User talk:Benjism89

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Find more on my French Wikipedia talk page.

Image French urban railway networks[edit]

Hi! I think you can add in brown LAON with its POMA2000 as urban railway, it is like VAL.

Thanks for your work!

FA

Image Image:carte_TGV.svg[edit]

Bjr, est-il possible d'ajouter en noir la liaison Le Havre-Strasbourg qui passe par la banlieue nord de Paris entre Mantes la Jolie et Roissy-CDG et inversement de supprimer le trait noir en Bern et Zurich, les TGV n'effectuant plus ce parcours. Hugovoyages (talk) 16:59, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

C'est fait ! Merci Benjism89 (talk) 08:40, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

C'est moi qui vous remercie, bravo. Je ne sais pas faire de telles manips. J'ai décelé d'autres petits points améliorables:

  • un trait rouge (pointillé pour l'instant) entre Liège et Aix la chapelle/Aachen
  • un pointille noir ? bleu ? entre Bourg en Bresse et Bellegarde avec Nurieux en rond vert.
  • Valence TGV est un rond plutôt qu'un carré puisque les TER Rhone Alpes Valence-Grenoble s'y arrêtent. On pourrait en dire de meme pour aéroport Charles de Gaulle TGV avec le RER B et Chessy Marne la Vallée pour le RER A.

Merci. Hugovoyages (talk) 06:28, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

C'est fait, sauf pour le dernier point où je ne suis pas d'accord avec vous. Les ronds correspondent pour moi à des gares sur LGV, qu'une desserte TER / RER s'y ajoute ou non. Dans tous ces cas, les trains régionaux ne desservent pas les mêmes quais que les TGV. Cdt, Benjism89 (talk) 19:14, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,

je suis un wikipédien novice et je ne sais pas créer/modifier des fichiers SVG comme on trouve beaucoup sur Wikipedia.

Or, je me désolé de voir la carte des LGV françaises ne plus indiqué aucun chantier de LGV alors qu'il n'y en a jamais eu autant de démarrés en même temps !

Aussi, je contacte tout les derniers contributeurs du fichier. Pouvez-vous m'aider à remédier à ce retard?Dog49 (talk) 10:15, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

C'est fait ! Merci pour le signalement. Benjism89 (talk) 13:50, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

merci mais ne manque-t-il pas le contournement de nimes et montpellier ?Dog49 (talk) 10:15, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sauf erreur de ma part, les travaux de cette ligne n'ont pas encore commencé. Benjism89 (talk) 14:37, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Je vois qu'une version modifiée est utilisée dans wikipedia et je ne parviens pas à la modifier. Comment fait-on?Dog49 (talk) 10:15, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, où voyez-vous cette version modifiée ? (quelle URL) Benjism89 (talk) 10:30, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ici: http://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fichier:Carte_TGV-fr.svg&page=1 Dog49 (talk) 11:31, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Alta Velocidad Española.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Alta Velocidad Española.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. skINMATE 19:34, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I'm sorry I was in a hurry when I uploaded this file ;) Now I've said what the copyright is. Benjism89 11:24, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Image Tagging Image:Alta Velocidad Española.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Alta Velocidad Española.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. 88.134.44.28 17:41, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Tgv reduced.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Tgv reduced.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. 88.134.44.28 17:41, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WEF[edit]

Salut Benjism, où en êtes-vous avec les images du WEF sur Flickr? Les avez-vous uploadés? Guérin nicolas 09:21, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please forward your e-mail exchange with Mr. Lüfkens to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). Lupo 11:01, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I had already done that, but I sent it another time ... ;-) Benjism89 19:39, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, OTRS takes some time... I've bugged one of the OTRS people to dig out the ticket ID. For future uploads from the WEF's Flickr site, just use {{WEF|cc-by-sa-2.0}}, this will automatically add the correct {{PermissionOTRS}} template. Oh, and I can't do all the images in the 2007/2008 categories myself. Maybe you could help out replacing the plain cc-by template there by this new WEF template? (Up to and including 2006 I've already done this.) Lupo 11:45, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
All existing ones done now. Lupo 11:55, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image:Bandiera_della_Pace_(reduced).jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Bandiera_della_Pace_(reduced).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

OsamaK 12:34, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Plop[edit]

Un loup qui passe et qui met des images, c'est marrant, non ? :-D

File:Courquetaine - Church.JPG[edit]

Renversante, cette église ! Pymouss Tchatcher - 00:17, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Commonist licenses[edit]

Dear Benjism89,

As you might know Wikimedia is currently migrating from the GFDL to cc-by-sa-3.0. Wikimedia Commons is also migrating and we're down to less than 2500 files (started with about 1,8M files) . Unfortunatly this number keeps growing because Commonist contains outdated license templates. You appear to be running Commonist, could you please change the following lines in your license.txt? You can also copy a new licenses.txt from here.

