User talk:BerndH

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Hi Bernd, könntest du bitte bei Image:Equisetum pratense 240405.jpg noch angeben, wo du es unter dem richtigen Namen hochgeladen hast. Danke -- Breezie 18:24, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Ok, steht beim Bild dabei. -- BerndH 14:08, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Hallo, BerndH, "ustulata" warst du schneller. Ich nehme den Anlass wahr, dir einen Gruß aus dem schönen Saarland zu schicken. Gruß Orchi 14:57, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)


Thelymitra[edit]

Thanks Bernd for your photo in this article on the en.wikipedia. I've worked hard to compile the article, but I couldn't find a photo on the internet satisfying the copyright requirements of Wikipedia. Now the article looks much nicer with your photo. JoJan 08:52, 4 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I knew I had a picture somehwere. Because of this new article I searched again and found it at last.--BerndH 18:12, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Eriophila verna[edit]

Hi: I'm in doubt: is Erophila or Eriophila? I think it is Erophila... Manuel Anastácio 01:01, 31 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Must be Erophila. I realised the error some time ago but then forgot to correct it. --BerndH 05:11, 31 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bernd, thanks for your correction into Gentianella campestris The pictures are exactly the plant I remember when I draw it. I am not aware of the most recent biological names. Elly 13:30, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that´s the problem with taxonomy, names can change from time to time. Usually someone comes along and corrects such little mistakes. --BerndH 17:53, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Dactylorhiza maculata alba 190605.jpg[edit]

Du kannst nicht einfach ein Bild mit dem Hinweis löschen lassen das es unter anderem Namen hochgeladen wird. Das sollte dann nämlich schon geschehen sein und ein Link auf das neue Bild ist da Pflicht. Ansonsten braucht man für die Kontrolle ne halbe Minute. --Saperaud 00:22, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ich kann auch nicht immer an alles denken. Du hättest ich auch vor dem Löschen darauf ansprechen können und ich hätte noch was dran machen können. --BerndH 17:53, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Tree of Life[edit]

Hallo Bernd,

Ich mochte dir gern ausladen zu Commons:WikiProject Tree of Life

TeunSpaans 18:05, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Anchusa?[edit]

Hi Bernd,

Thanks for being alert. I'll try to go back and have a second look.

TeunSpaans 18:01, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]


copyright information[edit]

--Eirini 14:31, 24 July 2006 (UTC)== copyright information ==[reply]

Hi Bern,

I am working for a greek encyclopedia and would like to use your picture of aceras anthropophorum. Could you please give me details on its use? Thank you

eirini

Which picture do you mean? --BerndH 17:02, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]


The link for the picture is : http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Aceras_anthropophorum_plant.jpg

I'm waiting for you reply, thanks again Eirini

You can use the CC by SA 2.5 License which I´ve added to the picture. See here how to use it. --BerndH 14:47, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bildrechte[edit]

Dianthus carthusianorum

Hallo BerndH,

ich würde gerne ein Foto, das du gemacht hast, für eine Kunstaktion nutzen. Bei dieser Kunstaktion würden Samentütchen unter dem Titel "Blühende Landschaften - Deutschland wächst zusammen" mit Samen der Karthäuser Nelke verteilt werden. Zusätzlich würde eine Begleitbroschüre erscheinen, in der ich gerne das Foto "Dianthus carthusianorum 210505.jpg" von dir nutzen würde. Ich kann leider mit Dual License GFDL und CC-by-SA nichts anfangen, könnte ich dein Foto nutzen? Ich wäre dir sehr dankbar!

Herzliche Grüsse,

kunstart


Es geht also um das bild rechts? Grundsätzlich habe ich nichts dagegen. Ich habe dem Bild noch die Lizenz CC by sa 2.5 hinzugefügt. Die bedingungen für eine Nutzung stehen hier:Klick --BerndH 13:04, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Epipactis palustris[edit]

Hello Bernd,

please let me know your thoughts at Image talk:Moeraswesporchis 12-11-2005 16.25.58.JPG.

t.i.a.,

TeunSpaans 04:51, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Interwikis[edit]

Hallo BerndH, ich sehe gerade, du hast auf Category:Nymphaeaceae die Interwiki-Links ergänzt, aber gleichzeitig umkodiert. Dies ist nicht nötig, die MediaWiki-Software kann schon länger den kompletten UTF-8-Zeichensatz. Diese Hieroglyphen sind also nicht notwendig. --Raymond Disc. 10:46, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Was hab ich gemacht? Das einzige was ich gemacht habe, ist die ''...'' zu entfernen. Alles andere ging dann "automatisch"--BerndH 11:25, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hm interessant. Dann muss dein Browser (welcher eigentlich?) die Umwandlung machen bzw. die Server zur Umwandlung veranlassen. Immerhin zerschießt er nicht die fremden Zeichen, das gabs auch mal eine Weile. Nichts für ungut :-) --Raymond Disc. 17:57, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Das war der Internet Explorer, den ich, nachdem ich Probleme mit meinem Computer hatte und alles neu installiert usw... habe, noch benutzt hatte. Wegen dieser Sache und auch überhaupt bin ich jetzt bei Firefox und wollte da nochmal rumtüfteln bei nächster Gelegenheit ob das wieder so passiert. --BerndH 18:04, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Centaurea‎[edit]

