User talk:Evan-Amos

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
User:Evan-Amos Wikimedia Talk Page
Main Userpage Wikipedia Talk Wikimedia Talk Interviews Email Me
Candy Food Misc Everyday Video Games Flickr

Intro[edit]

You can leave a message here. I am usually pretty good about getting back to notices and messages, but if I'm not it's because I'm not currently doing anything with Wikipedia. I'm always available through email, and you can email me through Wikipedia or you can do it directly at evan.amos /at\ gmail.com [I am currently on hiatus from Wikimedia with other projects, so replies might be belated.]

Talk Page Archive[edit]


Thanks![edit]

Thanks for the awesome gaming system pictures! 205.178.89.137 11:30, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nice job. Jduranboger (talk) 15:55, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Your pictures are great for preserving gaming history. --Mbrickn (talk) 02:33, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oreo-Size-Variations.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Raghith 05:12, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, I nominated one of your pictures as a Featured Picture candidate. The nomination is here. The list of current FP candidates is here. Nice work. Jbarta (talk) 19:59, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the support! I just realized that I could retake that picture since I've got my camera set up at the moment, so it was a good initiative to do so.Evan-Amos (talk) 04:09, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
UPDATE: Image is now a featured picture. Congratulations. Jbarta (talk) 12:54, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kinder-Bueno-Split.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --Jakubhal 06:37, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks![edit]

... for your good photos and also for putting them in the public domain instead of using complicated licenses! :-)

TwoThree other things: I noticed the addition of your info templates - fine generally, but don't you think that the PD template gets pushed far down by those big templates? A suggestion: put the PD template directly in the permission= field.

I have given you auto-patroller rights. I think you will not vandalize or upload copyvios. :-) You're edits do not need to be patrolled anymore. Do you think differently?

You have no SUL account ("There is no SUL account matching the name "Evan-Amos"."). Go to Special:MergeAccount to merge your enwp and Commons account to one global account (under which those both continue to exist). That way you will be able to also easily contribute in other Wikipedias and only have to sign in once.

Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 00:56, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for all of that! Looking at it now, I agree on the PD license field thing, so I'll be sure to do that. I'm still working on revamping the format of my pages and fields, so I'll be continuing to fix and tweak things over the next few days. I can only edit one photo at a time, so it can be a bit slow going, but I plan to get them all formatted the same.
I'll be sure to do the SUL thing, because I do have to sign in separately now, so having something simpler is good to know. I still feel like I'm fumbling around a lot when it comes to this whole Wiki thing, so any guidance or help always means a lot to me. Thanks again! - Evan-Amos (talk) 12:43, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Okay! SUL worked - your account is global now. Starting at the next sign in you will be logged in everywhere (if it doesn't work already). Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 22:16, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your amazing pictures! Americanplus (talk) 19:17, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the generous licensing on your photos. You are a hero! --2.25.48.69 19:15, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Super Nintendo / Famicom[edit]

Hi Evan, I was wondering if you had uploaded a jpg version of File:Super-Famicom-Console-Set.png. I just nominated your picture of the SNES for FP at Wikipedia, and I'd like to have the Famicom to compare it to (like a set). Great works, by the way. Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:13, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the support and interest! I uploaded a jpg version of the file. I usually have both ready when I do it, but sometimes I just haven't uploaded the second file. Evan-Amos (talk) 04:58, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • You're very welcome (I nominated three today; we'll see how they do before I nominate any more). After seeing how the Commodore did a couple weeks ago, I decided to take a look at some of your other pictures; I have a special place in my heart for the SNES, having cut my teeth on it back in the early 90s, so I nominated it right away. Thanks! Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:05, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the update and letting me know what's going. I'm currently away for the holidays so I don't have access to my computer and files for a few days. I could always retake or re-edit the picture of the Zapper when I get back, but it wouldn't be until Monday.
Also, I had looked over the pictures that have been put through to featured status via the community. Part of me has held back nominating my own stuff since a lot of the pictures that I see make featured are of animals, scenic vistas, marcos, etc. I've had the feeling that my product photos of video games and candy could been seen as more niche than that, especially to people who didn't play them. If the photos make it through the process then that's great, but it not I don't see it as a big deal. Evan-Amos (talk) 15:56, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Uh, it could be from shadows? At the time I wasn't using plexiglass to take pictures, so the edges can look sloppy because of the heavy shadows. I could take the picture better now since I could do a more competent job of photoshopping and actually taking the picture. A lot of my older pictures are on a to-do list because they can have problems like this. For the SNES specifically, it's a little bit harder to take a picture of it because the one that I own is heavily oxidized (the same as in the oxidized SNES picture), so it takes a bit more effort than the other console pictures. Evan-Amos (talk) 01:29, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I did some retakes of the SNES and the Zapper. I should be getting those ready in the next few days. Evan-Amos (talk) 03:30, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

PSX-Console-wController.png[edit]

Hello! Your photo PSX-Console-wController.png was nominated to Featured picture on Polish Wikipedia but you have to at least one edit. You can do it? Eurohunter (talk) 09:18, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I made a couple of edits on some Polish pages. I updated pictures of various video game consoles. Evan-Amos (talk) 02:21, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Evan, I just made a vectorized version of your logo. Is that OK with you? Atomicbeachball (talk) 02:29, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, that's cool with me. Thanks! I don't really know how to do stuff with vectors or SVG files, so I would never have been able to do that myself. It should come in handy at some point. Evan-Amos (talk) 05:24, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hey Evan, you know that an SVG vector picture has a smaller file size than the same photo in another format? That will be useful if you want to keep your page free of other clutter!

