User talk:Bernd Schwabe in Hannover/Archive 3

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Hinweis

Hallo, hab grade 2 Bilder von dir gesehen, weil sie auf meiner EN-Kreis-Seite neu eingebunden waren (wegen Kategorie "People of Witten"). Hier [1] und [2] hab ich dann repariert. Bei beiden Bildern war was mit den geschweiften Klammern schiefgegangen. Weiß nicht ob das noch woanders so ist. Aufgefallen ist mir außerdem daß du [[Category:Photographs taken on …]] als Kategorie einträgst. Da eignet sich besser die Vorlage {{Taken on}} bei der Datumsangabe, die gleich die passende Kategorie vergibt, siehe Beispiel. Gruß Holger1959 (talk) 07:15, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Guten Morgen, Holger1959, schau ich mir bei Gelegenheit gerne genauer an. Gruß und Dank zunächst, --Bernd Schwabe in Hannover (talk) 07:25, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:1900 circa Witwe Garve u. Sohn, Hannover, Deckblatt Wega Weiss-Zeichenblock W1.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:22, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

The file is elder than 100 years. --Bernd Schwabe in Hannover (talk) 14:52, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:20150521 Expo 2015 Themenabend, Deutsche Messe AG, Freundeskreis Hannover, Exposeum, (331) Gerhard Kier.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 12:33, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Done. --Bernd Schwabe in Hannover (talk) 12:42, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Guten Tag werter Herr Schwabe, vor kurzer Zeit hatte ich ihnen gesagt, das man Interwikilinks in Category oder Galery besser hier nicht setzt, sondern bei Wikidata unten unter "Andere Website" "com" und z. B. "Category:Kröpcke-Uhr" einträgt. Dann werde alle Wikilinks zum jeweiligen Wikipedia-Artikel, die beim Wikidata-Objekt eingetragen sind in der Commons-Category automatisch angezeigt, falls mal ein neuer Wikipedia-Eintrag bei Wikidata eingetragen wird, so wird auch dieser automatisch in der Commons-Category angezeigt. Übrigens gab es das Wikidata-Datenobjekt Kröpcke-Uhr nocht nicht, ich habe es angelegt und "com" und "Category:Kröpcke-Uhr" unten unter "Andere Websites" eingetragen und den Interwikilink in der Category entfernt, sonst funktioniert es nicht. Noch ein wichtiger Hinweis. Falls es bei Commons eine Category und Galery-Seite gibt muss man sich für eins entscheiden, denn es geht nur eine Verbindung pro Schwesternprojekt. Gruß --Jean11 (talk) 20:07, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Hallo, Jean11,
danke für Deine (Zu-)Arbeit(en) und Deine Erläuterungen. Gestern musste ich (wie so häufig) den Artikel in aller Eile zur Information für alle Wikipedianer und alle Menschen "rausschieben", um dann vor eine Fotodokumentation zur 130-Jahr-Feier zu beginnen. Schön, dass es Dich gibt - --Bernd Schwabe in Hannover (talk) 10:56, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:1900 circa, Willi Roerts, Prinz Georg Wilhelm von Braunschweig-Lüneburg, Atelieraufnahme, Bildseite.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 20:42, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Done. Thank you for your works, and greetings, --Bernd Schwabe in Hannover (talk) 08:00, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:2015-07-03 Grundschule Goetheplatz, Hannover, Schulfest mit Kinderliedermacher Unmada (44) Mitmachkonzert in der der Turnhalle, Kinder singen, Eltern filmen.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 20:17, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:2015-07-03 Grundschule Goetheplatz, Hannover, Schulfest mit Kinderliedermacher Unmada (16).JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 20:17, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:2015-07-03 Grundschule Goetheplatz, Hannover, Schulfest mit Kinderliedermacher Unmada (48).JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 20:17, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:2015-07-03 Grundschule Goetheplatz, Hannover, Schulfest mit Kinderliedermacher Unmada (21).JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 20:18, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:2015-07-03 Grundschule Goetheplatz, Hannover, Schulfest mit Kinderliedermacher Unmada (22).JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 20:18, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:2015-07-03 Grundschule Goetheplatz, Hannover, Schulfest mit Kinderliedermacher Unmada (24).JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 20:19, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, JuTa, all done. --Bernd Schwabe in Hannover (talk) 05:42, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Hannover

