User talk:ブレイズマン~commonswiki

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
English: Welcome to the Commons, ブレイズマン!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文(台灣)‎ | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−
First steps tutorial

Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy.

Getting help

More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.

Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities.
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}}
  • For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Filnik 09:47, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  italiano  lietuvių  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  Tiếng Việt  Ελληνικά  македонски  русский  українська  հայերեն  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  فارسی  +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 09:47, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

お願い

[edit]
はじめまして。
時折「ウィキペディアとウィキメディア・コモンズ以外は使用禁止」というメディアを上げていらっしゃいますが、これは掲載できません。画像データのアップロード時の表示メッセージにも書いてありますが、ウィキメディア・プロジェクト以外でも使用できるメディアのみを受け付けております。「ウィキペディアとウィキメディア・コモンズ以外は使用禁止」という画像やデータについては、ご自身で即時削除依頼への提出をお願いします。
さらに、アップロードする際は、漢字やかな文字などを使用しないようお願いします。もし漢字やかな文字を使用されたい場合は、jawpへのアップロードも検討してください。

LERK (Talk / Contributions / Mail) 05:35, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

「ウィキペディアとウィキメディア・コモンズ以外は使用禁止」のデータは、ここウィキメディア・コモンズではアップロードできません。ウィキメディア・プロジェクトではもちろん、プロジェクト外でも自由な利用(商用利用や改作を認めていることを言います)が出来るデータしかアップロードできないのです。提供者がこれに完全同意できない場合は即時削除対象となります(フェアユース資料も、同じ理由でアップロードできません)。即時削除は
{{Speedydelete}}
を添付することになります(
{{speedydelete|Non-free content, because the copyright holder of this data claims that this data must be used only on Wikipedias.}}
←これを該当する画像ページに貼り付けておくと、管理者が見つけ次第削除します)。jawpでも、大体同じ要領となります。
LERK (Talk / Contributions / Mail) 07:10, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
先程、User talk:LERKにて返答させて頂いたのですが、撮影許可を頂いたところに問い合わせました。そうしましたら「絵図に関しては著作権が切れているので掲載は問題ないが、遺物に関してはウィキペディアとウィキメディア・コモンズ以外は使用禁止という事でお願いしたい」と絵図に関しては同意して頂きました。そこで、遺物が掲載されているファイルに関しては削除依頼、絵図が掲載されているファイルに関しては説明文を訂正する方向で実施したいと思いますがいかがでしょうか。ブレイズマン 07:28, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
何度でも申しますが、「遺物に関してはウィキペディアとウィキメディア・コモンズ以外は使用禁止」など条件付で認める云々はプロジェクト外での自由な利用ができないデータに該当しますので、ここウィキメディア・コモンズでは受け付けることが出来ません(外部利用を禁止していてもアップロードが認められているものはウィキメディア財団が著作権を持つ画像およびデータのみです)。然るべき対処をお願いしたいのですが。
LERK (Talk / Contributions / Mail) 09:44, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
私の文章表現が誤っているかもしれませんが、上記にも「そこで、遺物が掲載されているファイルに関しては削除依頼」と記載しましたように、削除依頼のタグを掲載させて頂きました。つたない返答で誤解させましてお詫びいたします。ブレイズマン 10:02, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Pay attention to copyright
File:Iwa-Jinja05.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