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
Great work on the video game system images! Mattsephton (talk) 15:25, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hey there, thanks! Evan-Amos (talk) 03:14, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Special Barnstar
This is for the Bandai Playdia pic. One of the rarest consoles ever. Period! KiwikidCP7 (talk) 14:21, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for being behind on thanking you for this. Yeah, I was really excited to be able to get a picture of such a rare console. I really lucked out by finding someone with it. Evan-Amos (talk) 03:22, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Photographer's Barnstar
Awesome videogame pics! Keep up the good work! :D SchizophrenicDingo (talk) 17:01, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the encouragement! Evan-Amos (talk) 03:22, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Photographer's Barnstar
Great photos of those obscure games consoles! Keep it up! KiwikidCP7 (talk) 14:11, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! The obscure consoles are some of the most worthwhile considering there's so few good pictures of them on the entire Internet. Evan-Amos (talk) 03:22, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Photographer's Barnstar
Thanks for sharing photos Lmao (talk) 18:49, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, glad you're enjoying them! Evan-Amos (talk) 03:22, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you![edit]

The Photographer's Barnstar
Thank you very much for your public domain work! Every bit of free information is helpful, so thanks again! Illegitimate Barrister (talk) 15:00, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I just want people to have easy access to good pictures, so I'm glad that they're able to reach such a wide audience. Evan-Amos (talk) 03:22, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Photo request[edit]

Would there be any possibility you could get your hands on a PlayStation Vita? There's not any good photos around right now, one of yours would be appreciated. Kyores (talk) 11:15, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The current SVG file is pretty good, so I don't know if I'd be in a rush to replace it. I'm currently on a bit of a hiatus from pictures, and I also don't have a black Vita. If I run across one, I'll be sure to get a picture of it for the gallery and the Vita page. Evan-Amos (talk) 03:50, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

png photos[edit]

Hi Evan, Thank you for your great photographs. I edited and resized a lot of your food and candy photographs with photoshop so that they could become my dock and file folder icons. I was wondering if you'd be interested in sharing them; they're all about 500 max width/height. -Sara

Hey, thanks for the interest and sorry for the late reply. Using the pictures as dock folders sounds pretty cool. I don't know if I'd be able to upload them to them to any of my galleries as that falls under personal use rather than encyclopedic value. If you have any personal site of your own, you can feel free to distribute them, though! Evan-Amos (talk) 03:48, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Request[edit]

Hello there. Wow, I've just looked through your video gaming images and you're a top-class photographer. Well done!

I have a request: you made two images of the Xbox 360 Elite: one with a controller, another without. I've just seen that you also have an image of the 360 Arcade (File:Xbox-360-arcade.jpg), however you didn't make a image of it without the controller. Could you please make one?

Another request: could you please make a professional photo like these for the 360 Pro? You haven't got it in your collection and all others on Wikipedia and Commons are not so good. What I'm trying to do is to replace the Elite console (on the left) of the 360 infobox image (File:Xbox-360-Consoles-Infobox.png) with a Pro model, as the current image does not look so well on the Xbox 360 Wikipedia article (the Elite looks too similar to the S on that image, and multiple other reasons). So could you please, make a photo of the Pro model? Thank you and keep up your brilliant photography work! --Gaming&Computing (talk) 15:39, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The only 360 console that I currently own is the original arcade version and I've never had the opportunity to take a picture of the Pro. I don't have a picture of just the Arcade in my archives, though, so at some point I'll need to take one. The pictures that I took of the Elite and 360 S were from other peoples collections so it's not something that I have on hand. Ideally, I would need to own five or six xbox 360s just for all of the variants. It's something that is feasible in the future, though. I really want to be able to take all of combination photos at some point so I'd want to try and make it possible. - Evan-Amos (talk) 00:49, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, got it. If you know any friends who have those consoles you may borrow it and take the pic! The thing is, you are BY FAR the best photographer of consoles, or just simply any kind of consumer electronics, so I'd really like to see those 360s from you. --Gaming&Computing (talk) 17:52, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Xbox 360 E[edit]

If you get a chance, could you put in the Xbox 360 E image? --Archcaster 22:33, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm actually hoping to get an Xbox 360 E at some point (maybe Black Friday?) and when I do, I'll be sure to update it. Evan-Amos (talk) 05:42, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

3DS XL image needed[edit]

Hello, Please, could you take picture of 3DS XL and post it to wikimedia commons?

Thanks --Sponge123|留言 02:06, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I do own a 3DS XL, so when I'm able to get my studio set up again I'll be able to get a picture of it. Evan-Amos (talk) 05:42, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia in every language needs the 3DS XL image, so do it quick. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. Your photo are wonderful and useful. Hope I can learn how to take these games images.--Sponge123|留言 09:10, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations![edit]

