User talk:Fabian RRRR

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Fabian RRRR!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel irc:wikimedia-commons #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: `[[:Image:Foo.jpg]]`, which produces: `Image:Foo.jpg` If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: `{{bad name\|correct name}}` For more information read the full deletion guidelines.
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

TUSC token c8b4e6878462de34aa9bac9cec8834eb[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

File:Phot-12-04.jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 22:03, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Filenames[edit]

Deutsch: Hallo. Ein Tipp:Wenn du Dateien hochlädst, dann ist es sinnvoll, diese aussagekräftig zu benennen und bei Fotos vorher einen etwaigen fehlerhaften Rand wegzuschneiden. Grüße von ..

English: Hello. It woudt be nice to give images a more specific name and to cut away unusable borderareas before upload. Gretings from ...

Cäsium137 (T.) 15:41, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ja, ist mir (mittlerweile) auch aufgefallen. Ich mach's im zweiten Durchgang - bis dahin müssen die Cats herhalten. Viele Grüße, --Fabian RRRR (talk) 16:12, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wäre nett, wenn du sie zumindest teilweise neu hochlädst, denn du kannst sie anpassen und Vorlage Badname verwenden. Dann werden die alten besonders schnell gelöscht. Im übrigen schlage ich folgende Namenskonvention vor:

Wichtigste ID - Quelle - Genaueres Das wäre dann z.B.:
NGC_0123_ESO.jpg: NGC 123 von ESO, Monitorgröße
NGC_0123_ESO_XXL.jpg: NGC 123 von ESO, sehr groß (HiRes)
NGC_0123_2MASS.jpg: 2MASS-Bild
MESSIER_009_HST.jpg: Messier 9, vom HST, Monitorgröße
NGC_1234_GALEX.jpg: Ein GALEX-Bild von NGC 1234

Auf diese Weise sind Bilder vom gleichen Objekt alphabetisch benachbart. Bei mir hat sich das bewährt. Ich habe z.B. in meinem Verzeichnis auf meiner HDD alle Bilder eines Objekts beisammen gelistet. Sollen wir es gemeinsam so machen ? Cäsium137 (T.) 11:02, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deprecated License[edit]

It has been found that Image:GreatDarkHorse Nebulae.jpg has a deprecated license tag. Please choose a new free license tag which describes the rights of the image correctly otherwise it will be deleted! Thanks for your consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 21:58, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:NGC2976-hst-R814G606B475.jpg[edit]

File:NGC2976-hst-R814G606B475.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

–Tryphon ^☂ 14:57, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:NGC_3627_or_M66.jpg[edit]

File:NGC_3627_or_M66.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

–Tryphon ^☂ 13:24, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Simeiz_RT-22_telescope_(2005-09-286)_.jpg[edit]

File:Simeiz_RT-22_telescope_(2005-09-286)_.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Zukaz (talk) 09:58, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:M101 hires STScI-PRC2006-10a.jpg[edit]

File:M101 hires STScI-PRC2006-10a.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Denniss (talk) 23:59, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Featured Picture Nomination[edit]

The image File:Irregular_Galaxy_NGC_55_(ESO_0914a).jpg, which was produced or uploaded by you, has been nominated forfeatured picture status at Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set:NGC 300 by ESO. Good luck! Béria Lima ^msg 20:59, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Byurakan.jpg[edit]

File:Byurakan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Takabeg (talk) 12:45, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:NGC121-HST-R814GB555 img.jpg[edit]

And also:

Hi Fabian RRRR. The files above are listed in Category:Pages using Information template with syntax errors. Could you please have a look and try to fix the syntax errors? Thank you. Leyo 11:53, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Danke dass du mit den Korrrekturen schon mal angefangen hast. --Leyo 20:05, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mistake with NGC 214[edit]

Hi, the file uploaded by you (NGC 214 folder): NGC214-hst-R814G606B435.jpg is definitely not showing NGC 214 but NGC 201. You can check it HERE for example. However I'm not sure about the 2nd picture from the same folder: NGC201-hst-R190G606B160.jpg because it's not good quality, different filters have been used and not entire galaxy is shown. Can you check both files please, rename if necessary and move to correct folder to avoid confusion? Greetings, and thanks for uploading so many Hubble pictures :) Pikador (talk) 17:47, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for spotting this. I've cleaned it up according your suggestion and created a new picture of NGC 214: File:NGC 214 hst 08597 05 G606.png and corrected the links int he different wikis.