Guten Tag Herr Schwabe, sie haben mal wieder eine Category mit "Hanover" erstellt. hier die Hannover-Entscheidung. Dunkelgelbe Karte, sollte dies nochmal vorkommen, müssen sie sehr sehr lange gesperrt werden. Big brother is watching you

Schön, dass es Dich gibt. Magst Du diesen Samstag mit mir das Asternstraßenfest in der Nordstadt von Hannover Wikipedia-bespielen? Ich erhoffe mir hunderte von historisch einzigartigen Bild(ungs)-Dokumenten, möchte ab circa 14.00 Uhr einen Tisch mit Rechner, Scanner, Material und Ausdrucken schon vorhandener historischer Ansichten aufstellen, um eine kleine "Lawine" ins Rollen zu bringen. Es wird relaxed ablaufen, Spaß machen, zum Staunen bringen, Kaffee und Kuchen geben und eine Menge wichtiger Kontakte. Ruf doch bitte kurz durch, wenn Du magst. Liebe Grüße, --Bernd Schwabe in Hannover (talk) 06:00, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
File:20150521 Expo 2015 Themenabend, Deutsche Messe AG, Freundeskreis Hannover, Exposeum, (267) Deutscher Pavillon Fields of Ideas.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Josve05a (talk) 21:25, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Hallo Bernd, könntest du bitte auch die Kategorie anlegen und diese kategorisieren, welche du in verschiedenen Bildern verwendest? --Arnd (talk) 05:04, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Ja, selbstverständlich. Gerne. Wir hatten gestern wegen Umbau und Neustrukturierung der Bibliothek im Wikipedia-Büro Hannover sowie weiterer Termine noch nicht die Zeit dafür gefunden. Claus-Peter Enders und ich werden in Kürze zunächst zwei Bände der Reihe vollumfänglich hochladen. Noch schöner wäre es, wenn wir dabei gleich eine OCR-Schrifterkennung hätten, um uns für Wikisource Arbeit zu ersparen. Einen schönen Gruß sendet --Bernd Schwabe in Hannover (talk) 07:40, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
Ok, bzgl. Wikisource und OCR bitte Folgendes beachten: https://de.wikisource.org/wiki/Wikisource:OCR/Abbyy. Gruß, --Arnd (talk) 07:55, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
Klasse. Ich hätte gerne ein größeres Team in Hannover. --Bernd Schwabe in Hannover (talk) 08:02, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Category:Seidenhaus Koopmann

Hallo, Kategorien sollten nur Beschreibungen enthalten und Oberkategorien zugeordnet sein, die für alle Inhalte zutreffen. Das ist in dieser Kategorie nicht der Fall. Die Beschreibung und alle Oberkategorien treffen auf das Bild aus Hannover nicht zu. Es ist außerdem nicht sinnvoll, Kategorien, die den Hochladeweg betreffen, von der Datei auf die Kategorie zu verschieben. --Quarz (talk) 09:06, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Guten Morgen, Quarz. Ich habe Sinn Deines letzten Satzes nicht verstanden. Gruß, --Bernd Schwabe in Hannover (talk) 09:13, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
Das betrifft Category:Bremer Express-Upload. Habe ich inzwischen rückgängig gemacht. --Quarz (talk) 09:36, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
Wie geht es nun weiter mit der Kategorie für zwei Dateien, von denen eine nicht zu den Eigenschaften der Kategorie passt? --Quarz (talk) 11:48, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
Wollen wir zwei Unterrubriken schaffen, eine für Bremen, eine für Hannover? In wie viel Städten war das Unternehmen noch aktiv? Gruß, --Bernd Schwabe in Hannover (talk) 12:19, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
Woher weißt du, dass es dasselbe Unternehmen ist? Es kann ebenso eine zufällige Namensgleichheit sein. Niemand hat bisher eine Kategorie für das Haus in Bremen vermisst, für das es übrigens nicht nur dieses eine Bild gibt. Mir ist nur wichtig, dass bei einer Kategorie auch drin ist, was drauf steht - und nur das! Bei Unterkategorien stellt sich doch automatisch die Frage: Wo ist die Oberkategorie angehängt - Unternehmen in Deutschland? Keep it simple! Behalte meinetwegen dein Bild in der (entsprechend angepassten) Kategorie und schmeiß das Bremer Bild raus. Ansonsten mach eine neue Kategorie für den Hannoveraner. Wie gesagt - bisher hat niemand die Kategorie für Bremen vermisst. --Quarz (talk) 12:31, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
Gut, keine Antwort (trotz Aktivität auf Commons) ist auch eine. Ich mach dann mal. --Quarz (talk) 11:40, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
File:2015-07-29 Eröffnung Maschseefest Hannover, (1030) Der Tanz des Drachens.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Steinsplitter (talk) 12:21, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

