User talk:Archaeodontosaurus/Premier trimestre 2013

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Talpa europaea MHNT.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Talpa europaea MHNT.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Bravo et bonne année ! --Citron (talk) 13:24, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Archivage...

...Comme tous les trimestres ! Si ça ne te convient pas, n'hésite pas à me le dire ! Bonne année !--Jebulon (talk) 14:27, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

• C'est excellent, merci. Je suis confus de te donner cette peine. Bonne année à Toi et aux tiens. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:49, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
  • Je ne devrais pas te l'avouer, parce que ça va me faire perdre un peu de mon aura, mais ça m'a coûté deux clics, réellement...--Jebulon (talk) 20:17, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

"Ta dernière nomination a un pb technique"

Salut ! J'avais profité d'un passage chez Citron pour te donner mes bons vœux pour cette année à venir, mais je les réitère ici si tu ne les as pas vu passer. Je ne suis pas sûr de quelle nomination tu parlais : si c'était celle concernant Octodontomys gliroides 1847.jpg, j'en ai demandé la suppression immédiate après avoir vu que l'excellent Shyamal avait importé NeoctodonSimonsiSmit.jpg depuis que j'avais moi-même importé le dessin de chez d'Orbigny. J'étale mes propositions sur le temps pour éviter de monopoliser les VI, et même si les bestioles n'avaient toujours pas d'illustrations jusqu'à mon import mi-2012, il arrive parfois que les images que je propose ne sont plus seules dans leur scope au moment de leur nomination. Amicalement, Totodu74 (talk) 22:33, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Commons:Valued image candidates/Sony NEX-5N

Bonjour ! J'ai proposé cette série aux images de valeurs mais je ne sait pas si j'ai bien fait peut-tu m'aider ? Cordialement, Bourgeois.A (talk) 12:32, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Nous sommes en train d’arrêter les SET en VI car il y a un problème technique le traitement est bloqué... à Suivre...--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:24, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Smerinthus ocellatus MHNT Female.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A little spot (see note, easy to fix,). QI anyway. --JLPC 18:32, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for the words which you wrote on my talk page. I wish you a happy new year too.--MrPanyGoff 07:10, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:12, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mimas tiliae MHNT male.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:05, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Fluorine en VI

Je continue mon apprentissage au niveau du libellé des scopes : ne devrais-tu pas ajouter "(polychromatisme)" au tien ? -- Très cordialement. --JLPC (talk) 08:50, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

• Le scope demandé est fluorine. c'est une catégorie géante et difficile de s'y retrouver. Pourquoi celle ci plus qu'une autre? Elle est très typique de l'espèce, avec ces cristaux cubiques, sur un gisement qui est mondialement connu. Cette espèce peux avoir plusieurs couleurs mais il est rare de trouver sur une même pièce des cristaux de différentes couleurs aussi franches. Mais ce caractère n'est pas spécifique à l'espèce. Par contre l'image pourrait aussi illustrer le polychromatisme en minéralogie. Une image peut être (en théorie) promue pour d'autres scopes. Bonne Journée...--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:00, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Re:La gare

Bonjour Didier, Merci pour la Gare. J’avoue que labellisation des VI et des QI c'est exactement ce qui me manque dans l'affichage des catégories. Si on pouvait faire quelque chose pour que le seaux apparaissent, ça sera encore plus merveilleux, n'est ce pas? --Moonik (talk) 15:12, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

çà existe c'est La "gallery". C'est le lieux électif des bonnes images. Nos "category" sont appelées à devenir pléthoriques; il faut s'investir dans les "gallery"! Ont peut y classe les images avec leurs prix. Voici un exemple de bonne "gallery" Talpa europaea... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:25, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Choeradodis stalii MHNT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good --Llez 13:42, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Ta question chez Myrabella sur la tour télé en MVR

Salut.

Je viens de faire l'essai, ça ne marche pas si on clique sur "edit".

Mais si on clique sur "review page", tout rentre dans l'ordre, on a accès à la page et on peut voter (je viens de le faire avec succès).--Jebulon (talk) 18:16, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Parfait, merci Jebulon ! Pour ma part, gros effort pour ne pas même lever un sourcil quant au scope ("Aerial view of...") alors que l'image aurait, me semble-t-il, très bien convenu pour un simple scope "Television Tower St. Chrischona". Hard for me not to be too picky! --Myrabella (talk) 20:36, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Les mystères de VI! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:32, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chiesa di San Rocco, Dolo, Italy (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Please add information to the file description page about the architect (if known), year of construction, etc. Because Italy has no Freedom of Panorama, this information is absolutely necessary to verify that the work is free. Thanks, cmadler (talk) 14:03, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

• The architecture is not known. The church was completed in 1776. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:05, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
  •  Support : criteria met imo. --JLPC (talk) 19:06, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 13:31, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of San Rocco – Dolo (Italy) (interior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : best in scope. --JLPC (talk) 17:34, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 13:32, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Morpho telemachus telemachus mounted specimen, male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 16:46, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 13:33, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Morpho telemachus telemachus mounted specimen, female.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : good and useful. --JLPC (talk) 16:44, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 13:33, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lysimachia vulgaris (Garden Loosestrife), capsules and seeds.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 16:47, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 13:33, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Talpa europaea (European Mole).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : good quality and useful. --JLPC (talk) 16:48, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 13:34, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Macroglossum stellatarum (Hummingbird Hawk-moth) mounted specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 19:02, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 21:34, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jenny Haniver little dragon form..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : quite fascinating and useful. --JLPC (talk) 19:04, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

•  Comment I'd prefer a valued image set of these, but this works too.

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 21:34, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Smerinthus ocellatus, mounted spceimen, female.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : All criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 15:06, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Myrabella (talk) 00:15, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Caterpillar proleg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : didactic and useful. --JLPC (talk) 15:08, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Myrabella (talk) 00:15, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Broussonetia papyrifera (Paper Mulberry), leaf.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 11:44, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Myrabella (talk) 00:16, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cassia sieberiana, Fruit.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met . --JLPC (talk) 11:47, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Myrabella (talk) 00:18, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Xylophanes titana mounted specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met . --JLPC (talk) 11:48, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Myrabella (talk) 00:37, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sterculia setigera fruits and seeds.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 09:53, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

orientation

Bonjour, please don't forget to adjust the orientation in VI nominations. (And to check it when reviewing.) Happy new year! --Ikar.us (talk) 10:54, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

I had not thought of for this type of image. But it is just now I would. Happy New Year 2013. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:19, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

It's used by the template to adjust the preview size. Like the upright parameter when using an image. MediaWiki lacks a feature for automated displaying a useful thumb size according to image aspect ratio. --Ikar.us (talk) 11:28, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Indeed it is more important than I thought --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:41, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Xylophanes tyndarus mounted specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : nice green ones ! Useful. --JLPC (talk) 09:52, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikar.us (talk) 09:36, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Xylophanes elara mounted specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 11:20, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikar.us (talk) 09:41, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tordylium maximum fruits and seeds..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 11:22, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikar.us (talk) 09:40, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fluorine.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 18:29, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikar.us (talk) 09:46, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Xylophanes tersa mounted specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 22:58, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikar.us (talk) 09:47, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Porphyromma speciosa(Grasshopper-leaf ocelli) mounted specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 18:31, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikar.us (talk) 09:49, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Xylophanes chiron nechus mounted specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Criteria satisfied. --Walter Siegmund (talk) 18:30, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikar.us (talk) 09:51, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Glycyrrhiza echinata (Ledgehog liquorice), fruits and seeds.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 09:45, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikar.us (talk) 09:52, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pachylioides resumens mounted specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 09:46, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikar.us (talk) 09:54, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lophura nycthemera (Silver Pheasant) egg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 10:05, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 11:02, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Xylophanes epaphus mounted specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 10:07, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 11:03, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Encore une erreur

