User talk:Arsenikk

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to the Commons, Arsenikk!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文(台灣)‎ | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−
First steps tutorial

Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy.

Getting help

More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.

Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities.
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}}
  • For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Hello

thanks for your uploads

Pic in reference seems to show two problems

Firstly you forgot to tag it with a correct license.

Secondly there is a difference of name between the creator ant the uploader but perharps it’s only a difference between your name and your nickmane.

If it’s that could you explain that on your user page to lift all ambiguity

If not, just creator can put a license on his picture and you can’t take this decision for him. Thanks to give a valid source with correct license or an authorization of creator (by him) about his agreement for uploading of his picture on Commons. (authorization must send in OTRS system to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org)

friendly Oxam Hartog 22:51, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello!

Thank you for providing images to the Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to the Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on the Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. 85.181.247.10 12:43, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token e1f513ab7d3d4faa4f13321ae95233ff[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Trusted user[edit]

You are a trusted user for renaming mow.--Ahonc (talk) 20:50, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]


You've uploaded a derivative work We're sorry, but Image:Terina Bog.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Photographs of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this photo must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a derivative work, please explain why on the image description page.


čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  ไทย  日本語  Tiếng Việt  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

-Dodo (talk) 17:23, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright Violation - Image Subtepass 10 viajes.JPG[edit]

Hello Arsenikk, greetings from Argentina!

I saw the warning that you placed in my talk page about a possible violation to the Copyright for the mentioned image. I would like to know the reasons.

Please, respond me in this page:

Thank you very much, --Banfield (talk) 18:14, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Banfield. The reason I tagged the image in question for copyright violation, is that the basis of copyright law is that all creative expressions bound on a tangible media are automatically eligible for copyright. So the company that created the ticket, holds a copyright on the ticket. Even if you take a verbatim photograph a two-dimensional image, the copyright still belongs to the original holder. To use it on Wikipedia, you need a fair use rationale, and images used under fair use rationale must be uploaded to each language Wikipedia, not to the commons. Hope that answers your question (if you reply again, use my commons or en:wikipedia talk please). Regards, Arsenikk (talk) 00:06, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hei, angående denne redigeringen: tanken bak å ha den i hovedkategorien var at det er et bilde av en (generisk) billettkontroll, ikke primært av stasjonen kontrollen tilfeldigvis var på. Jeg tenkte derfor at stasjonskategorien ikke var passende, i alle fall ikke som eneste kategori. Hva tror du? Hilsen --Kjetil_r 01:20, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jeg spekulerte et øyeblikk rundt det, men siden jeg ikke hadde sett bildet før, tenkte jeg bare at det var noen som nettopp hadde lastet opp bildet. Helt greit for meg at det ligger på øverste hylle. Arsenikk (talk) 08:57, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

En feil[edit]

Hei (her også)! Bildet File:Tram in Drammensveien 1919.jpeg har feil Source, altså linken hvor det bl.a står "Tilvekstnummer" og "Internnr". Jeg skjønner meg ikke på det; kanskje du har mulighet til å fikse dette? Punkmorten (talk) 18:34, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ser ut til at Kjetik r rettet det. Takk for at du sier ifra. Arsenikk (talk) 21:51, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token f737ebe524ceb1aef6d645f4e8d7c2b2[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

TUSC token 55096caae49235f82bab5656a840012c[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Stortingsvalget 2009[edit]