File:2015-01-26 Ilse Paul im Wikipedia-Büro Hannover am Rechner von Bernd Schwabe, PENvolution Pressekonferenz.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Steinsplitter (talk) 12:28, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

File:2015-01-12 Bunt statt Braun, Freude, Miteinander (1000).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Steinsplitter (talk) 12:31, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Category discussion warning

Category:Geman_surnames has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Rudolph Buch (talk) 15:46, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

File:2015-10-10 Um Gottes Willen - Religion in säkularer Gesellschaft, DKR-Studientagung in Hannover (258) Mirjam Blumenschein Forum Junger Erwachsener (FJE), Dr. Christoph Münz.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Steinsplitter (talk) 11:55, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Ludwig Hemmer PC 0049 Hannover. Aegidienthorplatz mit Hildesheimerstrasse. Adressseite an Herrn Paul Müller, Barmen Berliner Straße 51 III.jpg

Überkategoriesiert ... oder?

Hallo Bernd, danke für die Bilder. Aber kategorisieren wohin die Postkarte geschickt wurde ist doch in diesem Fall übertrieben, oder? Der Bezu zu Wuppertal, dieser Straße und doch sehr gering. Wnn der Adressat relevant wäre - dann vielleicht. Aber so? --Atamari (talk) 09:22, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Guten Tag, Atamari,
magst Du Dir mal den handschriftlichen auf der Karte ergänzten Text durchlesen (oder sogar als Zitat ergänzend einfügen)?. Es ist also der Monteur, der "unsere Maschinen" einrichtet und ebenfalls handschriftlich grüßte. Welche Maschinen (noch immer im Zeitalter der Industrialisierung)? Welche Firma?
Wir sind doch erst am Anfang. Wenn erst mal die Adressbücher der Städte volldigitalisiert durchsuchbar werden ... Besten Gruß, --Bernd Schwabe in Hannover (talk) 12:15, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
File:2015-07-03 Grundschule Goetheplatz, Hannover, Schulfest mit Kinderliedermacher Unmada (43).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Steinsplitter (talk) 12:49, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

File:2015-07-03 Grundschule Goetheplatz, Hannover, Schulfest mit Kinderliedermacher Unmada (41).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Steinsplitter (talk) 12:49, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

File:2015-04-30 Professor Dr. Stefan Winghart mit einem Berichte zur Denkmalpflege in Niedersachsen.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Steinsplitter (talk) 12:51, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

File:2015-03-30 Markus Sattler und seine Kollegin Julia Rupp, Literatur zur HEWI Heinrich Wilke GmbH im Wikipedia-Büro Hannover.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Steinsplitter (talk) 12:52, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

File:2015-03-30 Markus Sattler und seine Kollegin Julia Rupp, Literatur zur HEWI Heinrich Wilke GmbH im Wikipedia-Büro Hannover, 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Steinsplitter (talk) 12:53, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

File:2015-11-19 13th international up-and-coming film festival in Hannover (1041) nur eine von tausenden von Dokumentarfotografien - und Video-Drehs.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Steinsplitter (talk) 12:44, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Template include size

