This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Hello, wiki administrator
About the three photos
1. File:Best Footballer in Asia 2021 Son Heung-min.png
2. File:The Best Footballer in Asia 2016 Shinji Okazaki.jpg
3. File:Best Footballer in Asia 2022 Son Heung-min.jpg
Could you give me reasons how they violate copyright?
As the three are all our own works, they don't violate copyright at all.
I checked all past messages. The only accusation from the administrator is the about the photo 1. File:Best Footballer in Asia 2021 Son Heung-min.png
"This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Photo: Tottenham Hotspur
I have defended that the photo is our own work. John Macauly, the reporter of the National News who is our friend, used this photo with our approval. They don't have the copyright, which is owned by us.
About the photos
2. File:The Best Footballer in Asia 2016 Shinji Okazaki.jpg
3. File:Best Footballer in Asia 2022 Son Heung-min.jpg
You don't give any reasons of deletion.
As the first photo File:Best Footballer in Asia 2021 Son Heung-min.png, copyrights of the two photos 2. File:The Best Footballer in Asia 2016 Shinji Okazaki.jpg
3. File:Best Footballer in Asia 2022 Son Heung-min.jpg
are owned by us.
Please restore the three photos ASAP.
1. File:Best Footballer in Asia 2021 Son Heung-min.png
2. File:The Best Footballer in Asia 2016 Shinji Okazaki.jpg
3. File:Best Footballer in Asia 2022 Son Heung-min.jpg
If you have any other inquiry about the copyright of the three photos, please let us know.
"Even if you can license those images, as they have been previously published, permission via COM:VRT is required." - Could you please clarify it? Many thanks. I need guidance to have the three photos restored. Ujishadow (talk) 00:11, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
Images have been deleted without reason
Hello
All my images have been deleted due to copyright violation, as some were my own work and i published them with my colleague for Ethnic studies, exclusively for baloch and balochistan for example:
Handmade Balochi Shoe.jpg,
Irani girl playing Ghaychak.jpg,
Balochi-do chapi.png (case was in sweden)
Kuch-o-Baloch.jpg(my graphical work),
Chawat.jpg(was my work and my colleague for publishing an article in balochistan university),
لباس-بلوچی زنانه.png
ranian Actresi In Balochi Dress.jpg(my work for online magazine)
دانش آموزان بلوچ.jpg(my own work)
زن بلوچ.jpg(my own work)
لباس مردانه بلوچی.jpg(my own work).
Please be noticed, the photos mentioned above may be found in other sites especially in sites in field of ethnicity research but i was the publisher who first published them. It was my neglect to not take action for their copyright.
Best Regards. Balash-Vologases (talk) 15:25, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Daniel Woirin et Benoit Saint Denis à l'entraînement à Anglet.jpg
File:Daniel Woirin et Benoit Saint Denis au Venum Training Camp en 2019.jpg
File:Première victoire professionnelle de Benoît Saint Denis.jpg
File:L'équipe de Benoit Saint Denis à l'UFC Paris 2.jpg
File:Portrait de Daniel Woirin en 2023.jpg
This user has been identified on the french Wikipedia as Benoît Saint Denis' father. Can you explain to him how how he can authenticate that he is the author of the photos? It's important, he's one of the few people that can share quality images of Benoît Saint Denis under CC licenses.
Many thanks to El Comandante and Didym for your help. Indeed, as Saint Denis' father, I am happy to contribue to the illustration of Benoit Saint Denis and Daniel Woirin articles with my own pictures that I share under CC licences.
I acknowledge the copy right rules releasing only pictures that I took with the permission of the persons who are displayed on them.