--KENPEI (talk) 10:00, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

御連絡有難うございます。私としましては著作権法第46条にあります「街頭において公開された看板・建造物の写真については、設置者に無断で掲載を行うことができる」に基づき、掲載は問題ないと考えておりますが、ウィキメディア・コモンズで屋外の案内看板の撮影に関し深く議論された事例がありましたら、教えていただけますようお願いします。また著作権の侵害のテンプレートの説明文によりますと「このテンプレート{{Copyvio}}は、明らかに「即時削除」の対象となる場合のみ、利用してください。それ以外の曖昧なケース、微妙なケースでは、「通常の削除」{{Delete}}をご利用ください。」とあります。今回のケースは少なくても「通常の削除」のケースと思われますがいかがでしょうか。--ブレイズマン (talk) 15:25, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
どうもKENPEIです。Commons:井戸端の方も拝見しました。説明文が書いてある看板は言語の著作物だから、著作権法第46条の範囲外と考えております(看板によっては、言語の著作物でもあり、美術の著作物でもということもあると思いますが)。この写真の場合、写真の中身が言語の著作物だから、明らかに著作権侵害と考えたわけで、著作権侵害かどうか「曖昧」とか「微妙」とかは考えてませんでした(ここはブレイズマンさんと見解の違いがありますが)。--KENPEI (talk) 21:18, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
本写真はすでに削除されていますので、議論する余地はありませんが、削除されました案内看板は美術的な要素はない、もしくは極めて少ない案内看板で、その点に異論はございません。しかし上記に記載しているように案内看板を建造物として捉えた場合、明らかに「即時削除」の対象とはならない、「通常の削除」のケースになると思われます。十分議論されないまま、本写真が削除されたことは残念です。今後はCommons:井戸端で議論させていただけたらと思います。--ブレイズマン (talk) 23:07, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
どうもKENPEIです。案内看板の写真(File:Koizumijo06.jpg)をアップロードされたようですね。Commons:井戸端で文献をしめした上で説明したのに、納得されてないのでしょうか? もう、十分、結論が出ていると思いますが。仮にまだ結論が出ていないという認識、または文献の調査中であったとしても、「問題ない」という確信なくアップロードしてしまうのはよろしくないかと。File:Koizumijo06.jpgや他の案内看板類(色々あるようですが)の写真は削除なさった方がよろしいかと。--KENPEI (talk) 15:17, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
「確信なくアップロードしてしまうのはよろしくないかと」はご指摘通りです。この点注視しておりませんでした。お詫びいたします。案内看板が著作権法第46条の適応外という結論になりましたら、私が掲載しましたすべての案内看板は削除依頼いたします。
とは別に「もう、十分、結論が出ていると思います」という点に関しましては、引用文が正しく掲載されていたとしても結論は出ていないと思っております。引用文を根拠にCommons:井戸端に発言されています「写真に撮って公開するのは駄目」とするのは現時点では難しいと思っております。但し引用文以外にも重要な点が記載されている可能性もあり、文献調査後意見の変更もあり得ますので、今しばらくお待ちください。何れにしましても結論が出るまで案内看板の掲載は控えます。御足労かけ大変申し訳ございませんでした。--ブレイズマン (talk) 14:51, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
ja:Wikipedia‐ノート:屋外美術を被写体とする写真の利用方針の議論を拝見しました。著作権法 第46条について御理解いただけたと思います。つきましては著作権のある文が書いてある案内看板の画像を削除していただきたく思います(削除依頼をされるより、自分で削除された方がいいでしょうから)。万一、議論の続きがあるようならja:Wikipedia‐ノート:屋外美術を被写体とする写真の利用方針でお願いします。--KENPEI (talk) 14:19, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
ja:Wikipedia‐ノート:屋外美術を被写体とする写真の利用方針では「不確かな情報で議論するのはいかがと思いますので、文献調査まで今しばらくお待ちください」と記載しており、現時点では議論は終了したという認識ではありません。但し「「句碑や案内看板を写真撮影した場合は、著作権法第46条の適応外となる」と明確に記載する文献」があるならば提示をお願いします。その提示がありましたら、議論は終了し案内看板が著作権法第46条の適応外と明確に記述できると思われます。現在の出典は「内容に忠実に記述する」という部分が担保できていない可能性があると考えております。--ブレイズマン (talk) 13:39, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
続きは、ja:Wikipedia‐ノート:屋外美術を被写体とする写真の利用方針でお願いします。--KENPEI (talk) 14:06, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
ja:Wikipedia‐ノート:屋外美術を被写体とする写真の利用方針を拝見しました。法律解釈に納得いただけたようで・・・。そこで、ブレイズマンさんがアップされた案内看板類の写真で、「文に著作権があるかも?」と思えるようなものは、削除していただきたく思います。--KENPEI (talk) 14:48, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
ja:Wikipedia‐ノート:屋外美術を被写体とする写真の利用方針で議論終了後、指摘の点を考慮し、削除依頼をするつもりでおります。--ブレイズマン (talk) 16:57, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

(インデント戻します)ja:Wikipedia‐ノート:屋外美術を被写体とする写真の利用方針で議論終了ということで、ブレイズマンさんがアップされた案内看板類の写真で、「文に著作権があるかも?」と思えるようなものは、削除お願いできますか? もちろん、許諾を得たことが証明できるものは、この限りではありませんが。--KENPEI (talk) 09:44, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