Voulant voter pour tes deux dernières photos, j'ai fait encore une grosse bourde : l'ordonnancement de la page est bouleversé et je ne sais pas comment faire pour revenir en arrière. J'ai sollicité l'aide de Slaunger. J'espère qu'il pourra régler le problème. Décidément, pour ce qui concerne mes relations avec cette page, l'enfer est pavé de bonnes intentions. Je suis, une fois de plus désolé d'avoir à faire appel à ta patience. Bien cordialement . JLPC (talk) 18:25, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

• Pas de problème, l'aide est venue de l'Indes. Merci... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:20, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Corydalus cornutus MHNT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:55, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Megascolia procer MHNT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:27, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

FluoriteUV.jpg

Hallo Archaeodontosaurus, I just noticed, that the picture of your VI-nomination has a lot of artefacts. Double outlines (DO) and cloudy structures (CS), both are typical artefacts of stacking. In addition, there are masking errors (ME) around the mineral. I have made annotations to each kind of artefacts, but this are only examlpes, there are far more. It doesn't matter in VI-nomination, but if you intend to nominate as QI, it should be corrected. Greetings and a Happy New Year --Llez (talk) 16:43, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for having scored only its few flaws. There are many more. I had not seen them. This is an image already old, more than 3 years. And it is seeing all these defects, I measure the path I have traveled in the treatment of photographs. As progress in 3 years. COMMONS is a great school where we both teachers and students. But the most valuable, they are friends, which you are. I wish you a very good year. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 20:14, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Change of Scope for VI nominated Dome of the Rock, Facade

Hi Archaeodontosaurus- I have changed the scope for my VI nomination. I had to create a scope in line with another in the parent category. Thanks. - Godot13 (talk) 08:19, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for your comment. I wasn't aware that could be done in the description/caption. It will be my practice from now on! - Godot13 (talk) 08:35, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

---

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 08:45, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Choeradodis stalii MHNT.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Choeradodis stalii MHNT.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Hop ! Pour bien commencer l'année !--Citron (talk) 20:31, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Merci s'est effectivement encourageant. Le 30Janvier je fais une conférence sur Phoebus à Toulouse à la fac devant des Universitaires je ne désarme pas et compte toujours étendre le concept. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:30, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rothschildia aurota speculifera MHNT female.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PierreSelim 10:06, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Aerial photographs of Dead Sea salt formations

I tried checking my metadata as it sometimes gives distance (it was not there). I'm sure there is a way to calculate, but that is beyond me.... Thanks--Godot13 (talk) 06:56, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

I just added the height (120m). I was thinking you were asking about the diameter of the salt-formation... --Godot13 (talk) 07:00, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Protambulyx eurycles mounted specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 18:14, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 16:03, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Adhemarius ypsilon mounted specimen, female.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 18:16, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 06:53, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sphinx pinastri (Hawk-moth) mounted specimen, female.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : well done and useful. --JLPC (talk) 19:29, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 07:06, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pagodroma nivea (Snow Petrel) egg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 19:31, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 07:07, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Geremia (Venice) Facade..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : best in scope. --JLPC (talk) 17:35, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 07:09, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Geremia (Venice) Interno. .
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 17:36, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 07:09, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Xylophanes loelia mounted specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 19:12, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 07:14, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Daption capense ( Cape Petrel), egg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support ok. --Berthold Werner (talk) 18:35, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 07:14, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Choeradodis stalii mounted specimen, male..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : beautiful and useful. --JLPC (talk) 18:08, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 07:18, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Datura stramonium (Jimson weed), fruits and seeds..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Criteria satisfied; appealing and informative. --Walter Siegmund (talk) 22:00, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 07:19, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Corydalus cornutus ( Eastern Dobsonfly ) mounted specimen, male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 22:55, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 07:25, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Corydalus cornutus ( Eastern Dobsonfly ) mounted specimen, female.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 10:25, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 07:25, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Piétinage de plates-bandes

OK, tu ne joue pas vraiment dans la même catégorie que moi =D Totodu74 (talk) 11:46, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

L’été dernier, dans la salle de consultation, du Muséum de Toulouse j’ai travaillé côte à côte avec Le Conservateur du Muséum de Montauban qui été venu consulter des silex taillés. Cette Dame prenait grand soin de dessiner les pièces quelle examinait. Au bout d’un moment je lui ai proposé de faire des photos qui lui feraient gagner du temps. Elle m’a expliqué l’utilité de dessin et, sur bien des points, elle à raison. Le dessin, en science, à encore beaucoup d’avenir, et permet de « voir » des choses que la photo ne montre pas. Nos plates-bandes ne sont pas les même, elles ont toutes les deux un rôle utile. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:00, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Haha oui tu as raison, les bons dessins ont leur intérêt, et les moins bons, un peu vieux et pas très précis, un intérêt historique ! C'était juste l'occasion de m'amuser à comparer nos types d'imports, mais je ne me donnerais peut-être pas tant de mal avec les vieux bouquins si je ne croyais pas à l'utilité de la chose (même si je préfère illustrer des espèces ne bénéficiant pas encore d'iconographie et que c'est surtout ça qui me motive). Totodu74 (talk) 15:01, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pachylia darceta mounted specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 10:01, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 23:42, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fluorite, fluorescence..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 10:04, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 23:43, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pinctada margaritifera shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : good and useful. --JLPC (talk) 10:46, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 23:48, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mimas tiliae (Lime Hawk-moth ) mounted specimen female.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 10:48, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 23:49, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portulaca oleracea (Common Purslane) capsule and seed.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support didactic and useful. --JLPC (talk) 10:45, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 23:56, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Xylophanes neoptolemus mounted specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 10:43, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 23:55, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Megascolia procer (Giant Scoliid Wasp) Mounted specimen female..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 19:34, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 04:33, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hyles livornica (Striped Hawk-moth) mounted specimen male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : VI for me. --JLPC (talk) 19:36, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 04:34, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Entada phaseoloides seed.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 14:19, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. cmadler (talk) 20:12, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sphinx ligustri ( Privet Hawk Moth) mounted specimen, female.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 14:21, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. cmadler (talk) 20:13, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pelagodroma marina (White-faced Storm Petrel) egg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : good (as usual) and VI. --JLPC (talk) 18:30, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. cmadler (talk) 20:17, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gorgonidia buckleyi whitfordi mounted specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 18:32, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. cmadler (talk) 20:18, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nassarius reticulatus shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support --Ikar.us (talk) 13:29, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. Nassarius reticulatus MHNT.jpg: 0 (current VI within same scope)
2. Nassarius reticulatus .JPG: +1 <--
=>
File:Nassarius reticulatus MHNT.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former.
File:Nassarius reticulatus .JPG: Promoted. <--

