User talk:Emeldir

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Emeldir!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 00:04, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Emeldir. Magst du dort bezüglich der Korrektheit der Beschriftung Stellung nehmen? --Leyo 23:23, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Superseded Diethyl phthalate 200.svg[edit]

You have created a new version of the image: Diethyl phthalate 200.svg (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Diethyl_phthalate_200.svg). Why? That is not necessary at all. This is not a jpg-file but a svg-file. That meant that for one single addition to the code of the file, you have created an enitre new one. Uploading a new version of the file and changing the template from invalidSVG to validSVG would have done the trick. Now the old file is still mentioned on the page: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Invalid_SVG. Wereldburger758 (talk) 07:23, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Hallo Emeldir. Du bist eingeladen, selbst eine korrigierte Version direkt drüberzuladen. Ich hatte damals nur den SVG-Bug korrigiert. --Leyo 19:12, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK, meine Version gibt es bereits hier: File:Pentan-2-one 200.svgEmeldir (talk) 19:35, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Eine reine Skelettformel von 2-Pentanon sollte es dennoch auch geben. In vielen WP-Sprachversionen werden solche Strukturformeln bevorzugt. --Leyo 20:13, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ach so, jetzt verstehe ich, was du meinst. Ja, das könnte man in solchen Fällen gleich mit erledigen. – Emeldir (talk) 20:21, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Danke! --Leyo 22:50, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Zur freundlichen Beachtung. --Leyo 23:40, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:(E)-4-methylpent-2-ene.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Wereldburger758 (talk) 07:32, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Aromatic nomenclature[edit]

Hi Emeldir. Thank you for your work in improving and curating chemistry images. I noticed that you marked a few polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon images with a template indicating low quality because of the orientation. The quote from IUPAC that you supplied only refers to the way that the image should be oriented for the purpose of determining its preferred systematic name. It is not a recommendation that the image needs to be drawn that way all the time, so I have removed the template from those images. Regards, Ed (Edgar181) 21:19, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

redrawn svgs[edit]

Hello Emeldir, I noticed that you uploaded valid svgs that look exactly the same as the invalid ones under a different file name like in the case of Dec-1-ene ACS.svg. I don't quite understand why. I would understand if the structures looked differently but if they are the same you could just overwrite the existing one with a valid one and if needed move/rename the file. I think that would make things easier.

Cheers --Cwbm (commons) (talk) 09:49, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Propionamide.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leyo 07:15, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Hallo Emeldir. Ich hoffe, dieser DR auf fehlerhafte und verwaiste SVGs ist in deinem Sinne. --Leyo 20:20, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Alles gut. Danke für die Mühe! – Emeldir (talk) 20:47, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Mittels COM:VFC geht das ziemlich einfach. Deine ebenfalls fehlerhaften, aber nicht verwaisten SVGs habe ich ausgelassen. Hast du vor, diese auch zu ersetzen? --Leyo 23:33, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ja, ich beabsichtige die letzten verbliebenden Altlasten auch noch zu bereinigen. Dann sollte alles einheitlich aussehen. Da aber auch meine formal ungültigen SVG-Dateien richtig dargestellt werden, hatte ich es damit nicht übertrieben eilig. Der größte Teil meiner tatsächlich in Artikeln eingefügten Abbildungen sollte allerdings mittlerweile saniert sein. – Emeldir (talk) 11:05, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely Leyo 22:48, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And also:

Hallo Emeldir. Diese Strukturformeln sind gemäss eingebundener Vorlage invalid. Da sie in Verwendung sind, können sie nicht gelöscht werden. Magst du deren Einbindungen vielleicht gelegentlich durch Alternativgrafiken ersetzen? Leyo 23:00, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Darum werde ich mich bei Gelegenheit kümmern. Bei den Einbindungen könnte es sich allerdings auch um Diskussionsseiten handeln. – Emeldir (talk) 14:56, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ja, ich weiss. VFC unterscheidet dies leider nicht. Bei den Bildern, wo deine Vermutung zutrifft, kannst du ja DRs stellen. --Leyo 18:39, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
File:Benzoic peroxyanhydride 200.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DMacks (talk) 18:29, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Diethyl phthalate.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kopiersperre (talk) 13:23, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dimethyl dicarbonate.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leyo 00:31, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"combined and compressed" SVGs defeat the purpose...[edit]

Hi Emeldir,

Thanks for posting nice SVGs of some chemical compounds! Unfortunately the current versions of these two (and perhaps others):

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Methyl_2-hydroxybenzoate_200.svg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%28Z%29-hex-3-en-1-yl_acetate_200.svg

are not really "good" SVGs, they appear to be PNGs or some other non-vector format placed within an SVG, so one cannot for example ungroup the paths of the objects to edit the images, defeating the whole purpose of making SVGs in the first place. The original images you posted for each (the previous versions) are actual editable SVGs. Would you mind reverting them or just posting them separately?

Thanks! - Lakmiseiru (talk) 12:02, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Carbonotrithioic acid.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DMacks (talk) 05:54, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Triethylgallium.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leyo 12:31, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Methylcyclohexane ACS.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Alhadis (talk) 04:43, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]