User talk:Didym/Archives/2022

How we will see unregistered users

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:11, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Clarification on your Comment on Poster Image upload

Hi! You left me a note that the permissions for the movie poster I uploaded (File:The Take Out Move - Movie Poster (Trees).jpg) were not done properly. I'm quite new to Wikipedia editing, so I want to make sure I'm doing everything right.

Question - The creator of the poster wants it uploaded so it can be used on the Wikipedia page for the film, but they don't want to make it available for everyone to use however they want (including commercial use, etc) under Creative Commons, since it's a copyrighted movie poster made for a specific movie.

I just looked, and the poster for the first Harry Potter film is shown on that movie's wikipedia page. But there's no way Warner Brothers would just allow their poster of one of their most valuable properties to suddenly be available for everyone in the world to use commercially under Creative Commons. In fact, I saw that at the bottom of the image page it says "This is a poster for Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone. The poster art copyright is believed to belong to the distributor of the film, the publisher, Warner Bros., or the graphic artist."

How can I help upload this Take Out Move poster so that it can be used on that film's Wikipedia page, but not so that the copyrighted poster is suddenly released to the world under Creative Commons?

Thanks!

WarrenGOut — Preceding unsigned comment added by WarrenGOut (talk • contribs) 05:24, 15 January 2022‎ (UTC)

Just read COM:L. You can only upload content that is freely licensed or in the public domain. Fair use media files are explicitly not allowed on Wikimedia Commons. --Didym (talk) 13:04, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Ok thanks. So how do big movies like HARRY POTTER or JAMES BOND have their movie posters on Wikipedia if the comments (as I copied above) state that the poster is copyrighted -- and there's no way that the poster for a Harry Potter movie would actually be considered freely licensed to the public? Is someone just uploading the image and saying it's freely licensed (even though that's probably not legally the case in the eyes of Warner Brothers who owns the films)? WarrenGOut (talk) 04:57, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Some projects might have different policies for local uploads, but there is no way of having such files on Commons. --Didym (talk) 20:13, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Ok, thanks. So by "local uploads" does that mean you can upload an image file to be used on one wikipedia page without uploading it to commons? That would be ideal. They only want the film's poster used on the film's page, they don't really want it in Commons -- but they though you have to upload it to commons in order to be able to use it on a wikipedia page. Is there a way to use it on just the wikipedia page, without Commons?. WarrenGOut (talk) 20:19, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

On most wikipedias, you can upload files locally, subject to local policies. --Didym (talk) 22:51, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

That's good to know. I just tried to fined the procedure to upload locally, but I've had no luck. Is there a link you can share that provides that info (as opposed to uploading to Commons)? Thanks! WarrenGOut (talk) 00:39, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

On which of the 314 wikipedias are you planning to upload? En? Then you can try the local upload wizard. --Didym (talk) 20:38, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Please delete

Hello, could you please delete File:Morgan McGarvey.png, File:Sen. Morgan McGarvey.png, File:Morgan's Family.jpg, File:Morgan McGarvey and Family.jpg, and File:Attica Scott.jpg? They have been tagged as "no permission" for longer than a week. BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 23:46, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

There is a huge backlog at the moment regarding no permission files, reaching back to November. I will try to reduce this backlog, but this might take some time. --Didym (talk) 20:40, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Content about personal picture Vicente Torregrosa

Hi, I don't understand why have you eliminate te Vicente Torregrosa picture, so it's a family original picture, so you (I don't know who you're, but I'm sure you haven't any wright, so I'm going to move it again, thanks to not to take it off. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jtorregr (talk • contribs) 13:16, 19 January 2022‎‎ (UTC)

Which file are you referring to? By the way: you can't just reupload files, use COM:UDR instead. --Didym (talk) 19:06, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Content about personal picture Melania Dalla Costa

Hi, I don't understand why you deleted Melania Dalla Costa's photo. I took that photo, it's not copyright violation. I talked to Melania Dalla Costa and she told me that I can use the photo! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vind Grizzly (talk • contribs) 17:06, 26 January 2022‎ (UTC)

Then please explain why the photo is also available here. --Didym (talk) 17:12, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Because it is copyright free.

