User talk:Ahonc/Archives/July 2015

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

WLE pictures on Quality images candidates

Hello Ahonc,

you threw some of the WLE Germany 2015 pictures on the Quality images page. Was there an idea behind it? "Reviews" there are not helpful for new photographers. More experienced ones do not take that for serious, anyhow. The evaluation results are in many cases worthless. I would not complain if photographers had been asked before and had agreed. Could you stop that, please? Regards, --Blech (talk) 17:44, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Sorry, you cannot forbid me to do this.--Anatoliy (talk) 19:18, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Your noFop undeletions.

Hi, would you please be so kind and unarchive those deletion requests - see here. Otherwise they will get likely never decided. Thx. --JuTa 23:26, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Andrey Korzun (talk) 09:17, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Andrey Korzun (talk) 19:47, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Andrey Korzun (talk) 12:06, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

  • Как я понимаю, вы отказываетесь пересмотреть своё решение по файлам с репродукциями произведений Богаевского? Вопрос в общем формальный, чтобы соблюсти процедуру перед тем, как обратиться далее с просьбой пересмотреть итог. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 07:02, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
    Ну в отличие от законов РФ правила Викисклада я могу трактовать. Написано, что повторно выставлять нельзя при отсутствии новых причин, значит нельзя.--Anatoliy (talk) 07:13, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
    Написано, что можно, если вы не согласны с итогом, можете выставить повторно. «If the admin declines to reverse the decision, you can request a review by other admins on Commons:Undeletion requests (or if the file was kept, renominate it for deletion).» --Andrey Korzun (talk) 07:23, 14 July 2015 (UTC) Впрочем участник более опытный, как я понимаю, бюрократ и администратор поправил вашу ошибку, обсуждение снова открыто. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 07:26, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
    Простой перенос шаблона не открывает обсуждения.--Anatoliy (talk) 07:28, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Hello Ahonc, could you please check the mentioned file uploaded by UWCTransferBot? Thanks, --Arnd (talk) 05:09, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi Anatoliy... I hope you are well. You undeleted a couple files because they had not been categorized before deletion. Just hoping you hadn't forgotten them. Cheers, Storkk (talk) 10:13, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Natuur12 (talk) 14:56, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Natuur12 (talk) 15:06, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Natuur12 (talk) 15:10, 30 July 2015 (UTC)