User talk:Alvesgaspar/archive37

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palácio Fronteira (Sol) December 2015-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:24, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palácio Fronteira (Saturno) December 2015-5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Please resolve the redlink. --Cccefalon 01:04, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palácio Fronteira (Vénus) December 2015-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:24, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fontana dei Quattro Fiumi (Piazza Navona) September 2015-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:25, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Carlo alle Quattro Fontane September 2015-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:25, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Carlo alle Quattro Fontane September 2015-5a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:25, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Forum of Trajan September 2015-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:25, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Galleria delle carte geografiche (Vatican Museums) September 2015-5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:54, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

	Have a great 2016. -- Colin (talk) 12:00, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

• Thank you very much, @Colin: . A Happy New Year for you as well! -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 16:00, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palácio Fronteira (Mercúrio) December 2015-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:10, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Maria Maggiore September 2015-3a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality fo me.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 17:03, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Sagrada Familia March 2015-10a.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sagrada Familia March 2015-10a.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

QI Tunisia training

As part of the project Quality images training in Tunisia, the Wikimedia TN user group is looking for a Wikimedia commons User able to organize a training about Quality images, featured pictures, Valued images and Graphic Lab/Photography in Tunisia from February 18th to 22th, 2016. To participate please fill this form --Touzrimounir (talk) 19:57, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porto Covo December 2015-4a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It might need a small perspective correction, but it's okay --Michielverbeek 08:33, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dublin October 2014-5a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:39, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:City Hall Antwerp July 2015-1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:City Hall Antwerp July 2015-1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porto Covo January 2016-6a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 08:50, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porto Covo January 2016-7a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 08:50, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porto Covo January 2016-8a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 14:10, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porto Covo January 2016-9a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 14:10, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barcelona March 2015-16b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:30, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chicago 2007-29a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:30, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porto Covo January 2016-11a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 15:51, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porto Covo January 2016-4a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality though it is leaning 1° to the left --Christian Ferrer 18:32, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Porto Covo January 2016-3a.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Porto Covo January 2016-3a.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Porto Covo January 2016-7a.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Porto Covo January 2016-7a.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aloe January 2016-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:56, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jerónimos January 2016-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:47, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! João Cutileiro January 2016-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:12, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barcelona March 2015-15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very difficult to say something about the quality, but IMHO it looks good --Carschten 17:38, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Expo 98 January 2016-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments See two dust spots in the sky at right, above and below the cables. --Cayambe 21:47, 17 January 2016 (UTC) --  Done You are quite right, I'm sorry. Alvesgaspar 12:08, 18 January 2016 (UTC) -- Good quality. --Cayambe 08:29, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Expo 98 January 2016-1a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 11:37, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

75px|center|

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Commons:Featured picture candidates/Chicago 2007-21a.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Commons:Featured picture candidates/Chicago 2007-21a.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Porto Covo July 2011-6.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Porto Covo July 2011-6.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:06, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Colored flowers e.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Colored flowers e.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:04, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Eristalinus June 2014-2a.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Eristalinus June 2014-2a.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Contacto para uso das suas imagens

Caro Joaquim Alves Gaspar. Gostaria de falar consigo relativamente ao uso das suas imagens por um cliente do atelier onde trabalho.

Deixo os meus contacto e agradeço o seu retorno com a maior brevidade possivel.

Hélder Soares

217 598 302 911 915 989, helder.atelier@gmail.com

Antecipadamente grato

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Madrid May 2014-8a.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Madrid May 2014-8a.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:04, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

User:Cadunico

Hi, can you help User:Cadunico make a pair of entries to the Commons:Photo challenge/2016 - March - Inside / Outside challenge? He is having problems and asked for help here and I replied to his talk page. But I don't think he understands me. I'm not sure he's actually got a photo of the inside of the building (inside another building perhaps or inside a vehicle?), so not sure he has a suitable pair for that Challenge. -- Colin (talk) 21:27, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

I don't know what is going with Commons:Photo challenge/2016 - March - Faces in objects. Cadunico has tried to insert his architecture picture to that challenge rather than "inside/outside". I don't see any face. Your edit to the challenge removed a fish-cloud entry (not a great entry, but still appropriate). -- Colin (talk) 18:08, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Curation of old maps in Commons

Olà Joaquim

I have been thinking for some time that the increasingly vast collection of old map images in Commons needs curation, so when I saw an idea contest organized by the Wikimedia Foundation I put together a proposal to do it (link). I would very much appreciate if you could take a look at it and let me know what you think, either on the discussion section or privately if you prefer.

Thanks, --Hispalois (talk) 21:02, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

PS: I am impressed by the statistics I just saw on your user page regarding your FP, VI and QI!

File:Abel Manta February 2015-1a.jpg

File:Abel Manta February 2015-1a.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Josve05a (talk) 22:35, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Bouro March 2016-1a.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bouro March 2016-1a.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Parque Mayer June 2013-1.jpg

File:Parque Mayer June 2013-1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Josve05a (talk) 16:55, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Eduardo Malta February 2015-1a.jpg

File:Eduardo Malta February 2015-1a.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Josve05a (talk) 17:07, 30 March 2016 (UTC)