User talk:מינוזיג

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, מינוזיג!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 19:03, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Galerida cristata 21, Israel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit small, but ok --Poco a poco 14:31, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Halcyon smyrnensis in Israel1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 19:12, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Halcyon smyrnensis in Israel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:27, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Upupa epops, Israel..jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit noisy, but ok for me. --Uoaei1 17:08, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Upupa epops.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice.--Famberhorst 16:22, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Psittacula krameri, Israel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ram-Man 04:14, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Acridotheres tristis (feral).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 17:09, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herpestes ichneumon, Israel 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Unfortunately tail cut off, hence weak GQ --Palauenc05 20:59, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dendrocopos syriacus, Israel 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good shot and good quality -- Spurzem 21:06, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dendrocopos syriacus, Israel 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:35, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turdoides squamiceps 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:19, 01 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turdoides squamiceps 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Excellent quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:19, 01 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cinnyris osea ,female.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice and QI -- Spurzem 16:00, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grus grus in flight, Israel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Just ok due to the size --Poco a poco 20:57, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ardea cinerea, Israel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:32, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Myocastor coypus with offspring.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:46, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Upupa epops, SandBath.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for a bird in action. --Zcebeci 19:50, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Upupa epops, Sand Bath.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 21:47, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pandion haliaetus (Osprey).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:01, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Osprey. (Pandion haliaetus).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not the best light, but QI. --Kadellar 13:53, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

=Your Name in English Notation

Hi, Thank you for posting your beautiful video of an osprey. I shared it on my YouTube channel with full credit given to you. I was wondering, would the English notation of your name מינוזיג be "Minozig"? I ask because I would like to give you appropriate credit for your work. All the best The Nature Box (talk) 11:27, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi, yep its MinoZig. Thanks for asking. best regards מינוזיג (talk) 22:07, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neophron percnopterus in flight.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Slaunger 19:07, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Black-winged stilt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 14:21, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! F-15 IAF Israel Independence Day flyover.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 15:33, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Green bee-eater (Merops orientalis).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great shot, but the filesize is to small. Can you please upload the whole file? Denis Barthel 15:17, 26 September 2015 (UTC) File size is 4,018,835 Pixel. Big enough. Good quality. --Hubertl 15:28, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Halcyon smyrnensis, Israel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:31, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ciconia nigra, juvenile.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:28, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neophron percnopterus in flight il.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support although only a segment, good quality --Elrond 20:26, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Actitis hypoleucos iL 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 00:37, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Milvus migrans, Israel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice picture, but the computer-generated blue sky is not well enough done. Charlesjsharp 15:43, 15 December 2015 (UTC) Really good! --Rolf H. 14:43, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Actitis hypoleucos iL 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scotocerca inquieta Israel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:56, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scotocerca inquieta - Israel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 00:19, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Capra nubiana, Israel 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very nice, good shot--Lmbuga 21:45, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Capra nubiana, Israel 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality IMO, especially if the subject are the horns--Lmbuga 21:49, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Capra nubiana, Israel 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, good shot, good and original composition--Lmbuga 22:14, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alectoris chukar 3 - Israel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 17:54, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alectoris chukar 1 - Israel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Best one of the serie --Ermell 17:58, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! European goldfinch (Carduelis carduelis), Israel 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice and good quality -- Spurzem 17:44, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! European goldfinch (Carduelis carduelis), Israel 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:34, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Falco naumanni, Negev.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Falco naumanni Negev 4I5A8820-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment IMO good for QI, but please choose a better filename. --XRay 04:53, 29 May 2016 (UTC) Now File renamed, good quality --Alchemist-hp 09:57, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Falco naumanni Negev 4I5A8824.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment IMO good for QI, but please choose a better filename. --XRay 04:53, 29 May 2016 (UTC) Now File renamed, good quality --Alchemist-hp 09:57, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Black stork (Ciconia nigra).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 13:38, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Falco naumanni, Israel 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:44, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 4I5A8821.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit of motion blur in a photo such as this can be forgiven, pity about the last bit of cut wing but good enough for QI. --W.carter 18:41, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aegupius monachus - 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality for a photo of a bird in flight. I particularly like the view of the head and facial expression, but seeing all those feathers spread out is also cool. -- Ikan Kekek 11:52, 24 December 2016 (UTC) CommentArtemy Voikhansky photo  Comment - This one is overcategorized, too. Having established that this is in Category:Vultures of Israel, why would you need to also add Category:Birds of Israel? -- Ikan Kekek 12:30, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

File tagging File:ArbeLevy-Vipera palaestinae, roadkill.png

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:ArbeLevy-Vipera palaestinae, roadkill.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:ArbeLevy-Vipera palaestinae, roadkill.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

 — billinghurst sDrewth 21:27, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Not sure whether it is your upload or not, however, the work is showing with a license of "Standard YouTube License" which is not a free license. There is a bit of an explanation at https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-difference-between-a-standard-YouTube-license-and-a-creative-common-license .  — billinghurst sDrewth 21:30, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

image quality

You've captured some amazing photographs, and, for that, I salute you. Most of your images are quite sharp, which, as you surely know, is quite important. Composition is also excellent, which makes the images even more visually appealing than they already were. Good work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by VarikValefor (talk • contribs) 04:09, 14 January 2018 (UTC) VarikValefor (talk) 04:10, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

Important message for file movers

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

• To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
• To perform file name swaps.
• When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)