Danke für die Änderung, das Template werde ich ab jetzt verwenden. -- Ayacop 15:18, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Feine Sache, die Templates. Das Vertauschte war aber ein Versehen.--BerndH 20:00, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Category und Article images[edit]

Please only put an image phot of a plant species in an Article gallery and not duplicate it in a Category. It is only necessary in an article. Great photos in your collection though. Danke and Thanks WayneRay 23:08, 13 November 2006 (UTC)WayneRay[reply]

Thanks, but I have absolutely no idea what you mean... --BerndH 05:19, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry I was in the wrong User Gallery, my apologies WayneRay 13:37, 14 November 2006 (UTC)WayneRay[reply]

Hallo BerndH, ich weiß, dass Pilze keine Pflanzen sind. Momentan gibt es aber keine Kategorie für Giftpilze; deshalb sind Pilze in dieser Kategorie momentan eingeschlossen, wie es in der Category-Beschreibung auch ausdrücklich steht. Wenn du bereit bist eine Kategorie Giftpilze anzulegen, würde ich das begrüßen. Gruß --Túrelio 09:48, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Natürlich wäre eine Category:Poisonous fungi oder so ähnlich sinnvoller.--BerndH 09:50, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Paper wasps-huddling.jpeg[edit]

I stumbled across the Image:Paper wasps-huddling.jpeg and saw the editwar. "Category does not exist" means, it appears as a red link and has not been edited yet, no matter if pictures are in it or not. You have to create the category. It is important to place it as a subcategory in another Category, something like Category:Insects or whatever. Since the picture can be found here: Polistes spec. the category is not necessary. --BerndH 10:22, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I know it means it's redlinked, but it doesn't matter, it still exists... just go there and look. All the categories and subcategories were setup before Olei decided to remove it all. I prefer categories over little pages. ¦ Reisio 11:58, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No, the category does not exist. No one has set up a category named polites. Click on it and it says: "Wikimedia Commons does not yet have a Category page called Polistes". A hierarchial category structure is one of the most important ways to navigate through commons.

The hierarchial category structure as it is now: 

              Image:Paper wasps-huddling.jpeg
                              |
                              | 
                      (Category:Polistes)
                              |
                             ---     <--- here it stops


As it should be: 

              Image:Paper wasps-huddling.jpeg
                              |
                              |
                       Category:Polistes
                              |
                              |
                       Category:Insecta         (or whatever fits)
                              |
                              |
                       Category:Hexapoda
                              |
                              |
                       Category:Arthropoda
                              |
                              |
                        and so on...


See also Commons:Categories#Category_structure --BerndH 12:48, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"No, the category does not exist. No one has set up a category named polites. Click on it and it says: "Wikimedia Commons does not yet have a Category page called Polistes"."
Click on it, and you see the image - that image has been categorized, and I can now find it by going to that category.
"A hierarchial category structure is one of the most important ways to navigate through commons."
I agree - that's why I prefer categories to pages (like the one Olei has setup).
"<--- here it stops"
"All the categories and subcategories were setup before Olei decided to remove it all. … ¦ Reisio 11:58, 10 January 2007 (UTC)"[reply]
I don't have the time or inclination just now to undo all his changes again, so I'm just undoing what's actually on my watchlist. If you want to fix it now, be my guest, but I have to go to work.
¦ Reisio 12:59, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"that image has been categorized, and I can now find it by going to that category."

But the Category itself has not been categorised.

"that's why I prefer categories to pages"

I prefer pages but I don´t want to start this category or articles/pages/galleries discussion again. Either has to be categorised.

"I don't have the time..."

Ok, forget it. I was trying to explain how the category thing should work to prevent further editwars. --BerndH 15:43, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It doesn't have anything to do with understanding categories. ¦ Reisio 03:08, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sortierung[edit]

Hallo, Bernd, schaust Du bitte noch bei Epipactis und Spiranthes vorbei. Gruß Orchi 23:01, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Überschriften[edit]

Hallo Bernd, wie ich sehe, magst Du die Abschnittsüberschriften 'Images' und 'Illustrations' u.a. bei Ribes uva-crispa und Glechoma hederacea. Ich hatte sie gelöscht, weil sie leider in größerer Schrift als die Titeldaten (Familia, Species) erscheinen, so eine höhere Wichtigkeit vortäuschen und das gesamte Layout der Seite verderben. Nenn mich pingelig, aber mir haut das echt hart auf mein ästhetisches Empfinden. Ich hoffe, Dir gefallen die eben hinzugefügten Fotos. Gruß, Ies 18:18, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Die Schriftgröße ist halt so bei Überschriften. Die sind drin, um ein bißchen Ordnung zu halten, besonders wenn bei größerer Anzahl Bildern noch unterteilt wird in Blätter, Blüten, Früchte, Standorte, usw... --BerndH 14:16, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"no cats on my pics"[edit]

