User talk:Clusternote/Archive 4

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Filemover

Are you able to do filemoves on your own? With almost 200,000 edits and plenty of good requests, I felt confident you could, and so made you a filemover. Anything that can cut down backlogs here is a good thing. INeverCry 23:16, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Thanks. I will move the files myself if it seems not cause the troubles. --Clusternote (talk) 23:39, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
File:Burning Man 2013 Feet of Truth is Beauty (10227019446).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

De728631 (talk) 00:05, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Discasto talk 16:30, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

File:1968 living room with Telefunken Opus Studio and Stig Lindbergs Lumavision.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

208.131.186.120 01:22, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Thank you, Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 02:11, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Category:MIDI-enabled has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mordomo (talk) 01:05, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

File:Lloyd Thayer - inked arm - WMPG radio "Us Folk" (2006-06-02 09.38.23 by Ctd 2005).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

88.198.7.18 18:05, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Talk page archiving set up

Hi,

I apologise if this is a bit presumptious, but I've archived most of the comments from your talk page. These can be easily accessed via the box at the top right of your main talk page.

The reason is that lots of more recent template-based notices on your talk page weren't displaying correctly. This happens when the number of such templates on a page exceeds a certain amount.

Since we need to be able to communicate with you via your talk page, it's important that such notices show up correctly; the solution is to keep the number of comments on the page below a certain limit by archiving the older ones.

Other than that I've no problem with people having very long talk pages if that's what they like- as I said, this was only a problem because some legitimate notices weren't showing up correctly.

I've also set up auto-archiving for comments older than 720 days(!), or- more importantly- for when your talk page gets too big. You're welcome to disable or remove that (via the template {{User:MiszaBot/config [etc]}}) or indeed to revert any of the changes I've made if you're not happy with them.

All the best,

Ubcule (talk) 23:07, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for your suggestion and archive setup! --Clusternote (talk)
No problem, Ubcule (talk) 21:58, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

What does this reference refer to?

Hi again,

I came across your edit to Category:Korg M1, and I wondered what the reference in question was actually for? It's not obvious to me.

Thanks, Ubcule (talk) 23:10, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

I added that reference to show who was a chief engineer of Korg M1, the world best selling synthesizer introduced in 1988. Jun'ichi Ikeuchi, a Japanese electronics engineer, was also described as a circuit designer of Firstman SQ-01, an ancestor of acid bass machine introduced in 1980 or 1981, on the private BBS hosted by the founder of Hillwood / Firstman, Kazuo Morioka. --Clusternote (talk)
That's interesting, but I really don't think it belongs there.
There are some cases, I guess, where references would be useful or necessary on Commons- to back up or explain things- but this one doesn't seem to be backing up anything else on the page itself.
Your content can still be found at this archived version of the page if you want to retrieve it, but I think such info belongs more on Wikipedia if you can figure out a way to make it useful there.
All the best, Ubcule (talk) 22:06, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not the place for an explanation about a specific categorization on Wikimedia Commons. If an explanation (including citation) was removed from Wikimedia Commons, the verification of a specific categorization may become a hard task. Thus I've added a note, and moved a citation into the new section, "further reading". --Clusternote (talk)
Okay, I see where you're coming from. As I said, there are cases where it can be justified to back things on Commons up with references, and this is one of them. However, I don't think "Further reading" is appropriate here; I've cut down and altered some of this into more reference-like format. I'm not 100% sure this is how it's meant to be done; it's still a bit intrusive. Ubcule (talk) 21:03, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
File:Gorillaz - All I Wanna Do is Dance - Coachella 2010 (2010-04-18 by Ian T. McFarland).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Taivo (talk) 11:32, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:47, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, (tJosve05a (c) 18:35, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, (tJosve05a (c) 18:48, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 19:08, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

File:Billboards under Onari-kaidō Overpass - 2015-01-24 (by Keiichi Yasu).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

G I Chandor (talk) 06:14, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

File:崎陽軒 炒飯弁当 (Kiyōken Chāhan bentō, assort of chahan, shumai, chicken karaage, and yakisoba), 2012-09-09 (by Memorin @ Photozou).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Daphne Lantier 21:27, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Category discussion warning

Inside of electronic devices has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Yoctoplus (talk) 17:51, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

File:I need to get back to Venice! (14165309737).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mabalu (talk) 17:10, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Dutch Design Week 2014 - Natlab, Eindhoven (uploaded on 2014-10-25 16.50.00 by soohyang.song).jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.

čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  ไทย  日本語  Tiếng Việt  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

And also:

Yours sincerely, Vera (talk) 15:11, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Ww2censor (talk) 16:06, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Category discussion warning

Guitar tuning pegs has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


El Grafo (talk) 10:58, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Category discussion warning

Category:SVG_diagrams_of_musical_instruments_in_Catalan has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Son of a tax collector (talk) 10:56, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

If you think this category should cointain individual files, maybe it should be renamed to Category:Guitar sizes. The current name implies that it is a metacat, and other editors might put back the template and re-remove the files. What do you think? --Auntof6 (talk) 08:26, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Where was a consensus formed on that matter by community ? For several years, I've created and maintained several handreads of these type of categories under Category:Musical instruments, and your opinion seems slightly unpractical. --Clusternote (talk) 08:39, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
Which part of what I said are you asking about the consensus of? If it's that others might change the cat to a metacat, I only meant that it might happen because the name and subcats make it look like a metacat. The other "by <criterion>" cats under Category:Musical instruments also appear to be metacats and the ones I spot-checked are set up as such, so I don't understand how this one should be different. Renaming a category isn't at all impractical: it's done all the time. In any case, I certainly didn't mean my suggestion to be an attack, just something that might help the community maintain this cat appropriately. --Auntof6 (talk) 09:16, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
I'm sorry for your opinion seems not yet formed any consensus of community. --Clusternote (talk) 09:25, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
PS. I think it is not practical thing that the users who didn't upload any images for several years and also not involved in the maintenance of categories of specific fields will suddenly try to impose private opinion. --Clusternote (talk) 09:34, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
Category discussion warning

Category:SVG_diagrams_of_musical_instruments_in_Persian has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Fotzenmoos (talk) 20:36, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Pixabay has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Speravir 20:31, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

File:Tower Of The Sun, Osaka Expo'70 (April 1970 by Kingei Marui).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Categorizing (talk) 03:06, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

You've had tagged it as SVG, which was wrong. May you please fix the file?--Currda (talk) 13:50, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for point out! I've fixed the category. --Clusternote (talk) 15:40, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Location of Tobu 1720 series photo

Hi. Are you sure the image File:Tobu 1720 Kegon 19670506.jpg was taken at Sugito Station (present-day Tōbu-Dōbutsu-Kōen Station)? As I wrote in the description on the image when I uploaded it to Commons, it obviously wasn't taken at Asakusa, as the caption on the original Flickr photo claimed, and I suspect it was actually taken at Tobu-Nikko, but it's hard to be sure since things change somewhat in 50 years. The Flickr photostream doesn't offer any solid clues, although judging by the photographer's movements, it is pretty likely he followed the standard sightseeing itinerary of Tokyo (Asakusa) to Nikko, so it would be unusual to stop off at Sugito on the way. I don't believe the Kegon services even stopped at Sugito Station, and the presence of water hoses next to the tracks would suggest that it is a terminal station. This photo of Tobu Nikko Station in the 1960s looks rather similar, especially with the distinctive overhead catenary supports, so I'm still inclined to believe the 1720 series Kegon photo was also taken there, but what do you think? --DAJF (talk) 03:07, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

@DAJF: Thank you for point out. It was simply caused by the my misunderstanding about the starting station (and also the stop station) of Kegon. Surely, the distinctive overhead catenary supports seems to indicate the Tobu Nikko Station rather than Tobu Dobutsu Koen Station, so I support your guess.--Clusternote (talk) 04:16, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
OK, thanks. I've changed the category for the image to Category:Tōbu-Nikkō Station. --DAJF (talk) 07:51, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
File:Daphne Oram and her Oramics.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Verbcatcher (talk) 22:29, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Tags

Hi Clusternote, please take care to not mix up Flickr and Pixabay, thank you.