Hello Bernd Schwabe in Hannover, This is to inform you that your user talk page template include size is exceeded. You are welcome to archive your talk page. You can have this done automatically for you - simply place {{subst:User:MiszaBot/usertalksetup}} at the top of your user talk page and old messages will be archived after 1 month (see User:MiszaBot/usertalksetup for more details). Regards --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:54, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:Separation Teil III, Separation Teil II, Variationen der GAZELLE von Nikola Sarić, art-f-air 2012 in Hannover, Kulturetage SofaLoft, Jordanstraße 26, 30173 Hannover.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Martin Sg. (talk) 20:37, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Nikola Sarić, Installation GAZELLE, art-f-air 2012 in der Kulturetage im SofaLoft, Jordanstraße 26, 30167 Hannover.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Nikola Sarić, Installation GAZELLE, art-f-air 2012 in der Kulturetage im SofaLoft, Jordanstraße 26, 30167 Hannover.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Martin Sg. (talk) 22:35, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Frank Buchholz Galerie per-seh Kantplatz 3 Hannover Kleefeld vertritt Simona Deflorin, hier ihr Werk Gestern und morgen von 2007.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Oursana (talk) 15:53, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Category discussion warning

Schloßplatz (Celle) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Achim (talk) 17:19, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

wieso schreibst du unter PD 70? Keune ist 1946 gestorben, also sind seine Bilder ab 2017 gemeinfrei. Diese Postkartenrückseite fällt imho allerdings unter inelegible. --Goesseln (talk) 17:14, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

File:2017-01-09 Neujahrsempfang der Landeshauptstadt Hannover (159).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Steinsplitter (talk) 15:57, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

File:2017-01-09 Neujahrsempfang der Landeshauptstadt Hannover (172).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Steinsplitter (talk) 15:58, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:2015-01-12 Bunt statt Braun, Freude, Miteinander (1005).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Steinsplitter (talk) 16:26, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

File:2014-11-22 Kundgebung Vielfalt statt Einfalt in Hannover, (1050).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Steinsplitter (talk) 16:29, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Steinsplitter (talk) 16:30, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Zusammenfassung der gelöschten Fotos

Moin Bernd also hier die Seite Commons:Undeletion_requests
Und hier noch mal die Bilder, doch gelöscht werden.

---

Personen bei der Kunstpreisverleihung, Kleine Ahnung ob sie relevant sind. -- Ra Boe watt?? 17:19, 22 February 2017 (UTC)


Die Herrschaften auf diesem Foto sind relevant, da bin ich mir sehr sicher. Tschüß -- Ra Boe watt?? 16:03, 22 February 2017 (UTC)


keine Ahnung ob Relevant -- Ra Boe watt?? 17:27, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Ältestes Geschäft in Hannover, vor 281 Jahren gegründet [3]. Nennungen in der Literatur: [4][5]. --Stobaios (talk) 17:21, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

keine Ahnung ob Relevant -- Ra Boe watt?? 17:27, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Bedeutendes bundesweites Festival, siehe Pressespiegel]. --Stobaios (talk) 17:31, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

keine Ahnung ob Relevant -- Ra Boe watt?? 17:27, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:1911-04-20 Illustrirte Zeitung S. 0007 S. VII Edmund Lill Paul Kammüller gerasterte Fotografie 1 von 4.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:1911-04-20 Illustrirte Zeitung S. 0007 S. VII Edmund Lill Paul Kammüller gerasterte Fotografie 1 von 4.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Zxmt (talk) 10:14, 6 March 2017 (UTC)


العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:1911-04-20 Illustrirte Zeitung S. 0007 S. VII Edmund Lill Paul Kammüller gerasterte Fotografie 1 von 4.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:1911-04-20 Illustrirte Zeitung S. 0007 S. VII Edmund Lill Paul Kammüller gerasterte Fotografie 1 von 4.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Quedel (talk) 18:17, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Hinweis: Siehe de:Wikipedia:Urheberrechtsfragen#keine kommerziellen Absichten. Eine Erlaubnis muss auch jederzeit die kommerzielle Nutzung beinhalten. Diese wurde jedoch verneint. --Quedel (talk) 18:17, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Bündnis 90-Die Grünen Filiz Polat Pressefoto.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Bündnis 90-Die Grünen Filiz Polat Pressefoto.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Martina talk 02:49, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Lieber Bernd! Bitte leite die Email-Erlaubnis, die du in der Bildbeschreibung erwähnst, ans OTRS weiter. Freigaben müssen unabhängig von dir auch in Zukunft überprüfbar und belegbar sein. Dank dir und alles Liebe! --Martina talk 03:17, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Liebe [User:Martina Nolte|Martina]]. Danke für Deine Nachricht. Ob ich die E-Mail noch einmal wiederfinde? Erst mal vielen Dank, und Gruß von --Bernd Schwabe in Hannover (talk) 13:17, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
Moin Martina und Bernd, Bernd wenn Du die Mail gefunden und gesendet hast, sende mir bitte die OTRS Nummer, bin leider momentan oft unberechenbar offline, würde dann aber gerne helfen. Tschüß -- Ra Boe watt?? 14:18, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
File:2014-11-22 Kundgebung Vielfalt statt Einfalt in Hannover, (1007).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sw0 (talk) 03:30, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