上記発言通り「指摘の点を考慮し、削除依頼をするつもりでおります」に変更ございません。個性が表現された文、著作性がある文が判読できる写真はすべて削除依頼するつもりであります。時期はおおよそ2カ月以内に作業を完了する予定です。現在この内容で精査し順次削除依頼するつもりであります。2カ月経過後、もし著作性のある案内看板があった場合、{{Delete}}で議論させていただけますようお願いします。--ブレイズマン (talk) 14:39, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
KENPEIです。30~40枚くらい看板画像があったように思いますが、いくらなんでも精査と削除依頼に2カ月もかかるわけないと思います。それほど時間がかかる見込みであれば、他の投稿者の看板画像類と一緒にから削除依頼しようと思います。--KENPEI (talk) 12:05, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
ja:Wikipedia‐ノート:屋外美術を被写体とする写真の利用方針で御自身の発言に「著作権の有無について明確な線引きは困難」とあるように、文章に個性が反映している部分が一文でも含まれているか、いないのかを判断するのに時間がかかります。他の案内看板の議論の経過状況をみて、基準らしきものが明確になれば、その基準に乗っ取って削除のスピードがあがる場合もあります。あまり議論の余地がない「個性が表現された文、著作性がある文が判読できる写真」は順次削除していくつもりです。「2カ月以内に作業を完了」とはその為の時間と考えております。--ブレイズマン (talk) 15:17, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
時間がかかるのは「著作権の有無について明確な線引きは困難」だからということですね。私の場合、「著作権の有無について明確な線引きは困難」なので、ほとんどの人が著作権無しと言いそうなもの以外は安全のため削除依頼に出しますし、他の人の出した削除依頼には賛成意見を出しています。それで、ほとんどの場合、削除の結論になります。著作権の有無で迷うようなものは、結局は削除されてしまうと思いますので、あまり時間をかけて考えても仕方ないような気はします。--KENPEI (talk) 22:31, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
「時間がかかるのは「著作権の有無について明確な線引きは困難」だからということですね」という質問には、その通りであります。「ほとんどの場合、削除の結論になります」という事が確認されれば、削除の作業量的にはそれほど困難なものではありませんので、スピードアップできると思います。--ブレイズマン (talk) 03:53, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:Ait2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--KENPEI (talk) 06:40, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

御連絡有難うございます。「声明文」に関しては、Commons:Deletion requests/photos of literary works(Deletion requests,11 May 2009)にて提出しておきました。--ブレイズマン (talk) 16:31, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:Oowada_Castle02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 19:30, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:Oowada_Castle05.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 20:17, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:Ozawa_Castle07.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 20:18, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

上記3件で「ライセンス間違い」を指摘されておりますが、Commons:不完全なライセンスによりますと「もしあなたが上記の情報を欠いた不適切な画像を発見した場合はFIXME: Replace by new deletion template like {{Subst:nld}}をその画像の説明ページに張り付け、このことをアップローダーに知らせ、少なくとも一ヶ月の間をおいてCommons:Deletion requests(解説)にて削除依頼を行ってください」とあり、仮に私がライセンス間違いをしていた場合でも、削除依頼するまで1ヵ月間を要するようにと記載され、今回のケースはこのCommons:不完全なライセンスのガイドラインにそった行動ではないと思われますがいかがでしょうか。--ブレイズマン (talk) 18:46, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Saikyoji04.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--KENPEI (talk) 11:59, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aduchi castle7.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--KENPEI (talk) 21:12, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

御連絡有難うございます。「声明文」に関しては、それぞれのページにて提出しておきました。--ブレイズマン (talk) 14:08, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Aduchi castle5.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--KENPEI (talk) 12:18, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chausuyama10.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--KENPEI (talk) 12:22, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yagij3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--KENPEI (talk) 12:26, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yagij10.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--KENPEI (talk) 12:30, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

