User talk:AngMoKio/archive6
Archive 6 – Don't edit please!
User page design[edit]
Hi, Just wanted to let you know that I liked your user page design and have borrowed some of the code. :). Prashanthns (talk) 09:46, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
Panning racecar[edit]
Hello! I wanted to use your picture as a great example of panning photography in a lecture course for a student run class at UC Berkeley, with credit given, of course! Nothing will be used without prior consent.
67.164.93.228 06:23, 28 February 2010 (UTC) (apolloae on the English Wikipedia)
International Photoworkshop[edit]
Hello, motivated by the six Fotoworkshops of the German Wikipedia an international Photoworkshop in the Swedish Nyköping will be launched during the Easter Weekend 2010. Nyköping was chosen since Skavsta Airport is a Ryanair Base and very close to Stockholm. Further information can be found on Commons:Photoworkshop_Nyköping_2010. --Prolineserver (talk) 06:23, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! DTM Mercedes W204 Di Resta2010 amk.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! DTM Audi A4 Tomczyk2010 amk.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
New York[edit]
Hi!
I would like to use you photo, Manhattan on an early morning, on my soon to be on-line website. It is a travel game for children. I will be selling postcards on the site, but I would like to use your photo only for editorial purposes on the New York City pages.
Please contact me at sopran2000@hotmail.com. I look forward to hearing from you soon.
Best regards!
C. Hornung
Done --AngMoKio (talk) 19:51, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lamborghini Super Trofeo 99 2010 amk.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! DTM Mercedes W204 Green2010 amk.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Taipei 101 2009 amk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chiang Kai-shek memorial 2 amk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Formel3 Dallara F308 Félix da Costa 2010 amk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! DTM 2009 Engel Tomczyk amk.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Sehr geehrte Herr宏茂侨[edit]
ich bin Assistent an der Uni in Taiwan und in Ihrer Userpage habe ich ein Foto von National Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall gesehen. Es fand ich sehr schön.
Ich möchte Sie fragen, ob ich das Foto benutzen darf?
Mit freundlichen Grüßen Alex Hsu
- 你好 Alex, 我想给你写电邮。 你能给我你的电邮地址(eMail-Adresse?)? --AngMoKio (talk) 13:51, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
to AngMokio : 好的,我的电邮地址是hyhsu[at]dorise[dot]info , 谢谢
Ich hab gelesen du wolltest das Bild beim deutschsprachigen Wiki nominieren, aber hast legale Zweifel. Also einerseits wurde das Bild nicht in Deutschland aufgenommen und andererseits liegt es in Amerika auf dem Server - es gibt also keine deutsche Jurisdiktion für das Bild. Gruß Hekerui (talk) 13:13, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall 2009 amk.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Crocodile head photo useful[edit]
Thank you for your photo "Crocodile Crocodylus-porosus amk2.jpg" my 8 year old son found it while researching Salt Water Crocodiles and has included it in his classroom presentation.
- Thanks for the info. I hope the classroom presentation went well :-) --AngMoKio (talk) 08:54, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
Where did you see the unsharp areas and overexposed FFFFFF places? The fur is sharp enough. Thanks.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 14:05, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
- i think that the whole photo is shaken thus unsharp. The overexposed area is on left side of the nose. Feel free to put the photo to discussion on the QIC-page. My vote doesnt have to be the only one. --AngMoKio (talk) 16:39, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, the scape seems shaken, but the animal itself not.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 18:54, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
- You should move it to the discuss section on QIC. Then others can also give an opinion too. This seems to make sense here. --AngMoKio (talk) 19:51, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, the scape seems shaken, but the animal itself not.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 18:54, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
|
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Chiang Kai-shek memorial 2 amk.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Chiang Kai-shek memorial 2 amk.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 23:02, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pagode Lotus Lake Kaohsiung amk.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ralf Schumacher 2 2008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Seat Leon Fulin 2010 2 amk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
FP Promotion[edit]
|
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Taipei 101 2009 amk.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Taipei 101 2009 amk.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 23:09, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
St. Paul.[edit]
Hi, I am the webmaster for a local Catholic Church. I plan the use the St. Paul image on http:///www.hoosiercatholic.org , check back for the new website within a few weeks. Thank you for this wonderful image.
- thanks a lot for the info. Glad you like the photo --AngMoKio (talk) 19:52, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
You voted to support this. I can only presume you haven't thouight this through:
Consider:
- Those that nominate good FPs must wait 10 days to nominate again.