Best regards, --Fabian RRRR (talk) 10:37, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this, keep up good work :) Pikador (talk) 17:14, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

NGC 2174[edit]

Hi. Most pictures in Category:NGC 2174: for example Heic1406a.tif and NGC 2174.tiff (renamed today into Fragment of NGC 2175.tiff) are actually parts of NGC 2175 and not NGC 2174. Hubble site made mistake with description and many sites (APOD) have the same mistake. Correct identification (NGC 2174 and NGC 2175) is here and here. NGC 2175 is big nebulae while NGC 2174 is just small fragment of NGC 2175 but different than fragment shown on these pictures.

I made screenshot of NGC 2175. NGC 2174 is on top in white square, while on bottom it is a fragment which is shown on Hubble pictures. Maybe you could modify this picture: Heic1406d-crop.png (or add this picture to Commons: http://www.spacetelescope.org/static/archives/images/screen/heic1406b.jpg where NGC 2174 is visible better - its stars are much brighter on this picture) to show the real NGC 2174 - maybe just use square or circle and insert NGC 2174 inscription?

Best regards Pikador (talk) 08:32, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, could you reply to this? Pikador (talk) 10:31, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I do not have made further investigations - feel free to correct it, if there is a mistake. --11:56, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

File:NGC 4100 HST 9788 R658nB814.png[edit]

Hi, Hubble photos are not licensed under cc-by, can you add the correct license tag please. Thank you. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:22, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, what is the correct license tag in your opinion? BR --Fabian RRRR (talk) 19:33, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

{{PD-USGov-NASA}}? --Steinsplitter (talk) 20:26, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Gilt das denn nicht nur für berufliche Arbeiten von US-Regierungsangestellten / NASA-Angestellten? VG --Fabian RRRR (talk) 20:31, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

... ein Gegenbeispiel findest Du unter: http://www.spacetelescope.org/copyright/ VG, --Fabian RRRR (talk) 20:34, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Opo0210b.tif[edit]

File:Opo0210b.tif has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

— Huntster (t @ c) 02:02, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:The remnant of the supernova SN 1006 seen at many different wavelengths.tiff[edit]

File:The remnant of the supernova SN 1006 seen at many different wavelengths.tiff has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

— Huntster (t @ c) 02:09, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Request to add a picture[edit]

I can see you add a lot of pictures from Mount Lemmon Sky Center. As you have so much experience in adding pictures to Commons could you please add another one? http://skycenter.arizona.edu/gallery/Nebulae/NGC6590

There are 3 NGC/IC objects on this picture: big red nebula is IC 1284, small blue left - NGC 6595 (alternative name NGC 6590, it's nebula with open cluster), small blue right - NGC 6589. Identification according to http://cseligman.com/text/atlas.htm , The NGC/IC Project, Wolfgang Steinicke.

Greetings, Pikador (talk) 12:46, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:N6590s.jpg Best regards, --Fabian RRRR (talk) 19:43, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I didn't see that :) So now it looks german wiki has separate articles for NGC 6590 and NGC 6595, according to most of sources it's the same object (duplicate entry in NGC catalog). Pikador (talk) 22:49, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, another request from me :) Please add recently published HST picture of NGC 7714. Thanks in advance. Pikador (talk) 12:51, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Heic1503a.tif - BR, --13:23, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:G19 xray.tif

Yours sincerely, Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 03:46, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:NGC 6393 hst 05479 606.png[edit]

Hi, the galaxy on this picture is usually identified as NGC 6394 (by modern sources), although there is some confusion with identification due to historical reasons (Swift's positions of NGC 6393 and NGC 6394 discovered by him on the same night are not exact) and some sources incorrectly identify these galaxies reversely. Anyway this galaxy is described here. You can also check positions at Hubble Legacy Archive (which correctly identified this galaxy as NGC 6394), SEDS.org, NGC/IC Project to confirm identification. So this file should be renamed. Greetings. Pikador (talk) 09:01, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've checked simbad and wikisky and tr:wikipedia - so I am unsure. I you like to fix it, go ahead but keep all wikis aligned. BR, --Fabian RRRR (talk) 16:00, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Both SIMBAD an WikiSky got it wrong (it's not unusual, they have many errors). SIMBAD has two different entries - NGC 6393 and NGC 6394 although they both show the same galaxy. Almost all wikis NGC articles made by bots are based on SEDS Revised NGC and IC Catalog and galaxy shown on your Hubble picture is identified as NGC 6394 there. This identification seems reasonable since description in NGC catalogue says NGC 6394 is northern and NGC 6393 southern (Wikisky has wrong reversed identification). So your today NGC 6393 article on german wiki is wrong too and it is describing NGC 6394 actually. NGC 6393 picture is here. NASA/IPAC EXTRAGALACTIC DATABASE has correct identificacion too. Pikador (talk) 16:22, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:IC356.jpg[edit]