Hallo Evan-Amos,
I've just read an article about your incredible work on PetaPiwel. Good job, congratulations and cheers! --Myrabella (talk) 08:38, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I second the congratulations :) good job, man! --Helios (talk) 13:44, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey everyone, thanks for this. It blew up like crazy overnight, but it's amazing the support the project is getting right now. This is going to mean so many photos! Evan-Amos (talk) 14:25, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I just backed your Kickstarter project. Honestly, I don't care all that much about the history of video game consoles, but I wanted to thank you in some small way for the many high-quality images you have contributed (and continue to contribute!) to the public domain. You've nearly doubled your goal! That's awesome. Please keep us in the loop about how you plan to spend the excess. All the best, – Quadell (talk) 14:20, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulation Evan for surpassing your kickstarter goal! I would have donated but didn't know about it in time. Anyway, awesome work, and good luck! Ross Hill (talk) 00:57, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Ross and Quadell! And all the money is still going to hardware. There's plenty of systems out there, so I had other areas and systems of gaming set to stretch goals. I'll certainly be able to get a wide variety now! Evan-Amos (talk) 01:40, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I'm curious if you need some more used Nintendo gadgets for the museum. I have a used grey Nintendo Gameboy Advanced SP and a used white Nintendo DS Lite that I no longer use. Also I have a lot of GBA, and DS game cartridges that I'm no longer using. Ross Hill (talk) 01:59, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hey Ross, thanks for the offer! I actually could use the grey Game Boy Advance SP and white DS Lite, so I would gladly take them. Color variants are something that I really want to document, but they come last in terms of my buying priority because of how many original consoles I need. I could also use any extra games for turning into dummy carts, so I'd be happy to take them, too. Anything that you send will be credited to you on the photo infopage, and I'll also be sure to get you some backer rewards as well.
Thanks Ross! Evan-Amos (talk) 06:32, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I'll see when I can get to sending it down. On another note, I happened to see your work on a youtube channel I'm subscribed to! http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=5+Awesome+NES+Facts%21+--+Fact+Surgery&oq=5+Awesome+NES+Facts%21+--+Fact+Surgery&gs_l=youtube.3...895.895.0.1253.1.1.0.0.0.0.63.63.1.1.0...0.0...1ac.2.11.youtube.ZGpfRJcdS6M Regards Ross Hill (talk) 23:15, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You are in Brooklyn? Have you ever said hello?[edit]

I just found out about your Kickstarter now that it is over. Have you ever said hello to anyone at the Wikipedia Meetup in NYC? I did not even know you were here. Would you come to one of our meetups sometime and chat with us? Could I meet you individually? This is great! I am so happy for you! I wish that I would have known about your Kickstarter - I would have shared it with other Wikipedia people.

Congratulations on getting the recognition that you deserve for your good work and for making so many people happy. I wish you success in whatever you attempt for the future. Thank you for doing what you do - I hope that you start a trend in the way you photograph. Blue Rasberry (talk) 16:23, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lane, it's great to meet you and thanks for all the kind words! I actually have not been to a Wikipedia meet-up before. I've pretty much kept to myself since I started uploading to Wikimedia, but I think that will be changing because of the Kickstarter. I want to make an effort to be on social media and reach out with other members of the community. I'll email you back with more info. Evan-Amos (talk) 18:23, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kitchen-Scissors.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:16, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nikon-sb-600-front.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:16, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kitchen-Scooper-Large.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good quality --P e z i 23:20, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Barnstar of Diligence
Hey, I found you through your PetaPixel article, great stuff! And good luck on the gaming museum. ··gracefool | 03:03, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! LD-Cosmic-Brownie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jastrow 18:42, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DualShock 4 image[edit]

Hello Evan-Amos, I am sorry if this has been brought up before. But I was wondering if you had gotten your hands on the DualShock 4, and whether or not you'd be interested in producing the same pose and image as you have done for the original DualShock, the DualShock 2 and DualShock 3. I would like to request this only if it is possible on your end. Thank you for reading this message. --Phailin1 (talk) 05:28, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be getting a PS4, so it's just a matter of time. I don't have a preorder, so we'll have to see how difficult they are to get before Christmas. I will be taking a picture of the DS4 though, in the same style as the other DualShocks. Evan-Amos (talk) 07:10, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I see, I've actually got one here on my desk. I wish I could lend it to you, haha. Thank you for the response, I'm relieved to know you were planning on it. Cheers. --Phailin1 (talk) 05:40, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Some stroopwafels for you![edit]

Great job, many thanks ! Lmao (talk) 18:14, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for being so passionate[edit]

Hi Evan, my name is María, I am communications coordinator of Wikimedia Argentina. I read your story in Peta Pixel and loved it. We translated in Sanish for our blog. If you want to use that content for any purpose, feel free to do so. The editing style is Argentinean informal Spanish. I wish to you all the best! http://www.wikimedia.org.ar/2013/11/20/el-poder-de-wikipedia-la-historia-de-un-fanatico-de-consolas-de-video/ María =) user:María Cruz (WMAR)

María Cruz (WMAR) (talk) 20:41, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Xbox Images[edit]

Dear Evan-Amos, Thank you for creating a PlayStation 4 image. If possible, could you please upload four new photos: 1. Xbox One - If you could upload a transparent photo of the Xbox One console, controller and Kinect, specifically for the Xbox One page, that would be great. 2. Xbox One Controller - Very much like your DualShock 4 controller image. 3. Xbox One Kinect - Just the Kinect on its own, please. 4. If you could add the new Xbox 360 E to your current Xbox 360 photo (the one that is on the Xbox 360 page), that would be great too. Thank you, --86.45.35.159 15:49, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sega Genesis[edit]

Greetings, Evan-Amos. I just thought you'd want to know, the Sega Genesis article on the English Wikipedia is currently nominated for Featured Article status. The article includes several of your high-quality photographs of many varieties of the Genesis (Mega Drive) and its various add-ons and controllers. It also includes photos by others: File:Pioneer LaserActive CLD-A100.jpg, a decent photo of the Pioneer LaserActive, and w:en:File:MegaPC Front.jpg, an adequate photo of an Amstrad Mega PC. Do you have either of these pieces of equipment? Are either on your wishlist of items to acquire? All the best, – Quadell (talk) 18:27, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! McDonald's Double Cheeseburger (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Very good quality I'm not very proud of this, but I should kill for that...--Jebulon 09:55, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Categorisation in parent and child categories[edit]

Hi there,

Thank you for your excellent-quality image of a Nintendo 3DS (File:Nintendo-3DS-AquaOpen.png), along with your many other uploads!

