User talk:Alvesgaspar/archive42

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palenis December 2021-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:50, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tibães March 2016-10a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:22, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tibães March 2016-23a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice. -- Ikan Kekek 21:22, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tibães March 2016-7a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:22, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flowers Porto Covo August 2021-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:48, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tibães March 2016-20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Watchduck 16:26, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poster Gazania 2a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:13, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Palenis December 2021-1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Palenis December 2021-1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Santa Maria della Vittoria September 2015-3.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Santa Maria della Vittoria September 2015-3.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alcobaça October 2021-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MB-one 17:50, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Coimbra April 2018-21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Prburley 00:11, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Coimbra April 2018-36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 17:40, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Coimbra December 2011-21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Perspective correction would be hilarious here. --Cayambe 19:41, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Coimbra April 2018-35a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok, Good quality. --Cayambe 10:12, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gazania December 2021-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Excellent. -- Ikan Kekek 23:36, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gazania December 2021-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice. -- Ikan Kekek 23:38, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porto Covo January 2022-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:20, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Waves & sun Porto Covo January 2022-1a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:27, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gazania Porto Covo January 2022-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:10, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porto Covo January 2022-11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:10, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lobularia maritima Porto Covo 2022-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:30, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gazania Porto Covo January 2022-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 10:03, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gazania Porto Covo January 2022-5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:27, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pallenis January 2022-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 08:09, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porto Covo January 2022-12a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:11, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porto Covo January 2022-15a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:31, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tecoma Porto Covo January 2022-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good quality. Please add a CAT for the location to make it more useful. --Tagooty 10:24, 13 January 2022 (UTC) ✓ Done Added location -- Alvesgaspar 11:50, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. The file name has Porto Covo so I added CAT:Porto Covo. Hope this is correct. --Tagooty 14:41, 13 January 2022 (UTC)  Info No, that is not the way to do it. Geocoding is enough. Alvesgaspar 16:04, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment There is no geocoding visible in the image page. --Tagooty 03:10, 14 January 2022 (UTC) ✓ Done Oops, sorry! Alvesgaspar 17:36, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Solandra maxima Porto Covo January 2022-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 13:28, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porto Covo January 2022-5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Horizon is not straight --Nino Verde 21:30, 15 January 2022 (UTC) ✓ Done Corrected - Alvesgaspar 11:31, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 14:30, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porto Covo January 2022-7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Horizon is not straight --Nino Verde 21:30, 15 January 2022 (UTC) ✓ Done - Corrected -- Alvesgaspar 11:31, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 14:30, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oxalis January 2022-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:15, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Osteospermum Porto Covo January 2022-8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:15, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ostospermum Porto Covo January 2022-9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:15, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oxalis January 2022-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 07:48, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Osteospermum January 2022-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 08:33, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porto Covo January 2022-17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 14:30, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sta Clara January 2022-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 07:51, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Osteospermum Porto Covo January 2022-10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:53, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porto Covo January 2022-26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 21:39, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porto Covo January 2022-25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:20, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porto Covo January 2022-23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:20, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porto Covo January 2022-20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 21:39, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Osteospermum Porto Covo January 2022-7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:43, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porto Covo January 2022-22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:37, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:S. Pietro May 2022-15.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:S. Pietro May 2022-15.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Boa tarde Alvesgaspar, Sempre procurando melhorar minhas fotos, gostaria saber que coisas tenicas poderiam ter sido melhores nesta foto. Muito obrigado Wilfredor (talk) 20:27, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for answering, I will take it more into account for future work :) --Wilfredor (talk) 13:00, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays 2022/2023![edit]

  * Happy Holidays 2022/2023, Joaquim Alves Gaspar! *  
  • Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
  • Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
  • Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

   -- George Chernilevsky talk 00:39, 23 December 2022 (UTC)   [reply]

Happy Holidays 2022/2023![edit]

Minster of the Holy Cross, Schwäbisch Gmünd. The imposing straw star in the centre is about 5 m tall and has been used every year for decades, thus it is an important part of local Christmas traditions. Happy Holidays, Alvesgaspar

Merry Christmas and a happy new year!
Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!
Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
Buon Natale e felice anno nuovo!
Frohe Weihnachten und ein gutes neues Jahr!

--Aristeas (talk) 12:53, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]