User talk:Claude PERON

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Claude PERON!

-- 16:49, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Claude PERON!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 12:53, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Brest 2012 19 juillet Marine traffic 15h 15.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

BrightRaven (talk) 08:37, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Monument aux Morts Brest.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Remi Mathis (talk) 15:31, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]



беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  Esperanto  español  eesti  français  italiano  മലയാളം  Nederlands  русский  slovenčina  српски (ћирилица)  srpski (latinica)  svenska  Tagalog  українська  +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear Claude PERON,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 00:13, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
File:Eglise Kérinou Brest.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 11:48, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gymnase Jean Guéguéniat Brest.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 11:55, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Le Quartz Centre Culturel Brest.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 11:55, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:La Carène Brest.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 11:56, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Auditorium Ecole de musique Brest.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 11:59, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please revert next time[edit]

Hi. The next time that you accidentally overwrite another file, please look to revert your edit, so that it doesn't effect where the original file was displayed. Thanks.  — billinghurst sDrewth 00:33, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Google translation … Salut. La prochaine fois que vous avez accidentellement écraser un autre fichier], s'il vous plaît regardez de revenir votre édition, de sorte qu'il n'a pas d'effet lorsque le fichier original a été affichée. Merci.

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, VIGNERON (talk) 09:33, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rugby féminin à Brest[edit]

Bonjour, Vous avez débaptisé la catégorie Rugby féminin Pays de Brest en un autre titre qui reprend la date et la rencontre photographiée ce jour-là. Ceci ne convient pas du tout à l'esprit du projet qui sous-tend ces prises de vues,(collaboration entre le Service des Sports de la Ville de Brest et les contributeurs de Wikimédia Commons, dans le cadre du projet plus global Brest, Ville Wikipédia). Notre collecte de photos vise, en effet, à montrer la diversité des pratiques sportives dans la ville. Votre catégorisation très restrictive, puisque ne retenant que l'intitulé d'un match, doit être revue, sachant que ce groupe de photos sera plus tard alimenté de nouvelles vues d'autres matches de rugby féminin. Merci de rectifier, Cordialement, Claude PERON

Bonjour,
Je ne suis pas un spécialiste du projet Commons Brest ; les modifications que j'ai apportées, l'ont plutôt été dans l'esprit d'une catégorisation "standard" des rencontres sportives. Lorsque suffisamment de matière est disponible, créer une catégorie spécifique pour mieux catégoriser. Dans l'exemple que vous citez, cela permet de bien affecter la rencontre aux bonnes équipes, et de ne pas catégoriser uniquement à Brest (la rencontre n'étant pas inter-brestoise, mais faisant intervenir l'équipe de Joué-lès-Tours). Ma démarche a donc été de créer une nouvelle catégorie (Category:2013-12-08 - Pays de Brest vs Joué-lès-Tours) qui représente davantage les photos versées, à la place de la précédente catégorie (Category:Rugby féminin F2), qui est beaucoup plus englobante et donc peut-être moins directement pertinente, puisque pouvant possiblement contenir tous les matchs qui se sont jouées depuis la création de cette compétition. A ce titre, il est de toute manière erroné d'attribuer la Category:Rugby féminin F2 comme Category:Sport in Brest, France, car il s'agit d'une compétition nationale.
La catégorie créée est, peut-être, il est vrai, mal nommée. Je me suis basé sur quelques exemple que j'ai pu trouver ici et là. Concernant sa catégorisation, j'ai souhaité catégorisé par date, compétition et équipes. D'où les catégories Category:2013 in Finistère, Category:2013 sports events in France ; Category:Women's rugby union in France (faute de mieux existant) et Category:Sport in Brest, France et Category:Joué-lès-Tours (là aussi, faute de mieux existant).
Je comprends, je crois, la démarche qui est la vôtre et m'excuse si j'ai été un peu brutal dans mes changements. Aussi, sans aller jusqu'à créer des catégories spécifiques Category:Rugby in Brest, France (ou les équivalents pour tous les sports pratiqués...), je vous proposerai la chose suivante : créer une catégorie "chapeau" pour toutes les images à venir de ce club de rugby (Category:Les féminines du Pays de Brest, pour autant que j'ai pu en juger sur Internet). Celle-ci serait catégorisée de la manière suivante Category:Women's rugby union in France, Category:Rugby union teams of France et Category:Sport in Brest, France. Et à l'intérieur de cette nouvelle catégorie, pourraient ensuite être insérés soit directement, soit indirectement (par une catégorie de type "saison de club sportif"), toutes photos se rapportant au club.
J'ai été un peu long. Mais je souhaitais que vous puissiez également comprendre mes intentions lorsque je me suis intéressé à ce travail. Je vous rappelle que vous pouvez tout à fait modifier vous-même les catégories. Je suis tout à fait disposer à m'en charger. Mais, comme je ne voudrais pas "empirer" la situation, j'attendrai toutefois un retour de votre part, en espérant que nous puissions parvenir à un consensus sur le sujet.
Cordialement, --Fab5669 (talk) 17:02, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bonsoir, Merci de votre réponse. Vous avez, je crois, réagi, en changeant l'intitulé de la catégorie de photos, du point de vue d'un observateur extérieur qui n'a pas toutes les cartes en main; ce projet de collectage de photos de sport n'est pas une activité "abstraite" de Commons, mais est le fruit d'un partenariat ancré dans la réalité dont il veut rendre compte et vous devez comprendre que l'intervention d'une personne extérieure, même avec les meilleures intentions, fait un peu "cheveu sur la soupe". Cependant, votre proposition de créer une catégorie chapeau que j'intitulerais "Rugby féminin au Pays de Brest", avec des sous-catégories à créer selon les apports ultérieurs de photos, à l'intérieur de "Sport in Brest" nous convient. Comme je ne suis pas administrateur de Commons - ce que vous semblez être - et que je ne peux pas le faire, merci de la créer, nous nous chargeons du reste. Je vous précise aussi que la catégorie "Sport in Brest" est la base de ce projet de collectage et ne peut être modifiée. Cordialement Claude PERON