I thought it would be useful to point out that if an image belongs to two categories, one of which is a child (or descendant) of the other, then it should *only* go in the more specific child category. For example, Category:Nintendo 3DS is a child of Category:Handheld game consoles, so anything in the 3DS category doesn't need to (and shouldn't) be in the more general parent category as well.

If this is unclear, Commons:Categories#Over-categorization probably explains things better(!)

(I know you uploaded this image three years ago, so if you're aware of this now, please disregard this comment!)

All the best, Ubcule (talk) 19:57, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! PS3-Slim-Console-Set.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Pyb 20:48, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wii-console.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Pyb 20:48, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nintendo-3DS-AquaOpen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Pyb 20:48, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Orange-Fruit-Pieces.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:42, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Xbox-360S-Console-Set.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 16:14, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Xbox-console.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 16:14, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nintendo-DS-Lite-Black-Open.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 18:47, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! PS3-Fat-Console-Set.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:53, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tony-Lucca-Infobox.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:53, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Big Mac hamburger.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Coyau 17:03, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oreo-Two-Cookies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:11, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! PS2-Versions.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 16:08, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! PS3-Consoles-Set.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --DXR 21:31, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Xbox-Debug-Console-Set.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 16:08, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nikon-D200-and-Lens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 17:06, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Minolta-70210mm-F4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:11, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nintendo-DSi-XL-Burg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Coyau 19:55, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! PlayStation-SCPH-1000-with-Controller.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Froot-Loops-Cereal-Bowl.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --DXR 22:23, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Matt-Duke-Infobox.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Cccefalon 19:46, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! OUYA-Console-set-h.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:06, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wii-Classic-Controller-White.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nintendo-3DS-XL-angled.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Coyau 08:46, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nintendo-2DS-angle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Coyau 08:46, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wii-Mini-Console-Set-H.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Coyau 08:46, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Psp-1000.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Coyau 08:46, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nintendo-DSi-Bl-Open.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Coyau 08:46, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wii-Console-Back.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Coyau 08:46, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! McD-Bacon-Egg-Cheese-McGriddle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 17:40, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Xbox-360-WiFi-Adapter-Original.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 17:40, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! GameCube-Set.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 21:20, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Xbox One Console Set.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 21:20, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Game-Boy-Advance-1stGen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 21:20, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WikiConference USA[edit]

Hey there,

I was wondering if you're attending WikiConference USA next weekend in Manhattan? If so I'd love to take the opportunity to touch base with you about Multimedia development and get your thoughts for the future. Even if you won't be at the conference it'd be great if we could arrange some sort of informal get-together while I'm in town. Let me know if you're interested. Keegan (WMF) (talk) 19:51, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sony-Alpha-A700-Front.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 07:29, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Some baklava for you![edit]

How sweet it is... Symposiarch (talk) 05:14, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A cheeseburger for you![edit]

Thanks for your great pics of food! And thank you for making your images public domain! Alcinoe (talk) 04:22, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Media Viewer and Superprotect[edit]

Hi Evan-Amos, are you aware of this open letter about the Media Viewer software, etc.?

meta:Letter to Wikimedia Foundation: Superprotect and Media Viewer -Pete F (talk) 01:04, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Some concern was raised about the Big Bag image at en:Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Big Mac. Could you take a look? Regards, User:Armbrust (Local talk - en.Wikipedia talk) 19:19, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Professor-SF-Attached.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:16, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, as you might have already noticed, I have undeleted the file. It was pretty much obvious that this high quality file isn't a copy of all those low quality files spread around the net. I have also closed your deletion requests for your pages in user name space. Next time just request a speedy deletion by using {{Speedydelete}}. -- Best regards, 32X (talk) 07:21, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laptop-hard-drive-exposed.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:07, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

License[edit]

Hey Evan, I read your complain about non attribution [1], but you use cc-0 (public domain), the license permits that. Why don't you use, for future contributions, the cc-by-sa-4.0? You cannot change the "past licenses", but this cc-by allows you to ask the attribution in "any way" that you want, you can ask for people in Wikipedia when uses your photo put your name in the caption, linking to your page here i.e., (they maybe will do that for courtesy with you asks now).

And do you mind with I organize your photos in one category with your name? This facilitates a lot, and improve the visualization of your work.

Thank you very much for your contribution, and if you have any questions about licenses, I can help. Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton (talk) 07:40, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 35-Desktop-Hard-Drive.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 17:11, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aero-Mint-Bar-Split.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 17:11, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amiga-CD32-CD-Flap-Open.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 21:39, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amiga-CD32-wController-L.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 17:11, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You are being notified because you have participated in previous discussions on the same topic. en:User:Alsee (en:Talk:Alsee) Alsee (talk) 16:59, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 3-Musketeers-Broken.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 10:25, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 3DO-FZ1-Console-Set.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 10:25, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aero-Caramel-Split.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 10:25, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Atari-2600-Light-Sixer-FL.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good quality --El Grafo 12:49, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amstrad-GX4000-Console-Set.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments nice --El Grafo 12:49, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Andes-Mints.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments looks tasty ;-) --El Grafo 12:49, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! NES-ROB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 18:25, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have more consoles?[edit]

I just want to ask you. Do you have more consoles?