Stop removing the photo! Vind Grizzly (talk) 17:19, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

What makes you think this is a free image? Please read COM:L and COM:VRT before complaining. --Didym (talk) 17:25, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Question about an image deletion request

Hi @Didym: Just wondering, why was this image (File:Mike paul.jpg) nominated for deletion by you? The uploader and the author seem to be same person. Satdeep Gill (talk) 07:18, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

After having a closer look at File:Promo Mike Paul Catherine Deslauriers.jpg, I just tagged both uploads of this user, even if this could be own work. --Didym (talk) 20:04, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

@Didym. Thanks for the clarification. Satdeep Gill (talk) 06:19, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

WLM 2021 Slovenia deletions

Hi. Yesterday, you deleted about 50 contributions to the Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 in Slovenia that I uploaded as donations from third parties, as "no permission". I wasn't aware of any problems with permissions having received no notification, could you please undelete a random one (say, commons:File:SG CERKEV sv.Elizabeta DJI 0917.jpg) temporarily for me to check the description page? — Yerpo ^Eh? 13:03, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

You have uploaded those files with OTRS pending, so there was no extra notification. I did check the VRTS, but was unable to find any permission. Do you still need one of the files temporarily undeleted? --Didym (talk) 17:03, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

I'll check my notes. — Yerpo ^Eh? 19:16, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

File:Napoleon Star, 2021.jpg

Hi, you recently deleted File:Napoleon Star, 2021.jpg. It had been restored before based on ticket:2021092110007157 by King of Hearts. Did you have a new (and stronger) reason to delete it? In any case, a regular deletion request might be a better course of action than speedy deletion given the file's history. whym (talk) 12:36, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

King of Hearts did tag this image with Permission received (not PermissionTicket), but the ticket never contained a valid permission, which means the file was eligible for speedy deletion after 30 days. I actually do not see any reason for a standard deletion request instead of speedy deletion. --Didym (talk) 15:49, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

I think I mistook different ticket numbers while I was looking around related tickets involving the same person/the same group of people (in particular [1], if you are interested), sorry. Please forget what I said. whym (talk) 03:34, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2022 - Deutschland

Hallo Didym,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. Mai bis zum 31. Mai 2022 findet zum zehnten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth statt. Deutschland ist bereits zum neunten Mal dabei. Dabei können unter anderem Nationalparks, Naturschutzgebiete, Geotope und Naturdenkmäler fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich ein, auch dieses Jahr wieder mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

• Sieger WLE 2021 – Landschaft
• 
  Halde Jägersfreude
• 
  Naturschutzgebiet Wacholderhänge bei Wallersberg
• 
  Landschaftsschutzgebiet Heseler Wald und Umgebung

• Sieger WLE 2021 – Detail
• 
  Schneebedeckte Pappel-Schüpplinge im FFH-Gebiet Regnitz, Stocksee und Sandgebiete von Neuses bis Hallstadt
• 
  Blüten des Gamander-Ehrenpreis im Naturpark Taunus
• 
  Striegeliger Schichtpilz im Bruderwald in Bamberg

Seit dem vergangenen Jahr ist der Wettbewerb zweigeteilt, das heißt wir unterscheiden zwischen den beiden Bereichen Landschaft und Detail/Makro. Zu Landschaft zählen auch geschützte Einzelbäume. Im Bereich Detail/Makro werden Pflanzen, Tiere und Pilze bewertet.

Es sind wie immer viele spannende Motive überall in Deutschland zu finden. Neben Naturdenkmälern wie alten Bäumen oder Naturparks im Gebirge und am Meer können Geotope wie Findlinge, Quellen und Aufschlüsse oder FFH-Gebiete fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. Auch im vergangenen Jahr sind zahlreiche neue Listen und Artikel in diesen Bereichen entstanden, für die wir uns über Fotos freuen - zum Beispiel in Bayern Liste der Naturdenkmäler im Landkreis Würzburg oder in Sachsen Liste der Naturdenkmale in Stollberg/Erzgeb.

Als Einstieg für die Suche nach Motiven hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du bei WLE 2022 – Deutschland und unter dieser Anleitung.