Please don't take this unkindly, but you gave them away under a free licence, and they're not yours anymore, they're "ours" :). --SB_Johnny|talk|books 15:55, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Spathoglottis affinis[edit]

hello there BerndH,

categories are the primary usage of putting images in order on the Commons. It does not matter if an article exists already. Please read upon Commons:Categories before making changes again such as removing a category on flowers, which actually should all be categorised. sincerely Gryffindor 20:09, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Read Commons:WikiProject Tree of Life. --BerndH 20:46, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removing categories[edit]

Please do not remove useful category information, as you did on the Digitalis images. Many users prefer to navigate Commons using categories for species, and when you remove these categories you remove this functionality. Please stop. Quadell (talk) 15:14, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Under one condition: your "please stop"... did you mean "be so nice and don´t remove the categories" or "stop removing categories you §$%&"?
By the way... You should use the Category: Viola (plant) and not Category:Viola! --BerndH 16:12, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I meant "be so nice and don't remove categories". You're right about "Viola (plant)". Thanks. Quadell (talk) 23:34, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Danke[edit]

Thanks a lot for recognizing some of my flowers :) Neva 18:36, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dankie ook van my af[edit]

Thanks for fixing Protea laetans.I screwed it up and asked Orchi to fix, but he said that you had fixed first. Best wises Andrew massyn 06:04, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

about Helianthemum_nummularium[edit]

Image:Helianthemum_nummularium_subsp_obscurum_260807a.jpg I think is actually a Hypericum. carol 09:48, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, no, it´s Helianthemum nummularium. Hypericum looks quite different. --BerndH 10:44, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
By the light of day I know one thing for sure and that is that I have nothing to argue this with! Sorry to take your time. Thanks for the pics.carol 19:56, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Valeriana[edit]

Thanks for the correction. It wasn't me who determinated the plant. Aelwyn 13:47, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ranunculus glacialis[edit]

Servus Bernd, Bist du dir mit Image:Ranunculus_glacialis_070707a.jpg sicher. Mir fehlt da die rotbraune Kelchbehaarung und die Blätter schaun auch ein bisschen anders aus. --Tigerente 13:08, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oha, das kann sein. Dieses und das Pflänzchen standen keinen Meter auseinander und daher hab ich mir die beim schnell mal im vorbeigehen nicht genauer ansehen können. Was schlägst du vor, was es sein könnte? --BerndH 16:19, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Servus, tja das ist nun die Frage. Das zweite Bild zeigt R. glacialis, beim ersten ist der Kelch ja kahl. Die Blätter würden mich eher an R. alpestris erinnern. Das Gestein schaut aber eher silikatisch aus. Vielleicht ein Hybrid. Wo genau hast du denn geknippst? War vielleicht Kalk wo in der Nähe. Bin nur zufällig drauf gestoßen, da ich heute Image:Ranunculus seguieri.jpg hochgeladen habe. mfg --Tigerente 16:27, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Servus Bernd, Inzwischen als Ranunculus alpestris bestimmt. Siehe auch http://forum.pflanzenbestimmung.de/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=2429 ein sehr empfehlenswertes Forum. Gruß, --Tigerente 12:10, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, von mir aus auch alpestris - allerdings hatte ich die mit deutlich kleineren Blüten in Erinnerung. --BerndH 12:19, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Erledigt. --BerndH 12:36, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thänks. mfg --Tigerente 15:37, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wental[edit]

Ich kann nicht glauben, dass das Wental zur Gemeinde Essingen gehört, auch wenn es auf www.essingen.de steht: "Auf der Albhochfläche, südöstlich der Nachbargemeinde Bartholomä, erstreckt sich über die Gemarkung von Essingen, bis ins Steinheimer Becken das Wental." Die Straße von Bartholomä nach X durchschneidet das Felsenmeer, das am Schnittpunkt gelegene Landhotel gehört zu Bartholomä (lt. PLZ), das w der Straße gelegene Stück dürfte teilweise zu Steinheim gehören. Hast du eine genaue Markungskarte? --Historiograf 22:20, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Seltsam, ist aber so. Ich hab da mal was vorbereitet: [1]. Ich hoffe mal, das funktioniert. --BerndH 18:02, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Wunderbar, danke. Kurios, in der Tat. "Das kann man nur historisch erklären" de:Hermann Lübbe, hab aber leider keine OAB Aalen zur Hand (ist auch antiquarisch nicht mehr erhältlich) --Historiograf 16:32, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Platanthera[edit]