File:1646 Ludolff Siegfriedt Kanone Christian Graf zu Oldenburg und Delmenhorst Herr zu Jever und Kniephausen (01).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 22:51, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Düstere Straße Göttingen

Hallo Bernd Schwabe in Hannover, Du hast File:Goe.Düstere.Str.01.JPG von Category:Düstere Straße nach Category:Düstere Straße (Göttingen) zurückverschoben. Die erste Kategorie war schon älter und enthielt nur Göttingen-Fotos, die zweite wurde neu angelegt. Ich bin dagegen, dass es zwei benutzte Straßenkategorien für dieselbe Straße gibt. Soll ich alle Bilder der Kategorie rüberschieben und Category:Düstere Straße zu einer Weiterleitung machen? --Dehio (talk) 10:16, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

Hallo, Dehio. Es gibt zahlreiche Orte, die eine Düstere Straße haben, siehe z.B. hier. Daher sollten wir - um potentiellen Hochladern aus anderen Städten nicht den Platz zu "blockieren" - am Besten konsequent den Straßennamen mit dem Ortsnamen verknüpfen, beispielsweise "Straßenname (Ortsname)". Gruß von --Bernd Schwabe in Hannover (talk) 10:47, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
So weit war ich auch schon. Deshalb habe ich in einer anderen Straße auch schon alles auf den Klammernamen verschoben. Ich wunderte mich nur, dass Du eine einzelne Datei verschoben hast und nicht gleich mit allen. Eine Antwort auf meine Frage war das jetzt nicht, ich mache also einfach mal. Wenns nicht passt, kannst Du es ja wieder zurückschieben oder anders ändern. --Dehio (talk) 12:21, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
Ja, danke Dehio. --Bernd Schwabe in Hannover (talk) 14:41, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
File:Asphalt-Magazin-Verkäufer Michael Wunderlich mit seinem bis zum 30.06.13 gültigen Ausweis Nummer 1676 an seiner regelmäßigen Verkaufsstelle in der Kurze-Kamp-Straße in Hannover-Bothfeld.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2A02:8108:9C3F:E518:41A5:37B3:52ED:F4BB 15:16, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

File:2014-03-02 World of Orient 2014, (013).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dandelo (talk) 09:08, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Dipl.-Theater-Pädagogin Frouwa Kebschull, hier am Holzmarkt als bäuerliche Marktfrau verkleidet im Auftrag von Stattreisen Hannover e.V.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bleistiftmine (talk) 11:46, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Dipl.-Theater-Pädagogin Frouwa Kebschull, hier vor dem Historischen Museum als bäuerliche Marktfrau verkleidet im Auftrag von Stattreisen Hannover e.V.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bleistiftmine (talk) 11:48, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Error in Category name

Hello Bernd Schwabe in Hannover, if the category name has an error, then you move the category. You do not delete it and create a new one, that is not allowed. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.178.2.224 (talk) 17:08, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, - Alexis Jazz ping plz 09:12, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

File:2013-09-15 Gedenktafel Neue Synagoge Hannover (24) SchülerInnen der Heisterbergschule und ihre Lehrerin.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kfktrugj (talk) 06:42, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi, Bernd Schwabe in Hannover, the question is: who is who. The file should be renamed because of #2 but before doing that, we need to know. Thank you for yout time. Lotje (talk) 09:33, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

@Lotje: . Done. Thank you. --Bernd Schwabe in Hannover (talk) 11:39, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Schädling am Werk

Hallo Bernd, guck dir die beiden Löschdiskussionen an:

Grüße, --Mewa767 (talk) 02:01, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 19:57, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

