit Negativen gemacht, sondern mit gedruckten Vorlagen. --Felistoria 00:06, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Zell.faks.1.jpg(erl.)

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Zell.faks.1.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Monobi 21:15, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Hi felistoria, ich hab die Angaben soweit formalisiert wie ich es konnte, kontrolliers bitte. Brauchst du die scans von den Grabschriften noch sie sind ja alle hier Category:Hundert Grab-Schrifften vorhanden. falls ja sag mir auf ws bescheid. --Joergens.mi 12:37, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Elefant.ludwigXIV.jpg(erl.)

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Elefant.ludwigXIV.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 09:05, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Weisserberg.jpg(erl.)

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Weisserberg.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. OsamaK 19:58, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Renart.jpg(erl.)

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Renart.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. CO₂ 21:43, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Siegel.Christianeum.jpg(erl.)

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Siegel.Christianeum.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. CO₂ 21:51, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Margins.jpg(erl.)

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Margins.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Ρх₥α 22:09, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Narren.Murner.Schelmenzunft.jpg(erl.)

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Narren.Murner.Schelmenzunft.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Ρх₥α 22:58, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:Coline.italico.jpg (erl.)

---

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Thank you. Siebrand 16:19, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.

16th century page - it is free licence (PD-Old). --Felistoria 20:46, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Carl.koldewey.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Carl.koldewey.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. OsamaK 22:20, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Free licence - 19th century drawing (PD-Old). Source was said. --Felistoria 20:48, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Image:Inf. 19, codex altonensis.jpg

I think I found on a web site... it's along time ago I don't remember. --Sailko 21:19, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

This scan is made from a facsimile, printed in 1965. That doesn't mean any problems of licensing - but shouldn't one mention the fact? All the other images in the article are original manuscript scans. Besides: I couldn't find it searching the web. Sorry that you cannot remember the source. --Felistoria 01:30, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Golf.1900.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Golf.1900.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. OsamaK 13:54, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Done. --Felistoria 23:57, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Hello, friend. I wanna to note you that "Internet" is so wide source. Please give a better source, Remember, from a trust website, or book. We're working there for encyclopedic library, and unsourced images can't be used in an encyclopedia, there are not trust. Thanks a lot!--OsamaK 03:44, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

The foto was made about fin de siècle (about 1900), the source seems not to be online any longer; I found it by a research about US and it's now part of my private sources where I saved it. There was no special comment but the foto is free and a saved document in commons now. --Felistoria 00:03, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Bundus.1.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Bundus.1.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. OsamaK 09:05, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Image:Fd2665.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Fd2665.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Hemmingsen (talk) 18:22, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

kept --Historiograf (talk) 23:34, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Image:Pierre_de_Saint-Cloud.jpg

Hi Felistoria, kannst Du noch die Quelle zu diesem Bild von Pierre de Saint-Cloud (Image:Pierre_de_Saint-Cloud.jpg) erinnert? Von welcher Webseite, aus welchem Manuskript (Sigle?) ist das? Ich find es immer so unschön, wenn die Bilder nicht richtig zuzuordnen sind... Gruß, Jonas kork (talk) 12:10, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Hab' ich gemacht. Die Manuskriptangabe habe ich wörtlich von der BNF übernommen. --Felistoria (talk) 22:00, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Prima, danke! :) --Jonas kork (talk) 07:54, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:1738.alt.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:1738.alt.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. OsamaK 03:00, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

Thank you. Done. --Felistoria (talk) 22:18, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Bachiacca_madonna.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Bachiacca_madonna.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. OsamaK 06:16, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

Thank you. Done. --Felistoria (talk) 16:37, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

Elephants in art

Posiblemente. Actualmente pude ser útil como referencia. (Possibly. I currently serve as a reference) Regards, --JMCC1 (talk) 02:34, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Weisserberg.jpg

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Weisserberg.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

shizhao (talk) 13:09, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, done. --Felistoria (talk) 22:43, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Carl.koldewey.jpg

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Carl.koldewey.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

shizhao (talk) 13:00, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

Sorry, I do not remember but I am sure there was a source of reputation for the picture; maybe one should take another pic of one of these sources? Please don't delete! --Felistoria (talk) 22:29, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Plannck.00166.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 22:38, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Das kann man wohl sagen. Bitte löschen, sorry: mein Fehler! Die Version (dreidimensional!) ist nicht gemeinfrei. --Felistoria (talk) 22:41, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Deprecated License

---

Hello. Thank you for uploading Image:Girolamini.stempel.jpg, however the license that you have uploaded it under has been deprecated. Please could you select a new free license that describes the rights of the image correctly? If you are not able to do this, the image will be deleted in 7 days.

For more information on licenses that can be used on Wikimedia Commons, please see Commons:Licensing. If you have any questions, please ask at the village pump. Thank you for your patience and consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 19:22, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

It's the detail of a page, date 1701, an autograph by Antonio Nola (1642-?). I hope the description is correct now. The library stamp is free license. --Felistoria (talk) 21:47, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Winckelmann.1765.3.jpg (erl.)

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 19:19, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Done. --Felistoria (talk) 20:31, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Category:Museum_für_Hamburgische_Geschichte

Museum für Hamburgische Geschichte has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

fyi - Gruß vom Mogelzahn (talk) 14:33, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion (erl.)

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Friedländer.plakat.9.7.krone.jpg

Yours sincerely, Rybec (talk) 15:50, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Hope, it's correct now. --Felistoria (talk) 20:50, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Cappuccini.biblioteca.stempel (2).jpg (erl.)

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Cappuccini.biblioteca.stempel (2).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 12:27, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Public domain, I filled "permission", hope that it's o.k. now. --Felistoria (talk) 20:47, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Vaucanson1.jpeg

File:Vaucanson1.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

— Racconish ^💬 16:32, 4 July 2019 (UTC)