Hi. Why do you keep on moving this? What makes you be sure that amongst the hundreds of P. bifolia there would be one (or a few) P. chlorantha? Lycaon 12:14, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's very simple. Look into the center of the flower of Pl. bifolia and Pl. chlorantha. The difference is the position of the pollinia. --BerndH 16:43, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I (think I) see: Parallel in P. bifolia and pointed outwards in P. chlorantha?? Lycaon 17:41, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yep. So there are both species in the same habitat. Maybe there are hybrids also. --BerndH 10:18, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. How do I distinguish hybrids? I'm going back there this weekend (it's only 210km ;-)). Lycaon 13:02, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Wellllllll, that's not easy. The position of the pollinia is not always intermediate. Usually they are not as close together and parallel compared to bifolia. --BerndH 14:40, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No hybrids found (probably not enough time too look properly ;-). Did find plenty Ophrys fuciflora though and a Cephalanthera damasonium, sadly showing cleistogamy. The Goodyera repens, had just surfaced yet, so that's for next week. Cheers. Lycaon 09:33, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You mean Cephalanthera damasonium didn't open its flowers. Well, that is the norm.
I had the chance to take pictures of both Platantheras and its hybrid in the same habitat. See Image:Platanthera bifoliia xhybrida chlorantha 110608.jpg with Pl. bifolia on the left, Pl. ×hybrida in the middle and Pl. chlorantha on the right. I think the hybrid looks very much intermediate. Hope that helps a little. --BerndH 19:25, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
....phantactic! Viele Grüße.Orchi 19:55, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Great images indeed. Lycaon 19:57, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Categories[edit]

Hello, every image should be categorized. Please do not revert people adding valid categories. Some people do not use galleries at all. How are they supposed to find the images then? Rocket000 (talk) 05:05, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Centaurium erythraea 050708.jpg[edit]

Do you mind me doing some noise reduction on your picture?
BTW, I saw a few hundreds of Herminium monorchis two days ago. Pictures soon. Lycaon (talk) 20:44, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Geocodes[edit]

Hallo Bernd,

meine Geocodes für Deine beiden Bilder Image:Burg Krautheim 300405.jpg und Image:Schloss Langenburg 260604.jpg waren zugegebenermaßen geschätzt, von daher eher ungenau als falsch. Wie dem auch sei, du kennst ja offensichtlich den wahren Kamerastandort und kannst ihn sicher ergänzen. Das geht ziemlich einfach (siehe Commons:Geocoding#Google_Maps). Grundsätzlich ist eine ungenaue Angabe immer noch besser als keine Angabe. -- Dr. Schorsch (talk) 14:17, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Iris germanica 250503.jpg[edit]

Moin Bernd,

soeben habe ich hier einen Kommentar von de.wikipedia zu Deinem Foto übertragen. Bist Du Dir mit der Bestimmung sicher? Selbst kann ich leider nichts dazu sagen, außer dass die Blütenfarben m.E. eher nicht für eine I. germanica-Wildform sprechen. Der Benutzer „CrocusGregor“ war schon einige Monate nicht mehr aktiv, hat aber in der de.wikipedia die E-Mail-Funktion freigeschaltet, bei Bedarf kannst Du ihn ja mal kontaktieren :-)

Beste Grüße --:bdk: 11:33, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Laut Inventarlisten des betreffenden Naturschuchtzgebiets und des wohl deckungsgleichen Biotops nach §32 NatSchG gibt es dort nur Iris germanica. --BerndH (talk) 11:05, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Centaurium erythraea 220603.jpg[edit]

Dear Bernd Haynold

I like your picture, especially the colors. Therefore I would like to ask you permission to print this picture in an article about Centaurium in our Paracelsus magazine.

Paracelsus magazine is a product of global cooperation, with people from Europe, North and South America, and India volunteering their time and working without pay. The objective of the magazine is to blend ancient and modern wisdom of medicine and holistic healing. The magazine is published monthly in three different languages: German, Spanish, and English; it is read all on every continent of the world. It reaches physicians, alternative practitioners and ordinary people. Although we sell the magazine, we are a non profit organisation and the printing coasts are hardly covered. Would you be so generous and give us your permission to print this photograph? If yes, we would need a higher resolution. We thank you in advance for your consideration and reply and send you our very best wishes. Anna Beutler anna.beutler@gmx.ch PS: For more information please visit our homepage: www.paracelsus-center.ch

Unfortunatley I seem to have mislayed the original image with a higher resolution.--BerndH (talk) 18:56, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Uncategorized images[edit]

Dear BerndH, please stop removing categories and uncategorized templates from images. At Commons every image should be categorized. A gallery is not a replacement for a category. See Commons:Categories and Commons:Categories vs Galleries for more information. Thank you, Multichill (talk) 18:15, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Finally someone noticed. In case you haven't seen it, these images are on my user page. I haven't decided yet what to do with them. Maybe I will put one or two back in a gallery, some are probably misidentified, some are not good enough anymore. --BerndH (talk) 18:53, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You dont seem to get it. You uploaded these files to Commons under a free licence so they became part of the collection. If you continue to remove these templates/categories, this will be considered disruptive behaviour and you will be blocked. This is your last warning. Multichill (talk) 19:03, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/A few old images by User:BerndH Satisfied? --BerndH (talk) 19:46, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
P.S.: Licensing and categorising isn't the same. Not a good argument. --BerndH (talk) 10:56, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]



