User:Romanceor/VI

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
fr-2
Cette personne peut contribuer avec un niveau intermédiaire de français.
en-2
This user is able to contribute with an intermediate level of English.
es-2
Este usuario puede contribuir con un nivel intermedio de español.


Click to see my photographs.
Click to see my photographs.


category

www

  • Wikipédia-fr |      • My pictures | 
  • Wikimedia Commons |  


Nominations aux images de valeur de Romanceor — Romanceor valued images nominations
Dernière mise à jour par — Last update by :
  Romanceor [parlons-en] 17:08, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

N.B. : Seules les images acceptées sont encore mises à jour ici. 19:57, 14 July 2010 (UTC)




Acceptées[edit]

   

View promotion
Nominated by:
Romanceor [parlons-en] on 2008-06-17 18:53 (UTC)
Scope:
Trogir's Riva, Croatia
Used in:
cf. Toolserver

 Support All 6 criteria look good. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 06:28, 4 July 2008 (UTC) 

Result: 1 support
=> Promoted. -- Slaunger (talk) 22:22, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Romanceor [parlons-en] on 2008-07-23 14:44 (UTC)
Scope:
William Klein
Used in:
cf. WikiSense toolserver
Result: 1 support
=> Promoted. -- Slaunger (talk) 21:22, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Romanceor [parlons-en] on 2008-09-03 11:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Jean-Claude Carrière
Used in:
cf. WikiSense
  •  Oppose If you mention a location in the description, you have to geo-locate. Lycaon (talk) 12:34, 3 September 2008 (UTC) Issue resolved. Lycaon (talk) 13:51, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
  •  Oppose 6th criterion --Eusebius (talk) 20:18, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
  •  Support OK for me. --Eusebius (talk) 11:57, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
Result: 1 support
=> Promoted. -- Slaunger (talk) 20:22, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Romanceor [parlons-en] on 2008-09-03 12:18 (UTC)
Scope:
Jean-Pierre Beauviala
Used in:
cf. WikiSense
Result: 2 support
=> Promoted. -- Slaunger (talk) 20:23, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Romanceor [parlons-en] on 2008-09-03 12:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Antoine Duhamel
Used in:
cf.WikiSense
Result: 1 support
=> Promoted
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Romanceor [parlons-en] on 2008-09-03 12:25 (UTC)
Scope:
Serge Toubiana
Used in:
cf. WikiSense
  •  Oppose 6th criterion (uncategorized). --Eusebius (talk) 20:16, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
  •  Support OK for me. Lively picture. --Eusebius (talk) 11:55, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
Result: 1 support
=> Promoted. -- Slaunger (talk) 20:25, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Romanceor [parlons-en] on 2008-09-07 19:13 (UTC)
Scope:
Dani Kouyaté
Used in:
cf. WikiSense
  •  Support meets criteria. Would be nice to say who the guy is in the picture description (or via a WP link). --Eusebius (talk) 14:51, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Berthold Werner (talk) 12:00, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Romanceor [parlons-en] on 2008-09-07 19:15 (UTC)
Scope:
Ray Lema
Used in:
cf. WikiSense
  •  Support meets criteria. --Eusebius (talk) 14:52, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Berthold Werner (talk) 12:00, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Romanceor [parlons-en] on 2008-09-07 19:17 (UTC)
Scope:
Pierre Schoendoerffer
Used in:
cf. WikiSense
  •  Support Meets criteria. Would be nice to say who the guy is in the picture description (or via a WP link). --Eusebius (talk) 14:58, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Berthold Werner (talk) 11:59, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Romanceor [parlons-en] on 2008-09-07 19:18 (UTC)
Scope:
Luc Moullet
Used in:
cf. WikiSense
  •  Support meets criteria. Would be nice to say who the guy is in the picture description (or via a WP link). --Eusebius (talk) 14:59, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Berthold Werner (talk) 11:59, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
User:Romanceor on 2008-11-30 17:42 (UTC)
Scope:
André S. Labarthe
Used in:
w:fr:André S. Labarthe, w:ja:アンドレ・S・ラバルト
  •  Comment Please geotag it and fix the categories. --Eusebius (talk) 09:31, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
  •  Support OK for me. I'm not sure a link to the French WP should be included, the current policy is to include links to the English WP. The link is likely to be modified when a multi-language feature is implemented for VI scopes, but I see no problem with it until then (since we don't have an English article about the guy). --Eusebius (talk) 17:27, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Eusebius (talk) 21:54, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Romanceor on 2008-11-30 18:19 (UTC)
Scope:
Manoel de Oliveira
Used in:
w:fr:Manoel de Oliveira, w:en:Manoel de Oliveira, w:es:Manoel de Oliveira, w:pt:Manoel de Oliveira
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Eusebius (talk) 21:54, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Romanceor[parlons-en] on 2009-05-23 20:39 (UTC)
Scope:
Dubrovnik walls
Used in:
cf. UsedIn Tool
  •  Request You should fill in the date field in the information template in yyyy-mm-dd format. --Slaunger (talk) 10:48, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
    • Something like that ? Romanceor[parlons-en] 20:05, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
      • Almost, You did not have the dashes needed for standard internationalized date-time formatting. I've added it. Have you considered simplifying your signature, I mean 12 lines of text for a signature, isn't that overdoing it? --Slaunger (talk) 20:21, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
        • Thanks. Have new signature since yesterday. --Romanceor [parlons-en] 14:25, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
          • Thank you for taking the suggestion on-board! --Slaunger (talk) 21:46, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
  •  Support Well, there is a lot of competition in this category, there are two images, taken from further away, which perhaps better gives an overview of the Dubrovnik walls. However, they have horrible image quality. The quality and composition in the nominated images outweighs the perhaps slightly non-optimal viewing position for me. And sorry for taking so long to finalize my review. I have been at sea for some days and not been on-line. --Slaunger (talk) 21:46, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Slaunger (talk) 07:41, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Romanceor [parlons-en] on 2009-08-01 20:48 (UTC)
Scope:
Ernesto Cardenal
Used in:
cf. ToolServer