- Those that noiminate bad FPCs need only wait 5 days (Rule of fifth day closure) or even just 1-2 days (FPX).
This means that the spammers will be able to put out more than the good contributors at a rate of as much as 10 to 1 in the worst cases.
Further, it's not unusual for potential FPCs to get finished in batches. A photographer comes back from vacation, or a restorationist finishes several projects in a burst of enthusiasm.
This proposal would force people to work on a timescale lengthy enough to kill all enthusiasm.
It gets worse:
This gives a strong disincentive against nominating work by anyone but yourself. People who go through and select high-quality works by others are usually to be praised, however, this proposal causes them to be punished.
I would ask that you reconsider your vote, and consider options 2 or 5, which are more restrictions than are currently in place, and which may always be built upon or increased later. Adam Cuerden (talk) 02:50, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
Floods in QI[edit]
You might be interested in an ongoing discussion regarding QI floods of late, here. Cheers, ianaré (talk) 19:21, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
Picture usage[edit]
I would like to use this picture for my article on the 2014 Super being hosted in New York on suite101.com. Thank you.
- Collin
- thanks for the info. When the picture be online? --AngMoKio (talk) 21:02, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for getting me to look at this again - I finally figured out why the sheep looked just a little odd when everything else looked good: One of the inks is shiny, and scans much brighter than it looks.
That said, I own the original, and was adjusting colour according to it. This is, of course, a good thing, but if scanners did colours accurately every time, you wouldn't really need me. =) Adam Cuerden (talk) 01:56, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
- Hi Adam, I uploaded a file which shows a bit what I mean. Here you can see that in some dark areas details get lost compared to the original scan. Btw I used the first time this upload tool for derivative work, it said that a link to my file will be added to your upload which doesn't really makes sense in this case. I checked so far this link didn't get added - we might have to remove it once it gets added. --AngMoKio (talk) 11:31, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
- I've checked File:The Sunday at Home 1880 - Psalm 23 cropped.jpg against the original. The right image better reflects what is actually seen. The details which are more distinct in the original scan are not distinct in the original.
- It's not particularly unusual to get some spurious detail (which isn't in the original) in the original scan, before colours are adjusted, though it usually manifests more in the lighter areas, as vastly increased amounts of paper grain. I'm honestly not sure what's producing the effect here, as the details you point out on the left have some parts that ought to be visible with the naked eye if they were really there, and aren't. At a guess, as the scan came out very light, we're seeing details of the paper grain under the ink, which is very subtle in the original.
- Also, just to put this in perspective: the spurious details you're looking at - and I have literally compared this on the image - are about the width of a human hair. If you're going to ask about anything smaller than that, I'm going to need a better magnifying glass. Adam Cuerden (talk) 13:23, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Formel3 Dallara F308 Wittmann 2010 amk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! DTM Audi A4 Jarvis09 amk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! DTM Audi A4 Winkelhock09 amk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lamborghini Super Trofeo 22 2010 amk.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Motorcycle stunt Schwarz amk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Motorcycle stunt Schwarz 2 amk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Zeppellin NT 2 amk.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pfahlbaumuseum Unteruhldingen 2 amk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pfahlbaumuseum Unteruhldingen amk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Zeppellin NT 3 amk.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Zeppellin NT amk.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
want to use image[edit]
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Manhattan3_amk.jpg
i would like to use this image in a book cover that will probably never be published. it will be heavily edited in manipulation programs. please email me at metreonfuture@gmail.com to let me know if you approve of this usage of your image.
could i use this one as well?
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d7/Manhattan4_amk.jpg
Tip: Categorizing images[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]][[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 10:36, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall 2009 2 amk.JPG was uncategorized on 18 June 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:36, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
|
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Pfahlbaumuseum Unteruhldingen amk.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pfahlbaumuseum Unteruhldingen amk.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 23:04, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
Nice new mode![edit]
Herr AngMoKio,
You have a very nice FIFA world cup mode-- 德国加油! But why don't you use 國? :P
德國加油德國加油!!! :D
Frau Ma, hehe
- Dear Miss Ma,
- '國'是不好的中文. 你怎么不知道吗?:P
- Herr大王
Dear Herr 大王
國是对的中文, 国是不对的~hahaha 国是炉国人的~~hehe 你是炉国人嗎??