Bonsoir,
Je précise que je ne suis pas un administrateur. Juste un contributeur qui s'est quelque peu investi dans la catégorisation des fichiers de la Category:Bretagne depuis quelques temps. Quand il m'arrive d'en voir passer sur des communes que j'ai pu "traiter" (j'ai commencé un travail de catégorisation commune par commune, successivement en 56, 22 et 29), j'essaye de faire en sorte de pouvoir, d'une part, conserver une certaine unité dans l'ensemble de la catégorie et, d'autre part, de mieux catégoriser dans les catégories annexes au sujet général qui ne sont pas forcément bien renseignées. Quoi qu'il en soit, et si, comme il le semble, nous sommes parvenus à un consensus, j'ai créé une Category:Rugby féminin au Pays de Brest. Celle-ci reprend l'unique - pour l'instant - Category:2013-12-08 - Pays de Brest vs Joué-lès-Tours (en précisant à tout le moins, et comme je l'ai déjà expliqué, que chacun peut effectuer les modifications de catégorisation si le nom pour lequel j'ai opté ne vous satisfait pas). Cette nouvelle catégorie est intégrée aux catégories suivantes : Category:Women's rugby union in France, Category:Rugby union teams of France (voire Category:Women's rugby union teams of France ?) et Category:Sport in Brest, France. Si vous le permettez, à l'avenir, et si le besoin s'en faisait sentir, j'appliquerai le même schéma que celui qui précède pour d'autres catégorisations ultérieures. Encore que, en voyant vos dernières contributions, je ne suis pas sûr que ce sera nécessaire.
Si je peux me permettre enfin un dernier conseil : dans le cas d'évènements annuels, il serait bon de créer une catégorie chapeau, puis des sous-catégories par années (deux exemples : Category:Stade Brestois 29 matches, puis Category:2011–2012 season of Stade Brestois 29 ou Category:Brest Classic Week, puis Category:Brest Classic Week 2010). Enfin, et je ne l'ai pas fait, il me semble que la Category:Badminton 2013 (et d'autres...) est mal catégorisée. Certes, en cherchant un peu, l'on comprends qu'il s'agit d'une compétition de badminton qui a eu lieu en Brest en 2013. Mais ce nom très générique peut porter à confusion pour n'importe qui cherchant une compétition de badminton, n'importe quand en 2013, n'importe où sur le globe. Suggestion, renommer cette catégorie, selon le nom de la compétition et l'année de celle-ci (Tournoi de badminton de Brest 2013 ?). Dernière pensée qui me vient, si au bout d'un moment, il y avait suffisamment de matière, il pourrait être bon de créer des catégories spécifiques par sports. En particulier, je pense à Category:Athletics in Brest, France ou Category:Sailing in Brest, France.
Cordialement, --Fab5669 (talk) 22:34, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
PS : Pour plus de facilité, à l'avenir, je vous remercierai de répondre directement sur ma page de discussion, afin de pouvoir déceler rapidement vos messages. Je reste disponible pour continuer cette conversation en tant que de besoin.