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Photographer's Barnstar
I just found out what you had done for Wikipedia and the history of game consoles and it is absolutely incredible. I am at a loss for words Tashi (talk) 22:03, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

SNES-CD[edit]

Hi. You've probably heard about a guy who found a copy of SNES-CD. Is there a chance you will be able to take a photo of this console? It would be great, because of its rarity Tashi (talk) 10:41, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

He did tweet about it: The PlayStation prototype being found is like christmas to me. God, I wonder if I could get the chance to photograph it.Dispenser (talk) 04:47, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I would like to take a photo of it, but I likely won't have the chance. The dude who has it will likely sell it and then it won't be seen again.Evan-Amos (talk) 13:12, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'd love you to photograph prototypes and devkits. Have you tried contacting the journalists to put him into contact with you? Hard to imagine someone turning down a free "professional" photo shoot, especially if it'll be featured in Wikipedia articles. Dispenser (talk) 04:09, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you :)[edit]

Awesome console/computer pics! Thanks.

Mhoenig (talk) 10:37, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Big Mac[edit]

Your photo of a Big Mac has resulted in a common on Wikipedia's talk page - the commentator points out that yours looks non-standard (e.g. the cheese slice is on top of the bottom burger, not underneath it). It seems picky but it intrigued me as well. Is it a Big Mac? It looks more like a Burger King Big King. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 18:02, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's a Big Mac, and I explained it more on the page. I did make a mistake with the cheese when I took the photo, though. Evan-Amos (talk) 18:51, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Big Mac photo[edit]

The Big Mac is assembled incorrectly. The cheese should be under the meat. There should only be two pickles, and they should be under the meat. The photo does not accurately represent a McDonald's Big Mac. Please replace with accurate image


Tandy Video Information System[edit]

Did the en:Tandy Video Information System make it onto your list?Geni (talk) 01:10, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Email[edit]

Hi Evan, I've sent you an email (it'll show as coming from The ed17, my volunteer account, because I logged into the wrong account. My email is eerhart@wikimedia.org. Thanks!). Ed Erhart (WMF) (talk) 02:44, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging uploaded images with correct permissions[edit]

Consider adding Template:Trademarked and a possible public domain template in Template:Information permission field, where necessary. See COM:LAYOUT. I tagged few of your console controller images as examples, e.g. File:NES-Controller-Flat.jpg. 80.221.159.67 15:43, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unrelated to this topic, but please also add Template:Archival version and Template:Compressed version respectively if you can. Thanks. 80.221.159.67 17:49, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Assuming you took the picture of the latest revision yourself, you may want to tag the right copyright and author information on the file. It doesn't look like to be a derivative work of the original one. 80.221.159.67 15:58, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind me, it is a derivative work. Nicely cleaned up! 80.221.159.67 16:03, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

CX40 image[edit]

Your image of the CX40 Atari joystick found here has no orange color on the top like this one. Do you know if it simply rubbed off, like this one is doing, or it never had it in the first place? Maury Markowitz (talk) 16:13, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There are multiple versions of the same joystick, some have the orange and some don't. The Sega Genesis also has a lot of minor variations between its controllers. Evan-Amos (talk) 18:35, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Google-Cardboard.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Aeou 15:22, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! PS4-Console-wDS4.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. I wish photos of places and buildings had as good descriptions as the devices in these photos! --W.carter 10:37, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Xbox One Console Set.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --W.carter 10:37, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wii-Console.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --King of Hearts 05:13, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Xbox-One-Kinect.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --W.carter 10:37, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Images[edit]

Hey, how do you create such high quality images?

For instance: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Xbox-360-E-HardDrive-Bay.jpg

This looks like an official stock image. Clear image on a perfectly white background. It's perfect. How is it possible?

I'd like to be able to do the same, so I can contribute quality images of a similar standard.

Cheers. Tjt263 (talk) 19:48, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

He's tweeted photos of his setup: [2][3][4][5]. A light box with glass table, nice camera and lights, and lot of post processing work. Dispenser (talk) 14:24, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
File:Logitech-Driving-Force-PS3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2001:E68:442E:58E:8DBE:81C4:9626:2554 03:32, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This Photo Challenge seems right up your street, particularly since your photos are used as examples! -- Colin (talk) 11:47, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Sears-Tele-Games-Super-Video-Arcade-Intellivision-Console-FL.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:15, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A cupcake for you![edit]

Wonderful candy gallery d1g 16:19, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Request: Rocket eBook[edit]

The Rocket eBook was the first dedicated e-book reader. Would be nice to have a Free photo for Wikipedia, considering the encyclopedia's nature. Dispenser (talk) 22:12, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, first system that did not use physical media and had an online store, otherwise Sony's Data Discman predates it by five years. Dispenser (talk) 11:08, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I have certain hardware oddities in mind for photos, like the Data Discman, it's just a matter of cost, availability and time to do it. But I do like the idea of chronically these milestones of technology. Evan-Amos (talk) 16:17, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
For completeness, I should mention the grand daddy Domesday Project. LV-ROM (LaserDisc) allowed up to 324 MB of data per side (stored in the audio channel) + 54,000 video frames. The BBC Research estimated 9 GB if both audio and video channels were used. An emulation and documentation project for this bespoke hardware is at domesday86.com \o/ —Dispenser (talk) 19:03, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kodak-Max-400-35mm-Film.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A tiny bit of noise but not too much for QI, I think. --Peulle 15:19, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Evan-Amos, a sub-page of your user page have been mentioned in the Administrators' noticeboard for being "advertising", first I would like to thanks you for the great content you give to Wikimedia Commons, but secondly I'd like to point you our policies : "(...) including advertising or excessive linking to external domains...". Maybe you can reply on the noticeboard, and maybe can you consider, if you use this page as a transclusion in some of your files, changing this page with full respect for our policies. Regards, Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:28, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Atari SIO port close up[edit]