{{self2|GFDL|cc-by-sa-2.5,2.0,1.0}} should be changed to {{Self|GFDL|Cc-by-sa-3.0,2.5,2.0,1.0}}
{{self2|GFDL|cc-by-2.5}} should be changed to {{self|GFDL|cc-by-3.0}}
{{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} should be changed to {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}}

Can I also fix the images you have already uploaded by adding {{Cc-by-sa-3.0}}?

Thank you very much, Multichill (talk) 20:56, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rotate[edit]

Hi Benjism89, please use the Rotatebot to get images rotated. Add the tag

  • {{rotate|90}} to get an image rotated 90 degrees clockwise or
  • {{rotate|270}} to get an image rotated 270 degrees clockwise = 90 degrees counterclockwise.

-- Ies (talk) 17:18, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ies,
I do know the existence of the rotate template, and I do use it ... Unfortunately, some bug in my image showing software makes image look correctly rotated on my computer, but wrongly rotated on Commons. And adding the rotate template to a hundred pictures each time I use Commonist is ... very annoying :-(
Thanks anyway !
Benjism89 (talk) 17:46, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Attribution[edit]

This edit makes it look much better and now the attribution works. You might want to change your other uploads. Multichill (talk) 18:01, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Patrouilles automatiques[edit]

Salut, je t’ai donné les droits d’Autopatrolled : désormais, tes modifications ne seront plus marquées du disgracieux point d’exclamation rouge (et les patrouilleurs de Special:RecentChanges et Special:NewPages sauront qu’il n’y a pas besoin de vérifier tes contributions en quête de vandalisme ou d’erreur de débutant). Concrètement, cela ne changera rien dans ta manière de contribuer à Commons.

Jean-Fred (talk) 00:39, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pompage de tes photos et des miennes[edit]

Bonjour ! J'ai découvert il y a une quinzaine de jours que plusieurs de mes photos mais aussi au moins une de toi ont été illégitimement copiées-collées sans mention de licence et sans noms d'auteurs par ce site http://www.infotourisme.net/circuit-touristique/1612/villers-cotterets. Voir mon "alerte" sur le Bistro d'hier ainsi que mon début de page spéciale, suite au conseil d'un autre contributeur ... User:Markus3/Photos réemployées - Amicalement - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 15:58, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

J'avais ajouté sur leur site ce qui "manquait" (licence + nom d'auteur), mais ils ont supprimé ta photo. Voici un autre de leurs délits te concernant : http://www.infotourisme.net/circuit-touristique/1619/chambly (Jour 1). Là encore, je fais le nécessaire par intrusion/ajout ! Amicalement - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 05:46, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Et pour la même page (et même "jour 1"), il y a cette autre vue :
.
Là encore, je fais le nécessaire ! Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 05:51, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Photos des églises de Connerré et Courtillers[edit]

Bonjour, ces photos ne sont pas tournées et je voudrais te demander l'autorisation de téléverser les images dans le bon sens ;)--YSpirine (talk) 19:46, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re, je viens de voir juste au-dessus qu'il y avait un modèle pour les faire tourner. Désolé du dérangement--YSpirine (talk) 19:48, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Amnéville_-_Casino_-_1.jpg[edit]

File:Amnéville_-_Casino_-_1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Grcampbell (talk) 00:08, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:TGV on LGV Atlantique in Palaiseau.jpg[edit]

Vu l'orientation de la photo on dirait qu'il s'agit d'un train qui monte vers Paris, est-tu sur de ta légende?--Kirikou (talk) 01:11, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, oui je suis sûr de ma légende car j'avais pris des photos en rafale - et donc je vois où était le train une demie-seconde plus tôt, etc. 86.70.92.232 07:17, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Boulogne-Billancourt - Musée Albert Kahn.JPG[edit]

File:Boulogne-Billancourt - Musée Albert Kahn.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

PierreSelim (talk) 23:24, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]


File:Boulogne-Billancourt - Collège Paul Landowski - 1.JPG[edit]