Overcat @ File:Eryngium campestre 310705a.jpg[edit]

Hey, you were a bit blunt there, it's not nice to revert people's stuff like that. Also, you are misunderstanding what overcategorizing is, here it's (over?)refining to prevent crowding. I am creating many of these in some country cats, because I prefer images of the actual flora to image from remote places. So if you disagree with that you should ask for their deletion and notify me, I would then wait and see. That you be more coherent than wtf-is-this-fool-doing-i-m-reverting-that-at-onceing. - Olybrius (talk) 14:27, 17 August 2010 (UTC) See Category:Cupressus sempervirens which is the most advanced. And in the future I even plan cats like Category:Cupressus sempervirens cultivated in France and Category:Cupressus sempervirens growing wild in France (not sure if that's possbile in this case though). But for these, I'll ask first I think, as I don't know if such names are appropriate.[reply]

Ps: OK, maybe 2005 in Germany was too enthusiastic, I won't re-add this one... - Olybrius (talk) 14:27, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yep, 2005 was too enthuastic, because the plant looks pretty much the same in 2006, 2007, 2008 and so on...
You don't contribute much to flora/fauna? Categories by country is in my opinion not very helpful. Suppose someone needs a picture of a certain part of a plant (flowers, leaves, seeds, etc.). So the person has to go through all the countries to find the disered picture. So I would say that if a species category becomes too crowded, it should be divided by morphology, like flowers, plants, seeds,...--BerndH (talk) 17:13, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Also, the plant species pretty much looks the same in germany, france, whereever...--BerndH (talk) 19:49, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Klepsau 230509.jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 20:20, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Bestimmung von File:Gentiana nivalis 230705.jpg[edit]

Hallo BerndH, ich habe das Bild File:Gentiana nivalis 230705.jpg in Category:Gentiana utriculosa geschoben und die Beschreibung entsprechend angepasst, da die extrem stark geflügelten Kelche zeigen, dass es sich um diese Art handeln muss (und nicht um Gentiana nivalis). Zum Vergleich:

  • Gentiana nivalis Kelche kantig
    Gentiana nivalis
    Kelche kantig
  • Gentiana utriculosa Kelche breit geflügelt
    Gentiana utriculosa
    Kelche breit geflügelt

Mit freundlichen Grüßen -- Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 07:03, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oha, das dachte ich auch vor längerer Zeit mal und habs dann vergessen. Stimmt natürlich so. Dank dafür. --BerndH (talk) 21:41, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fundortangaben Ackermoose[edit]

Hallo Bernd,

ich plane, meine Doktorarbeit über Ackermoose in Baden-Württemberg zu schreiben und eins meiner Untersuchungsgebiete wird die Hohenloher Ebene sein. Da Du dort ja einige Fotos diverser Ackermoose gemacht hast, bin ich an entsprechenden Fundortangaben oder auch generell Hinweisen auf artenreiche Äcker interessiert. Hast Du da evtl. Angaben für mich? Dankeschön. --Schokoanna (talk) 14:04, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ich kann nur mit ein paar Fundangaben zu Hornmoosen und Riccia dienen. --BerndH (talk) 21:37, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Angaben zu den beiden wären schon prima. Du kannst mir die Angaben an folgende Mailadresse schicken: altenfel(at)uni-hohenheim.de. Herzlichen Dank! --Schokoanna (talk) 08:50, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Arnica_montana_180605[edit]

Hallo Herr H.,

ich konzipiere gerade eine Ausstellung in einem Museum. Dort soll es auch eine Texttafel über Heilmittel geben. Sehr gerne hätte ich für diese Tafel Ihr Arnika-Foto verwendet. Natürlich würde Ihr Name genannt werden. Leider ist das Bild auch in der höheren Auflösung noch nicht gut geeignet. Hätten Sie das Foto in einer noch besseren Qualität?

Viele Grüße Doris Hefner

Etliche Origninalbilder mit höherer Auflösung aus dem Jahr 2005 sind mir abhanden gekommen, darunter auch das mit der Arnika.--BerndH (talk) 16:17, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gruß[edit]

Hallo Bernd, ich würde mich sehr freuen, wenn Du Dich mal kurz melden könntest. Grüße. Orchi (talk) 20:15, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Location?[edit]

Hi Bernd - do you have a location for File:Atropa belladonna 030705.jpg please? - Thanks! MPF (talk) 18:28, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I can't remember. --BerndH (talk) 20:50, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Any memory come back with time? ;-) Even roughly (country?, region?, nearest city?) is better than nothing! Also for File:Atropa belladonna 220605.jpg, please. Thanks! - MPF (talk) 11:19, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I use one of your photos[edit]

Hi Bernd!