Collecting images usually means you are not able to license them. Please have the actual photographers follow the process at COM:VRT. --Didym (talk) 20:10, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
What do you mean by "the actual photographers"? Vincent Saint Denis just told you he took these photos of his son himself. Why would it be necessary to prove it at COM:VRT if these pictures haven't been previously published? El Comandante (talk) 20:24, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
Good evening. I only uploaded this time the pictures that I took myself. In addition, I have sent a VRT request. I hope that everything will be ok now, best regards. Gowdu59 (talk) 21:09, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
Jack Kavanagh was my grandfather. This photo is from my family archive collection. Not sure why it was deleted as I cited my own collection of photographs. I don’t understand why the fact that Jack died in 1964 should cast any doubt as to the validity of the source. Gfinlay (talk) 07:57, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
You say that source of the photo is not my own work or that it is not as claimed. I’m not sure how you come to this conclusion just because my grandfather died in 1964. Gfinlay (talk) 08:01, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
You told us that you did take this photograph, which is actually impossible. It may be PD, but we can't tell if we don't know the photographer and date. Owning a copy usually does not mean you can license a photo. --Didym (talk) 15:06, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Auskunft zu Löschvorgängen
Hallo Didym, ich habe heute ein paar Bilddateien gesucht, die ich u.a. verteilt über mehrere Jahre auf Commons hochgeladen habe. Mir ist aufgefallen, das inzwischen einie ganze Serie Bilder aus dieser Zeit gelöscht wurden. Offenbar hat jemand zu meinem damaligen Benutzernamen fast gezielt Bildmotive beseitigen wollen. Die gleichen Bildmotive sind z.T. ersetzt d.h. von anderen Fotografen hochgeladen worden. Kannst Du mir helfen? Beste Grüße
Hast du ein Beispiel für eine gelöschte Datei? Üblicherweise sollte es da keinen Löschgrund geben, ohne weitere Angaben ist das aber schwer zu beurteilen. --Didym (talk) 16:23, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
Hallo Didym ich hatte über mehre Wochen einen Lehrgang im Nachbarkreis GTH. Es betrifft z.B. den Motivsatz im Verzeichnis Schlosshof (Gotha). Ich habe bei meinen Bildern als Merkmal immer auch das Autokennzeichen des jeweiligen Kreises mit im Dateinamen vermerkt also hier GTH. Einige Benutzer aus Thr. haben damals Bots gesetzt, um meine Uploads auf ihre Webverzeichnisse wochenweise abzuspeichern. Ich habe nat. auch die Originale der jeweiligen Serie fast immer zeitnah zum Uploaddatum noch auf HDD vorliegen. Im Prinzip sind die gelöschten Bilder meist Motive - die jetzt durch spezialisierte "Architekturfotografen" als Serie dort neu eingestellt wurden. Da sind sicher auch von anderen Uploadern Bilder verschwunden, z.B. wenn da Touris/Leute drauf waren. Offenbar sollen da nur sterile Architekturfotos enthaltensein? Ich könnte das auch zeitlich eingrenzen - weil der Lehrgang ja nur 5 Wochen war ich ergo speziell in dieser Zeit Bilder erstellt und hochgeladen habe. Diverse "unwichtige" Motive - z.B. Gedenktafeln und Örtlichkeiten am Stadtrand sind vollständig erhalten. Afgefallen ist es mir - im Schlosshof gibt es eine Serie von Wappensteinen - ich hatte damals die Bilder "mühsam inForm getrimmt" - die Doku dazu lag mit einem Handzettel aus der Shloss-Info vor. Der jetzige Set enthält ebenfalls alle Wappen aber eben neu fotografiert. Und der Schlosshof ist fast nur mit Panoramafotos präsent, früher waren da auch Fotos von Schlossfesten ... Entweder wurden die Angaben bei den Bildkategorien der Fotos bearbeitet - teilweise ausgetauscht oder entfernt - das wäre die Motivlöschung in der Light-Version, ggf. ist auch das Bild gänzlich gelöscht. EACC80 (talk) 16:56, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
Ein gelöschtes oder aus der Kategorie entferntes Bild ist auf diese Weise unmöglich zu finden. Mit dem Benutzernamen könnte man im Datei-Log oder den gelöschten Beiträgen zum betreffenden Zeitpunkt nachschauen, sonst hilft nur ein konkreter Dateiname. --Didym (talk) 20:24, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
Why have you removed photos from my updates to criminologists?
I have uploaded photos of various scholars to go on their pages. A number of these photos are MY OWN photos that I took (for example, Richard T Wright). A few others others are fair use photos. I am updating their profiles on Wikipedia as part of a larger effort to keep them from going out of date. Crivot (talk) 23:14, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
I saw you tagged all the photos I had recently uploaded. These photos have been uploaded to the public domain as per the metadata on the image uploads. This is indicated in the URL Source of the files. This is all I can prove on my end. You say 'but there is no proof that the author agreed to license the file under the given license.' - The author of the photo added this proof in the metadata of these images. ArleneHerman (talk) 22:19, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Structured data will show this. I can only see this with viewing the photos you have tagged in Photoshop. The images there say 'Public Domain' by the NZ Herald. On 'https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Dom_Harvey_New_Zealand.jpg' it always shows that it's pulled this through on the Structured data info. This information works if you can view the IPTC data. These show three options 'Unknown' 'Copyrighted' and 'Public Domain'. All these photos which I have included the source JPG url all have indicated 'Public Domain'. Thanks :) --ArleneHerman (talk) 22:40, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
If you can only see this in Photoshop, it's probably not reliable copyright information, maybe even a bug in Photoshop. --Didym (talk) 15:29, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
No worries. It's no bug but maybe it just doesn't show on commons. Shows on all the structured data (IPTC) data. This isn't all displayed on Wiki commons. Thank you for letting me know. ArleneHerman (talk) 19:07, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
(talk page stalker) I have seen the “Copyright status” field among the “extended details” in Commons’ display of metadata on other file pages. Perhaps the PD setting (which did indeed appear in the file when I downloaded it) gets suppressed when the “Copyright holder” field is filled in.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 20:52, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
I think you're right. Makes sense to then remove these images. Sorry for the inconvenience caused. I saw 'Public Domain' on my end so that is why I uploaded these images. Thank you for letting me know though and thank you @Didym for sorting for me too. ArleneHerman (talk) 21:15, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Demande d'equité pour tous les contributeurs
Salut svp. Les droit d'auteurs sont universelle. Et si vous l'appliquer pour tous ce serais bien pour la communauté. L'audio chendaleman by shagil kannur est maintenu alors que tous les œuvres sont sous droit d'auteurs. Il a gagné le prix bien sûr cependant le rythme et song n'est pas à lui et cela appartient a groupe folklorique qui joue ce rythme. Donc il a automatiquement reproduit cette oeuvre sur wikimedia qui protège les droits d'auteurs.