In diesem Jahr feiert die FFH-Richtlinie ihren 30. Geburtstag. Aus diesem Grund vergeben wir fünf Sonderpreise für die Fotografen, die die meisten FFH-Gebiete fotografieren.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, vom 1. Mai bis 30. Juni 2022 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Damit bewertest du die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelst so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Juli tagen wird, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Earth 2022 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist bald hier freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z ^thomas 12:00, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

Using my photos on page without credit

Hi Didym, I noticed that almost all (6) of my photo contributions to the Commons were also being used by you. When I looked to see how they were being incorporated into your Commons page, I saw that they were being grouped into dated lists under the—insinuating—title of Mobile Upload, mixed in with your own work, uncredited... All my licenses require that the files be credited to me upon use. I'm asking you to please either credit me for these files or remove them. Here is a list of the pages that have my (uncredited) photos and said file URLs. Thank you.

Your August 15, 2021 Mobile Upload page (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Didym/Mobile_upload/2021_August_13-16#15_August_2021) — My files here (3 total): 1. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:The_Breakfast_Room_at_Biltmore_House,_Asheville,_North_Carolina.jpg, 2. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Dumbwaiter_at_Biltmore_House,_Asheville,_North_Carolina.jpg, 3. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:The_Kitchen_at_Biltmore_House_in_Asheville,_North_Carolina.jpg.

Your August 18, 2021 Mobile Upload page (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Didym/Mobile_upload/2021_August_17-21#18_August_2021) — My files here (2 total): 1. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:The_Banquet_Hall_at_Biltmore_House_in_Asheville,_North_Carolina.jpg, 2. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Panoramic_of_Edith_Vanderbilt%27s_Room_at_Biltmore_House,_Asheville,_North_Carolina.jpg.

Your August 19, 2021 Mobile Upload page (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Didym/Mobile_upload/2021_August_17-21#19_August_2021) — My files here (1 total): 1. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Looking_up_through_the_chandeliers_and_spiral_of_the_Grand_Staircase_at_Biltmore_House,_Asheville,_North_Carolina.jpg. ·• Comtesse d'Autodidactica ^(talk) 09:38, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Of course, unless there is a sanctioned purpose for these lists that isn't properly explained on the Commons? I tried to find out what this use could maybe legitimately be before posting to your Talk page, but couldn't find anything. Like, is this a way of bookmarking that I've not heard about? Thanks. ·• Comtesse d'Autodidactica ^(talk) 09:55, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Those lists are created by bot to include all new files in Category:Mobile upload and subcategories. Starting in 2014, when the amount of copyright violations and spam was even higher than today, these were meant as a tool to help detecting images that need deletion (which does not mean that the files still on these page have any issues). Your files are attributed as on any page on any wikipedia, the image links to the file page with all information. --Didym (talk) 10:22, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Restore deleted files

Is there any chance you can restore these files

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Frederic.wang

It would be highly important for an ongoing research project to find a way to access a copy of those files.--Physikerwelt (talk) 07:56, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Ohne Quellen wird das mit dem Wiederherstellen schwierig. Falls es dir ausreichen sollte, die Dateien nur sehen zu können, könnte ich dir diese auch per Mail zuschicken. --Didym (talk) 12:54, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Reason for deletion of File:Eli-Clare-publicity.jpg

Hello! I saw that you deleted File:Eli-Clare-publicity.jpg in October 2021. It's not clear to me why the file was deleted. Would you be able to explain why this image is not able to be used? Thank you!

LemonOrangeLime (talk) 03:14, 7 June 2022 (UTC)LemonOrangeLime

This file was uploaded as own work, but probably was taken from somewhere else. The uploader was told to provide evidence of permission to use the file, but failed to do so. --Didym (talk) 13:23, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Template:Francisco Peralta Torrejón u.a.

Hallo, kannst du bitte das doppelte "and" (and and volunteer response team members only), das der Bot da eingesetzt hat, aus dieser Vorlage und aus Template:Haifisch64 sowie Template:Lygia Simetzberger entfernen? Danke. --Magnus (talk) 06:17, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Alle erledigt. --Didym (talk) 14:07, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Sound Logo

Hello,

I am messaging you because a contest for a sound logo for Wikimedia is being developed and your opinion as a Wikimedia Commons admin is appreciated. My team would like to know if it is possible for the top finalist sound logos in the contest to have attribution temporarily hidden from public view until all the votes are final? The idea is to let the public judge the sound logo contestants based on the merit of the logo, not the person or people who made it. Again, any feedback is appreciated.