File:IC356.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

189.25.205.2 01:16, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Paardenkopnevel.jpg[edit]

File:Paardenkopnevel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

— Huntster (t @ c) 01:43, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Herbig-Haro 46-47 - Eso1336a.tif[edit]

File:Herbig-Haro 46-47 - Eso1336a.tif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

C messier (talk) 09:39, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Fabian RRRR,
can you please upload a composite image for NGC 7552 from mast archive. Thank you in advance. --C messier (talk) 14:51, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

SDSS images[edit]

Hi, I'd like to inform you, that Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) changed their image use policy recently. See discussion here and here. Since you uploaded many HST images I thought it would be good to let you know about this. Older DSS survey is another story, those images are still copyrighted. Greetings Pikador (talk) 08:18, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pikador,

thanks for the information. This are very good news. The quality of the sdss images is big improvement over other free surveys.

Best regards, --Fabian RRRR (talk) 05:39, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adding images. I noticed you added a wrong image of NGC 4. In fact NGC 4 looks more like an edge-on spiral galaxy, see here. It used to be identified as PGC 620 (this is the galaxy on your image) by some databases, like SIMBAD, but almost all of them already corrected that error (including SIMBAD). There are many discrepancies in astronomical databases concerning identification of NGC/IC objects due to poor data and many errors in original NGC/IC catalogues. Prof. Seligman is updating his database very often in cooperation with other astronomers and I think his site is best source for identification at the moment. Also Mr Wolfgang Steinicke is working on identification of NGC/IC objects, but his database is just Excel file with basic info. So before adding any image to commons better check in different sources (Seligman, SIMBAD, NED) if this is the correct object. Sometimes if identification of an object is doubtful better use PGC number in case of galaxies to avoid confusion. Greetings, and keep up a good work. Pikador (talk) 08:22, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for spotting this. I've corrected the image. Best regards, --Fabian RRRR (talk) 20:57, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I found NGC 296 article on German wiki is total mess - because of misidentification in SIMBAD it mixes data from 2 different galaxies. I also renamed NGC296 - SDSS DR14.png image because it points to that misidentified galaxy. Correct PGC number is PGC 3260 and correct image is NGC 0296 SDSS.jpg. Can you correct that article? See prof. Seligman's site for more details. Pikador (talk) 09:50, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:NGC328 - SDSS DR14.png[edit]

File:NGC328 - SDSS DR14.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Pikador (talk) 14:19, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:NGC1270 - HST 814.png[edit]

Can you check if NGC number of this galaxy is correct? I checked in Hubble Legacy Archive, but I see that NGC 1270 looks like elliptical, not similar to your image. It is disc galaxy on your image. Pikador (talk) 14:49, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pikador,

It's a feature around the core of some (or all?) elliptical galaxies. It can be seen by darkening the image.

Best regards, --Fabian RRRR (talk) 08:10, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

HST images of Messier objects[edit]

Recently NASA released a set of images of objects from Messier Catalogue taken by Hubble Space Telescope. We already have many HST images of Messier objects on Commons, but in some cases these new ones are better, for example Messier 105. Here is an adress. Can you check it and upload to Commons some good quality images? Best regards Pikador (talk) 15:05, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license[edit]

File:NGC 1936 & 1935.png[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 23:08, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:NGC1749 - SDSS DR14.png[edit]

NGC 1749 is a star cluster in Large Magellanic Cloud, so I suspect you made a typo in that name, but I don't know which galaxy is on the picture. Pikador (talk) 11:52, 13 March 2018 (UTC)* I've got it - it's a NGC 1740, requesting rename. Pikador (talk) 13:22, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:NGC2603 - SDSS DR14.png[edit]

Actually this is NGC 2606 although some sites (including SIMBAD) call it NGC 2603. See prof. Seligman's page. Pikador (talk) 09:48, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:NGC3265 - SDSS DR14.png[edit]