Category discussion warning

Bundesschießen has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


46.86.133.46 10:49, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

File:2014-02-23 TV-Aufnahme NRD über Wikipedia mit Thomas Schwark, Sid Auffarth und Bernd Schwabe, (35) Rene Zander, Micha Bojanowski, Oliver Laffin.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2003:E7:970C:DB11:18D3:7349:F77F:4381 16:08, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Handwerk hat goldenen Boden, dreigeteiltes Mosaik, Julius Diez, Simon Theodor Rauecker, Neues Rathaus, Hannover, 3.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 13:42, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

File:Handwerk hat goldenen Boden, dreigeteiltes Mosaik, Julius Diez, Simon Theodor Rauecker, Neues Rathaus, Hannover, 1.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 13:43, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

File:Handwerk hat goldenen Boden, dreigeteiltes Mosaik, Julius Diez, Simon Theodor Rauecker, Neues Rathaus, Hannover, 2.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 13:43, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Raphael Tuck & Sons London Heraldic View Postcard Series 2174 THE RIVER & ST. PAUL'S FROM THE SHOT TOWER picture side.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Raphael Tuck & Sons London Heraldic View Postcard Series 2174 THE RIVER & ST. PAUL'S FROM THE SHOT TOWER picture side.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:11, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Magog the Ogre. I added "pd-old". Thanks for your attention. Best regards. Bernd Schwabe in Hannover (talk) 09:27, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Raphael Tuck & Sons London Heraldic View Postcard Series 2174 THE RIVER & ST. PAUL'S FROM THE SHOT TOWER address side.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Raphael Tuck & Sons London Heraldic View Postcard Series 2174 THE RIVER & ST. PAUL'S FROM THE SHOT TOWER address side.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:11, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Magog the Ogre. I added "pd-old". Thanks for your attention. Best regards. Bernd Schwabe in Hannover (talk) 09:27, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Albert Rosenthal Ansichtskarte 001 Bremen. Totalansicht. Bunt. Adressseite.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Albert Rosenthal Ansichtskarte 001 Bremen. Totalansicht. Bunt. Adressseite.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:11, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Magog the Ogre. I added "pd-old". Thanks for your attention. Best regards. Bernd Schwabe in Hannover (talk) 09:27, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Albert Rosenthal Ansichtskarte 001 Bremen. Totalansicht. Bunt. Bildseite.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Albert Rosenthal Ansichtskarte 001 Bremen. Totalansicht. Bunt. Bildseite.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:11, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Magog the Ogre. I added "pd-old". Thanks for your attention. Best regards. Bernd Schwabe in Hannover (talk) 09:27, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

1893 Wilhelm Geißler kolorierter Holzstich Auffahrt des steuerbaren Wölfert'schen Luftschiffes in Berlin

Hallo Bernd Schwabe, danke für deinen Upload . In der Bildbeschreibung schreibst du, dass das Bild "aus dem zweiter Halbjahresband von 1883" stammt und mit "83" signiert ist. Im Dateinamen und Datumsfeld steht jedoch 1893 und nicht 1883! Ist das ein Schreibfehler oder Absicht? MfG HeinrichStuerzl (talk) 11:41, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

Guten Tag, @HeinrichStuerzl: . Danke für Deine Aufmerksamkeit und Deine Nachricht. Im Internet-Archive ist die ursprüngliche Version noch erhalten. Dort sind beide Daten so genannt. Kannst Du weiterhelfen? Gruß und Dank von Bernd Schwabe in Hannover (talk) 15:24, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
Die Datierung bei www.kunstfreund.eu scheint ein Fehler zu sein, denn sie steht im Widerspruch zur Signatur des Künstlers. Woher stammt die Info, dass die Zeichnung im Halbjahresband von 1883 erschien? HeinrichStuerzl (talk) 16:56, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
Guten Tag, HeinrichStuerzl. Leider ist das Digitalisat so klein und nur gering aufgelöst, dass die die von dem Maler mit seiner Künstlersignatur gegebene Jahreszahl - zumindest für mich - nicht eindeutig lesbar ist. Aber ja, es muss wohl 1893 heißen, da der Künstler Wilhelm Geissler laut im Artikel gegebenen Einzelnachweis ja erst ab 1890 realistische Berliner Straßenszenen malte. Gruß von Bernd Schwabe in Hannover (talk) 11:55, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
1883 ist doch das richtige Jahr der Erstellung! Der Holzstich erschien schwarzweiß 1883 im auf S. 784 im Band 50 der Zeitschrift "Über Land und Meer". Die Signatur stimmt also! Bitte die Beschriftung und den Dateinamen entsprechend korrigieren. Mit bestem Gruß HeinrichStuerzl (talk) 14:01, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Mutter Erde (talk) 15:21, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

