User talk:C6541

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, C6541!

Filnik 09:03, 19 July 2009 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 09:03, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

TUSC token 59a8cab9866c8170aa69edfa429c6fb4[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

59a8cab9866c8170aa69edfa429c6fb4[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

TUSC token 59a8cab9866c8170aa69edfa429c6fb4[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!


The factual accuracy of the chemical structure File:Cyclohexylacetone 2D.svg is disputed[edit]

Dispute notification The chemical structure File:Cyclohexylacetone 2D.svg you uploaded has been tagged as disputed and is now listed in Category:Disputed chemical diagrams. Files in this category are deleted after one month if there is no upload of a corrected version and if there is no objection from the uploader or other users. Please discuss on the file talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload a corrected version or simply allow the file to be deleted.

In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --DMacks (talk) 17:44, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]