Thank you,

VGrigas (WMF) (talk) 17:33, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

Multimax (71) Packung

Hallo Didym, du hast ein No-permission-Bapperl auf File:Multimax (71) Packung cropped.jpg geklebt. Ich gehe davon aus, dass dir das Bild auf der Hauptseite aufgefallen ist. Wie du gesehen hast, habe ich das Bild nicht originär hochgeladen, sondern nur als nachbearbeiteter Ausschnitt von File:Multimax (71).jpg. Ich nehme mal an, es geht dir um die Rechte am Bild der Packung selbst, denn das Foto selbst ist lizenziert. Deine Aufforderung, nun eine "Permission" von einem Autor einzuholen, geht an der Sache vorbei.

1. Laufende Übung: Das Bild ist ein Foto einer Packung eines Konsumproduktes, wie man es zu tausenden auf Commons findet. Andernfalls müsste man so ziemlich alles unter Category:Coca-Cola cans löschen, oder ist der gestaltete Coca-Cola-Schriftzug gemeinfrei? Gleiches gilt für Abbildungen von tausenden anderen Konsumprodukten auf Commons.
2. Die Vorderseite der Packung der Multimax besitzt keine Schöpfungshöhe, die einfache blaue Farbe und der Schriftzug ganz sicher nicht. Das Bild ist keine künstlerische Darstellung, sondern ein Schema, eine stark vereinfachte technische Darstellung. Zwar sind grundsätzlich nach § 2 Abs. 1 Nr. 7 UrhG auch technische und wissenschaftliche Zeichnungen geschützt. Das bezieht sich nicht auf den Inhalt der Darstellung, nur auf die Art und Weise der Darstellung. Diese Darstellung ist vorliegend aber so simpel (eine Perspektive, Draufsicht, Shading), dass keine Schöpfungshöhe vorliegt - wenn, dann nur für die Form der Bohrmaschine selbst, und die Rechte daran würden bei Wolfgang Dyroff liegen, nicht beim unbekannten Gebrauchsgrafiker von 1965. Dann dürfte man das Objekt aber gar nicht ohne Erlaubnis abbilden, was nicht der laufenden Rechtsprechung entspricht. (Im Gegensatz zu Architektur mit künstlerischem Anspruch.)
3. Es entstehen also durch die Art der Darstellung keine neuen Rechte, im Gegensatz zur BGH-Entscheidung vom 20.12.2018 (Az. I ZR 104/17) liegt kein schützenswertes Kunstwerk vor.

Ich bitte dich, die No-permission-Bapperl zu entfernen. --Minderbinder (talk) 08:06, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

Hier wird definitiv Schöpfungshöhe erreicht, es bleibt also nur eine Freigabe oder Löschung. Tatsächlich gibt es auf Commons größere Mengen Abbildungen von bedruckten Verpackungen, die dazugehörigen Löschanträge aus gutem Grund aber auch. --Didym (talk) 11:42, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

Ich halte deine Meinung in diesem konkreten Fall für nicht sachgerecht. Ich bin Admin auf de:WP, auf Commons kenne ich mich mit diesen Prozessen kaum aus. Ich kann mir aber nicht vorstellen, dass hier ein Benutzer ganz allein entscheidet. Wo wird also eine entsprechende Diskussion geführt? --Minderbinder (talk) 07:10, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Natürlich gibt es noch die Möglichkeit, das ganze in einen regulären Löschantrag umzuwandeln, was du ja bereits getan hast. Am Ergebnis wird das aber auch nichts ändern. Vor einigen Jahren wäre die Abbildung auf de wahrscheinlich so sogar noch akzeptiert worden, aber auch da hat sich die Auffassung mittlerweile geändert. --Didym (talk) 16:29, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

TORPOR jpeg

Thank you for your feedback regarding the picture I uploaded of the band TORPOR. I wish to upload a picture of the band and have permission to do so however I am new to Wikipedia editing. Could you give me some advice on how to go about adding an image appropriately to the page I am creating?

Many thanks in advance. Inanimate man (talk) 22:32, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

COM:VRT should contain every information you need. --Didym (talk) 17:29, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

Liván artist article

May I kindly ask for the reason why the photo from Livan Artista article was deleted. Photo name: Livan_płyta_01248_(1).jpg Inelita (talk) 12:18, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

More than a month ago, you have received a notification that included information how to prevent deletion. --Didym (talk) 15:11, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2022

Hallo Didym,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2022 findet zum zwölften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments (WLM) statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Sieger 2021 – Schloss Langenburg

Vergangenes Jahr hat Matthias Süßen mit einer Drohnenaufnahme von Schloss Langenburg im Morgennebel gewonnen. Welcher Fotograf wird dieses Jahr sein Nachfolger?