Hello, me again. Any chance I could get a medium-shot of the SIO port on one of your Atari machines? I'm fleshing out the SIO article... Maury Markowitz (talk)

More Atari stuff?[edit]

Your pictures are truly amazing! Thanks! I used lots of them in my articles (German Wikipedia) about Atari 8 bit computers. Do you consider to shoot some more for Atari XL computers? I would like to see a "striptease" of 600XL and 800XL down to the mainboard as well similar to Atari 800. Also backside views of SIO-daisychained Atari devices (XL Computer with 1050 and/or printer/tape drive/whatever) would be cool. Thanks again for your pics Schnurrikowski (talk) 11:21, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Necco-Candy-SweetHearts.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

70.166.239.201 16:39, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ping problems[edit]

Hi there,

Just a heads up that I pinged you over here, but forgot your hyphen in the ping (too many people pinged to just redo it). :) — Rhododendrites talk00:00, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Help in inserting the Atari Jaguar & Atari Jaguar CD pics on the List of Atari Jaguar games on Wikipedia.[edit]

Hi! Hey I don't know how to insert image files onto Wikipedia, I need you to inset these files (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Atari-Jaguar-Console-Set.jpg & https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Atari-Jaguar-CD-wPro-Controller.jpg) onto this page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Atari_Jaguar_games) to make it look more professional please. It may be too much to ask but I would be grateful if you did ;) KGRAMR.

Detailed controller teardowns?[edit]

Hi there Evan, I’ve been following your work for quite some time and I have to say you’ve done a tremendous job at archiving these consoles in detailed photoshoots for everyone to see, it’s gorgeous to look at them with their guts out as well, to see what’s inside these machines.

But something I found to be missing in most of your albums, even those marked with green to say it’s complete, is a teardown of the controllers.

The Casio PV-1000 and Amstrad GX4000 have them witch is really cool, but the rest seem to stay closed.

I wonder what the criteria are for what controllers get a full teardown. Or will they all get one in the future? Talkkaris (talk) 09:42, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There's many reasons for me, but it's been random and it's hard to say what will and won't get controller teardown pics. Many controllers feature extremely similar construction and don't have important information inside like what's contained on motherboards. Evan-Amos (talk) 16:11, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have a request for you[edit]

can you please do pictures of the transformers toy as a little break from video games. Thanks, Ninsative (talk) 20:30, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Help with translations?[edit]

Hi, I started translating a few image descriptions to my native language (Portuguese) since not everyone that discovers these photos knows English, but as I was starting on the Xbox, I only translated the first 4 picture descriptions (here is one of them), it seemed like a lot of text, and I'm not sure if this help is welcome.

Before I go much further, is it ok if I continue to translate them, or will you do this in another way? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Talkkaris (talk • contribs) 17:11, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Evan-Amos has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this user page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

I eat bananas 101 (talk) 21:21, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What do you think of your Wikipedia article?[edit]

I'm sure you already know about the fact that you have your own wikipedia article from one of the comments above, but the question I have is, what do you think of the article? Are there any flaws in the article or stuff that should be added to the article? Tell me what you think. 344917661X (talk) 02:41, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Original Barnstar
Your photos are among the highest quality available. Kosmosi (talk) 17:00, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Huge thanks![edit]

Just to let you know your work is really appreciated! I have written a new article about Interton's VC 4000 in German Wikipedia. Your excellent pics were extremely helpful :o) Thanks for that, Schnurrikowski (talk) 06:54, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Are these accessories Japan version, or the North American version?[edit]

I'm currently working on the Dreamcast article on Chinese Wikipedia, but I'm not quite sure about the originate of some of the accessories. Could you give a help and identify them? Thanks.

Sincerely, —— Eric Liu留言百科用戶頁 13:41, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Photographer's Barnstar
I would like to thank you for all the wonderful, high-quality photographs of video game consoles that you have created and shared with Wikimedia Commons and Wikipedia over the years. Please accept this barnstar as a small token of my appreciation. Thank you so much for all the great content! Michael Barera (talk) 02:48, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 00:59, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Themightyquill (talk) 11:01, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 15:19, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Evan, just wanted to let you know that File:Coleco-Telstar-Colortron.jpg doesn't have it's own gallery item. Not sure whether that's intentional or not but I thought I'd let you know Crimsonfox (talk) 17:34, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 19:57, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Important message for file movers[edit]

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chrome-Safety-Razor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GRDN711 19:14, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Temple-of-Olympian-Zeus-Athens-198X.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Temple-of-Olympian-Zeus-Athens-198X.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 12:37, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A cupcake for you![edit]

Thanks for the gallery 26zhangi (talk) 19:15, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


A barnstar for you![edit]

The Photographer's Barnstar
I've used many of your fantastic images over the years, I just wanted to thank you for all the hard work in making such lovely photographs of so many items, both significant and obscure. I know from experience that getting the perfect shot involves a lot of hard work, it is much appreciated. Shritwod (talk) 19:13, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
File:Magnavox-Color-Screen-Overlays.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Spicy (talk) 13:13, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Question...[edit]