It's a wrong picture, it's a spiral galaxy on it while NGC 3265 is a lenticular galaxy, see SIMBAD. Pikador (talk) 18:51, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

fixed, thanks - not sure, whats happend there --Fabian RRRR (talk) 10:38, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:NGC3436 - SDSS DR14.png[edit]

It's an incorrect picture. Most catalogues identify NGC 3436 as PGC 32633 (CGCG 038-039) (http://spider.seds.org/ngc/revngcic.cgi?NGC+3436 http://ned.ipac.caltech.edu/cgi-bin/nph-objsearch?objname=NGC+3436 http://leda.univ-lyon1.fr/ledacat.cgi?o=ngc%203436) and according to Harold Corwin (http://haroldcorwin.net/ngcic/ngcnotes.all) this identification is certain because discoverer left a sketch which clearly points to that galaxy. SIMBAD incorrectly identifies NGC 3436 as PGC 31905 which is also different galaxy than the one on your picture. Pikador (talk) 07:21, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for rechecking - I'll fix it. BR --Fabian RRRR (talk) 20:05, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A beer for you![edit]

Thank you for your contribution at NGC 3199. Keep going! Jmencisom (talk) 00:56, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can you help upload the picture to NGC 5929[edit]

It seems like your really good with these types of photos and copyright. I am not. I found this photo of NGC 5929/5930 on this Wikipedia. I tried uploading it myself and I've tried getting everything down but it's still not working. Can you please help me upload it. Thanks.

AdrianWikiEditor (talk) 03:39, 10 October 2018 (UTC) https://bs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datoteka%3ANGC5929-SDSS.gif lso its from the SDSS[reply]

Oops the title is supposed to be can you help me upload the picture OF NGC 5929. Sorry AdrianWikiEditor (talk) 03:40, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am planing to do a bigger upload, all NGC and IC objects from SDSS DR14 wih a scriped upload. BR --Fabian RRRR (talk) 21:34, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, Any chance you could know when this scripted upload is going to happen. Thanks, Adrian AdrianWikiEditor (talk) 21:18, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Davidedemartin 3.jpg[edit]

File:Davidedemartin 3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

C messier (talk) 12:03, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

SDSS DR15[edit]

SDSS has issued Data Release 15 (DR 15) last month. I don't know if it improves image quality or extends sky coverage (probably not) but as it is latest revision I think you should check it. Greetings and thanks for your uploads Pikador (talk) 10:41, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

SDSS DR14[edit]

Hello.
What mean colors in the images? It should be documented.

As a note of secondary importance, licensing should be specified via templates. Pushing such details as Email addresses of persons into file description pages directly is inappropriate. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 12:09, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

most of astronomical images are false color. Details can be found here: https://www.sdss.org/dr14/imaging/jpg-images-on-skyserver/

I am not shure whether it is a star or Halpha region.

I can change the text for future uploads, please make a suggestion.

If you provide a template, I can include it - the email results from a citation of the web site.

BR --Fabian RRRR (talk) 20:00, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again,

added an explanation and a template.

What to do with the already uploaded files?

BR, --Fabian RRRR (talk) 19:07, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Good, with this legend. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 19:33, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for {{SDSS DR14}}. Sorry for not being in touch – I spent my today Commons edits for various quarrels. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 19:29, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:NGC5858 - SDSS DR14.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Arthur Crbz (talk) 22:01, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:NGC3645 - SDSS DR14.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:27, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

v:File:Camera filters-300x274.png[edit]

Hi Fabian RRRR!

I tried to upload v:File:Camera filters-300x274.png to File:SDSS Camera filters for JPG -300x274.png but Special:UploadWizard would not allow it claiming the two are identical which they are not. The Wikiversity version is an updated version which includes the ultraviolet band on the far left and the Z band on the far right. Suggestions welcome! --Marshallsumter (talk) 02:22, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Camera filters-300x274.jpg

BR --Fabian RRRR (talk) 18:34, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea! --Marshallsumter (talk) 04:09, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:NGC3606 - SDSS DR14.jpg[edit]

I don't think a galaxy on this image is NGC 3606. This area of the sky is not covered by SDSS yet and the image doesn't fit DSS image of NGC 3606 (http://simbad.u-strasbg.fr/simbad/sim-id?Ident=NGC+3606). Probably it's a typo, pls check it. Pikador (talk) 07:50, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for spotting this error, it is 3607. Not sure, what happens here, i used a program. Anyway, I‘ve fixed it. Pls notify me, if you see further mistakes.