Nach WLM 2022 sind wieder zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden – zum Beispiel die Denkmallisten in Cloppenburg oder in Oldenburg.

Wir haben dieses Jahr unter dem Motto „Klein aber Oho“ drei Sonderpreise für Kleindenkmale ausgelobt. Damit sollen Fotos prämiert werden, die die unterschätzten Kleindenkmale wie Grenzsteine oder Bildstöcke zeigen.

Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Anfang September 2022 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2022 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z ^thomas 06:08, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Widerherstellung eines Bildes

Hallo Didym,
Diese Datei wurde offensichtlich nur deswegen gelöscht, weil ich mich bei der Angabe der Lizenz vertippte und CC-by-nd-3.0 statt CC-by-sa-3.0 angab und dann war ich einige Wochen praktisch nicht aktiv. File:Nikodemeskirche mit dem Kirchhofstor (2008).jpg. Diese Datei war jedenfalls frei. Falls du doch eine andere Unstimmigkeit entdecken solltest, was ich nicht hoffe, dann kopiere mir bitte die vollständige Beschreibung, damit ich nachvollziehen kann, was los ist. Danke Mewa767 (talk) 13:37, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Woher hast du denn die Informationen zur Lizenz? Die Quelle (archivierte Version) nennt auch ND. --Didym (talk) 18:18, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Dann habe ich mich vertan. Ich weiß nicht, wie das möglich war. Jedenfalls vielen Dank für das Nachschlagen. --Mewa767 (talk) 21:31, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

User:Yadhu Krishna BP

Dear Administrators:Didym

I want to know from You that if an image uploaded by me is nominated for deletion by some other User, what should I do next in order to delete that upload. 2409:4050:2E4D:C046:0:0:289:EC06 05:02, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

As only administrators can delete files, there is nothing you can do. --Didym (talk) 17:24, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

File:Braschosser Straße 53.jpg

File:Braschosser Straße 53.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

87.156.211.25 11:55, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/Blocks_and_protections/Archive_33#User:Falk2

Hallo Didym, könntest Du den Benutzer mal testweise entsperren? Irgendwie kümmert sich da einfach kein anderer Admin drum ... Gruß Brackenheim (talk) 15:09, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Ohne eine weitere Adminmeinung würde ich nur ungern entsperren, immerhin waren an der Sperrung damals auch mehrere Admins beteiligt. --Didym (talk) 18:30, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

Ok, stimmt, kann ich vollstens verstehen. Aber "die anderen" scheinen die Anfrage wohl zu ignorieren, sonst wäre sie ja nicht unbearbeitet archiviert worden. Naja, versuche ich mal, noch nen Admin zu finden ;-) Brackenheim (talk) 18:53, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

Sonst könnte man natürlich auch die Anfrage wieder aus dem Archiv holen und so lange mit gelegentlichen Kommentaren vor Archivierung schützen, bis sie bearbeitet wird. --Didym (talk) 19:28, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

Oder, wie bereits geschehen, einfach im Archiv weiterdiskutieren ... :-) Brackenheim (talk) 09:04, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Habe inzwischen die offizielle Vorlage gefunden. Nur zur Info: User talk:Falk2#Antrag auf Entsperrung. Mal schauen, was draus wird. Liebe Grüße Brackenheim (talk) 14:50, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

Irgendwie tut sich da gar nichts. Mal gespannt ob sich durch meinen Kommentar was ändert, sonst ist das Problem morgen auch gelöst. --Didym (talk) 17:42, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

Danke Dir! Commons ist manchmal echt verwunderlich :-) Brackenheim (talk) 18:23, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

WikiCon 2022 Banner

Hallo, weißt du, wer das Banner mittig in diesem Foto entworfen hat (und unter welcher Lizenz es steht)? Bevor ich anfange WikiCon Fotos hochzuladen möchte ich das lieber geklärt haben. Ralf hat ja schon wieder angefangen alles mögliche hochzuladen File:22 10 06 Stralsund DSCF2369.jpg ist bestimmt nicht von der Panoramafreiheit gedeckt. 🙈 Solche Frustrationen ohne Quellen/-Künstler/-Freigabeangaben erspare ich mir gern. Rillke^(q?) 20:36, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

Brücke, Rathaus und Ozeaneum habe ich aus eigenen Fotos gebaut, ich sehe darin aber keine SH. Ralf Roletschek 08:45, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Die Banner/Plakate sollen demnächst auch auf Commons hochgeladen werden, die Freigabe ist also kein Problem. --Didym (talk) 17:32, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

File:Der neueste E-Citaro der Stadtwerke Trier.jpg - no permission?