--Ikar.us (talk) 01:26, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for nominating, chapeau! --Llez (talk) 13:12, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rothschildia aurota speculifera mounted specimen, female.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : good and useful. --JLPC (talk) 10:07, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. cmadler (talk) 14:34, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vanellus vanellus (Northern Lapwing) egg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 10:08, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. cmadler (talk) 14:34, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Opsiphanes cassiae mounted specimen female.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 09:10, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. cmadler (talk) 14:26, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Opsiphanes cassiae mounted specimen, male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Good work. --Berthold Werner (talk) 18:55, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikar.us (talk) 20:31, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lanius excubitor (Great Grey Shrike), egg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 18:12, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikar.us (talk) 12:11, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kunzite.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : best in numerous scope imo. --JLPC (talk) 18:11, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:27, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Grand Carré, muséum de Toulouse.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : best in scope. --JLPC (talk) 10:15, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:38, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hyles euphorbiae ( Spurge Hawk-moth) mounted specimen, male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 10:17, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:39, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Demande d'aide

C'est fait. Salut --Llez (talk) 12:48, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dinoponera quadriceps mounted specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 11:37, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Ikar.us (talk) 11:31, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lanius meridionalis (Southern Grey Shrik) eggs.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 11:38, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Ikar.us (talk) 11:30, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Protambulyx goeldii mounted specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 10:05, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Ikar.us (talk) 11:42, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Regulus ignicapilla (Common Firecrest) eggs.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 10:06, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Ikar.us (talk) 11:43, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Oecophylla smaragdina mounted specimen, queen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 17:26, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:18, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Regulus regulus azoricus eggs.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 17:25, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:19, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altamira Littorina littorea Édouard Harlé MHNT.PRE.2012.0.609.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments In scientific photography I have to make black or white backgrounds. From time to time I allow myself a little fantasy ...--Archaeodontosaurus 11:19, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Urania fulgens (Urania Swallowtail Moth), mounted sepcimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. Totodu74 (talk) 18:05, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:27, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Passer domesticus domesticus (House Sparrow), eggs.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : VI for me. --JLPC (talk) 09:58, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:28, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oecophylla smaragdina MHNT reine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality; assume a self nomination by Archaeodontosaurus. --Jkadavoor 08:13, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Set ?

Bonsoir mon ami.

J'ai dû faire une bêtise dans la proposition de mon "set".

Ça t'ennuierait de jeter un coup d'œil pour me dire quelle étape j'ai loupée ?--Jebulon (talk) 19:59, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Euh... Aucunes tout est en ordre. Je ne vais plus dans cette section depuis un moment car je suis effrayé du travail que çà donne à ceux qui veulent bien clore les images. Je te félicite de ta présence dans la finale. Il n'y a que les meilleurs. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:27, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Merci, j'avais aussi "tapé" Myrabella, qui a fait ce qu'il fallait avant que tu ailles voir. Apparemment, ça viendrait des guillemets... Pour la "finale", je trouve qu'ils n'ont vraiment pas choisi la meilleure de mes FP de l'année... La tienne en revanche est décidément magnifique. J'ai eu peur un moment que ça soit encore une "Nasa picture" qui gagne, mais finalement, on dirait que non... Heureusement ! --Jebulon (talk) 11:04, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Comme dirai le Baron : "L'important c'est de participer". Dans tes pérégrinations chez Gallica peux tu trouver une image d' fr:Édouard Harlé celle que nous avons ne lui rend pas hommage. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:10, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

 Done. Ce n'est pas beaucoup mieux (c'est la même source), mais la résolution est meilleure, et on moins, là, on voit qu'il avait des lunettes ! J'ai changé la vignette dans l'article. Pour améliorer celui-ci, je te recommande la nécrologie dans laquelle j'ai trouvé l'image (qui n'est pas référencée en tant qu' "image", mesure l'exploit !), qui apporte quelques détails sur sa vie. Il y a plein d'articles écrits par lui, peut-être à exploiter. Ceci dit, le portrait reproduit doit exister à la "Société préhistorique de France". N'hésite pas à me redemander des trucs. Amitiés, --Jebulon (talk) 17:42, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Effectivement! Tu as trouvé une vrai mine. Mais je reconnais que c'est très utile. Je produit peu ces temps ci du fait du changement d’appareil. Je réapprend à peu prés tout. Je passe alternativement du plus grand enthousiasme au plus grand abattement. Si j'avais pu prévoir l'investissement en temps je crois que je ne l'aurai pas fait. Mais c'est parti, j'ai quitté Sony pour Nikon. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:21, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Je n'ai pas d'amour propre d'auteur ! Si tu as trouvé mieux, c'est tant mieux pour tout le monde !--Jebulon (talk) 18:45, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Arsenale (Venice) - Solid ground entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : best in scope. --JLPC (talk) 10:03, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:45, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Morpho deidamia (Deidamia Morpho), mounted specimen, male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : nice and useful. --JLPC (talk) 10:05, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:43, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altamira Patella vulgata Édouard Harlé MHNT.PRE.20120.0.608.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 15:26, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

You have a new message

Thanks for writing on my talk page, I've answered. You have 1 message in my talk page. Thanks --The Photographer

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Morpho rhetenor rhetenor MHNT.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Morpho rhetenor rhetenor MHNT.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Tes papillons ont la côte ! Bravo ! Je sais pas si tu as vu, mais notre talentueux Pierre Dalous est la star de la POTY2012, je crois qu'il est en tête des votes ! La classe !--Citron (talk) 07:39, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

• Nous pourrons dire tous les deux que nous l'avons découvert. J'espère qu'il s'investira dans COMMONS, je le vois demain. Merci pour le papillon. Tout çà est un beau travail d'équipe. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:17, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Polyphylla decemlineata (Ten-lined June beetle) mounted specimen, female.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : nice and useful. --JLPC (talk) 11:36, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 03:28, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portulaca oleracea (Common Purslane) flower and leaves.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 11:38, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 03:29, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Breithauptite.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 18:12, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 03:34, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eryphanis automedon MHNT femelle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:11, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Passer hispaniolensis (Spanish Sparrow) eggs.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 18:14, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Ikar.us (talk) 18:21, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

VIC Change of Scope Notification

Hi Archaeodontosaurus- You suppored my VIC Commons:Valued_image_candidates/Al-Aqsa_Mosque_Summer_Pulpit_(Minbar_al-Sayf)_on_the_Temple_Mount_(Jerusalem,_2008).jpg I added the word "Jerusalem" to the scope. The category remains completely unchanged. Thanks - Godot13 (talk) 03:24, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eryphanis automedon mounted specimen, male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:10, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 04:36, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eryphanis automedon mounted specimen, female.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:11, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 04:36, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ernassa sanguinolenta mounted specimen, male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope.--Jetstreamer (talk) 14:04, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 04:45, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Helix aspersa Sinistra

 Done Hallo Archaedontosaurus. En Allemagne on appelle ces coqillages "Schneckenkönig" [1], c'est "Roi des escargots". J'en ai aucune dans ma collection. Salutations --Llez (talk) 17:09, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Si tu en veux je t'en donne avec plaisir. J'en ai dans mon jardin. Tu les veux cuit ou crus? --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:21, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dipsacaster africanus MHNT Holotype.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:53, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fire opal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : best in scope. --JLPC (talk) 08:59, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 08:52, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Marocaster coronatus holotype.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support : useful.--JLPC (talk) 09:14, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
•  Question If the scope is for the organism, why not use the close-up? It is much more recognizable in thumb.  B.p. 09:45, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
•  Comment The holotype must be presented in full. But I did not put Holotype in scope. In fact, the two images are useful. I'll link a note. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:05, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

• Maybe you should (put holotype in the scope), we might get an non holotype image of this species in the future... Alternatively you could submit both images: one for the holotype the other for the species.  B.p. 13:56, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

* Yes I change the scope.