I have use a photo of Cantharis rustica from wikimedia in my free software educational proyect "Animalandia" (http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia)

You can see directly in the follow link and click over "Siguiente" ("Next"):

http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/imagen.php?id=33636


If you wish, you can send me some letters or/and a photo for your "contributor card" in Animalandia:

http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/autor.php?nombre=Bernd%20Haynold

This is my "contributor card", for example:

http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/autor.php?nombre=Fernando%20Lis%F3n%20Mart%EDn


In the future, I use more of your photos, I sure!

Thank you for the licence and, of course, for your splendid photos!! Regards! Fernando Lisón

--Fernando.lison (talk)

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Photographer's Barnstar
Hi BerndH!

My name is Edoardo Bit, I am an architect and also a “young researcher” of the University of Ferarra (Italy).

I am writing a book on the “green walls technologies” and I have found very interesting a photo in your Wikimedia Commons page. So, I would kindly ask you if I can use it in my book.

Obviously, if you gently decide to grant me the permission, your name (or your Wikimedia Commons nickname) and the link of the picture will be correctly cited in the credits of my publication.

The photo which I would use is: http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Salix_reticulata_030905.jpg


Thank you very much! I hope you will attend my request… My e-mail is: edoardo.bit@gmail.com

Bye, Edoardo 

Edoardo.bit (talk) 17:52, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Anchusa officinalis ?[edit]

Helo BerndH,

I see, that you are botanical expert and one times in the past you have corrected my wrong name of plant. Now I am in doubt about my picture [[2]], which I took in botanical garden, but now I am not really sure, that this plant is really Anchusa officinalis. Could you, please have a look on it and write to me your opinion? Thanks in advance, --Karelj (talk) 19:58, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not that much of a botanical expert.. --BerndH (talk) 20:49, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Centaurium erythraea 220603.jpg[edit]

Hi BerndH - this pic is missing source info (presumably "{{Own}}"?), can you add it please? Photo location would also be valuable, please. Thanks! - MPF (talk) 21:42, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A problem orchid[edit]

Dear Bernd,

Could you please help me with a "problem orchid" which I have found in the French Alps (on 2,300 m above Montalbert, Savoie)?

It looks as a variant of Dactylorhiza fuchsii, but with the habit of Trausteinera globosa.
NB: I have found both Dactylorhiza fuchsii and Trausteinera globosa on this mountain.

Thank you in advance for your appreciated help, --Réginald alias Meneerke bloem (To reply) 11:09, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm quite sure this is not a hybrid. Genetically the relationship between Traunsteinera and Dactlorhiza is too distant. It looks more like the upper half of the inflorescence got stuck in development and stopped growing somehow. So it's most likely Dactylorhiza fuchsii.--BerndH (talk) 20:48, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Danke schön, Bernd, für ihre Beantwortung. Mit dankbaren Grüßen aus Belgien, --Réginald alias Meneerke bloem (To reply) 09:13, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I use one of your photos, again[edit]

Hello Bernd:

On this occasion I used a photo of Zygaena filipendulae in "Animalandia" (http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia)

You can see directly in the follow link:

http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/imagen.php?id=1885

I would love to send me a personal photo (or avatar) and a short text to complete your profile in Animalandia:

http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/autor.php?nombre=Bernd%20Haynold


Thank you again! Best wishes! Fernando Lisón

--Fernando.lison (talk)

Dexter[edit]

Cool! Your pic of the Aconite source flower http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Aconitum_variegatum_110807f.jpg was used in the latest episode of the Dexter TV series (S7 E6). Hope the researchers did their stuff and asked first though!

How interesting... and no, they didn't ask!--BerndH (talk) 00:00, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Caladenia pendens.jpg[edit]

Hi Bernd, yes, it called may attention because it was under the Cat unidentified Caladenias. As you took the photo you're probably right about the identification. In fact Jones mentions there is a hybrid of C. chapmanii and C. polychroma in nature, but it has no name as yet. On the other hand, these two species are typically red (despite there are other colors). I sure may cancel the unidenfified Cat and the move thing. Sorry for being nosy! Cheers ~~

Use of your pictures for a book[edit]

Hi,

We’d like to use some of your pictures for a book that will be publish next fall. On wikimedia, it says that the pictures are copyright free.

The title of the book is Secrets de plantes 2 and the name of the author is Fabien Girard. The initial print run will be 1000 copies.

We’d like to have your autorisation by e-mail to use these pictures. If you accept, what is the exact name of the source that we must write beside the pictures?

Here are the link of the pictures.