Hi, ich verstehe den Baustein bzw. SLA nicht. "SubDistricted" gibt als Quelle eigenes Werk an. P170 (talk) 09:23, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Die Angaben in den Exif-Daten sind eigentlich schon ausreichend, um das anzuzweifeln. Spätestens damit ist aber eine Freigabe erforderlich. --Didym (talk) 12:07, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Die höhere Auflösung spricht für ihn, exif-Daten sehe ich beim Foto auf der Webseite auch nicht. Gibt es denn in diesem Fall kein "schonenderes" Verfahren? P170 (talk) 14:06, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Das ist doch schon das schonendste Verfahren. Ein regulärer Löschantrag wäre auch nicht besser, und die Alternative wäre eine Löschung ohne Vorwarnung. --Didym (talk) 14:28, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

File:Farah Deen.jpg

Sorry, was fehlt dir, wenn es ein eigenes Werk ist, noch? Es sei denn du findest irfgendwo eine Copyvio. lg 13:00, 21 October 2022 (UTC) -- K@rl (talk) Diskussion 13:00, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

Glaubst du diesen Angaben wirklich noch? Das wäre eigentlich sogar ein Grund für eine Löschung ohne Vorwarnung, gerade mit der Angabe eigenes Werk. --Didym (talk) 13:36, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

Dann gib eine URV dazu, so ist das nix, denn da kennt sich ein Neuling schon gar nicht aus. Das eigene werk kann ja stimmen, denn dort sind keine Fotografen angegeben. ---- K@rl (talk) Diskussion 15:28, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

Ismail Erez Photo Copyright

Ismail Erez's photo has been marked as a possible copyright violation and that's pointless. Because that image is re-colorized by me and cannot be copyrighted! Against Dictator (talk) 11:32, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

When you colorize an image, you automatically own the copyright for the original as well? That's not how copyright works. --Didym (talk) 11:38, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:2011-01-30 Schulranzen Wolf.jpg

Good morning. Thanks for deleting the image. But I can still call it up and look at it. There must have been a mistake? Lukas Beck (talk) 06:53, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

Das übliche Problem: Gelegentlich versagt das Gadget für die Abarbeitung von Löschanträgen ohne Fehlermeldung. Jetzt ist die Datei aber wirklich gelöscht. --Didym (talk) 09:12, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

Wrong action

Hello, I have a problem because I have the rights on this photo, of the person concerned by the wiki itself. BlendKreative (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

Please see COM:CB#Internet_images and COM:VRT. --Didym (talk) 23:25, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

File:2018 - Porträt Günther Huber.png

...und weitere. Hallo Didym, ich habe die Nutzungsrechte angegeben und das schon vor fast einem Jahr. Weshalb jetzt der Löschantrag? Beste Grüße Erika39 (talk) 12:50, 24 November 2022 (UTC) Erika39 (talk) 12:50, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

Wo soll da eine gültige Freigabe sein? Ticket:2021120110011889 wurde vor einem Jahr als nicht ausreichend abgelehnt. Nebenbei: das erneute Hochladen von gelöschten Dateien ist nicht nur ein Löschgrund, sondern auch ein Sperrgrund. --Didym (talk) 13:04, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

Mir ist nicht klar was hier noch gefordert wird. Herr Huber hat vor knapp einem Jahr dem Permissionteam, zu Handen Herrn Seybold, per Mail mitgeteilt das er der Eigentümer der Bilder ist. Sie zeigen ihn selbst, seine verstorbene Frau und seinen Vater. Ich habe sie für ihn nur hochgeladen. Was mehr soll er den noch tun? Erika39 (talk) 13:18, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

Die Ablehnung betraf Folder und PR-Texte und hatte mit den Bilder nichts zu tun. Erika39 (talk) 13:20, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