---

Scope changed from Marocaster coronatus to Marocaster coronatus, holotype --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:31, 11 February 2013 (UTC) {{{3}}}

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Support Then I can only support ;-).  B.p. 15:12, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
•  Support : new scope, new vote. --JLPC (talk) 13:30, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 09:03, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Giustina (Venice), facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Best in scope.--Jebulon (talk) 18:05, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 09:04, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chrysiridia rhipheus MHNT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Well done --The Photographer 13:39, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sphinx ligustri (Privet Hawk Moth) mounted specimen, male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 18:19, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 06:36, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Petronia petronia (Rock sparrow), eggs.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 18:20, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 06:37, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

The Commons Contributions (Triple) Barnstar

		The Commons Contributions Triple Barnstar
		I hereby award You The Commons Contributions Barnstar for Your tireless work and a plenty of very nice, very artistic and very valuable pictures. Thank You for all Your uploads! Keep going! Très amical --George Chernilevsky talk 18:52, 17 February 2013 (UTC) I hereby do solemnly second this barnstar strongly, and I double it ! Très amical aussi --Jebulon (talk) 20:42, 17 February 2013 (UTC) Although I'm a bit late, I think you really deserve a Triple Crown : one for each category ! Bien cordialement. --JLPC (talk) 13:08, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Wow çà c'est un bel anniversaire! Merci à tous les deux.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:27, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ernassa sanguinolenta MHNT ventre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Selbymay 08:17, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dipsacaster africanus Holotype.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 09:13, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:08, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mimas tiliae (Lime Hawk-moth) mounted specimen, male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : good quality and VI. --JLPC (talk) 09:14, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:09, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chrysiridia rhipheus (Madagascan sunset moth) mounted specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : beautiful and useful. --JLPC (talk) 11:06, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 09:03, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Passer montanus (Eurasian Tree Sparrow) eggs.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 11:08, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 09:04, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

À propos d'Almandine

Loin de moi l'idée de vouloir restreindre la qualité de ta photo ("File:Almandin.jpg"), d'ailleurs déjà bien pourvue en labels, mais j'ai juste une question : n'est-il pas nécessaire de séparer, au moyen de l'intitulé du scope, la pierre à l'état brut de l'almandine polie ? -- Je pose la question n'étant pas spécialiste. -- Bien cordialement. --JLPC (talk) 13:16, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Au contraire, bonne question. J'ai l'idée de proposer aussi la version taillée. Je l'ai eu fait par le passer. Pour la forme naturelle et brute le scope est sans adjectif pour la forme taillée il s'enrichira du terme "cut". Merci pour ma 3e étoile, me voilà décoré comme un général soviétique. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:47, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marocaster coronatus MHNT.PAL.2010.2.2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:46, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Gaston le Navigateur

Salut.

Hélas, trois fois hélas, point de portrait nulle part...

En revanche, je sais où tu peux en trouver un.

L'homme, tu le sais, fut officier de marine, membre de la Société de Géographie de Toulouse, et Mainteneur des Jeux Floraux. J'ai compulsé tous les articles (aux différentes orthographes du nom) des archives disponibles sur Gallica de ces institutions, il y a beaucoup à exploiter, mais pas d'image...

Il s'appelait en fait "Gaston Rocquemaurel", avec un "c" avant le "q". C'est démontré là. Page suivante, avec d'autres indications biographiques qui pourraient enrichir l'article, il est dit qu'il mourut à cent mètres de l'Hôtel d'Assézat, où se trouve son portrait dans le salon blanc des Jeux Floraux.

Bon, d'accord, c'était en 1907, mais il y est peut-être toujours, qui sait ? En tous cas on doit pouvoir en retrouver la trace...

A toi d'y courir, tiens moi au courant ! --Jebulon (talk) 15:10, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

PS. Un petit tour sur la base Léonore de la Légion d'Honneur (toujours utile), me donne ça, mais pas d'image...--Jebulon (talk) 15:15, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

re PS. Ne jamais désespérer. Bingo ! Mais je ne sais pas si c'est "libre de droits".--Jebulon (talk) 15:20, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

• Ah çà c'est une piste. Je te tiendrai informé. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:42, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

• Si vous me permettez de mettre mon grain de sel (marin), on retrouve cette image sur ce site. Et voici sa fiche de l'X (entrer "Rocquemaurel"). Le document "Objet numérique" confirme la graphie "Rocquemaurel". --Myrabella (talk) 15:56, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Salut 'rabella ! Oui, j'avais vu ça aussi (merci Google images), mais c'est partout la même photo, en fait. Je m'étais dit qu'on pouvait leur demander d'où qu'c'est qu'y z'avaient chopé c'te photo, mais j'ai comme dans l'idée qu'ils nous renverraient vers le site "familial"... (je trouve ça marrant et bien agréable de bavarder tous les trois). Au fait, le Ro"CQ"emaurel se trouve aussi dans le dossier de la Légion d'honneur.--Jebulon (talk) 18:50, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Vote ...

Bonjour Archaeodontosaurus. J'ai modifié la description et la catégorie car je n'ai su qu'aujourd'hui que je m'étais trompé de bestiole (pourtant j'avais bien cherché, mais je ne m'y connais pas vraiment en ce domaine). J'ai aussi ajouté les coordonnées. Peux-tu m'en dire plus sur ton commentaire "Identification of the animal is not made" ? C'est ma première et je ne connais pas trop la procédure. J'ai lu toutes les recommandations, mais il y a quelque chose qui m'a sans doute échappé. Si tu veux bien reconsidérer ton vote, ou juste jeter un oeil pour me conseiller, sans vouloir abuser e ton temps ... Penses-tu que je doive faire renommer le fichier (c'est peut-être ce que veut dire ton comm') ? Merci d'avance et bonne journée/soirée. --Llann .\m/ ^{(Lie 2 me ...)} 16:45, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Il y a plusieurs petits problèmes. Il faut écrire le nom en italique suivi du nom vernaculaire anglais entre parenthèse. Mais il y a déjà une image promue avec ce scope il faudrait rajouter (Alive). Il y a un gros problème : on ne peut pas reconnaître cette espèce de profil. Ce point est rédhibitoire. Ne te décourage pas car nous avons tous eu des problèmes avec VI qui n'est pas un Label évidant. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:39, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

J'ai apporté quelques modif's supplémentaires. Je verrai bien ... Merci encore. --Llann .\m/ ^{(Lie 2 me ...)} 21:18, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

FP etc...

salut,

J'espère que tu apprécies mes efforts pour faire vivre le label VI !

