User talk:Amphibol

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Bilder umbenennen[edit]

Hallo Gunnar, danke für das umbenennen deiner Bilder mit unpassendem Namen. Ich habe eine Bitte: Es wäre hilfreich, wenn du nach dem hochladen des neuen Bildes die Nutzung des alten überprüfen und ggf. die links in den Commons-Galerien und den Wikipedia-Seiten anpassen könntest (zum Beispiel ist Image:100 2102.JPG in Ortler eingebunden). Vielen Dank --GeorgHHtalk   10:17, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nicht hudeln! Wird schlicht um schlicht erledigt, kann aber immer eine Weile dauern. Das gilt für die Umbenennung der restlichen Bilder auch.
Ich wollte doch nicht hudeln, niemals.. ;-) Nur drauf aufmerksam machen eben. Viel Spaß noch --GeorgHHtalk   15:22, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Amphibol!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:38, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ups, da ist mir wohl was unterlaufen. Danke für die Mitteilung --Amphibol (talk) 10:55, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Moin Gunnar,

kannst Du mir sagen, auf welchem Gebäude dieses Altonaer Wappen steht (und wenn ja, wo das Gebäude genau steht)? Vielen Dank und Gruß vom --Mogelzahn (talk) 18:44, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Steht soweit ich mich erinnere auf der Fischauktionshalle am Fischereihafen, Elbseite. Viele Grüße --Amphibol (talk) 10:55, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Danke! --Mogelzahn (talk) 13:50, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Amphibol, könntest du die beiden Bilder bitte genauer kategorisieren, ist evtl. Dobbertin (ohne h) gemeint? Gruß Niteshift (talk) 16:13, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mifft! Natürlich Dobbertin. danke für den Hinweis. --Amphibol (talk) 14:50, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:Rathaus_PotsdamP1020141.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

77.49.129.144 17:13, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nö, persönlich nehme ich das nicht. Aber ich vermisse so etwas wie eine Begründung. Schliesslich kann es ja Gründe geben, die eine Löschung notwendig machen. Aber warum werden die von demjenigen, der den Antrag stellt, nicht mitgeliefert?--Amphibol (talk) 09:36, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! You wanted to be notified if your photos are used outside the wiki projects, so I thought I'd drop this note about the one mentioned in the title: I used it on my blog (which is about wildlife in Finland, and in Finnish only), to accompany a post about recent wolf sightings. Thanks for sharing your good work! -Uusijani (talk) 06:56, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for using my pictures! --Amphibol (talk) 08:49, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just to notify that I used this file here: [1] The goal is to illustrate some mnemonics in a website for vocabulary learning. Let me know if the attribution is enough. --Bli (talk) 13:05, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm completely fine with this, thanks --77.176.87.107 17:22, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

unfortunately the credit says "Photo:wikipedia". if you wish to contact them I will be happy to assist. Hidro (talk) 00:47, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alpen-Mauerpfeffer[edit]

Servus, Folgende Bilder von dir zeigen nicht den Alpen-Mauerpfeffer sondern den Fetthennen-Steinbrech (Saxifraga aizoides). Könnest du dies bitte berichtigen. Danke --Tigerente (talk) 15:19, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Danke für den Hinweis, wird korrigiert! --Amphibol (talk) 09:36, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

use of picture P1120953[edit]

Hi Gunnar! You wanted to be notified if your photos are used outside the wiki projects. I´m writing a monitoringprogram for Lutra Lutra for the County Administrativ board of Östergötland [3]. Thanks for sharing your good work erik Årnfelt erik.arnfellt@lansstyrelsen.se

copyright Problem Museumsfotos[edit]

Hallo Gunnar, danke dass Du so tolle Fotos für Wikipedia bereitstellst. Leider muss ich Dir sagen, dass innerhalb von Museen aufgenommene Bilder in Deutschland im Allgemeinen nicht frei verwendbar sind, sondern nur für "private Zwecke". Das gilt vor allem dann, wenn ein entsprechendes Schild am Eingang steht. Dies ist im Museum für Naturkunde Berlin der Fall, uns zwar schon so lange ich denken kann. Daher meine Bitte: kontaktiere die doch mal (Frau Steiner; [[4]], und frage nach, ob die Bilder verwendet werden dürfen. Sonst müssen sie leider raus.... Betroffen sind: [[5]] [[6]]

