User talk:Ætoms

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
   
   
   
   
Home
   
Talk
   
Userboxes
   
Uploads
   
Wikipedia
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Ætoms!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 10:15, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Gazebo Gazebo (talk) 09:28, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Flag of Normandy, suggestion[edit]

Hi,

I would like to ask you something about your Flag of Normandy's image ( https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Flag_of_Normandie.svg ) The colors and the design are perfect, but could it be resized (i don't know if resize is the good word)

Here's an example of this Normandy's flag with the proportions we're used to : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Drapeau_de_la_Normandie.png

Sorry, I don't know how to use the .SVG.

Thank you --Oedipe23 (talk) 00:32, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Oedipe23: thank you for your message! I've adapted the proportions of the SVG file. — Ætoms (talk) 13:40, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you ! --Oedipe23 (talk) 21:49, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Caroline van der Plas[edit]

Photo taken in 2021? Not according to the Exif data, mentioning: Date and time of data generation: 08:39, 12 March 2020. Exif data can be wrong, certainly, but what is your source proving the photo was taken in March 2021? Vysotsky (talk) 13:42, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Vysotsky: Hi! The source of the photo seems to be the House of Representatives ([1]). Van der Plas wasn't an MP yet in 2020. Also, she wore this outfit ([2]) on the day the newly elected MPs got their pictures taken (see [3] at 2:02). So the Exif data is probably wrong. — Ætoms (talk) 14:21, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 NB: I copied this discussion to File talk:Caroline van der Plas 2020.jpg#Date of creation. Let's continue the discussion there. — Ætoms (talk) 15:41, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Queen Máxima and Sigrid Kaag, GES The Hague 2019.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

180.219.55.89 09:43, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Problem with the flag of Sark on Wikipedia[edit]

Hi, I would like to know if you could do a modification on the SVG flag of Sark ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Flag_of_Sark.svg )

On the current wikimedia's one, the lions don't touch the bars, but they are supposed to exceed over (like that : https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drapeau_normand#/media/Fichier:Sark-flag-sized.png )

Here's the page of the official version certified by the Flag Institute : https://www.flaginstitute.org/wp/flags/sark-flag/

Thank you --Oedipe23 (talk) 05:44, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Oedipe23: Done! — Ætoms (talk) 20:21, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you ! --Oedipe23 (talk) 20:53, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Samenstelling Tweede Kamer[edit]

Hoi Ætoms. Vier jaar geleden heb jij File:Dutch House of Representatives, 2017.svg gemaakt. Voor nl:Kabinetsformatie Nederland 2021-'22 en en:2021-2022 Dutch cabinet formation ben ik op zoek naar een vergelijkbaar figuur. Naast een actualisering zou ik ook het liefst gestreept willen aangeven dat vijf Kamerleden zijn afgesplitst (50PLUS, Omtzigt, Haga en consorten) tijdens de formatie. Daarnaast zou ik idealiter duidelijk willen hebben uit het plaatje welke partijen toegetreden zijn tot de coalitie, bijvoorbeeld door een achtergrond rond die zetels te doen (alleen SGP zit in de weg). Ik ben zelf alleen niet zo handig met svg. En aangezien jij dit al een keer eerder gedaan hebt, vroeg ik me af of jij kon helpen. Ik hoor het graag! Als het niet lukt, zal ik zelf weer even rondkijken. Met vriendelijke groeten, Dajasj (talk) 18:16, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Dajasj: Hi, sorry voor de late reactie! Ik ga ermee aan de slag. — Ætoms (talk) 10:19, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Geen probleem, het heeft geen haast en is sowieso vrijwilligerswerk :) In ieder geval heel erg bedankt! Dajasj (talk) 10:23, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hoi, geen haast, maar was je hier toevallig mee bezig? :) Als het niet lukt, is het ook prima, dan zoek ik verder. Dajasj (talk) 10:42, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Dajasj: Hé, ja ik ben er nog mee bezig. Ik zal proberen het eind deze week af te hebben! Ætoms (talk) 20:32, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Dank je! Geen haast nogmaals, maar wel fijn dat je er nog mee bezig wilt :) Dajasj (talk) 22:52, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Dajasj: Hij is klaar en geüpload! Zie Dutch House of Representatives, 2021.svg. Het is helaas niet gelukt om op een mooie manier de coalitiepartijen aan te geven. Ik denk dat je dit het beste in een legenda o.i.d. kunt aangeven. Ik heb wel de afgesplitste fracties gestreept weergegeven. Hopelijk is dit wat je ongeveer in gedachten had! — Ætoms (talk) 17:24, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Wauw goed gelukt! Jammer inderdaad van de coalitie, maar beter dan mijn eigen pogingen. Dus ik ben zeer tevreden. Heel erg bedankt! Ik zal het morgen plaatsen op de relevante pagina's. Nogmaals, heel erg bedankt :) Dajasj (talk) 20:13, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Graag gedaan! Ætoms (talk) 20:42, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I dont speak Dutch so I have no clue what you guys are talking about but I couldnt help but notice that if you click on the image it show "Volt" having 3 seats. Nilüfer Gündoğan was thrown out of the party in february so it might be smart to change that! كميراج (talk) 12:11, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Preferably a new image then, because right now I use it on pages from before the latest Volt changes :) Dajasj (talk) 12:01, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! Would you able to make one? Would be cool for several pages! Dajasj (talk) 12:41, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Dajasj and كميراج: Here you go!Ætoms (talk) 19:02, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you again! :) Dajasj (talk) 19:06, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Well, there appears to be a new challenge for you :P Dajasj (talk) 14:32, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Check ;) — Ætoms (talk) 21:19, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Would it be possible to make the recent changes also striped? Soo JA21/BBB and PVV/BBB. That works best for the lists of members :) Dajasj (talk) 05:51, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Changed it! — Ætoms (talk) 11:30, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
File:Water Natuurlijk logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Vera (talk) 19:54, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Small error on the image of the flag of La Manche[edit]