Moi en tous cas, je me cultive ! Et l'aspect "restauration" est amusant aussi.

je voudrais te recommander d'aller faire en tour sur la page des FP, il s'y passe des choses désagréables, dont une de tes images est le point de départ. Il faudrait aussi que tu ailles sur la page de discussion des FP, cette image a entraîné une discussion indirecte à laquelle tu devrais prendre part, je pense. Évidemment rien de personnel contre toi.

En gros certains (avec Alvesgaspar comme boute-feu) disent: "Les papillons d'Archéo et les coquillages de Llez, y'en a trop, y'en a marre, je vote contre". Et il faut renouveler les FP, et on en promeut trop etc etc, bref, des débats qu'on connait, mais qu'il faudrait cadrer un peu.

bien à toi, --Jebulon (talk) 20:21, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

• I'm very disappointed to see some people consider that discussion targeting against Archaeo or Llez. In-fact it is against nominators who try to nominate as many pictures as possible from main individual contributors (including you) and other institutional ones (like NASA). On the first reply itself I pointed that we (me and Alves) should refrain from nominating similar works of our own FP. I don't think the interest of the nominators who repeatedly nominating your work is very genuine (I've doubts at least). See the very unhealthy conflicts raised here. Sorry for any misunderstanding if occurred. JKadavoor Jee 06:13, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

• Merci a tous les deux de cette alerte. J’ai répondu sur les images de Lhez et sur les miennes. Mon travail est ailleurs, je nourris une encyclopédie universelle. Pour le seul mois de janvier j’ai eu plus de 10 millions de connexions sur les pages des wiki qui contenaient au moins une image du projet Phoebus. Et je reçois de plus en plus de demande de photo de la part des scientifiques. J’ai eu cette année 3 images publiées dans « Nature » qui est la plus haut des revues scientifiques. Mon travail est de connecter les scientifiques aux Wiki… Je regrette de ne pas prendre assez de temps pour ces concours qui ne sont pas inutiles mais qui ont perdu le sens de notre engagement. Aller on s’y remet. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:13, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hyles gallii (Bedstraw Hawk-Moth) mounted specimen, male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : nice and useful. --JLPC (talk) 13:24, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 22:15, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Byssolite.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support VI. --JLPC (talk) 11:39, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 22:19, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Regulus madeirensis (Madeira Firecrest), eggs.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 11:45, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 05:13, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Almandine.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : very good work. --JLPC (talk) 09:31, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 05:14, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Betelgeusia orientalis MHNT.PAL.2010..2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 19:04, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Traduction pour ta proposition en FP

Je te remercie pour ta confiance, j'ai fait de mon mieux.

Je pense que la description n'est pas très claire. Il s'agit de bactéries fossiles, si je comprends bien ?--Jebulon (talk) 15:13, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Oui tu as bien compris. Il est donc normal qu'avec des ancêtres pas très clairs nous en soyons arrivé là... Merci de ton coup de main, j'ai déjà un français bizarre alors passé par la moulinette de M.Google çà donne parfois des traductions surréalistes. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:59, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Du coup, je me demande si tu ne devrais pas agrémenter ta description des précisions apportées brillament par Cayambe...--Jebulon (talk) 20:47, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

C'est évident. Nous ne parlons pas assez des choses qui nous émeuvent. Les passionnés sont toujours étonnés de voir que le monde entier ne partage leur point de vue. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:00, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Tout à fait. C'est en insérant ton image dans d'autres articles que j'ai appris qu'il ne s'agissait pas juste d'une pierre, et quel témoignage précieux du passé remontant jusqu'à notre présent c'était : fr:Histoire naturelle de l'Australie#Précambrien, fr:Stromatolithe. --Myrabella (talk) 08:57, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

C'est pour ça que je suis toujours (trop?) bavard dans mes propositions, je pense d'ailleurs que les "reviewers" sont toujours un peu plus bienveillants dès qu'ils en savent un peu plus... C'est mon cas, je dois dire: je ne demande qu'à m'émerveiller ! Bon, j'ai trouvé un joli "Verdi" dont il faut que je m'occupe pour vous en VI, à l'occasion de son bicentenaire. Je vous laisse donc, bon dimanche.--Jebulon (talk) 10:26, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Poulpe supersonique

Ah tu le crois pas: je charge une image, je vais manger, je reviens : elle est déjà dans l’encyclopédie anglais. J'ai toujours su que ce fossile était exceptionnel mais là! il est peut être vivant... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:48, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Faut dire que tu parles à un amateur de céphalopodes ! Aussi bien dans l'assiette, que à étudier ! Même si le tiens n'est pas spécialement appétissant !--Citron (talk) 16:32, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Yes; we're happy to add your beautiful works to Wikipedia whenever possible. JKadavoor Jee 05:13, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Benitoite.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 09:34, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 05:34, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Xylophanes thyelia, mounted specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 09:35, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 05:34, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Betelgeusia orientalis, Holotype.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : good work. --JLPC (talk) 17:08, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 23:43, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Passer moabiticus (Dead Sea Sparrow), eggs.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 17:09, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 23:44, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Météorite de Saint Sauveur MHNT1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:12, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Météorite de Phnom Penh MHNT.MIN.2011.0.1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ercé 07:16, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hyles euphorbiae MHNT female ventre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:06, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Jenny la raie

J'ai fait quelques changements cosmétiques, mais c'était bien, à mon avis. Ceci dit, j'ai grand plaisir à t'aider, mais quelqu'un comme Myrabella est bien meilleure angliciste que moi !

Bon. On n'attend plus que ton article en Français, maintenant !--Jebulon (talk) 09:01, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

Merci je ne manquerai pas de vous solliciter de façon alternative, pour ne pas vous lasser. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:57, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

Rien de lassant ! J'apprends plein de choses, et j'adore ça ! --Jebulon (talk) 12:30, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

Scléromètre

Bonjour,
Merci beaucoup pour ton conseil, je viens de faire les modifications nécessaires pour la nomination du scléromètre. Bien cordialement !--— Habib M'HENNI ^[Message] 09:31, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lazurite.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 11:10, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 03:23, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Passer italiae (Italian Sparrow), eggs.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 11:11, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 03:23, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Stromatolithe Paléoarchéen - MNHT.PAL.2009.10.1 .jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Stromatolithe Paléoarchéen - MNHT.PAL.2009.10.1 .jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:25, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rhomboteuthis lehmani.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 17:07, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Myrabella (talk) 22:13, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hyles euphorbiae (Spurge Hawk-moth) mounted specimen, female.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 17:08, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Myrabella (talk) 22:14, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Re: Shinde Chhatri, exterior

Replied to you on my talk page. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 11:03, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Venice?