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Trifolium_hybridum_230711.JPG

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Trifolium_hybridum_230711a.jpg

Stéphane Aubut Editor assistant for Les Éditions JCL

stephane@jcl.qc.ca

File:Dactylorhiza incarnata - kahkjaspunane sõrmkäpp.jpg[edit]

I did consult with person with more experience and she suggested that it looks mostly like Dactylorhiza maculata. Are you ok with that conclusion? Thanks in advance, --Ivar (talk) 08:26, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

One more update with more persons involved. Conclusion: this is probably a hybrid of D. incarnata. I requested filerenaming. Regards, --Ivar (talk) 15:51, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, the matter has been solved... --BerndH (talk) 16:25, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrol given[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. Trijnsteltalk 20:23, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Diphasiastrum complanatum 030913b.JPG[edit]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Diphasiastrum complanatum 030913b.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 20:14, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Main-Karte-160710.jpg[edit]

Hallo BerndH,
in der Karte "Main-Karte-160710.jpg" hat sich ein Fehler eingeschlichen. Die Stadt Haßfurt schreibt sich ohne ein "h" am Ende. Bedeutet das viel Arbeit, dieses zu korrigieren?
Gruß --Handbrems (talk) 12:55, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sehr geehrter Herr Haynold,

Für unsere neue Sonderausstellung zum Thema "Auen – Die wilden Seiten des Aargaus – 20 Jahre Auenschutzpark" suchen wir noch ein Foto einer deutschen Tamariske. Bei wikimedia habe ich solch ein schönes Foto von ihnen gefunden: Myricaria germanica 300906b.jpg Könnten wir dieses Foto als Abbildung in unserer Ausstellung und eventuell auch für die Bereiche Bildung/Vermittlung und Kommunikation verwenden? Sie würden uns mit dem Foto sehr helfen. Ist die Quellenangabe, die direkt beim Foto erfolgen soll, mit "Bernd Haynold" korrekt? Hätten sie eventuell die Aufnahme noch in einer höheren Auflösung? Bitte nehmen sie mit mir Kontakt auf unter der e-mailadresse: K.Blassmann@naturama.ch

Freundliche Grüsse Katrin Blassmann

Katrin Blassmann, Sonderausstellungen naturama das Aargauer Naturmuseum • am Bahnhofplatz • Postfach •5001 Aarau Tel. 0041 62 832 72 21/Fax: 0041 62 832 72 10 • K.Blassmann@naturama.ch• www.naturama.ch

Aufnahmeposition des Grünsteines[edit]

Was macht dich so sicher, dass dies nicht der Punkt war, von dem das Bild aufgenommen war? Ich hab mir das schon sehr genau in Luftbildern angeschaut und die Koordinaten nicht leichtfertig geändert. Zwar irritieren die Bäume links, wegen denen man vermutlich die Rodelbahn nicht sehen bzw. nur vage durch die Zweige erahnen kann, aber die können ja seit 2006 gefällt worden sein. Jedenfalls passen Position und Orientierung der drei Häuser (sowie des fast vollständig verdeckten vierten mit dem weißen Dach), die sich auf der Wiesenfläche befinden sowie bestimmte Charakteristika der Ostflanke des Grünsteins ausgesprochen gut zu der von mir angegebenen Position. Eigentlich gibt es gar keine andere Position, von der aus das Bild sonst noch aufgenommen worden sein könnte... --Gretarsson (talk) 01:44, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ah ja. Keine Antwort ist auch ’ne Antwort. Danke für’s Gespräch. --Gretarsson (talk) 10:32, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ungeduldig? Habs erst gestern gelesen.
Was macht mich so sicher, daß das nicht der Punkt war? Ich hab das Bild gemacht! Auch wenn ich es nicht mehr genau nachvollziehen kann, wo es war, soweit ich mich erinnere, war es auf der anderen Seite des Königsee. --BerndH (talk) 14:35, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Naja, das Leben ist kurz, und meine Änderungen rückgängig zu machen hat ja auch keine 7 Tage sondern (wenn überhaupt) 24 Stunden gebraucht. Aber OK, ist jetzt egal. Ja, dass du das Bild gemacht hast, hab ich mir schon fast gedacht, bzw. steht es ja unten drunter. Aber nach fast 8 Jahren ist die Erinnerung ja nun nicht unbedingt mehr die frischeste. Wenn es vom Ostufer des Königssees aufgenommen worden ist, dann kann es nur von einem der Häuser am Malerwinklweg aus, die dort direkt am Wasser stehen, gemacht worden sein, und war so, dass die untersten Teile der Rodelbahn, die dazugehörigen Gebäude sowie der Parkplatz sich direkt unterhalb des unteren Bildrandes befinden. Das würde sogar erklären, warum die höheren Teile der Rodelbahn hinter Bäumen versteckt sind, ohne dass man annehmen müsste, dass diese Bäume nach 2006 gefällt wurden. Der Aufnahmepunkt muss jedenfalls ungefähr auf einer Linie mit dem seinerzeit von mir angegebenen Aufnahmepunkt liegen und ich fände es absolut sinnvoll, einen Aufnahmepunkt (Vorschlag:
Camera location47° 35′ 12″ N, 12° 59′ 23″ E  Heading=292.5° Kartographer map based on OpenStreetMap.View all coordinates using: OpenStreetMapinfo
in der Beschreibung anzugeben, damit der interessierte Betrachter weiß, von wo aus er auf den Grünstein schaut. --Gretarsson (talk) 16:09, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Position ist ok. Das Bild entstand während einer kleinen Wanderung zum Malerwinkel, daher kam als Position die westliche Seite garnicht in Frage. Nach Absuchen der Luftbilder wars dann letzlich offensichtlich: Das Teil vom Dach, welches auf dem Bild zu sehen ist, ist von einem der Bootshäuser.--BerndH (talk) 18:41, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Alles klar, hab’s eingefügt. Und wie ich merke, ist die Erinnerung doch noch ziemlich frisch. Cheers! --Gretarsson (talk) 14:13, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Übergang Buntsandstein-Muschelkalk 220912.JPG[edit]