Hello,

Could you make a small modification on this image: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Drapeau_non-officiel_fr_d%C3%A9partement_Manche.svg

The flag taking up the coat of arms of the Manche, drawn by Robert Louis, the separation of the blue zone and the red zone must not be straight, but wavy.

Here are the coats of arms: https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manche_(d%C3%A9partement)#H%C3%A9raldique

This flag appears on the bottom left of the cover of this book: https://france3-regions.francetvinfo.fr/image/foZpLNQxl1SvBdfreEv1SzZ8njE/1200x1200/regions/2021/10/16/6169fb3d955a7_livre-drapeaux-de-normandie-photo-5491399.jpg


Cordially, Thank you ! Oedipe23 (talk) 05:29, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Oedipe23: My apologies for the delay; I've been away so I haven't had the chance to respond to your request earlier. I've uploaded a new version of the flag with a wavy line and improved leopards! — Ætoms (talk) 14:19, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you ! That's really nice like that ! Oedipe23 (talk) 17:01, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 17:37, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open![edit]

2022 Picture of the Year: Saint John Church of Sohrol in Iran.

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:16, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open![edit]

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022.

Round 2 will end at UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:46, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Liesje Schreinemacher (2023) A (cropped).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: ©RVD – Valerie Kuypers en Martijn Beekman
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Timk70.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 14:06, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Liesje Schreinemacher (2023) A (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dajasj (talk) 10:55, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nieuwere foto voor Pieter Omtzigt[edit]

Huidige foto is zeer oud en ik vroeg me af of je hier een goede foto van hem eruit kan halen https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2oX1ACi9zMo Shadow4dark (talk) 21:50, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Zeker! Zoiets: File:Pieter Omtzigt, De Balie, 2021.png? — Ætoms (talk) 21:51, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Samenstelling Tweede Kamer[edit]

Hoi, aangezien er (alweer) iets is veranderd in de samenstelling van de Tweede Kamer (fracties van GL en PvdA zijn gefuseerd) vroeg ik me af of je een nieuw plaatje van de zetelverdeling zou kunnen maken. Ik heb zelf in de lijst met fracties op de pagina van de Tweede Kamer de kleuren van allebei de partijen gebruikt, maar kijk maar wat er beter uitziet op het plaatje. NaamDesGebruikers (talk) 12:57, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:PVV logo (2006–present).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2A02:A463:296:1:F9C3:3CA1:1CF9:D4C1 15:10, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Chris Stoffer, 2023.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

0x0a (talk) 15:50, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stien den Hollander, 2019 A.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

FristiChocoladebonen (talk) 21:19, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]