User talk:B2Belgium/Archive 1

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heverlee War Cemetery - Cambridge1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 21:33, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heverlee War Cemetery7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Wikijunkie 12:00, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Category:Buildings and structures of the European Union

Hello, B2Belgium. You probably didn't know, but a while back all the "Buildings and structures" categories were renamed to use either "buildings" or "structures" but not both. This is because all buildings are already structures, so that naming is redundant. Because of this, I renamed this category that you created to Category:Buildings of the European Union. Please don't created more "buildings and structures" categories. If you have any questions about this, feel free to ask. --Auntof6 (talk) 07:11, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Hello Auntof6, I indeed didn't know this and simply adopted the name of the category in the English wikipedia. Thanks for alerting me to this and for fixing the error. -- B2Belgium (talk) 21:27, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mochtar Lubis.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Must connect the scope to the category that contains the image --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know! -- B2Belgium (talk) 08:03, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:14, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fons Rademakers.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:04, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Erik Pausin and Ilse Pausin (pair).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Be more specific with the scope. What are you trying to convey here? --BoothSift 05:18, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

I don't get your comment. This is the best picture that we have of the figure skaters Erik and Ilse Pausin. -- B2Belgium (talk) 06:59, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

@B2Belgium: You mean them together or individually? --BoothSift 17:01, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

We don't seem to have individual pictures of them. I would nominate them as a pair, they skated together. I tried to clarify the scope but I don't know if it corresponds to the usual practice. -- B2Belgium (talk) 18:31, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

•  Best in Scope--BoothSift 19:12, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jeanne Hersch.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful, best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:19, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

Need your presence at Featured sound candidates

		We request the honor of your presence at Featured sound candidates
		Dear B2Belgium, Featured sound candidates needs your help and you can participate by reviewing or nominating sounds for the FS tag. You can start reviewing/nominating sounds now. Welcome! -- Eatcha (Talk-Page ) 12:30, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Kerspetalsperre (31858950837).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kerspetalsperre (31858950837).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/--Cart (talk) 07:57, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Glyphoglossus molossus (Blunt-headed Burrowing Frog or Balloon Frog).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment The common name is generally helpful, there are several for this species--BoothSift 04:35, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support useful. Charles (talk) 09:31, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --BoothSift 23:02, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

File:During the debate (47805845762).jpg

File:During the debate (47805845762).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

大诺史 (talk) 12:39, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Trimeresurus gumprechti, Gumprecht’s pit viper (female) - Phu Suan Sai National Park (46711073485).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Trimeresurus gumprechti, Gumprecht’s pit viper (female) - Phu Suan Sai National Park (46711073485).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. MorganKevinJ^(talk) 21:47, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
William Sterling Cole.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:39, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

File:G7 meeting of interior ministers in Italy. - 23942497038.jpg

File:G7 meeting of interior ministers in Italy. - 23942497038.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

De728631 (talk) 21:46, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Atlas Studio columns set (17690883312).jpg

And also:

• File:Cleopatra Palace (17020353334).jpg

Yours sincerely, 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:59, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:In Val d'Orcia.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:In Val d'Orcia.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi B2Belgium/Archive 1,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 01:17, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rhacophorus nigropalmatus (Wallace's flying frog) (Ventral side).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Nice and very good image, often used -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 22:03, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment The binomial always in italic (look at the scope changes). We see very well the legs, the belly and the head, very good image. But we see nothing of the back that has white punctuations. For VI it is necessary to reduce the scope to "Ventral face" and it will be perfect. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:39, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

• Many thanks, Archaeodontosaurus. Is it correct now? I also added the common name, based on advice that BoothSift gave in a previous nomination. -- B2Belgium (talk) 07:01, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

•  Support edited scope to ventral side. Charles (talk) 11:24, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:47, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:42, 14 September 2019 (UTC)