Hi Archeo, I understood that you will be in Venice in march. Is this still in your plans. I'll be in Venice on the evenings 5, 12, 19, 26 of march 2013. I'd be happy if we could meet for dinner. Regards --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 17:32, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Hi,

My wife and my daughter will come to Venice in the family, but I'm stuck at work. I would come in May. I bought the D800E, it is difficult to use artificial light, because there are a lot of chromatic aberration. The D800 was the right choice . --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:14, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Hi, well, let's do it in May. I thought i'd better buy a D800E, so you convince me I was right. I think (that's at least my experience) that CA dipends more from the lens and I avoid it using lower apertures like f/11. Let's share our experiences. But I am sure you enjoy the new camera. Bonne nuit --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 22:02, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint-Sauveur meteorite.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : VI. --JLPC (talk) 19:45, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 22:36, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Regulus regulus teneriffae (Tenerife Goldcrest), eggs.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good for me. Totodu74 (talk) 16:56, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 22:37, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Gallery Suggestion

Hi Archaeodontosaurus- Thanks for the suggestion. It will take some shaping, but here is the first stage of the U.S. Currency Gallery. While I have a great deal of experience with banknotes, I have made an amateurish attempt to create a basic taxonomic hierarchy in numismatics. I am not a biologist (nor do I have experience with taxonomic tables), but have attempted to use the existing framework/labels. I don't know if it will make you laugh or cry, or just scratch your head, but any feedback is welcome. Thank you--Godot13 (talk) 08:55, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

No, very good, it's here, it should be done. Do not forget to add the logo or  at the end. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:01, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Thank you. When images are officially promoted, I will add the logo. --Godot13 (talk) 09:20, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

File:Chondrite H5.JPG

Hi! The image File:Chondrite H5.JPG lacks the name of the meteorite. Is it a NWA classified meteorite? Do you know the actual name? (eg. NWA 6947) Thanks in advance! -- Basilicofresco (msg) 09:58, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

No, it's a piece that I have in collection. The analysis was made ​​in Lyon. This is a rather trivial chondrite. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:26, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eldonia berbera.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 10:30, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 03:08, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Himerarctia docis mounted specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : nice and useful. --JLPC (talk) 10:31, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 03:08, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

POTD

Great image!Godot13 (talk) 05:42, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

• Thanks!--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:50, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Muséum de Toulouse, Bibliothèque Cartailhac..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 18:22, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 05:58, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Montifringilla nivalis, (White-winged Snowfinc) eggs.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 18:20, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 05:58, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Goliathus goliatus (Goliath beetle) Mounted specimen, in flying possition.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support All criteria - New postion -- Ercé (talk) 15:08, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 03:03, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cochlostoma nouleti, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope, crteria satisfied. --Walter Siegmund (talk) 17:38, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 03:03, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

Perspective correction...

How did you do that? Its not just cropping. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 08:17, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

There are many software that can do this job. Many are free and open. I use Photoshop CS6 (not free). We straighten the edges and expands the upper 1/3 of the image upwards. You can not do that if you have the space on both sides of the monument. With a little practice you get there quickly ... Test! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:09, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

I see! Will try that sometime.

By the way, you seem to be good with digital image processing. Can you help me in something? I wanted to know how .svg images, especially those maps can be prepared. If its something easy, i would like to create some. There are many such maps missing for India, for major cities and districts. Do you create such maps as well? You know of any softwares that help here; good if free. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 10:49, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Unfortunately no I do not know anything in digital vector drawing, but requests. We between us to learn. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:56, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

George Sand

Ça aurait été bien volontiers et j'y avais évidemment songé, j'en ai vu plein, mais nous sommes déja abondamment pourvus, et je n'ai pas trouvé mieux que ce que nous avons déjà (notamment un grand Nadar). Je vous propose une intéressante sculptrice, en échange. Rare, non ?

au fait, tu as oublié de signer une promotion de coquillage de Llez... Supprime-z-y mon message une fois que ce sera fait !

--Jebulon (talk) 21:15, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Giorgio Maggiore (Venice) basilica, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  CommentAs I understand when looking at the the category/gallery, San Giorgio Maggiore is both an island and a church. Maybe I'll reduced the scope so: San Giorgio Maggiore (Venice), basilica, exterior, then it could be easyly the best in scope. Thoughts ?--Jebulon (talk) 09:21, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
•  Done very true! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:34, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
  •  Support Thank you. I make few reviews, but I (try to) make serious reviews ! Best in scope.--Jebulon (talk) 14:35, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Cepaea nemoralis

Hallo Archaedontosaurus. I didn't dare to nominate a single specimen of this species as "typical" hitherto, for we have a lot of colour variation (white, pink, yellow. reddish, brown). In addition, we have unicolored specimens, with 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5 bands, in addition sometimes several bands fused and so on. What is typical for the species? I think, there are also reginal differences. All in all, a set would be better to describe the species. But let's see, what others say. --Llez (talk) 08:54, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

This is true. In my collection I have a shell with no pattern but with the edge of the peristome black that characterizes this species. I put a note on the image to fit the distinctive sign of the species. I'll try to get a good picture of my specimen. It will be a good exercise because I do not control much my new camera. :)

My incursion in malacology not go far, because we will open the site ethnology ...--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:05, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Antozonite.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 18:32, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 00:35, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Furca mauritanica holotype.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : good and useful. --JLPC (talk) 18:33, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 00:40, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Taxus baccata (European yew), aril..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Very very good ! -- Ercé (talk) 17:02, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 00:40, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Taxus baccata (European yew) male flowers.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : beautiful and useful. --JLPC (talk) 16:35, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 01:12, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Morpho helenor helenor mounted specimen, male..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : good work imo. --JLPC (talk) 16:34, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 01:12, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Grave of George Enescu (Romanian composer).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Enesco died in 1955, therefore the sculptor was alive at that time. Don't you think a discussion is possible about the copyright of the tombstone ? Recently, a pic of Rudolph Noureev's grave (by Ezio Frigerio) was deleted for this reason. My concern is about the threshold of originality. Frankly I don't know...--Jebulon (talk) 11:16, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

• I thought too late. In absolute terms this is true. I have no more idea than that. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:29, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
  • I suggest to let the nomination open for the moment, let see if there is any reaction the next days. If not, I'll support, because it is the best in scope indeed.--Jebulon (talk) 15:14, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
    • I understand --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:18, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
      • At what point does a tombstone become art? Rudolf Nureyev's tombstone an extremely elaborate and very original (possibly unique) artistic creation and may be in a different realm. Are there guidelines for this? I am inclined to support this image--Godot13 (talk) 07:49, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
    •  SupportThanks Godot, I agree. OK, let's support, because it is really the best in scope, and nobody opposed because of no FoP.--Jebulon (talk) 13:33, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
    •  Support--Godot13 (talk) 14:49, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 23:53, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Taxus baccata seed.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 18:14, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 03:43, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fiesso d'Artico - Italy, The Town Hall..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 18:15, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 03:43, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Helix lucorum shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 09:59, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 23:46, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Buildings in Dolo (Italy), Mills of XVI century.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : best in scope. --JLPC (talk) 10:01, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 23:46, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Phymata crassipes mounted specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 10:01, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Myrabella (talk) 21:10, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Ethnologie

Bonjour Didier,
Quelques autres remarques sur la présentation de la fiche après réflexion. Il faudrait avoir plus haut dans la fiche les informations sur la culture et la région d'origine de l'objet (ici "culture Akan" et sans doute au moins "Afrique"). Ici, on apprend que c'est un objet de la culture Akan au fil du texte de la description détaillée, mais la mention elle-même n'apparaît que tout en bas, dans le champ "Notes" — or, n'est-ce pas une information essentielle pour des collections ethnologiques ? A remonter, il me semble. J'ai vu que cette information figure dans le nom du fichier, mais il me semble important de le mettre plus en lumière dans la description.
En revanche, le champ "Auteur" sera la plupart du temps "anonyme", n'est-ce pas ? Donc peut-être pas utile à garder ou afficher systématiquement en première information de la fiche.
A propos des noms de fichiers, prévoyez-vous simplement une convention "nom de culture" + "n° d'inventaire" (ce qui permet tout à fait de distinguer les objets) ou parfois des noms de fichiers un peu plus développés et explicites ?
Au passage, je trouve l'échelle utile, discrète et élégante. Tu ne la donnais pas toujours par le passé :) --Myrabella (talk) 09:23, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Je m'intéresse...