Jeg endret på bildet, da du så vidt jeg kunne se hadde vært litt vel romslig med mandater til KrF. Røed (talk) 12:39, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Takk. Jeg oppdaget nettopp det samme. Men da kom du meg i forkjøpet. Arsenikk (talk) 13:09, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Jeg vurderer også å legge en svart strek på "vippen", siden mange ikke ser at det er flere seter på den ene siden. Hva syns du? (gjelder alle valgene, men blir litt på sikt). Røed (talk) 13:57, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Jeg satt og finleste en av disse illustrasjonene i går i Aftenposten eller noe sted, og fant plutselig ut at antall seter på hver side var ujevnt. Problemet var jo at "på midten" er det et partalls antall seter, mens det er et oddetall i sum. Så jeg tenkte at dette gikk ikke, men så skjønte jeg da du laget en identisk diagram (og så på historien til bildene) at det var jo den korrekte oppstillingene av setene i salen. Jeg er ikke helt sikker, det ser finere ut uten strek, men samtidig er det kanskje viktig å peke at det er forskjell. Så lenge det ikke oppstår en situasjon hvor "flertallet" er på feil side av streken, så er det vel greit uten. Tror egentlig begge måter går bra. Må ellers si at det var en kjempeidé å lage disse diagrammene, det piffer på mange måter opp Wikipedia og gjør det mer profesjonelt. Og med vektorgrafikk er det jo forholdsvis lett å manipulere også. Arsenikk (talk) 15:41, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hei. Jeg har satt inn mandatfiguren i den norske artikkelen om stortingsvalget. Her er det imidlertid fra før brukt litt andre fargenyanser for partiene, og det er vel uheldig. Er det mye arbeid å lag en variant som har samme farger som dem som brukes i infoboksen? Hilsen --GAD (talk) 20:14, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Det letteste er nok å tilpasse infoboksen i artikkelen. Hvis du ønsker å endre .svg-filene, er det ikke noe problem. Siden det er vektorgrafikk, kan du enkelt bruke Inkscape til å endre fargekoden. Jeg ser veldig gjerne at hvis du gjør det, så lager du nye filer (husk å laste opp som derivat for å beholde lisensen), da disse filene har de ønskede fargene på den engelske Wikipedia. Hvor jeg tok farge fra, husker jeg ikke nå, men det var nok en annen lignende illustrasjon på Commons; jeg er ihvertfall sikker på at jeg ikke bare fant på noen farger. Arsenikk (talk) 23:19, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Takk. Fargene i infoboksen ligger skjult i et malverk, så jeg synes ikke dette er enkelt. Vi får se hva det blir til. Hilsen --GAD (talk) 06:35, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tips: Vildanden sin rute fra Skien til Stockholm/Bromma ble nedlagt den 30. august 2009, se vildanden.no. Mvh Bitjungle (talk) 18:03, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Takk for snarsyntheten :) Bildet er nå oppdatert. Arsenikk (talk) 08:36, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Supert, men nå så det rutekartet temmelig tassent ut... (det er ikke din skyld!). Jeg har lagt inn kartet på no:Vildanden (flyselskap). Bitjungle (talk) 14:52, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ja... Kanskje jeg kan legge inn nedlagte ruter. De har jo forsøkt en par ulike ruter opp gjennom årene. Hele historien er fullt referert på den engelske siden, så det bør gå ann å finne ut. Arsenikk (talk) 15:49, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Arsenikk!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:39, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oslo Tramway Map[edit]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Oslo_Tramway_map.svg

It seems you've misspelled "Disen" on line 11. You've written "Diesen". :) Svedman (talk) 09:12, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for telling me. I found some more errors too, and they've also been fixed. Arsenikk (talk) 14:00, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're now a filemover[edit]

Hi Arsenikk, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

  • Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one.
  • Please do not tag redirects as {{Speedy}}. Other projects, like InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references.
  • For guideline when to rename a file, please see Commons:File renaming and Commons:File naming.

Geagea (talk) 23:41, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Frederiksborg Allé" is wrong, it has to be "Frederiksberg Allé"

Could you change the name from "Frederiksborg Allé" to "Frederiksberg Allé"? I have no program or ability to do that myself. Thank --Rodejong (talk) 19:03, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Thanks for pointing that out :) You may have to recash the image on your browser to see the change, though (ctrl+F5 in Firefox). Arsenikk (talk) 19:53, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Airline photos[edit]