BR —-Fabian RRRR (talk) 17:03, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

NGC 387[edit]

I know you are currently uploading 2 types of SDSS images. The galaxy and its surroundings (and with labels). And the zoomed in version and no labels. Can you please upload the one without labels and zoomed in of NGC 387] as the only one available is with. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:NGC_387 AdrianWikiEditor (talk) 17:29, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Simbad didn't know the galaxy. https://cseligman.com/text/atlas/ngc3a.htm says it's PGC 3987, so i put it under this name.

The images with labels are not from me.

BR --Fabian RRRR (talk) 18:53, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Community Insights Survey[edit]

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Fabian RRRR,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 01:15, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Fabian RRRR,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:24, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request to add a new image[edit]

Hi, Fabian RRRR. I have found Hubble image of IC 1993, a galaxy in Fornax. Can you have add that image to Wikipedia, the site where I found image is [[1]]

Space2006 7:56, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

Request to add a new images[edit]

Hi, Fabian RRRR. I have found another image on another page. Image represents NGC 1375 and it is on page [[2]]. When you visit this page, look to NGC 1375 and add first image. This text is below to image "Above, a 2 arcmin wide HST image of NGC 1375; for wider-field images see NGC 1374 (Image Credit Hubble Legacy Archive, Judy Schmidt)"

I have also found another images of galaxies NGC 1379 and NGC 1389. Image of NGC 1379 is on [[3]] and NGC 1389 on [[4]].

Also, there is HST image of NGC 1326A. It is on page [[5]] Above the image is a text "Below, a ? arcmin wide HST image of part of the galaxy (Image Credit Hubble Legacy Archive)

I hope you will add this images to Wikipedia, if it is possible until tomorrow or even immediately after you see this message.

Sincerely,

Space2006 17:07, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure about the copyright of the other images, please check.

BR --Fabian RRRR (talk) 19:08, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Fabian RRRR,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You aren't add requested images[edit]

Hi, Fabian RRRR. You aren't images I have requested.

So I decided to show what images I have requested. Please, go to the page using this link [[6]]. When you arrive on page, you will see the image of only NGC 1375. Please try to add this image as soon as possible, because it is my top priority.

Also, you show me image of NGC 1326, no of PGC 12783 or NGC 1326A. NGC 1326A is a galaxy on the second requested image. The link is [[7]]. When you arrived to page, go below and find PGC 12783. Then, do not add first image of PGC 12783, but second (HST) image. This is also top priority image, so try to add this image also as soon as possible.

Also, when you add images, please confirm this and left message of confirmation on my page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Space2006 (talk • contribs) 11:47, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sincerely,

Space2006 (talk) 12:45, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I see. You can add these images simply by yourself (after checking copyright).

BR., --Fabian RRRR (talk) 17:18, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:NGC 3576 (Crop of 'Around NGC 3603').jpg

Yours sincerely, — Huntster (t @ c) 18:30, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

UGC 9391[edit]

Hi, Fabian RRRR̟. It would be nice if you will be able to add new image on Wikipedia. Image is called heic1611c, and you can find it on the page [[8]].

Also, happy April's Fools Day.

Sincerely, Space2006 (Talk) 12:42, 1 April 2020.

@Space2006: done

editing foreign comments[edit]

Regarding your suggestion: Special:Diff/410844654

I changed your post in Special:Diff/410792561, since it misses a signature/timestamp, you can change that by adding {{Unsigned}}
I do not think that a single post, by a single user may contain several {{Vd}}. If you do think differently you can undo my edit in Special:Diff/410755544, regarding your own posts.

Remember: If someone decides over the Image, the person considers how reliable and uncommitted the refferies are.

So if I decide over the image: (which I could)

I would value User:Gestumblindi the most, also his comment is pretty vague, since he is uncommitted and since he is an admin, which declares that he cummunity trust him having a profound expertise. (see: Commons:Administrators/Requests/Gestumblindi)
I value your expertise maybe a bit more than User:Regiomontanus in w:de:Spezial:Diff/198168202, since you made a more profound explanation of your conclusion.
I would value User:Count Count comment in Special:Diff/407610976
I would even value User:JoKalliauer (=myself) arguments, also he is the uploader, since he imho has some experince. But he mostly reffers to external opinions.

