User talk:אמא של גולן

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, אמא של גולן!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 10:15, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 11:01, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement[edit]

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:NEEMO 20 Crew.jpg[edit]

Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  français  hrvatski  italiano  日本語  മലയാളം  Nederlands  sicilianu  Tiếng Việt  +/−


A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:NEEMO 20 Crew.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY), BY SA (CC BY-SA), CC0 (CC0) and PDM (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Túrelio (talk) 19:58, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

my Apologies. Thanks for explaining the difference. I thought all flicker pics were o.k.--Golan's mom (talk) 22:12, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Iriss education logo medium.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

Yours sincerely, JuTa 10:47, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Ju, I wonder if you can help me determine the copyright status of the ESA astronaut mission logos. Is it like NASA's mission patches? Do you know what is the status - I could not find it on the website, except a general comment that the information is free for personal and non-commercial use? For using it only in relation to the related astronauts article in wikipedia (Hebrew\English) should I use a "fair use" license outside commons? Thanks --Golan's mom (talk) 10:54, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry, but ESA images are only free for non-commercial uses an commons requires commercial uses too - see Commons:Licensing. This image has to be deleted, I'm afraid. --JuTa 11:04, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the explanation Ju. Can I upload it to the different wikis under "fair use" in the related astronaut article? --Golan's mom (talk) 11:53, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
If it allows fair use, yes. --JuTa 16:07, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Ju, I have found the following copyright information. Can you please advise me if it's free or fair use? Thanks --Golan's mom (talk) 09:19, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Because of teh non-commercial clause, yes its fair use.--JuTa 15:08, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Marine protected areas[edit]

Marine protected areas

Hi! I got a reply from MP Atlas, we worked things out and now we have the map! yes Thanks for bringing that up @ the village pump! Cheers! C(_) --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:04, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Hedwig in Washington this is so cool! thank you for following it and convincing them! Golan's mom (talk) 16:05, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Not much convincing needed, just some technicalities and bureaucracy. But thanks anyway. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 17:45, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2016 is open![edit]

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2016 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear אמא של גולן,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2016 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eleventh edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2016) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 20 April 2017, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
--Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 08:41, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Expedition52.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ras67 (talk) 18:47, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:EstherBerliJoel.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:EstherBerliJoel.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:EstherBerliJoel.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jcb (talk) 23:32, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Jcb, the image license says "OTRS-Pending" - I have sent the OTRS info, and the request ticket is Ticket#: 2018111410003194. --Golan's mom (talk) 07:28, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Placing a license template is mandatory anyway, files without a license will be deleted after a week (if not fixed), regardless of OTRS templates. Jcb (talk) 23:07, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hey Jcb, I put the license - Is that what you meant? Thanks --Golan's mom (talk) 12:56, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that's correct. Jcb (talk) 19:58, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2018 is open![edit]

Dear אמא של גולן,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in R1 of the 2018 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2018) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked.

In the final (and current) round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2018.

Round 2 will end 17 March 2019, 23:59:59.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 18:05, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

File:SpanishLeftistsShootStatueOfChrist.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 06:58, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Condolences[edit]

I am very sorry for your loss. Deror was a lovely man and a great Wikimedian. I will never forget his smile, his good humour, and his warm greetings on the sadly too few occasions when we met. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:16, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Andy Mabbett for your kind words ! so comforting to hear memories from his friends Golan's mom (talk) 13:02, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]