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Themightyquill (talk) 11:14, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Luttes celtiques has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Tshavis (talk) 14:10, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments France 2019[edit]

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est de retour et ouvert jusqu'à 31 septembre ! Déjà 8309 photos ont été importés cette année, vous aussi rejoignez le concours !

Le concours concerne tous les monuments présents dans la base Mérimée (qu'ils soient classés, inscrits ou simplement classés). De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la chapelle au coin de la rue aux mégalithes en forêt, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Où que vous soyez il y a des monuments autour de chez vous. Enfin, vous pouvez mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments. Pour information, le règlement est disponible sur le site du concours. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international sélectionnera ensuite des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France les années précédentes. Si vous avez déjà ou si ne pouvez pas participer au concours cette année, faites passer le message autour de vous pour que de nouveaux et nouvelles photographes rejoignent l'aventure !

Bonne journée,

Sarah Krichen WMFr et Nicolas Vigneron, pour l'équipe de Wiki Loves Monuments France, 14:50, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:50 ans du CRBC www.antoineborzeix.fr -13 websize.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Killarnee (TRP) 00:49, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:50 ans du CRBC www.antoineborzeix.fr -159 websize.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Killarnee (TRP) 00:50, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:50 ans du CRBC www.antoineborzeix.fr -59 websize.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Killarnee (TRP) 00:52, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bibliotheque crbc 2018 lettres -Bibliothécaires.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Killarnee (TRP) 00:53, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bibliotheque crbc 2018 lettres cartes.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Killarnee (TRP) 00:54, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bibliotheque crbc 2018 lettres chants anciens.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Killarnee (TRP) 00:54, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:50 ans du CRBC Affiche du Breiz Atao.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Killarnee (TRP) 01:34, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:50 ans du CRBC Matériel ancien pour le son.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Killarnee (TRP) 01:35, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Exposition des 50 ans du CRBC.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Killarnee (TRP) 01:45, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:50 ans du CRBC Visiteur devant une vitrine.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Killarnee (TRP) 01:46, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:50 ans du CRBC Exposition de livres anciens.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

--Killarnee (TRP) 11:33, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:50 ans du CRBC www.antoineborzeix.fr -13 websize.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:50 ans du CRBC www.antoineborzeix.fr -13 websize.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:02, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:50 ans du CRBC Visiteur devant une vitrine.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:50 ans du CRBC Visiteur devant une vitrine.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:03, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, Je viens de demander à l'auteur des photos de transmettre son accord de licence CC BY SA 4.0 directement le formulaire prévu à OTRS. Dommage que je n'aie pas eu ce formulaire plus tôt (ou la marche à suivre). Je vous remercie de m'avoir éclairé par vos explications plus claires que ce que j'ai reçu avant. Kenavo, Claude Péron

File:CD Donatien.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 07:41, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Plus que quelques jours pour participer à Wiki Loves Monuments France ![edit]

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est ouvert pour une semaine encore, jusqu'au 30 septembre. Déjà plus de 6 000 photos ont été importées cette année alors vous aussi rejoignez le concours ! Cette campagne de contribution concerne tous les monuments et objets mobiliers présents dans la base Mérimée et dans la base Palissy. De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la verrière décorative au reliquaire, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Vous pouvez dès à présent mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments et objets du patrimoine français. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international constituera ensuite une sélection des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:37, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]