Hallo, du weißt doch bestimmt noch wo du dieses Bild gemacht hast. Kannst du gucken, ob es vielleicht in Category:Naturschutzgebiet Kallmuth reinpasst? Bei File:Kallmuth bei Homburg am Main 220912.jpg habe ich ungefähr das NSG markiert (quasi alles oberhalb des Weinbergs). Gruß Holger1959 (talk) 23:57, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nigritella from Oisans to identify[edit]

Vielen Dank für ihre Hilfe!

I have renamed the pictures accordingly.

Beste Grüße aus Belgien, --Réginald alias Meneerke bloem (To reply) 16:14, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Foto Grenzdolomit Eschenau[edit]

Hallo Bernd! Es gibt mehrere Eschenau. Von welchem Eschenau stammt das Foto vom Grenzdolomit. Franken (Knetzgau oder bei Nürnberg) oder doch bei Vellberg Baden Württemberg?? Bitte gib die korrekte Zuordnung bei dem Bild noch an.

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Photographer's Barnstar
Für die Ansicht von Kirchberg an der Jagst! Aarp65 (talk) 07:49, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dein Bild "Silvaner"[edit]

Hallo Bernd,

habe dein schönes Bild verwendet, allerdings als Ausschnitt. Es findet sich hier: Silvaner auf Webseite RHC-Weinkontor

Vielen Dank dafür! Beste Grüße --Holger Casselmann (talk) 18:50, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cladonia_convoluta_020408[edit]

Das ist Cladonia foliacea

Image without license[edit]

File:Buxbaumia viridis 20140416.jpeg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 17:06, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Foto Obersontheim[edit]

[3] Könntest du evtl. helfen oder kennst du jemand, der ein Foto machen könnte? Gruß --Historiograf (talk) 15:30, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ich guck mal, was ich machen kann. --BerndH (talk) 07:15, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Science Competition 2017 closes on December, the 15th[edit]

Hi, "Wiki Science Competition" 2017 has started

It is a world event.
The upload phase in Asian, American and European countries without juries ends on December 15th. In Africa two weeks later.
Here you can find more details.

This is a manually inserted message for commons users who are also globally active or who have uploaded images related to the competition's themes (science buildings, microscopic images, scientists, wildlife...).

#WSC2017 #WikiScience #WikiScience2017

Wiki Science Competition

Wenn du aus der Schweiz oder aus Deutschland oder aus Südtirol bist. In Österreich ist der Wettbewerb schon zu.--Alexmar983 (talk) 06:06, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tulipa orphanidea[edit]

Hi BerndH, can you please add in the description from what garden and country this tulip comes ? --Salix (talk) 17:43, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If I could remember... --BerndH (talk) 11:04, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Anfrage zu einem Bild[edit]

Hallo Bernd,

dein Nestwurz-Foto, File:Neottia nidus-avis 060507.jpg ist ein Dokument, welches optisch für die Illustration auf einer Schautafel in einem kleinen örtlichen Naturschutzgebiet infrage kommt. Was für eine Namensnennung möchtest Du haben, oder wäre die Zeile "Foto: Bernd Haynold, CC-By-SA 3.0" für dich in Ordnung? Grüße, Grand-Duc (talk) 09:39, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Opalinuston-Aufschluss[edit]

Lieber BerndH, im Rahmen der Suche nach einem möglichen Standort für ein Atommüll-Endlager sucht ein Fernsehsender einen Opalinuston-Aufschluss, um dort zu drehen. Können Sie mir sagen, wo Ihr schönes Foto https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opalinuston-Formation#/media/Datei:Opalinuston_120610.jpg entstanden ist? Gerne per E-Mail: fritz.mielert -at- bund.net Danke & beste Grüße --Fritzmielert (talk) 07:13, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Erkrath fossils[edit]

In 1969 I was digging up fossils of clams, mussels and snails in sandstone. I would like to know what era they are from. 2001:569:53C0:8200:6572:BCF8:A595:5E57 18:07, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know. --BerndH (talk) 18:52, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:BerndH&oldid=620971657"