Frau Ma
- Frau Ma,
- 我不是炉国人我是疯国人!!
Manhattan picture=[edit]
Hi AngMoKio,
I'd like to use your Manhattan panorama photo on my work's website (www.actioncenter.org). Please let me know if that is OK and send me your name so I can credit you accordingly. My email is mnieman@nyc.mercycorps.org.
Thanks,
Marianne
HAHA![edit]
施魏因施泰格加油!! 你昨天吃了小豬嗎??:P
from瘋國小馬
- 我昨天吃小猪，可是我是不好的厨师。
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Seat Leon Breslin 2010 amk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Seat Leon Bebion 2010 amk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Seat Leon Klein 2010 amk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kaiseradler Aquila heliaca 5 amk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kaiseradler Aquila heliaca 6 amk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Zeppelin Photo[edit]
Hi We would like to use your Zeppelin Photo on a medical patient information brochure. Would that be ok for you when adding your name? Thanks Christian
- Hi thanks for your request. can you please send me a mail to
. Thanks. --AngMoKio (talk) 09:18, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
_in_Amritsar,_India.jpg){kind=link}
_in_Amritsar,_India.jpg){kind=link}
_in_Amritsar,_India.jpg){kind=link}
Reuse the photo of Confucius temple[edit]
Hi, Just let you know that I use your photo on Confucius temple on our website: bayvut.com.au ( attribution to you). Thanks
File talk:Italy Anguillara 2006 2.jpg[edit]
Herr 瘋國人, I used this pic for my article and I will surely credit it. :D Xie xie...
Bye bye! :P
Frau 瘋國女王 xxx
- Ni hao 瘋國女王 :) are you writing an article about Anguillara? --AngMoKio (talk) 11:38, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
Use of your Yosemite Park digitqal photo[edit]
AnfMoKio,
I am a dental specialtist who presents dental continuing education programs and my next 2 day program is in Sacramento, California. Your Yosemite Park digital photo is beautiful. May I use it in an introduction slide to the Sacramento area?
Thanks for your consideration, Allen mtmanak@gmail.com
imperial eagle Photo permission[edit]
Hi, I'm from WWF Portugal and I would like your premission to use the imperial eagle image in our website and during the green festival event to make people aware of the extintion dangerous of this particular specie in portugal.
great photo! Thanks
- Hi there, thanks a lot for the info. Feel free to use the photo for the website and the green festival event. Could you send me the link to the website with my photo ones it is online to . Thanks a lot in advance. --AngMoKio (talk) 14:29, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the fotos![edit]
王老師
Thank you for your pics of CKS memorial hall. They are not like the egg.
- )
李平
- 谢谢你. But my camera is still broken...it is really like the egg :( --AngMoKio (talk) 14:23, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
Too bad, hope it will be fixed soon! "kakaka" is such an important thing!!
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Porsche race car 2009 Sigacev.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Porsche race car 2009 Plesse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Porsche race car 2009 Bleekemolen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Curious as to how you've handled commercial requests for your work[edit]
Hello,
I’m curious as to how you’ve dealt with commercial requests to use your work, as I am trying to get some ideas on how to handle these types of requests. I have received a few myself but have deferred to the licensing terms of the CC/GFDL and now realize that I have probably left some money on the table. For example, what has or hasn’t worked for you, what kind (s) of licensing do you use for, and what else you can think of that may be helpful. If you feel it’s more appropriate, we can continue this discussion via email. Thanks. BrokenSphere (Talk) 20:08, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
- Hi there,
- well I had really a lot of commercial requests so far and mostly just allowed them to use my photos. Mostly I requested a voucher copy, which I got in maybe 80% of the requests. I also often thought about getting money for commercial use of my pictures. But as I make photos as a hobby and don't want to earn money with it, I decided that people using my pictures for commercial purposes, should consider donating some money to a humanitarian organization and send me a voucher copy. It is really a nice thing to hold a book in your hand, in which your photos get used and you can additionally help other people in need. I see the whole wiki-thing as something charitable, so I thought this is the best way. --AngMoKio (座谈) 20:57, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for your input. I saw the notice about considering making a charitable contribution in exchange for use on your userpage, it's a very commendable idea. I like the voucher copy idea, as I have had a few of these types of requests also. BrokenSphere (Talk) 21:03, 26 October 2010 (UTC)