User talk:Alvesgaspar/archive27

Image file:Butterfly April 2008-2a.jpg

Question: where did you take this photograph? It looks very orange-spotted for subspecies tircis... —Grmanners (talk) 19:48, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

• Hi Grmanners, I agree with you. But the English description does not mention the subspecies tircis. The problem seems to be that in French, the common name for the species is ... "Tircis" -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:33, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porto Covo April 2013-6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:19, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Surf on rock April 2013-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments High quality. --ArildV 19:27, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Surf on rock April 2013-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments High quality. --ArildV 19:27, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arctotis April 2013-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 02:15, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waves July 2009-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments And shades of blue. QI for me. --Kadellar 22:22, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

Buxus July 2011-1.jpg

Nous avons un problème avec cette image que tu as prise à Paris, c'est un rosier et non un buis. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:02, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

• Hi Didier, nice to hear from you! Bien sur que tu as raison, je vais présenter une protestation officielle au Jardin des Plantes! Or je suis peut-être trop confiant... Merci! Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:00, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Galactites april 2013-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 21:20, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iridaceae April 2013-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks OK to me. --Tuxyso 19:45, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arctotis April 2013-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Tuxyso 19:43, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sympetrum April 2013-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality IMO--Lmbuga 21:51, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Galactites april 2013-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Perhaps you could edit out the purple petals on the left? --Jastrow 20:36, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Moscow July 2011-46.jpg

File:Moscow July 2011-46.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Clarissy. 14:16, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Poster of white flowers

Awesome! That's a great poster. Thanks for letting me know! 208.87.217.46 01:18, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anthemis april 2013-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Gidip 07:42, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! White flowers a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice, I guess next step is FP, right? --Poco a poco 20:05, 20 April 2013 (UTC) - Nope, I came here now to remove the nom but you were too fast! A better version coming along! -- Alvesgaspar 21:09, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salticidae April 2013-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. --Mattbuck 18:03, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glebionis April 2013-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nicely done. --Mattbuck 17:55, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Colored flowers a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and useful IMO

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Colombo April 2013-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:White flowers b.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:White flowers b.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:16, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Carpobrotus April 2013-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok.--Earth100 23:55, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Colombo April 2013-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality & good crop. --Selbymay 21:49, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anthemis april 2013-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --Rjcastillo 23:45, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trifolium April 2013-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --Rjcastillo 23:45, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Yellow flowers a.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Yellow flowers a.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:14, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Colombo April 2013-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 16:19, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mafra May 2013-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very Good --Rjcastillo 03:01, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mafra May 2013-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mafra May 2013-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:55, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mafra National Palace (facade), Portugal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : best in scope imo. --JLPC (talk) 21:18, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Estádio da Luz (exterior) (Stadium of Benfica), Lisbon.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : best in scope. --JLPC (talk) 21:20, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Estadio Benfica April 2013-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Maybe a too much satured for me, good quality. --Christian Ferrer 16:04, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lisboa May 2013-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 23:35, 12 May 2013 (UTC) Dust spots in the sky to remove (and a weird halo around the flag). --Selbymay 06:21, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lisboa May 2013-6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 23:35, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lisboa May 2013-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 23:35, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lisboa May 2013-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Perhaps small amount of tilt? Or too strong correction of pincushion distorsion? --Smial 23:35, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lisbon May 2013-17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 01:10, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lisbon May 2013-16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 06:21, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Cantino planisphere (1502).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cantino planisphere (1502).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sonchus May 2013-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 22:44, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spiraea May 2013-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 22:46, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sonchus May 2013-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 18:50, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cichorium May 2013-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 18:50, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polistes May 2013-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great shot --Rjcastillo 18:47, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trifolium May 2013-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:46, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lisbon May 2013-25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Some CA (mayby due to f/5.6?) --Moroder 14:12, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lisboa May 2013-11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:57, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lisboa April 2013-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:10, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lisboa May 2013-8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:08, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scolymus April 2013-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 04:06, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scolymus April 2013-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very good --Llez 04:06, 18 May 2013 (UTC)  Comment Sorry, but I'm not happy with the resolution (just above 2 MP). --Iifar 14:45, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spiraea May 2013-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could be cropped a little imo, but otherwise very good. --Cayambe 07:17, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lisbon May 2013-24a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Superior Quality -- Arcalino 13:10, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Polistes May 2013-2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Polistes May 2013-2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:17, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Convolvulus May 2013-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steindy 19:03, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anthomyia May 2013-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beggar Lisbon May 2013-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI. --Kadellar 21:12, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polistes May 2013-5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me--Lmbuga 07:07, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Guincho June 2013-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 10:13, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lisboa June 2013-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Pazienza... --Moroder 09:55, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lisboa June 2013-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Nice but could you please name the sculptor in the description? --Moroder 17:33, 2 June 2013 (UTC) --  Done Alvesgaspar 18:34, 2 June 2013 (UTC) Comment Thanks --Moroder 09:55, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Guincho June 2013-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 16:54, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Monument to the Marquess of Pombal, Lisbon, Portugal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : best in scope. --JLPC (talk) 09:30, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:46, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calystegia May 2013-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dirtsc 18:26, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vozes Almodovar August 2009-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 11:02, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fly June 2013-7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Size minimally acceptable, remember place category, nice --The Photographer 21:44, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hirundo June 2013-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A pity that the nest is cut off, but good anyhow --Poco a poco 21:21, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Appropriately Licensed