File:Familienkonferenz Hannover Nordstadt 184b3c POLITIK ZUM ANFASSEN e.V., v.l. Monika Dehmel, Nadine Dörffer, Gregor Dehmel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

130.75.236.218 21:19, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

File:Skulptur, von Ansgar Nierhoff, 1983, in der Grünfläche hinter dem Gebäude Finanzamt Hannover-Nord und Hannover- Land II, Vahrenwalder Straße 206 und 208, 30165 Hannover-Vahrenwald.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

84.180.5.109 19:20, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

Hallo, der Name scheint nicht besonders sinnvoll. Damit ich keinen Fehler bei der Umbenennung mache, da ich zufällig auf die Datei gestoßen bin, könntest du vielleicht einen Antrag auf Umbenennung zu einem beschreibenden Namen stellen? Danke. Gruß, 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 10:22, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

Hallo, 1234qwer1234qwer4. Vielen Dank. Muss irgendwie ein Fehler passiert sein. Gruß von Bernd Schwabe in Hannover (talk) 10:43, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
File:Jutta B. Bauer mit einem echten Marc Chagall, Galerie J. H. Bauer, Eingang während der Fassadensanierung Holzmarkt 4, D - 30159 Hannover.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Wickipädiater (talk) 13:07, 21 August 2020 (UTC)


File:100 Jahre Neues Rathaus Hannover, Integrationsbeirat Ahlem-Badenstedt-Davenstedt, Migranten Alexey Rechter und Ismael Ates am Infostand.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion. A reason for the tagging has not been detected or none was placed.

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now ! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 09:45, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

Hallo Bernd, aus der Bildbeschreibung geht nicht eindeutig hervor, dass die Akademie die Pressemitteilung tatsächlich unter der genannten Lizenz veröffentlicht hat. Normalerweise ist für sowas ja ein OTRS-Ticket verlinkt o.ä.. Kannst du das noch nachbessern? -- Discostu (talk) 09:18, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

#invoke:Autotranslate 85.212.190.192 06:43, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate 85.212.190.192 06:44, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Tim Rademacher (talk) 22:08, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

Kategorie "Sprengelgelände"?

Hallo Bernd Schwabe, nun bitte ich doch noch mal um Deine Hilfe – und zwar bei der Erstellung einer Kategorie "Sprengelgelände" für die gesammelten Bilder und Dokumente, von denen Du etliche beigesteuert hast (danke dafür!). Liebe Grüße von der --1falt (talk) 04:26, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

