User talk:Falense

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Da Fürstbischöfliches Schloss Münster eine Unterkategorie zu Münster, Germany ist, was das Bild so schon korrekt eingeordnet. Ich habe die Kategorie Münster, Germany wieder raus genommen. -- Rüdiger Wölk 06:22, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

geniales Bild[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Okonjima Lioness.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Danke für dieses wirklich exzellente Bild. --Ikiwaner 22:07, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Freut mich zu hören, dass es gefällt. Grüße --Falense 17:56, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

QI Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fernrohr Zeilgalerie Frankfurt-untilted.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

My telescope picture from Frankfurt[edit]

Hi Alvesgaspar, I saw you did promote my picture Image:Fernrohr Zeilgalerie Frankfurt-untilted.jpg as QI after tilt correction. I made some more changes in color saturation and contrast (=>Image:Tourist Telescope Zeilgalerie Frankfurt-col sat.jpg). I think the new version is a little better, what do you mean? Is it possible to nominate the new pic for QI and delete the promotion from the other one by success? And is it possible to delete my first awry version? --Falense 14:11, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

I don't think it is necessary a new nomination. Just upload the edited version with exactly the same file name and answer "Yes" when the system asks if you want to replace the old one. Alvesgaspar 15:04, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FP promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image Image:Okonjima Lioness.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Okonjima Lioness.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Alvesgaspar 15:56, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

QI Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Taunusblick.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--Jnpet 08:01, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

POTY 2006[edit]

Your vote was not considered because you don't have at least 100 edits in Commons and didn't provide a valid "diff" link to your home wiki. Please try again until 2400 14 Feb. Alvesgaspar 14:34, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nokia 7110 photo[edit]

Hey, would you mind telling me how you took that quality photo of the Nokia 7110? Thanks in advance. :D Lewis Collard! (natter) 17:07, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quality? It isn't really sharp, I didn't take a tripod stand for it. But, okay, the most self made photos from cellphones are really bad... The whole secret is a big sheet of white paper for the background and lay down the object for taking the photo from above. Than I lighted the room and took care of the light position because of bad interfering shadows, that's it. Greetings --Falense 07:28, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm writing to let you know that an image of yours that became a Commons Featured Picture during 2007 is now part of the 2007 Picture of the Year competition. If you have > 200 edits you are welcome to vote too. Thanks for contributing your valuable work and good luck. -- Bryan (talk to me) 20:21, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torhaus Elmshorn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Not the best light but technical quality is fine. Lycaon 15:32, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is it possible to have an english caption? I don't read german...--Berru 11:56, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This building in the centre of Elmshorn is called „Torhaus“. I don't know if there is an english name for it. It's like Gate Lodge or Gate House, nothing more. --Falense 07:20, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Acanthoplus longipes?[edit]

Hi Falense, guckst du bitte mal hier. Gruß, --Mosmas (talk) 11:04, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Falense,
Um Deine Bilder im obigen Artikel ist eine riesige Diskussion entbrannt, ob diese nun in den Artikel gehören oder nicht bzw. ob die Bilder authentisch sind oder nicht. Ich denke, es wäre nur richtig, wenn Du selbst auch an der (meiner Meinung nach absurden) Diskussion teilnehmen könntest. Jörg, der BajanZindy (talk) 19:10, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]