Die komplette Freigabe wurde abgelehnt, nicht nur Teile. Zu tun ist da gar nichts mehr, ohne gültige Freigabe gibt es keine Möglichkeit die Bilder zu behalten. --Didym (talk) 13:31, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

ist das nicht ein bisschen selbstherrlich vom Permissonteam? Da liegt eine Bestätigung des Eigentümers der Bilder vor und die Freigabe wird verweigert? Erika39 (talk) 14:14, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

Herr Huber möchte die Bilder in den Atikeln ja gerne behalten. Es müss ja möglich sein, wenn Urheber- und Nutzungsrechte geklärt sind und er das auch bestätigt. Ganz nachvollziehen kann ich das nicht. Soll er sie selber hochladen? Erika39 (talk) 14:25, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

Bisher ist nichts geklärt. Der einzige Weg wäre, dem Support-Team eine gültige Freigabe zukommen zu lassen. Sollten die Dateien erneut hochgeladen werden, egal von wem, wird das zu einer sofortigen Sperrung des hochladenden Accounts führen. --Didym (talk) 17:30, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

Hallo Didym, ich habe dem Support-Team Freigabe Unterlagen übermittelt. Danke für den Hinweis. Können sie vor dem Löschen der Dateien bitte die Bearbeitung durch das Support-Team (Rückstand 14 Tage) abwaren? Danke. Erika39 (talk) 18:37, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

Im Moment gibt es bei der Bearbeitung deutschsprachiger Freigaben keinen nennenswerten Rückstand, die eine Woche für den Löschantrag sollte also eigentlich ausreichen. --Didym (talk) 22:52, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

File:Москвич 3.jpg

Hello, you deleted file File:Москвич 3.jpg due reason "copyvio from https://www.mk.ru/economics/2022/11/23/nazvana-cena-novogo-gorodskogo-krossovera-moskvich3.html ". If you check that page, it says "источник: википедия". This means "source: Wikipedia". So, mk.ru has taken that picture from Wikipedia. Pls restore the file. --Mikko Paananen (talk) 03:21, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Even if that page has taken the image from here, there are other sources that predate the upload. --Didym (talk) 12:19, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

File:Official Emblem of Somaliland.svg

File:Official Emblem of Somaliland.svg has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: CSD G2 (Unused and implausible, or broken redirect)) Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : FXXX.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 22:36, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Kho Guik Lan image

Hello, I'm the guy creating the page for my ex. highschool. I would like to know if all I need is an email from the source allowing free use or is there anything else I need?

~ItsHong 10:43am 21/12/2022 ItsHong (talk) 02:43, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

That should be sufficient. You can find further information on COM:VRT. --Didym (talk) 16:19, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Joseph Prill (1934).jpg

Hi, This may be OK or not, but could you explain your deletion? The license is actually correct. Thanks, Yann (talk) 01:32, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

As the last comment states, we don't know the author, but that does not make this an anonymous work. The author may have died more than 70 years ago, but there is no proof of this. --Didym (talk) 01:36, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Allison Silverman image

Hello, I'm the guy trying to update the page for Allison Silverman and thought that I sourced a photo from a source allowing free use. Is there something else I need to do? Falconsovereignstorm (talk) 18:59, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

What makes you think this is a free image? Also, you didn't specify a license, which is a reason for deletion itself. --Didym (talk) 01:02, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Hi Didym. I'm new to wiki and am still learning. I thought because the photo was posted to the WGA fb page with a credit, and that since the creator is deceased that the photo was a free image. Any tips you can offer would be valued. Falconsovereignstorm (talk) 20:31, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

Please read COM:L. In short: an image is usually free if the author releases it under a free license or if the author has been dead for a certain time, usually 70 years. --Didym (talk) 21:01, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for your assistance. This is a lot of new language for a layman like me. Falconsovereignstorm (talk) 19:36, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

File:Spurs.svg

The file wasn't transferred to wikipedia, can we still do that? Govvy (talk) 10:29, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

In theory we could do that, but I am not going to undelete the file to support that fair use nonsense. --Didym (talk) 20:36, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Barnes Noble Booksellers 3321 Congressional Plaza.jpg

Another user and I indicated that this file is in scope, especially since there are no other (obvious) examples of receipts from that country. Why did you delete it? Brianjd (talk) 02:53, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

A random receipt in pretty bad condition is certainly not within the project scope. --Didym (talk) 11:53, 30 December 2022 (UTC)