Hi, you have been uploading airline photos from Konstantin von Wedelstaedt. Great stuff. However, can you please use the permission templates as outlined at User:Russavia#Aviation-related. For example, Konstantin's template is {{KonstantinvonWedelstaedt}} or {{KvW}} for short. This will do the permission and the categorisation, etc. Also Category:Photos by Lars Söderström may have photos that you are looking for too. Cheers, russavia (talk) 09:25, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I tried uploading using that template, but Commons wouldn't let me upload with them. I can always add the template afterwards, but adding the permissions manually is the only way I could upload the images at all. Arsenikk (talk) 10:50, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Are you using the old or new upload form to upload images? russavia (talk) 11:08, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'm using this, which is what I've used for many years now. Perhaps there is another form which can force an upload? Arsenikk (talk) 11:10, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I am using the same "old" form, and have no problems in uploading. Just put the {{KvW}} template (if for Konstantins photos) into the text field, and don't bother chosing any other licencing. Is that how you have tried it? And if so, what error do you get? russavia (talk) 11:12, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
By using the "basic" form I was able to upload directly using the template. Thanks for the help. By the way, are there any other airliners.net authors on your list which have a lot of Scandinavian airliners? Arsenikk (talk) 11:20, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Try Torsten Mainwald - he has 5,000 pics - to be honest, the easiest way to do it is to check ALL of the links - one has 8,000 photos on jetphotos.net for instance, and simply search away. Pertti in Finland also has a lot of old B&W photos available. Other than that, just search away. It's what I've been doing ;) If you come across anything on airliners.net for which we don't yet have permission, and which you wanted to upload, drop me a lie, I may have already contacted them, and have yet to do up permission template, or I may be waiting on a reply - I've contact nearly 300 photographers now, so there could still be a lot to come. russavia (talk) 11:34, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Shall do. Thanks for the help and your efforts at getting these permissions, they'll be improving a lot of articles :) Arsenikk (talk) 11:37, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Have you seen the conversation on WP:AIRLINES in relation to photos in the tables? I mentioned the SAS article you did. BTW, be sure to add the BAC 1-11 to the list of aircraft- Lars has photos of it. russavia (talk) 11:41, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Photos by Alexander Jonsson another one for you. russavia (talk) 09:13, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I see you are liking the photos we now have access to, busy uploading the Scandinavian ones. Lars' photos are awesome. I have nominated one of his pics for FP Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Aeroflot Tupolev Tu-104B at Arlanda, July 1972.jpg but it doesn't look like it will become FP, which is a complete sham(e). If you come across any photos whilst you upload that you think would be FP quality, drop me a line, and I'll see if I can get larger res photos and we can put them thru the process. Cheers, russavia (talk) 07:28, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Photos by Ralf Manteufel another one with some you might be interested in. russavia (talk) 04:59, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Photo from Bergen[edit]

Hey Arsenikk, I just noticed you are in Bergen. Could you help with en:User:Russavia/Required_photos#.C2.A0Norway? It would be good to get Bergen off the list, and if you can help me find someone in Kirkenes to help with the photos I need from there, I'd appreciate any assistance with either of those. Cheers, russavia (talk) 07:44, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This image contains the church; according to their web site, they have their services in St. Sunniva-kapellet, which is part of Florida Hospital (the chapel is the small building to the left in the image). I can go by and get a better image some time, but I can't promise anything immediately. Don't think I know anyone living in Kirkenes (it's about as far away from me as I'm from Rome :p) Arsenikk (talk) 09:25, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
That's the one. If you can get a clearer shot, there's no rush at all for it. In relation to Kirkenes, could you possibly post a message on no/nn wiki pointing someone to my Kirkenes request? I would be most appreciative. Cheers, russavia (talk) 04:58, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Route maps[edit]

Hey man, in regards to File:DNL international route map.svg, can you tell me what program you use to do all of these in? And is it very hard to do? I want to do some various Aeroflot maps from different eras for the rewrite of the english wiki article. Any guidance appreciated. Cheers, russavia (talk) 15:47, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Inkscape. The background map is from the Commons, and once you have understood the basics of vector graphics, it is fairly easy to make the maps. Arsenikk (talk) 19:29, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 12:38, 27 October 2011 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 12:38, 27 October 2011 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 12:56, 27 October 2011 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 12:57, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

Only 2 more to go.....[edit]