Adding several {{Vd}} in a single post does imho neither look experienced nor very competent.

If you whish you can undo my edit regarding your post on your own, I will keep it this way. I personally still think my edits of your post are correct. If you think I'm wrong and I should appologize and undo it. We can disscuss it e.g. at Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems, to get other opinions.

PS: If I currently would decide over the given arguments, I would decide (week) keep.

— Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 11:56, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:NGC 4565 - A beginner's star-book (1912) - Cu31924012302588 0030.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:NGC 4565 - A beginner's star-book (1912) - Cu31924012302588 0030.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:NGC 4565 - A beginner's star-book (1912) - Cu31924012302588 0030.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

File:NGC 4565 - Beginnersstarboo00murp 0 0031.jpg

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 11:06, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:NGC3568 - HST - Potw2150a.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:NGC3568 - HST - Potw2150a.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:NGC3568 - HST - Potw2150a.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 07:05, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:NGC976 - HST - Potw2202a.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:NGC976 - HST - Potw2202a.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:NGC976 - HST - Potw2202a.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 06:05, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:NGC 2014, NGC 2020 - HST - Heic2007a.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:NGC 2014, NGC 2020 - HST - Heic2007a.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Isaohm Shunt BVS, Nikrothal LX.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Isaohm Shunt BVS, Nikrothal LX.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Isaohm Shunt BVS, Nikrothal LX.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 12:05, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Use of sh2-216 Ha extract?[edit]

Hi, I see that you used an image I created of sh2-216 at (https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Sh2-216_H_alpha.jpg&oldid=675885293) by extracting the Ha? But I have the original Ha data image which is here: https://www.astrobin.com/dfmz8d/C/#r0 which IMO is better (and genuine) and I can provide it for without the water mark if you wish. Please contact me at me@ram.org if you are interested.

This is the original colour sh2-216 image I uploaded to Wikimedia Commons: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sh2-216_c_lsho_1218m%2B812m%2B903m_2933m_49h.jpg Ram samudrala (talk) 10:36, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ram samudrala,

Many thanks for the offer - and many thanks for already giving the original image to wikipedia, in the first place.

In fact, the title of my "Halpha" extract is somehow misleading, and I presented it in the german wikipedia article simply as "line filter" image. I simply hesitated to present your colored image in the infobox, because it looks a little bit surrealistic, to different to the other colorizations of the other planetary nebula. I would be very happy, if we have a colored version with a scheme roughly aligend to other planetary nebulas. I try to extract something like this from your colored image, but did not get it to work, so I ended up with the monochrome image.

The Halpha image from you would be a great gift to wikipedia, if possible with an additional OIII image so I would to combine them to a colored image, or - i am not very skilled at this - i you could provide a colored image with multiple filters, somehow more "realistic" colored, I would be happy to include this in the article.

Best regards, --Fabian RRRR (talk) 10:30, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Fabian, I have uploaded the Ha, O3, and S2 data. I also created a more "muted" colour image combining this data. This removes all the greens but both colour images (this one and the one you found surrealistic) are just a standard combination of the data and SCNR in Pixinsight. The original image was tweaked a bit in terms of saturation to make it more psychedelic to differentiate it from all other efforts but I am not sure this image is less so but it is standard Hubble palette processing. Either way I hope you find it useful. The monochrome data is the real data (i.e., no false colour). I hope you find some/all of this useful.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sh2-216_Ha.v0.4.cropped.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sh2-216_O3.v0.4.cropped.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sh2-216_S2.v0.4.cropped.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sh2-216_lsho.v2.1_scnr.cropped.jpg Ram samudrala (talk) 09:29, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ram samudrala,

It looks great! Many Thanks for your effort and great contribution. The original image was already appreciated by the wikipedia community but for me this new image values even higher. I've already updated the article.

Best regards, --Fabian RRRR (talk) 10:07, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

PS.:Could it be that the OIII extract is overexposed, saturated - in case, do you have a different dataset at hand? Best regards, --Fabian RRRR (talk) 21:51, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Great!