File:Boulogne-Billancourt - Collège Paul Landowski - 1.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Jastrow (Λέγετε) 15:07, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Account creator[edit]

Hi, following a request on your behalf by User:Jean-Frédéric, I've granted you the accountcreator userright on commons to help with the Wikimedia Commons workshop. Best of luck with that, and poke if there are issues. This userright will allow you to bypass the limit *when creating accounts from your own account*, it has no effect on new account creations from the IP, that is handled by sysadmins and should be requested in advance in #wikimedia-tech or on bugzilla. Regards, Snowolf How can I help? 14:12, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Argentan - Train station - 1.JPG[edit]

File:Argentan - Train station - 1.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Sven Manguard Wha? 15:41, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:2007 WSJ Restaurant tent.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:2007 WSJ Restaurant tent.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:2007 WSJ Restaurant tent.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Smooth_O (talk) 14:09, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:2007 WSJ scarves.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:2007 WSJ scarves.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:2007 WSJ scarves.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Smooth_O (talk) 14:09, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:2007 WSJ arrival 1.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:2007 WSJ arrival 1.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:2007 WSJ arrival 1.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Smooth_O (talk) 14:10, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:2007 WSJ Clock monument by night.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:2007 WSJ Clock monument by night.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:2007 WSJ Clock monument by night.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Smooth_O (talk) 14:10, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:2007 WSJ Prince William.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:2007 WSJ Prince William.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:2007 WSJ Prince William.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Smooth_O (talk) 14:13, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:2007 WSJ 2 French IST.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:2007 WSJ 2 French IST.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:2007 WSJ 2 French IST.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Smooth_O (talk) 14:13, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Montereau-Fault-Yonne - Statue de l'Europe.jpg[edit]

File:Montereau-Fault-Yonne - Statue de l'Europe.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 11:16, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

carte des autoroutes de France[edit]

Bonjour

Je vois que tu as travaillé sur les cartes des autoroutes de France. Je ne trouve pas de carte pour le présent, carte aussi propre que les cartes historiques qui s'arrêtent à 2011. Est-ce une problème de droit ?

--Io Herodotus (talk) 08:16, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! PN des Calanques - 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
There is CA which needs to be removed --FlocciNivis 10:42, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Benjism89 17:36, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hm this is strange. The borders of objects now seem to have a turquoise touch --FlocciNivis 09:50, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, slightly turquoise in the trees on the left. Maybe crop the top? I mean, it's still a great shot. --Der Angemeldete 08:12, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Der Angemeldete, I couldn't find the turquoise CA without the details you gave. I did some additionnal fixing and now cannot find any CA left, hope it's OK. --Benjism89 20:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Alright then. --Der Angemeldete 20:42, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Côte Bleue - 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
There is CA which needs to be removed --FlocciNivis 10:41, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done --Benjism89 17:36, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:51, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Railway map of France - Rennes - animated - fr.gif[edit]

Salut,

Il me semble qu'il faudrait ajouter la ligne B du métro non ? Lyon-St-Clair (talk) 09:14, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Salut Lyon-Saint-Clair, la dernière année représentée est 2020 pour cette carte comme les autres cartes animées, donc avant la ligne V. Et vu que la carte avance de 5 ans en 5 ans, ce sera logiquement à mettre à jour après la fin de l'année 2025 ...
Vu l'importance de la modification provoquée par la création de la ligne B, je vais quand même faire une exception, en ajoutant "à la main" une carte 2022 pour Rennes (le faire proprement sur QGis m'obligerait à de lourdes modifs pour ajouter des années après 2020, que je ne prévois pas de faire à chaque fois qu'il y a une nouvelle infrastructure quelque part : un SIG c'est bien, mais pas très souple ...)
Cordialement, Benjism89 (talk) 17:36, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Benjism89 (talk) 18:28, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Noli - Cathedral tower, castle and Torre del Comune.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments It needs a perspective correction --Michielverbeek 19:08, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the review, perspective corrected. Benjism89 19:19, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
QI now --Michielverbeek 07:26, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Genoa - Palazzo Sinibaldo Fieschi - Scultpure above main gate.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:22, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Noli - Torre del Comune.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 10:22, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Segovia - Aqueduct - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 13:32, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Camogli - Western seashore - 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 20:08, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Noli - View from Capo Noli - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Some minor CAs, but QI for me. --C messier 20:08, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Early French railway companies - 1937 map.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support OK. --C messier 21:06, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Benjism89&oldid=830282259"