上記4件の内上から2つに関しては、「あなたの意見を拝聴したいと思います」とのテンプレートの指示に従い、声明文を各ページにて表明しました。しかし下2つに関しては、「あなたの意見を拝聴したい」としておきながら、議論開始時間が[12:28, 10 June 2009 (UTC)]で削除決定時間が[15:02, 10 June 2009 (UTC)]と2時間半程度しかなく、投稿者がどのような写真か確認する事ができませんでした。Commons:削除のガイドラインによると、削除には「1週間ほどの議論を要します」と記載されており、このガイドラインが尊重されていないのではないかと思われます。問題ある画像だとしても、[通常削除]の場合は、投稿者がどのような写真か確認できる時間を作るべきで、2時間半は短すぎると思われます。ガイドラインが尊重されない、議論がされないまま削除するのは管理者として問題ではないかと思われます。--ブレイズマン (talk) 15:08, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Ai12.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--KENPEI (talk) 12:57, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Enamij2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--KENPEI (talk) 13:01, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fukui1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--KENPEI (talk) 13:05, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Inabaj5.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--KENPEI (talk) 13:09, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:高槻城8.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--KENPEI (talk) 13:14, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kozenjit1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--KENPEI (talk) 21:34, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mikij4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--KENPEI (talk) 21:38, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mikij5.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--KENPEI (talk) 21:41, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ishiyamah1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--KENPEI (talk) 09:15, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ishiyamah7.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--KENPEI (talk) 09:18, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kenhonji1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--KENPEI (talk) 09:24, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jigenji5.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--KENPEI (talk) 09:21, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Koriyamaj2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--KENPEI (talk) 09:27, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Oota1.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--KENPEI (talk) 11:52, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shiraiw1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--KENPEI (talk) 11:52, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Takashima castle8.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--KENPEI (talk) 11:52, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Takatorij2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--KENPEI (talk) 11:52, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Takayaj1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--KENPEI (talk) 11:52, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Takayaj11.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--KENPEI (talk) 12:31, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Takayaj9.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--KENPEI (talk) 12:31, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yodo2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--KENPEI (talk) 12:31, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yodoj3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--KENPEI (talk) 12:31, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:松坂城7.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--KENPEI (talk) 12:31, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:滝山城3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--KENPEI (talk) 12:31, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:置塩城4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--KENPEI (talk) 12:38, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:芥川山城1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--KENPEI (talk) 12:38, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

御連絡有難うございます。「声明文」に関しては、それぞれのページにて提出しておきました。--ブレイズマン (talk) 16:36, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:Fukaejo 06.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--KENPEI (talk) 04:14, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ファイルの出所明記のお願い

[edit]

ブレイズマンさん、はじめまして。井戸端でこのような議論があり、ブレイズマンさんの投稿について問題があるとお考えの方がいらっしゃいますのでお知らせします。あちらにも書きましたが、ご自身の作品ではないファイルに出所(原著者・転載元)の情報が明記されていませんと、最悪の場合削除される可能性もありますので、善処のほどお願いいたします。Yasu (talk) 14:45, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

御連絡頂きまして有難うございます。議論の内容は拝見させて頂き、適切なコメントして頂き感謝申し上げます。「出典元:このファイルの入手元はどこでしょうか?」「作成者:このファイルの制作者は? 」との説明文に準じた記載をしたつもりでありますが、同議論を参照し善処したいと思います。--ブレイズマン (talk) 16:17, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]
bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Hyogoj01.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Smooth_O (talk) 14:26, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Kameyamaj03.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Smooth_O (talk) 14:49, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed

[edit]

00:41, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

[edit]

06:27, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

画像データの削除依頼

[edit]

上記画像データは、画像データの元となる写真を撮影した者に、無断でアップロードされていますので、速やかに削除して下さい。

File:Takao2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

G I Chandor (talk) 13:45, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:三宅城6.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

G I Chandor (talk) 14:43, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:鳥羽城1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

G I Chandor (talk) 14:44, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Darumaj7.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

G I Chandor (talk) 23:35, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Konfukojijo01.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

G I Chandor (talk) 23:36, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:建勲神社4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

G I Chandor (talk) 03:52, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kataokaj3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

G I Chandor (talk) 03:54, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kishiwadaj7.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

G I Chandor (talk) 03:55, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, G I Chandor (talk) 23:47, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yamasinaj18.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

G I Chandor (talk) 08:44, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Statue of Hosokawa Tadaoki and Hosokawa Gracia.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

G I Chandor (talk) 06:08, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Toyotomi Hidetsugu02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Guanaco (talk) 21:04, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Kouyouen has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


トトト (talk) 05:03, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]