Best, --Achim (talk) 19:14, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Thanks! I've corrected it. --Clusternote (talk) 00:52, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
Sure? ;) That's why I personally prefer plain source links like https://www.flickr.com/photos/guwashi999/6754630203/ instead of Tokyo Night. Best, --Achim (talk) 07:44, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
File:70s-80s Japanese songs dedicated bar, Shinbashi, Tokyo (昭和歌謡曲リクエストバー, 港区新橋) (2013-10-04 12-48 by Rubber Soul @Photozou 190242248).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Guanaco (talk) 08:22, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:70s-80s Japanese songs dedicated bar, Shinbashi, Tokyo (昭和歌謡曲リクエストバー, 港区新橋) (2013-10-04 12-48 by Rubber Soul @Photozou 190242248).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Guanaco (talk) 08:23, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

File:70s-80s Japanese songs dedicated bar, Showa BOOGIE, Nishi-Shinjuku (70, 80年代歌謡曲BAR 昭和BOOGIE, 西新宿) (2009-10-18 19.28 by Rubber Soul @Photozou 28542668).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Guanaco (talk) 08:24, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:70s-80s Japanese songs dedicated bar, Showa BOOGIE, Nishi-Shinjuku (70, 80年代歌謡曲BAR 昭和BOOGIE, 西新宿) (2009-10-18 19.28 by Rubber Soul @Photozou 28542668).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Guanaco (talk) 08:25, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

File:C.F. Martin & Co. 100% Natural Spring Water 16.9 fl.oz. (.5 Liter) bottles - C.F. Martin Guitar Factory 2012-08-06 - 151.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:12, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:28, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Category discussion warning

Category:Music_diagrams_in_Norman has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Physanto (talk) 16:58, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

File:JK (highschool girls) taking the night meal at sidewalk of Akihabara (女子高生お食事中) (2012-10-16 19.18.40 by Ryo FUKAsawa).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ISIL-KP (talk) 22:45, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Cityscape of Nishi-Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan (@Pixabay 1900443).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 23:54, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Zendrum in concert.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

David Van Dusseldorp (talk) 06:12, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Zendrum Laptop in concert (1246x768).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

David Van Dusseldorp (talk) 06:12, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Category discussion warning

Category:SVG_diagrams_of_musical_instruments_in_Armenian has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


David Van Dusseldorp (talk) 06:33, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:Oramics Machine & recorded sound by Daphne Oram.ogv has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

  — Jeff G. ツ 01:17, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

File:Anna Miller's uniform (pink) in Second Life (2012-01-22 22.36.22 by Ramona Forcella) clip.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jörg Haffke (talk) 19:01, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Category discussion warning

Workshops (hands-on seminars) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 05:49, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Category discussion warning

Workshops (seminars) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 05:50, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Triangle Park MTriangle Park Mural - Asheville, North Carolina (2013-11-12 20.14.35 by denise carbonell 11073903144).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 18:02, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Music event in Japan (2011-08-21 17.32.33 by yuiseki aoba).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kulmalukko (talk) 21:57, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Shitaya Shrine at night, Hihashi-Ueno, Taito, Tokyo (夜の, 下谷神社, 東上野, 台東区) (2011-05-09 22.45.49 by yuiseki aoba).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kulmalukko (talk) 21:58, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Category discussion warning

Category:The_Cranberries,_Enmore_Theatre,_2012-05-26 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Jotzet (talk) 21:45, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:2009 Presidential Inauguration - Symbolism.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Yann (talk) 13:41, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Hi, @Yann: . Do you said that the author of this photograph (original source: [1]) is not the Steve Jurvetson@Flickr ? As far as I know:
  1. at 2009-01-18 11:09:33, he was at the venue of Presidential inauguration ceremony to shoot these photographs (as seen on EXIF of previous photo on Flickr stream),
  2. at 2009-01-18 11:23:37, he shoot this photograph (as seen on EXIF of this photo),
  3. until 2010-09-06 (at least), he had published this photograph under {{Cc-by-2.0}} license on Flickr (it is valid on Wikimedia Commons),
  4. at 2010-09-06 16:15, User:FlickreviewR (bot) reviewed that this license is valid at that point (as seen on revision history diff),
  5. and, (at least) on Wikimedia Commons, once the material was published under the valid Creative-Commons license, its change of license after the distribution is not retroactive.
Under the above conditions, additional written permission to OTRS is unnecessary.
On the other hand, in my opinion, if the original author want to delete this photograph from Creative Commons region, there is worth of considering his claim, because this photograph is not re-used on other Wikimedia projects.

A cup of coffee for you!