J'aimerais simplement que vous soyez juste envers tous les contributeurs. Merci komavo, 25 février 2024 8h14min (UTC).
Le droit d’auteur est généralement indépendant de tout cas d’utilisation potentiel et les enregistrements d'audio sont presque toujours protégés par défaut. --Didym (talk) 09:09, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
About the file: Perrieritece Dellen AR 3mmhigh.webp
It seems you are right. Maybe someone should tell that guy it's not a great idea to put All rights reserved on a page when the actual license is CC-BY-4.0. --Didym (talk) 00:20, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
pictures copyright - philippe chéreau page
Dear Didym, I would like to discuss about the files you deleted regarding the wiki page I am preparing for Philippe Chéreau. All concerned pictures have been courtesy given or are coming from my side.
So , I don't understand why you did this deletion and why you blocked my account for a week..
Then, could you explain me the best way to do to be eligible when it comes to upload such pictures please ?
I would like to upload additional pictures to enrich this wiki page and I would like to publish this page next.
Thank You, Best Regards.
Tili0408 Tili0408 (talk) 10:05, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
The artist posed together with own works. Obviously he gave me the permission to take a photo of himself and of his own artworks. If the artworks were from another artist, I understand the problem of DW, but in this case the artworks are works of the artist on the photo. --Sultan Edijingo (talk) 08:03, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
There is a difference between permission to take a photo and permission to publish it under a free license. --Didym (talk) 15:47, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
But what do you ask especially? I told them, that I will publish the photo on wikipedia under free license and they agreed, otherwise I hadn't taken the photo.--Sultan Edijingo (talk) 18:03, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for your message on my talk page concerning the file Birgitte Anker.jpg. Here is a link to Statistics Denmark's website explaining its free use, but I do not know where I should provide the link:
If it's not obvious from the source, you can use the permission field in the information template to provide the link as I did here. --Didym (talk) 15:13, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
File:Stojanka Radenović Petković.jpg
Hello! Why did you remove the photo that I posted again? I found out who its author is and posted the Permission pending tag until the author sends a permission email to OTRS volunteers. Please, therefore, undelete this photo. WikiDiaspora (talk) 21:09, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
All deleted. But there is no need to contact an administrator for requesting deletion of copyright violations, just use speedy deletion requests instead. --Didym (talk) 19:15, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Das sind zumindest zum größten Teil andere Dateien, wenn auch teilweise dieselben Bilder in höherer Auflösung. --Didym (talk) 22:38, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Danke fürs Nachsehen! Die Auflösung allerdings würde doch an der Urheberrechtssituation nichts ändern, oder?
Übrigens habe ich zwischenzeitlich gesehen, dass die Nutzerin auch auf ihrer deWP-Disk. erklärt bekommen hat, dass die Freigabe durch ihre Mutter nicht ausreicht, wenn der/die Fotograf(in) eine andere Person ist. Mal sehen, ob da was kommt. --2003:C0:8F14:5900:4C91:78ED:567A:A78006:23, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Unmittelbar ändern würde die Auflösung nichts, bei höherer Auflösung ist allerdings der Eingang einer passenden Freigabe grundsätzlich wahrscheinlicher. Ohne die beiden Freigaben bringt das aber natürlich noch nichts. --Didym (talk) 19:22, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
wo war das Problem bei diesem Bild? Das Bild wurde 2014 von user:Igor2 unter CC 4.0 hochgeladen und erweckte bei mir nicht den Eindruck, das er dieses nicht selbst aufgenommen haben könnte? Elmepi (talk) 01:31, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Nicht ganz, die andere Datei hat das gleiche Problem. Da kommt sogar noch der Hintergrund der Verpackung dazu. --Didym (talk) 18:16, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
wo war das Problem an diesem Bild? Ich habe dieses wie viele andere Bild von der Sparkfun-Webseite in die Commons übertragen. Hier geht aus der Quelle sicherlich nicht sofort und zu einhundert Prozent die Lizenz hervor. Ich weiß auch nicht mehr genau, was für eine Quelle ich angab, aber das Bild findet sich auf jeden fall auf https://learn.sparkfun.com/tutorials/light/. Dieses Tutorial ist unter CC 4.0. Zu den dort verwendeten Bilder wird dort keine expliziete Aussage getroffen. Unter https://www.sparkfun.com/brand_assets wird jedoch dargestellt, dass alle Bilder unter CC stehen und auch auf den Flickr-Account hingewiesen, der ebenfalls alle Bilder unter CC 2.0 enthällt. Elmepi (talk) 01:51, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