You participated at the earlier discussion on licence choice for Featured Pictures. A number of users felt that such restrictions should be made at policy level. Please comment at Commons:Requests for comment/AppropriatelyLicensed. This is a proposal to amend this licence policy to disallow future uploads where the sole licence is inappropriate for the media (e.g., GFDL for images). In earlier discussions there were a number of comments that, while reasonable opinions, did not align with Wikimedia's mission for free content. Please read the FAQ before commenting. Thanks -- Colin (talk) 23:02, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Carpobrotus June 2013-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 14:14, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Carpobrotus June 2013-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Iifar 17:16, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wasp June 2013-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:05, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wasp June 2013-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok now. --Cayambe 20:01, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leucanthemum June 2013-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Iifar 12:14, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porto Covo June 2013-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 07:45, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hirundo June 2013-8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I think, there are several dust spots visible. Apart from that OK for QI, I think. --NorbertNagel 20:48, 17 June 2013 (UTC) -- Those are spots on the wall, not on the lens!... Alvesgaspar 21:24, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Armeria June 2013-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality. --NorbertNagel 18:36, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Armeria June 2013-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me--Lmbuga 19:12, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porto Covo June 2013-5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 16:06, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porto Covo June 2013-6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 21:10, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hirundo June 2013-7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Interesting.--ArildV 10:40, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

Beautiful pic

Just saw a sextant animation made by you and think feel compeled to thank for the contribution.--83.49.89.161 03:31, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

• Very nice to know that people appreciate our work. Thank you, 83 ! Alvesgaspar (talk) 08:34, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for Contributing to Radio Paradise

Congratulations, your POTD image of the boy jumping into the ocean has been accepted for the W:Radio Paradise RPHD broadcast! It will be in rotation with thousands of other outstanding photographs, at:

http://www.radioparadise.com/rp_2p.php?slideshow=yes

Thank you very much for donating this image to the Creative Commons. I've modified the image by cropping closer to the boy, and I embedded the following caption, with attribution:

Porto Covo, Portugal

CC-BY-SA-3.0: Joaquim Alves Gaspar

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Porto_Covo_July_2011-1.jpg

I hope that you will listen to Radio Paradise, one of the pioneering, and premier, internet radio stations. Once you are a member of our community of listeners, perhaps you'll consider contributing other photographs to the RPHD broadcast.

Thanks again!

Tom Cool

Assistant for Creative Commons Images to the RPHD Photo Editor Tomcool1 (talk) 15:12, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gazania June 2013-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:32, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hortensia June 2013-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. --Kor!An 20:50, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porto Covo June 2013-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 11:55, 24 June 2013 (UTC)