Hallo 1falt. Vielen Dank für Deine tolle Arbeit. Das mit dem Kantinen-Trakt hatte ich selber noch nicht auf dem Schirm. In Deinen Skizzen fehlt allerdings noch die (Glünderstraße 8, die heute Studentenwohnheim ist, früher aber mal Verwaltungsgebäude nach Plänen eines bekannten Architekten war. Herzlichen Dank für Deine Arbeiten, hoffentlich frohe Feiertage und - bleib uns gesund erhalten. Liebe Grüße von Bernd Schwabe in Hannover ([[User talk:Bernd Schwabe in Hannover#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:30, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
Hallo Bernd, vielen Dank für Deinen Zuspruch, der freut mich sehr! Das Fehlen der Glünderstraße 8 ist wirklich interessant. Da bin ich auf wohl das fehlende Gelb reingefallen. Leider lässt sich die Legende nicht sicher entziffern. Ich hab mal Pfeile zur Glünderstraße 8 eingebaut: Vorlage und Nachbau
Demnach sollte ich den Verwaltungsbau in der Vorher-Skizze ergänzen, oder? Dass das Gebäude zu den Sprengel-Werken gehörte, steht auch so auf der Wiki-Seite des Architekten Karl Siebrecht (danke für den Hinweis!): 1928: Verwaltungsgebäude für die Sprengel-Werke in Hannover, Glünderstraße 8.
Darüber bin ich dann noch mal im Stadtarchiv gelandet:
„Bereits 1853 siedelte die Firma aus wirtschaftlichen Gründen nach Hannover über. [...] Das erste Fabrikgebäude in Hannover war in der Hallerstraße 9 beheimatet. Anschließend zog die Fabrik in die Kronenstraße 6-7, später folgte die Errichtung eines neuen Fabrikgebäudes in der Schaufelder Straße 29. Auf der Rückseite dieses Gebäudes wurde 1934 noch ein Bürohaus mit der Anschrift Glünderstraße 8 erbaut.“ Damit ist das Bürogebäude fast 40 Jahre jünger als die Fabrik.
Verrückt, was alles im Internet zu finden ist ... --1falt ([[User talk:1falt|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 01:23, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
Liebe 1falt. Vielen Dank für Deine Arbeiten. Auffallend die Diskrepanz zwischen den Baujahren 1928 und 1934. Fotos folgen, insbesondere von dem schmiedeeisernem Tor (Detailfotos). Grüße und Dank von Bernd Schwabe in Hannover ([[User talk:Bernd Schwabe in Hannover#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:58, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 11:48, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Template:Autotranslate This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot ([[User talk:AntiCompositeBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) (FAQ) 14:05, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Hanooz 12:36, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Template:Autotranslate This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot ([[User talk:AntiCompositeBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) (FAQ) 10:05, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 02:30, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Template:Autotranslate This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot ([[User talk:AntiCompositeBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) (FAQ) 21:05, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Hallo Bernd, ich denke, dass die von dir gewählte Lizenzvorlage pd-old hier eher nicht passt, weil der Fotograf ja eben nicht bekannt ist. Da wäre Template:Tl wohl passender. Oder hattest du das vorher mal mit Input Dritter diskutiert?
Der Name der Kategorie Category:Documents by Jürgen Wessel scheint mir auch etwas irreführend, weil er nahelegt Wessel sei der Urheber. Ich denke eine Formulierung wie "donated by" o.ä. wäre angemessener. --Túrelio ([[User talk:Túrelio|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:48, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Ah, danke, Túrelio. Wir haben gerade an unserem heutigen Wikipedia-Termin über eine korrekte und einheitliche Formulierung gesprochen, die wir gemeinsam auch für andere Institutionen finden wollen. Vielen Dank für Deine Vorschläge, ich werde die anderen WikipedianerInnen darüber gerne informieren. Gruß von Bernd Schwabe in Hannover ([[User talk:Bernd Schwabe in Hannover#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:34, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Noch was, Túrelio. Wäre nicht ein Lizenzbaustein zielführender, der das anonym vor 1923 veröffentlichte Werk verdeutlicht? Bernd Schwabe in Hannover ([[User talk:Bernd Schwabe in Hannover#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:40, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Bild Glashütte Steinkrug

Das Bild existierte bereits, auch in der Kategorie: File:ARH_NL_Kageler_900.png. Bitte aufpassen, dass du nicht noch mehr doppelt importierst. --Rolf Eike Beer ([[User talk:Rolf Eike Beer|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Hallo, Rolf Eike Beer. Ja, ist mir gestern nacht nachträglich auch aufgefallen. Danke für den Hinweis; und Danke für Deine "uploads". Gruß von Bernd Schwabe in Hannover ([[User talk:Bernd Schwabe in Hannover#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:49, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Template:Autotranslate This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot ([[User talk:AntiCompositeBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) (FAQ) 14:05, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Template:Autotranslate This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot ([[User talk:AntiCompositeBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) (FAQ) 14:05, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Template:Autotranslate This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot ([[User talk:AntiCompositeBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) (FAQ) 15:05, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Template:Autotranslate This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot ([[User talk:AntiCompositeBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) (FAQ) 16:05, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Template:Autotranslate This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot ([[User talk:AntiCompositeBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) (FAQ) 20:05, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Template:Autotranslate And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot ([[User talk:AntiCompositeBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) (FAQ) 13:08, 30 September 2021 (UTC)