I have no idea how the timing works between the launch of new consoles and when you're able to get your hands on one, and then subsequently prepare photographs of it. I only ask as with the Xbox Series X/S and PS 5 consoles now basically out, we're looking to get pictures of them (COVID made E3 a wash for early shots of them this year). I'm only curious if you by any chance may have them soon, or if it makes sense to pursue other means for decent free photos from others until you're able to get these done. --Masem (talk) 07:22, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hard to say how things will work. I was not able to get an Xbox preorder and am hoping the PS5 doesn't fall through. I also don't have access to my photo setup right now due to the pandemic, so it could be a while before I'm able to get photos taken. Evan-Amos (talk) 13:26, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I'll start pinging a few groups that I'm in that I know are likely getting them for at least intermediate ones. --Masem (talk) 21:05, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sega-Genesis-6But-Cont.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:03, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Game-Genie-Genesis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:03, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sega-SG-1000-Console-Set.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:03, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sega-SG-1000-MkII-Console-FL.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:03, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Game&watch-donkey-kong-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:03, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nintendo-Switch-Console-Docked-wJoyConRB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice console :D - and image of course ;) --PantheraLeo1359531 15:27, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Solar-calculator.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Measuring-tape.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:47, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sony-MZ-N707-MD-Walkman.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:21, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ipod-classic-6th-gen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:21, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Electronic-Component-Red-LED.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:21, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blueberries-In-Pack.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:21, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cherry-Tomatoes-in-Pack.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:21, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 1st-Gen-iPad-WiFi-iBooks.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 07:39, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you[edit]

Candied Apple Award
Thanks for your contributions. I was talking to some product managers today, and I needed an example of a person who makes a significant contribution in a particular niche. Your story was the perfect illustration of the need for a variety of contribution types and different skills, and they loved looking at your pictures. Thank you. Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 18:42, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Method[edit]

Hi, I'm just curious how you take these great photos? I was thinking about photographing my SNES Classic and NES Classic but don't know how you get all the lighting to be so perfect. DemonDays64 (talk) 22:07, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Original Barnstar
Thanks for your work! DJ Palyeado (talk) 13:51, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
File:Infant-Incubator-wBaby-1978-USA.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2A02:CE0:2801:465F:B1DA:2161:AB91:B83 23:01, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! White-Peaches-Bunch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Lmbuga 12:06, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grapefruit-Whole-&-Split.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 13:08, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lime-Whole-Split.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 13:08, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Red-Plums.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 17:40, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! McD-Saus-Egg-McMuffin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality, useful. --Nefronus 06:25, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! McD-Egg-McMuffin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality, useful. --Nefronus 06:25, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! McD-Apple-Pie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality, useful. --Nefronus 06:25, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! McDonald's Quarter Pounder with Cheese, United States.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality, useful. --Nefronus 06:25, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! McD-McRib.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality, useful. --Nefronus 06:25, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cereal-Fruity-Pebbles.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 03:49, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Near FP quality but certainly a useful VI. I'll try to remember to nominate it at COM:VIC, if there's no preexisting VI in scope. -- Ikan Kekek 20:39, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done. -- Ikan Kekek 20:46, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zero-Split.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:37, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Snickers-Egg-Split.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good quality. Possible FP? I'm not sure. -- Ikan Kekek 22:56, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Reeses-PB-Cups.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

KamranBhatti4013 (talk) 23:38, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Peppermint-Crisp-Close-Up.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nefronus 06:55, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Walnut-Whip-Split.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nefronus 06:55, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maltesers-Pile-and-Split.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nefronus 06:55, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Reeses-pieces-loose.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

KamranBhatti4013 (talk) 06:20, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion Disucssion[edit]

Make sure you put "delete" or "keep" when voting on a deletion discussion. Your response was simply a comment. Mr. C.C.Hey yo!I didn't do it! 00:59, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gigabyte GV-NX66T128VP.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 21:41, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Turtle-Beach-Sound-Card.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 21:41, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A790GXH-128M-Motherboard.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Johannes Robalotoff 18:36, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Audio-TRS-Mini-Plug.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK for me. --Johannes Robalotoff 18:31, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vga-cable.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:20, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Planters-Trail-Mix.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 20:10, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! CSA-Red-Spring-Onions.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 20:24, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Entenmann-Crumb-Donut.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:58, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sunmaid-Raisin-Pile.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. I love his photos of commercial food products. -- Ikan Kekek 20:10, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fried-Chicken-Set.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Cool and very good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 20:22, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dough-Donut-Toasted-Coconut.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Mmm. --Nefronus 20:42, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dough-Doughnut-Blood-Orange.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:27, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Raisin-Bran-Bowl.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 20:00, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Count-Chocula-Bowl.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nefronus 20:42, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Choc-Chip-Cookie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 14:24, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oatmeal-Cookie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 14:24, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lipton-mug-tea.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nefronus 20:37, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 6-Pack-Chicken-Eggs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 17:08, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pink-Frosted-Donut.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nefronus 20:26, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! CSA-Rhubarb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:17, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Asparagus-Bundle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:17, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nabisco-Oreo-Cakesters.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:05, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dunkin-Donuts-Chocolate-Sprinkled.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 08:17, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dunkin-Donuts-Vanilla-Sprinkled.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 08:17, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
All of your pictures are amazing, what a wonderful contribution to Wikipedia and the gaming community! XanUltra (talk) 02:29, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VTech-Socrates-Set-FL.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 10:55, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Atari-2600-Jr-Console-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 10:42, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sega-Genesis-Mk2-6button.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 10:42, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sega-Genesis-Mk2-Motherboard-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:13, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nintendo-Super-Game-Boy-JP-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:13, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SuperGrafx-Console-Set.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:59, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! NEC-PC-Engine-SuperGrafx-Console.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:59, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Milton-Bradley-Microvision-Handheld-FL.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:53, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Odyssey-300.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:53, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dough-Donut-Dulce-de-Leche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Xbox-360-Controller-Black.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Zinnmann 06:42, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Xbox-360-Wireless-Controller-White.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Zinnmann 06:42, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Xbox-Debug-Kit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Zinnmann 06:42, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Epoch-Game-Pocket-Computer-FR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 16:16, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sega-Saturn-Console-NA-Mk-I-FL.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

