User talk:Akim Dubrow

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Babel user information
ru-4
en-3
fr-1
la-1
de-0
Users by language

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 21:20, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:WulfsonAgitplakat2.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

/St1995 16:52, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Пожалуйста, не стирайте ссылко, т.к. там заявление о передаче в ОД лежит. --Akim Dubrow (talk) 15:32, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Развязывать войну правок во избежание конфликтов и напрасной траты времени я не буду. Подождём админов, посмотрим что скажут они. Но мне всё же интересно, для чего Вы загрузили этот файл и как будете использовать? /St1995 20:52, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Вы действительно автор этого фотографии? А то скорее кажется, что персонаж откуда-то вырезан, потом отфотошопен и залит сюда как "own work". /St1995 17:05, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Отфотошоплен мною из фотки, переданной владельцем в ОД. У меня есть письмо от Волкова, если не стёр. Можно сделать ОТРС, но надо ли возиться? --Akim Dubrow (talk) 00:07, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • Я бы сделал, чтобы никто не номинировал этот файл на удаление в будущем. Хотя это лучше Вам решать.
      P.S. не нужно восстанавливать ссылку на сайт, который находится в глобальном чёрном списке. Посему эту правку я вынужден буду откатить. /St1995 11:33, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not advertise on Commons[edit]

Пожалуйста, не вставляйте больше ссылку на сайт, который находится в глобальном чёрном списке (тем более в обход). Я ничего против Викиреальности не имею, но не зря же он там есть. Также нельзя изменять/удалять [1] предупреждения со своей СО, это запрещено. /St1995 20:39, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rasagilin.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leyo 19:44, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:WM 284ru.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jarekt (talk) 16:38, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]