مرحبا صديقي اتقبل ان تشرب معي كوبا من القهو مع مشاهدة اجل واروع اعمالك في ويكي كومنز YAKINE 2003 (talk) 15:46, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

File:Amdahl 4705.jpg‎;

Hi, Clusternote, I see you recategorized File:Amdahl 4705.jpg‎ from Category:Control panels (engineering) to Category:Control panels (computer hardware). I'm not certain exactly what the latter category is intended to encompass, but it looks like everything in there is a control panel for what we would think of as a computer. The 4705, though, was a communications controller, as distinguished from a general-purpose computer. Mind you, a communications controller really is a computer, in the same sense that a wi-fi router is a computer -- both run specialized software operating systems, for example -- but it's not what one generally thinks of as a "computer". Given that, does the recat make sense? TJRC (talk) 23:31, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Critically evaluate Flickr licenses
File:Traktor Kontrol S4 - rear (2010-09-16 02.32.15 by ビッグアップジャパン).jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. You may have preserved the information shown on Flickr correctly when transferring the image here, but the Flickr uploader is not the copyright holder of this image. Either the image was created by someone else, or it is a derivative of someone else's work. As stated in Commons:Licensing, only the copyright holder may issue a license, so the one shown on Flickr is invalid. Always remember to critically evaluate Flickr licenses. Photostreams with professional-looking photographs, album covers, posters, and images in a wide range of styles or quality taken by many different cameras often indicate that the Flickr uploader either does not understand or does not care about copyright matters. See Commons:Questionable Flickr images for a list of known bad Flickr users.

Deutsch  English  magyar  português do Brasil  italiano  norsk  norsk bokmål  português  français  македонски  slovenščina  suomi  українська  svenska  sicilianu  中文(臺灣)  +/−

LittleWink (talk) 16:42, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Barb Truex & Annegret Baier - Loopin' @ CCE, Halloween Dance Party (2005-10-29 21.02.11 by Ctd 2005).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Hiddenhauser (talk) 15:36, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

If you think it is unnecessary, please delete it. --Clusternote (talk) 03:19, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
File:Barb Truex, Annegret Baier & Shamou gettin' down - Loopin' @ CCE, Halloween Dance Party (2005-10-29 20.57.42 by Ctd 2005).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Hiddenhauser (talk) 15:36, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

If you think it is unnecessary, please delete it. --Clusternote (talk) 01:25, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
File:Shadows and player - Loopin' @ CCE, Halloween Dance Party (2005-10-29 20.23.50 by Ctd 2005).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Hiddenhauser (talk) 15:37, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

If you think it is unnecessary, please delete it. --Clusternote (talk) 01:25, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Pi.1415926535 (talk) 16:25, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for the message. If you think these files are unnecessary or out of scope, please delete these. --Clusternote (talk) 00:53, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Category discussion warning

Arabic musical instruments has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


E4024 (talk) 09:22, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

Category discussion warning

Category:Jahrmarktsorgels has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Abderitestatos (talk) 19:01, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Removed category

Why did you remove the category Guild Guitars from File:Buddy Guy 1983.jpg? He is playing a Guild guitar. Bubba73 (talk) 22:47, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

Oh, sorry. It seems my mistake (possibly due to the instability of Cat-a-lot gadget). That media should be categorized under Category:Guitarists with Guild guitars, and optionally under Category:Guild guitars. I'll fix it. --Clusternote (talk) 02:33, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
Ok, thank you. Bubba73 (talk) 03:49, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, - Alexis Jazz ping plz 19:35, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Category discussion warning

Straatorgel has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Themightyquill (talk) 12:05, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Archtop Guitar MET DP239377.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Archtop Guitar MET DP239377.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:37, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

@Magog the Ogre: Thank you for pointing out the lacking of license. I had misunderstand these are also under MET Open Access Policy, but NO "Public Domain" licenses are found on the source pages. So, respectfully I have submitted the requests of the speedy deletion of these two files and similar files (total 16 files 11 files). --Clusternote (talk) 22:35, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
Category discussion warning

Category:Images_from_MaxPixel.FreeGreatPicture.com has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Anarchyte (work | talk) 03:21, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, - Alexis Jazz ping plz 21:48, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

File:R.I.P. Lou Reed (1942-2013) - Static Age Records - Asheville, North Carolina (2013-11-08 03.11.25 by denise carbonell).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

B dash (talk) 14:26, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Takashi Murakami, painted portrait DDC 0457, painted by thierry ehrmann.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

B dash (talk) 16:12, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

File:1-3rd Residence Tokyo Serviced Apartments, Akihabara (2015-06-14 06.11.53 by Franklin Heijnen).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Solomon203 (talk) 03:32, 16 September 2018 (UTC)


— hike395 (talk) 08:11, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Foci + loci - Handmade Music @ Culturefix, 2010-10-10 20.22.38.jpg

Template:Dw image source/layout

Yours sincerely, BevinKacon (talk) 21:24, 4 October 2018 (UTC)