J'ai donc mis mon grain de sel pour une ou deux corrections ortho comme tu l'as vu, et pour le reste, je suis +1 avec Myrabella. Il y a visiblement un modèle à créer.

Comme je suis un peu grippé et que mon cerveau est embrumé, j'ose écrire "Akan la suite ?", mais c'est juste parce que je suis malade, ça ne se reproduira pas, promis...--Jebulon (talk) 09:33, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Didier encore une fois tu nous montres le bon chemin ... (pffiou j'ai honte de mes photos quand je vois ta photo ^_^). Je vais essayais de faire un modèle prenant en compte les remarque de Myrabella pour les collections d'ethnologie ie Titre, Culture, Origine, Date, Description, Materiel ({{technique|brass|lost-wax casting}} → brass on lost-wax casting) et le photographe et la date de la prise de vue ^_^. --PierreSelim (talk) 12:52, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Pierre, Il n'y a vraiment pas de quoi avoir honte, mais bien plutôt d'être fier ! Merci par avance pour le modèle. Je revenais pour le bout de texte en anglais emprunté au Brooklyn Museum : en fait, on en dispose dans Commons sous license CC BY 3.0, sans mention NC, suite au projet "Share Your Knowledge" dont voici une des versements : File:Brooklyn Museum 88.192.88 Gold Weight.jpg (il faudrait cependant l'attribuer si on l'emprunte...) --Myrabella (talk) 13:29, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Le texte vient d'être finalisé par notre conservateur (conservatrice?) Me Sylviane Bonvin. Je pense qu'il n'y a pas de problème particulier. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:05, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Point d'avancement:

• J'ai crée {{EthnologyItemMHNT}}
• Il faut finir la doc Template:EthnologyItemMHNT/doc et quelques détails
• J'ai fait un exemple avec la description de File:Akan MHNT.ETH.2010.25.100.jpg (il faudra probalement corriger car j'ai copié coller celle de ta photo grosso modo ^_^). --PierreSelim (talk) 20:09, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Parfait, superbe travail; j'ai fais migrer pour ma première image çà marche très bien. Il faudrait harmoniser les catégories en ajoutant "laiton" et "cire perdue". --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:46, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

VIC talk page

Hi Arch!

I have started two discussion topics at Commons talk:Valued image candidates/candidate list. But it seems that this page is visited less frequently. Hence thought of notifying you as you are a regular editor at VIC. Please put your views, if any, on these topics. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 09:42, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Images from Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences

Hello,

Currently, I work for the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU) as Wikipedian in Academy and one of the researchers at the university have started to upload his own pictures from the Insect collection at SLU (Category:Insect collection SLU, Uppsala). Do you think the pictures are possible to nominate as VI? Should there be any additions in the scope? I ask you because you seem to be one of the most experienced users at VI.--ArildV (talk) 13:51, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

• This is great news for the community. It should encourage the institutions to submit their images in COMMONS. The majority of these images are eligible VI. It would be useful to create a template for the university and is present on all images. As we did for the Museum of Toulouse Here. This is to thank the institution that helped make the images. I'm waiting on some practical details for VI. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:31, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rutilated quartz.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support VI imo. --JLPC (talk) 14:05, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 22:17, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cepaea nemoralis (grove snail), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support All criteria -- Ercé (talk) 09:56, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 22:17, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Lazzaro dei Mendicanti (Venice), facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Paris 16 (talk) 10:25, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 22:21, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Regulus regulus inermis, eggs.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 18:30, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 22:22, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

File:Cigarette smuggling with a book.JPG

Hello!

Thank you very much for your asistane during the VI-nomination of this image. Best regards, High Contrast (talk) 19:51, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

It was a pleasure, you will always be welcome. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:05, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cepaea hortensis ( white-lipped snail), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria --Ercé (talk) 08:36, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 03:23, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fiesso d'Artico - Italy Exterior of the church..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria ! --Ercé (talk) 08:34, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 03:24, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cadurcotherium nouleti, paratype tooth.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 15:26, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Myrabella (talk) 17:41, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of San Giobbe - Venice, facade..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : best in scope. --JLPC (talk) 15:27, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Myrabella (talk) 17:42, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

VI Change of Scope

Commons:Valued_image_candidates/Jefferson,_Thomas_(signature_on_check).jpg has has a slight change of scope. I hope you will support again. Also, I am putting some the currency into sets that go together. Thanks--Godot13 (talk) 01:38, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Focus stacking

Bonjour Didier,
Je viens vers toi pour une image d'un détail de cyprès de l'Arizona en focus stacking, qu'un contributeur a proposée en QI : File:Cupressus_arizonica_-_Glauca_-_blaue_Zypresse_-_02.jpg. J'ai remarqué des petites zones bizarres (2 mises en note, il y en a d'autres dans l'image). L'auteur donne des explications que j'ai du mal à comprendre complètement, ne pratiquant pas moi-même cette technique. Comme tu en es un spécialiste, peut-être un conseil, des astuces à donner ? Car tes images scientifiques en focus stacking présentent rarement ce genre d'irrégularités — mais peut-être est-ce parce que l'image en question contient beaucoup de détails fins sur différents plans, comme le feuillage des rameaux. Bref, j'aurais sans doute dû m'abstenir de commenter une photo créée selon un procédé que je ne maîtrise pas, mais peut-être-ce là l'occasion d'un échange fructueux (bien qu'en anglais obligé). --Myrabella (talk) 20:30, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

• Tu as une très bonne vue! J'ai répondu directement en QI. J'ai utilisé plusieurs mois ce logiciel avant de l'abandonner car il ne permet pas, sauf à multiplier exagérément le nombre de photo nécessaire, d’avoir un bon résultat. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:37, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ca' Rezzonico (Venice).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice but dates don't fit --Moroder 17:47, 20 March 2013 (UTC) Done --Archaeodontosaurus 18:12, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Zonites algirus, Shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 09:11, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 15:54, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Arsenale (Venice) - Fourth Ancient Greek lion.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : best in scope. --JLPC (talk) 09:12, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

•  Question Could you please explain why yours is better than this one I tend to prefer ? --Jebulon (talk) 09:36, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
• The inscription on the pedestal See Caption. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:48, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

 Support Per JLPC. The background/context adds to the value. --Godot13 (talk) 05:42, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 15:57, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of San Leonardo in Venice exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 09:08, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 16:03, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Buxus sempervirens (Common box), leaves.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : best in scope. --JLPC (talk) 09:06, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