I will see what I can do in finding the other 2...hopefully some of the Norwegian photographers will reply before too long. The Heron I think is going to be much harder to find. If you have seen any photos of it on the net anywhere, let me know, and I can contact them if you like? It seems the emails I am sending are perfectly worded, given that my email inbox is full of permissions that I am having trouble keeping up with lol. russavia (talk) 15:07, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Heron is on exhibition at the aviation museum in Stavanger, so there is always the possibility of getting a modern picture of one. Otherwise, there are a number of of images at this forum thread. Several of the people I asked you about the last time have F-28 images. Any chance of contacting Mel Lawrence? Thanks, Arsenikk (talk) 15:33, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Seen this?[edit]

Hi Arsenikk howzit? Have you seen this? I wonder if this "radek" person thinks the same way about other people's works and contributions to this project? russavia (talk) 05:46, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! This file obviously has an incorrect source address. You probably know the correct address, so, please fix. ––Apalsola tc 15:11, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. Arsenikk (talk) 16:47, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!
Thank you for uploading that great image! :) Could you please re-check the source link for it's accuracy? There seems to be a small mistake ;) Thanks a lot! abf «Cabale!» 22:15, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thanks for letting me know Arsenikk (talk) 22:17, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Air Canada Tango A320.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Coekon (talk) 21:04, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Aviation Wikiproject on Commons?[edit]

Hey mate, I've had an idea of starting an Aviation WikiProject on Commons. I have created a page at User talk:Russavia/Proposal where I hope that if other editors think this is a good idea, we can all come up with ideas, etc. Please keep all comments on that page for time being, and if you know of other editors on Commons or on other language projects who might be interested in commenting, coming up with ideas, etc, please let them know of the discussion. Perhaps you could let Norwegian WP project and editors know of the discussion? Let's see if this could be a workable project. russavia (talk) 23:38, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely Stefan4 (talk) 19:55, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flybe logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

FASTILY (TALK) 01:27, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 22:03, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Original Barnstar
Thanks a bunch for creating categories and such for airports in British Columbia, Canada. TBrandley 13:09, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Gee, thanks :) It's actually partially your credit, as I was just going to put the image of Penticton Regional Airport into a category, and then things just started getting out of hand. Arsenikk (talk) 13:11, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, AzaToth 18:46, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Norwegian LN-KKT B737-300 at Værnes.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 20:50, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Nord-Trøndelag County Administration administration building.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 21:36, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:VIA TurboTrain 2 cropped.jpg[edit]

Arsenikk, I tried to revert the image to the 17:02, 18 August 2010 version that you uploaded (without watermark), but I was unsuccessful. Do you have any idea why? Did I something wrong clicking on 'revert'? Carlotm (talk) 08:34, 25 September 2013 (UTC)'[reply]

I don't know and I can't seem to fix it. I'll try asking for some help. Arsenikk (talk) 20:08, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
File:Selfoss Airport.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 21:14, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:British Midland logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

russavia (talk) 21:56, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Airtex Aviation has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


OAlexander (talk) 05:20, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:North Lake Tahoe in summer.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Ankry (talk) 01:26, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also File:Kayaking Lake Tahoe.jpg. - Both reported by the real copyright holder by e-mail. Looks like the Flickr user put up a bad license. They have been added to the bad Flickr user page. Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:29, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
File:Prior eggs.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

🎂CAKE🎂 07:59, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tromsø 2013 06 05 3714 (10117848756).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-- Deadstar (msg) 13:41, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


File:Tromsø 2013 06 05 3717 (10117794265).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-- Deadstar (msg) 13:47, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Ad Astra by Carin Wessel.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

TommyG (talk) 16:43, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Paninternational BAC 1-11-515FB.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

YSSYguy (talk) 00:05, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Three SL95 at Holtet.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

171.23.6.14 12:07, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Important message for file movers[edit]

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Murals in Chemainus.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 02:47, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Themightyquill (talk) 22:31, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Luaswelcom.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Djm-leighpark (talk) 08:20, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:45, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

Yours sincerely, --Rosenzweig τ 21:22, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fjell and Andersen wall mural at Fornebu.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 04:20, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Carl Otto Thommesen (6278984919).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

36.75.64.225 23:03, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]