HMallison (talk) 11:10, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Amphibol,
die von HMallison erwähnten Ansprüche werden von unseren Copyright-Experten überwiegend bestritten, weshalb du in Anbetracht der momentan laufenden Diskussion dazu eher keine cv-speedies darauf setzen solltest (sie werden einfach revertiert). Wenn es dir aber um die Vermeidung möglicher persönlicher Rechtsprobleme geht, lässt sich sicher eine andere Lösung finden. --Túrelio (talk) 15:40, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ich war bisher auch davon ausgegangen, dass dies unproblematisch ist. Und bislang hat es auch keine Probleme damit gegeben. Persönlöich halte ich es auch durchaus für Werbung, für die betreffenden Institutionen. Aber ich bin eben kein Rechtsexperte. HMAllisons Einwand hatte mich schlicht aufgeschrekt. Das Museum hüllt selber hüllt sich dazu in Schweigen und ich wollte schlicht Probleme für alle Beteiligten vermeiden. Wenn das unnötig ist, bitte ich von den cv-speedies abzusehen. --Amphibol (talk) 16:07, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rechtsexperte bin ich auch nicht. Wie gesagt, wenn du deinen Klarnamen von den Bildern weghaben willst, lässt sich das lösen ;-). --Túrelio (talk) 16:38, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
ganz ruhig - keiner redet von Klagen oder Schadenersatzansprüchen oder so. Laßt bitte die PFerde im Stall! Es besteht - so ich recht habe - u.a. die Möglichkeit, dass das Museum die Bilder nachträglich mit seinem Logo so versieht, dass eine kommerzielle Nutzung uninteressant wird, und dann einer Wikinutzung zustimmt. Geben wir der Rechtsabteilung die ca. 6 Monate, die sie wohl brauchen wird. HMallison (talk) 23:45, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 20:21, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

What location, please? Wild, or captive? Thanks! - MPF (talk) 13:35, 17 February 2012 (UTC) Abwehrspray / seo[reply]

Grauwolf_P1130275.jpg[edit]

Hello Gunnar, Just writing to you to let you know that I am using you photo as inspiration for a painting and I will be giving credit to you for the original image on the back of the painting. Will this be sufficient? It is to be a present for a close friend. Thank you for making your photos available.

THom

Thats completely OK for me, thanks --Amphibol (talk) 21:50, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Parapuzosia_seppenradensis_3.jpg[edit]

Hi, I'm planning to use your photo of Parapuzosia in my forum posting about large marine animals, if it's okay. Of course I give credit to you. Thanks! --JikhanJung (talk) 09:13, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thats completely fine with me! Thats what these fotos are for!--77.8.173.48 17:14, 13 February 2015 (UTC)--Amphibol (talk) 17:16, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Grauwolf P1130280.jpg usage[edit]

I am using this photo in my book, thanks in advance

Thanks a lot!--Amphibol (talk) 20:35, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kranich_P1120505.jpg - Usage outside Wikipedia[edit]

Hi Gunnar, we used your picture inside a blogpost about microadventures with kids: https://ausgebuext.info/kinder-mikroabenteuer-oktober/ Thanks for this great image.

Best Patrickheck (talk) 10:55, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Danke! Genau dafür sind die Bilder jau auch da.--Amphibol (talk) 18:28, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Geisloch[edit]

mini)

Hi, du hast ein paar Bilder von einem "Geisloch" hochgeladen. Kannst du es bitte sagen welches Geisloch es ist? In der Frankenalb gibt es einige Geislöcher. Eine Ortschaft in der Nähe würde auch helfen. Danke --Derzno (talk) 18:20, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, da muss ich mal in alten Unterlagen suchen. Bei uns auf den Exkursionen wurde immer diese Höhle als das "Geisloch" geführt. Ich schau mal, ob ich noch einen alten Exkursionsführer oder mein damaliges Feldbuch finde. 2A02:8108:96C0:4F98:EC00:4C8A:38CF:C056 20:53, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:18, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]