•  Comment Tu es canoniquement en avance d'une semaine... --Jebulon (talk) 23:21, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 16:04, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

Lophius piscatorius MHNT.jpg

Dear Archaeodontosaurus, Juste par curiosité: How do you make such an image? Single image or stacking? And how do you get the lévitation effect and the shadow? Best regards -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 19:58, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

fr:Ce squelette est exposé dans «le mur des squelettes ». Il y a plusieurs difficultés : une vitre derrière avec de la lumière, une vitre devant sans possibilité d’éclairage au flash. Mais surtout se squelette est dans un coin très mal éclairé. Je passe très souvent devant pour rentrer et sortir du Muséum. Ce soir là il y avait un rayon de soleil très bas qui rendait la photographie possible. J’ai sorti mon tripode et j’ai fait 2 groupes de photos. Un groupe antérieur et un groupe postérieur car la jonction de la vitre passe par le milieu du squelette. Chaque groupe est fait de 4 empilements en focus stacking. Les groupes sont empilés et les deux images finales sont assemblées. Le problème s’est que pendant le travail le rayon de soleil a baissé et la queue est mal éclairée. Puis tout le squelette est détouré, travail un peu long, mais s'est un bon entrainement. Il ne reste plus qu’à faire un fond. Il y a une fausse ombre et un faux éclairage mais qui respecte le sens de l’éclairage initial. Ses images sont des « Etudes » qui prennent beaucoup de temps mais qui sont intéressante pour progresser. La majorité de mes Etudes finissent à la poubelle. Mais il faut prendre du temps pour expérimenter et voir si « on peut le faire ».

en:This skeleton is exposed in "wall skeletons". There are several difficulties: glass with light behind a glass front without the possibility of flash lighting. But especially in the skeleton is very poorly lit corner. I often pass in front to get in and out of the museum. That evening there was a very low sunshine that made photography possible. I pulled out my tripod and I made 2 groups of photos. A front group and a rear group as the junction of the glass passes through the center of the backbone. Each group is made of four stacks of focus stacking. Groups are stacked and final images are the two assemblies. The problem is that while working the sunbeam fell and the tail is poorly lit.Then the whole skeleton outline, work a little long, but is a good workout. It remains only to make a background. There is a false light shade and a false but respects the direction of initial lumen.His images are "studies" that are time consuming but are interesting to grow. The majority of my studies end up in the trash. But we must take time to experiment and see if "we can do".--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:43, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for the comprehensive answer. -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 18:31, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casa Mainella (Venice).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:16, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Brachyplax tenuis, mounted specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 14:40, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 00:42, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of San Salvatore (Venice), exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : best in scope. --JLPC (talk) 14:41, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 00:43, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Carcharodus alceae (Mallow Skipper) mounted specimen, female.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 13:04, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 00:45, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of San Martino (Venice) Monument to Francesco Erizzo.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : best in scope. --JLPC (talk) 13:08, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

 Support Awesome one! §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 07:37, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 00:47, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dolo Squero 45.423629,12.074801.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:23, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Helix pomatia (Burgundy snail).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Good quality photographic animal is shown in its environment. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:34, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

•  Support Lacks of butter, garlic and parsley, but good anyway. Better than the other one.--Jebulon (talk) 13:44, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
  •  Support Now I'm hungry...--Godot13 (talk) 23:38, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose Very poor lighting: disturbing unnatural flash-light reflections make it seem as if the shell is actually glossy, which it isn't.  B.p. 18:47, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. Grapevinesnail 01.jpg: -2 (current VI within same scope)
2. Helix pomatia 002.JPG: +1  <--
3. Helix pomatia (Dourbes).jpg: 0 
=>
File:Grapevinesnail 01.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former.
File:Helix pomatia 002.JPG: Promoted.  <--
File:Helix pomatia (Dourbes).jpg: Declined.

--Myrabella (talk) 00:29, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Thanks and happy Easter --Llez (talk) 11:35, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Palazzo Cavalli Franchetti

Bonjour et merci pour le coup d'œil sagace ! Le fichier est renommé. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 07:33, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lucanus cervus (Stag beetle), male, mounted specimen, head and mandibles.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best resolution for details. -- Ercé (talk) 08:19, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:41, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Helix pomatia (Burgundy snail), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : best in scope. --JLPC (talk) 20:06, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:41, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Goliathus goliatus, mounted specimen, dorsal side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 16:33, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:42, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Goliathus goliatus, mounted specimen, ventral side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 16:33, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:42, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Regulus regulus regulus (Goldcrest) eggs.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria --Ercé (talk) 07:59, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:43, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Squero Dolo Italy.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 17:48, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:44, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Buxus sempervirens (Common box), flowers.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : best in scope. --JLPC (talk) 08:12, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:24, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ca'Rezzonico (Venice) - Facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : best in scope. --JLPC (talk) 08:13, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

promoted

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:25, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

Enluminure carolingienne

Merci ! Mais ta modestie naturelle semble t'avoir empêché de signer ta promotion...--Jebulon (talk) 14:23, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

• Non mais dans ma présipitation j'avais enlevé |review=... C'est réparé. Ceci dit c'est un très beau travail. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:29, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
  • Tu remarqueras que je suis très éclectique dans mes choix de sujets... ;)--Jebulon (talk) 14:36, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
    • Comme tu as remarqué ma largesse de vue; car il y a parfois des personnages historiques avec qui je n'aurai pas passé mes vacances... :) --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:58, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
  • Une semaine avec Drumont, ça ne t'aurai pas plu ? Cela dit, cette enluminure carolingienne est vraiment unique et magnifique, je suis heureux de l'avoir trouvée et de vous la proposer. J'espère qu'elle séduira en FP, je dois dire que ça fait des semaines que j'y travaille... Dire qu'on sait exactement quand elle a été faite et par qui, avant même que Charlemagne ne devienne Empereur ! Moi, ça me parle. Et je suis heureux d'avoir offert ça à "Commons" (les autres versions sont pitoyables).--Jebulon (talk) 17:23, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
• Zut je ne suis pas prés nous aurions pus aller en FP de concert, je vois que tu y ai déjà. Demain je mettrai un instrument de musique. Mais d'avant Charlemagne... bien avant...

Pour la question que tu pose à B.P. : il faut le nom binominal car il fait référence. Linné a inventé cette voie pour éviter les termes vernaculaires qui fleurissaient un peu partout pour la même espèce. Mais ce ne sera pas difficile de trouver le nom usuel...--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:43, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Non, j'ai déjà tout, c'était juste une question de principe. Je me doute de la réponse, même si je trouve ça parfaitement anachronique... Mais bon. Sa réponse, s'il répond, m'intéresse...--Jebulon (talk) 18:58, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palazzo Moro a San Barnaba (Venice).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:43, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palazzo Loredan dell'Ambasciatore (Venice).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Very nice! Are you sure about the geotag --Moroder 12:23, 28 March 2013 (UTC) Yes, I was on foot.--Archaeodontosaurus 08:50, 29 March 2013 (UTC) Now I understand, on the northen bank of the Canal in the mornig!Thamks. --Moroder 16:54, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palazzetto Stern (Venice).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 10:43, 27 March 2013 (UTC)