173.225.146.152 05:18, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

how much[edit]

How mush 197.185.103.0 21:31, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Joe[edit]

your images are great, I love the quality and the way they are photographed, hey, someday could you take images of Playstation 5 and Xbox Series X and S? 189.202.71.175 07:05, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

your photos are great[edit]

Could you take photos of the PlayStation 5 and Xbox Series X? 189.202.71.175 07:09, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Wii photos[edit]

Can you take a photo of the Wii Speak? Please ping me with your response, thanks Newfiebluejay (talk) 20:38, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RAW images/higher quality images[edit]

Hi Mr. Amos, your images are amazing! I was curious, do you offer camera RAWs or otherwise uncompressed versions of your images? They look spectacular already, but I understand the images need compression for normal viewing. I like collecting high-resolution images of many things and it would be so cool if you have them and could upload copies somewhere.

Best regards. --173.20.216.139 08:19, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Future image suggestions[edit]

Greetings Mr. Amos, I thought it would be really cool if you could happen to get ahold of a Roland MT-32 or Roland Sound Canvas and take photographs of them.

I know you lead a busy life, so I'm not expecting anything to come of this request, but if you happen to come across either of them I think it would be awesome to see pictures of them with your level of quality and detail. Some photographs of the internal PCBs as well would be a real treat! :-)

All the best. --173.20.216.139 12:11, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I also just thought about devices like the Palm Treo, PalmPilot (there are different revisions of this), Apple Newton and Apple QuickTake. Again, just giving some additional suggestions. :-)
Best regards. --173.20.216.139 12:29, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Commons as a multilingual project[edit]

Please see Commons:Localization. Why would you remove instances of {{En}}? How does this make this project better? Also, please see Commons:Overwriting_existing_files#Substantial_crop_or_un-crop; removing some blank whitespace around an object in a photo is preferable. —Justin (koavf)TCM 03:51, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh. I just left a message for Koavf before seeing this. Yes, {{En}} is good to keep in place, allowing for easy addition of other languages. No, it's not ok to edit war you're preferred version when the uploader undoes it. It's an easy solution, though: undo your edit warring and upload a separate version without whitespace under a different filename. — Rhododendrites talk00:51, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The "after" example you link to actually looks like my before photo File:Miyasaka_Hakuryu_II_-_Tigress_with_Two_Cubs_-_Walters_71909.jpg. There is noticeable spacing around the entire object. I have not found anywhere where extreme cropping has been show to be listed as preferable or accepted practice. And deleting the {{En}} was unintended, as I thought I was only removing the addition of the "opaque" listing on the image, which is unnecessary. I shoot on glass, so the area around the image is white. I'm not against the {{En}} tag or users adding helpful metadata to my uploads.Evan-Amos (talk) 05:34, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you would like, I can add a template like Template:NoUpdate to files you would like to remain as is? Mbrickn (talk) 02:21, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The file you uploaded, is on the main page!

The file File: Big Mac hamburger.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Xbox One[edit]

Hey I’ve noticed that you’ve uploaded some images for the Xbox systems. Could you upload one for the Xbox One X to make the info box complete?? Since the other two images are your work I wanted to ask you. 2601:84:847E:AB70:8C01:1D98:B1AA:1B84 14:39, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Evan-Amos I agree. There should be a consistent image depicting the Xbox One X model to follow the original and S models. Makes the article much more complete and accurate. Banan14kab (talk) 17:52, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Question about book site differences[edit]

Hi there, as an owner of the book i am very confused as to why theres stuff on the website thats not in the book and stuff in the book thats not on the website. ive really been wanting some digital versions of stuff in the book and was wondering if you could add them. StateraFurs (talk) 22:38, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you![edit]

Thanks for this wonderful gallery - great work!

Glamourqueen (talk) 10:29, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Evan-Amos[edit]

Evan-Amos 2 111.125.106.57 23:38, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Evan[edit]

Evan-Amos 3 111.125.106.57 04:22, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Evan-Amos 4-6[edit]

Evan-Amos 6-11 111.125.106.57 11:29, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Evan-Amos 12-50[edit]

Evan-Amos 50-160 111.125.106.57 11:30, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Xbox One S[edit]

Request for Xbox 1s Photos 111.125.106.57 11:32, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I’m Ready to get my Xbox One S! 111.125.106.57 09:27, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2DS XL image needed[edit]

Last week we are in the area of our 2DS XL Image! 111.125.106.57 11:19, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

3DS Logo Png Image Needed[edit]

File:Nintendo 3DS Logo.svg.png was my vector version now there goes! 111.125.106.57 11:57, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

3DS Image Needed[edit]

My 3DS Image! 111.125.106.57 12:00, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2DS image needed[edit]

2ds image! 111.125.106.57 12:01, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On my your iQue 3DS XL Image needed[edit]

On your iQue 3DS XL Image Now Goes! 111.125.106.57 12:03, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

you rpcl[edit]

love the photos man Ayyydoc (talk) 04:23, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

my rocks[edit]

My phone is working on rocks 124.107.207.34 12:18, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

your Image Consoles[edit]

Console Images PlayStation 4, Nintendo Switch, Wii, Wii U, PlayStation 2 and many more of them those are who’ve you to have to help you outside. 124.107.207.34 12:22, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How do you photograph things?[edit]

What equipment do you use? How do you get the background to be pure white? How do you light what you photograph? 70.190.149.220 01:53, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Original Barnstar
:) AOMAF2024 (talk) 16:33, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]