The part in the nebula itself is the raw data at unity gain though a bit processed - if I didn't do that, the O3 data would be very faint (aside from the upper left quadrant; there's O3 throughout the nebula) so I had to use masks: the region that is the planetary nebula is left alone - it is the background that I darkened using a mask, this is pretty standard for relatively faint O3 data, otherwise the Ha data would overwhelm it. If you used the original O3 without any processing the blues would be non-existent and it would look all red/orange. Processing O3 is one of the trickiest things to do with narrowband images: most images don't do a good job of it to highlight it IMO. A lot of the images of sh2-216 (even in narrowband) looks red only for this reason. You have to first collect a lot of data (15+ hours in this case) and then use various techniques to highlight it. Ram samudrala (talk) 00:52, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Featured Picture Nomination[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that the image Messier83 - Heic1403a.jpg, which was created or uploaded by you, has been nominated for featured picture status; have a look at the nomination page. Thank you and good luck!--Q28 (talk) 10:11, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Messier83 - Heic1403a.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Messier83 - Heic1403a.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Vela supernova - VST - Eso2214a.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vela supernova - VST - Eso2214a.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:NGC_5236[edit]

NGC 5236 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

SevenSpheres (talk) 01:03, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:NGC_4501[edit]

NGC 4501 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

SevenSpheres (talk) 01:03, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Hubble Chronicles Brightening of Ring around Supernova 1987A (1994-2016 - crop, small).gif[edit]

Copyright status: File:Hubble Chronicles Brightening of Ring around Supernova 1987A (1994-2016 - crop, small).gif

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Hubble Chronicles Brightening of Ring around Supernova 1987A (1994-2016 - crop, small).gif. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 00:05, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Vela Supernova Remnant - Noirlab2406a.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Vela Supernova Remnant - Noirlab2406a.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Vela Supernova Remnant - Noirlab2406a.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 09:05, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Fabian RRRR

TUSC token c8b4e6878462de34aa9bac9cec8834eb[edit]

File:Phot-12-04.jpg[edit]

Filenames[edit]

Deprecated License[edit]

File:NGC2976-hst-R814G606B475.jpg[edit]

File:NGC_3627_or_M66.jpg[edit]

File:Simeiz_RT-22_telescope_(2005-09-286)_.jpg[edit]

File:M101 hires STScI-PRC2006-10a.jpg[edit]

Featured Picture Nomination[edit]

File:Byurakan.jpg[edit]

File:NGC121-HST-R814GB555 img.jpg[edit]

Mistake with NGC 214[edit]

NGC 2174[edit]

File:NGC 4100 HST 9788 R658nB814.png[edit]

File:Opo0210b.tif[edit]

File:The remnant of the supernova SN 1006 seen at many different wavelengths.tiff[edit]

Request to add a picture[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

File:NGC 6393 hst 05479 606.png[edit]

File:IC356.jpg[edit]

File:Paardenkopnevel.jpg[edit]

File:Herbig-Haro 46-47 - Eso1336a.tif[edit]

SDSS images[edit]

File:NGC328 - SDSS DR14.png[edit]

File:NGC1270 - HST 814.png[edit]

HST images of Messier objects[edit]

Image without license[edit]

File:NGC 1936 & 1935.png[edit]

File:NGC1749 - SDSS DR14.png[edit]

File:NGC2603 - SDSS DR14.png[edit]

File:NGC3265 - SDSS DR14.png[edit]

File:NGC3436 - SDSS DR14.png[edit]

A beer for you![edit]

Can you help upload the picture to NGC 5929[edit]

File:Davidedemartin 3.jpg[edit]

SDSS DR15[edit]

SDSS DR14[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

v:File:Camera filters-300x274.png[edit]

File:NGC3606 - SDSS DR14.jpg[edit]

NGC 387[edit]

Community Insights Survey[edit]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

Request to add a new image[edit]

Request to add a new images[edit]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

You aren't add requested images[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

UGC 9391[edit]

editing foreign comments[edit]

Copyright status: File:NGC 4565 - A beginner's star-book (1912) - Cu31924012302588 0030.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:NGC3568 - HST - Potw2150a.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:NGC976 - HST - Potw2202a.jpg[edit]

FP Promotion[edit]

Copyright status: File:Isaohm Shunt BVS, Nikrothal LX.jpg[edit]

Use of sh2-216 Ha extract?[edit]

Featured Picture Nomination[edit]

FP Promotion[edit]

FP Promotion[edit]

Category:NGC_5236[edit]

Category:NGC_4501[edit]

Copyright status: File:Hubble Chronicles Brightening of Ring around Supernova 1987A (1994-2016 - crop, small).gif[edit]

Copyright status: File:Vela Supernova Remnant - Noirlab2406a.jpg[edit]

Navigation menu

Search