 Question Why do you think it is better than File:Ernesto Cardenal a la Chascona 2.jpg? Scope formating fixed. Yann (talk) 00:10, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

 Info C'était une erreur ; File:Ernesto Cardenal a la Chascona 2.jpg est la bonne version. --Romanceor [parlons-en] 07:44, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
 Support I slightly prefer this one. Yann (talk) 10:41, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

 Oppose as not yet eligible for VI status. Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it cannot at present become a valued image since it currently fails valued image criterion 5 (should be geocoded, but is not). "All images are expected to be geocoded unless it would not be appropriate to do so". I have not reviewed the nomination against all the criteria, but if you are able to fix this issue and would like me to re-evaluate the image please leave me a message on my talk page. - Rastaman3000 (talk) 15:13, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

 Comment Done. --Romanceor [parlons-en] 18:49, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

 Support - Image is now geocoded. Good enough for me. Rastaman3000 (talk) 14:47, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. TonyBallioni (talk) 01:41, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Romanceor [parlons-en] on 2009-09-08 00:36 (UTC)
Scope:
San Alipio Portal of San Marco Basilica in Venice
Used in:
cf. ToolServer
  •  Oppose - Scope too narrow. --Rastaman3000 (talk) 12:29, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
  •  Support Scope are normal. In my opinion, it is valued place in the World --George Chernilevsky (talk) 13:33, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Have to agree with Rastaman. This is actually not even a scope but a copy of an unfortunately named category (adjusted Lycaon (talk) 14:46, 15 September 2009 (UTC)). Lycaon (talk) 21:26, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
  •  Comment I'm pretty sad you don't consider that door as important as the tousands of mushrooms and insects promoted. The exemple of "Narrow scope" in the rules is about something else : this very precise scope seems to me to have the importance of the third exemple of "suitable scopes" in the rules : "A location of more than local interest, like Château Frontenac" --Romanceor [parlons-en] 01:52, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
  •  Oppose It's a matter of words, but not only. Of course, San Marco Basilica in Venice is an main building that deserves a scope. And I agree, your image is beautiful. But in the present case, the scope is worded: "Category:San Marco (Venice) - Facade doors - 01 - Mosaics". That's a link, not a scope. For buildings, criteria precise: When appropriate, the building scope can be divided in a "XXX (exterior)" scope and a "XXX (interior)" scope, so an acceptable scope would be "St. Mark's Basilica (Venice) (exterior)" - too wide for this image. About content: there are thousands of mushrooms and insects promoted, but there are also thousands of articles about mushrooms and insects in the various wikipedias (and much more not illustrated yet and needing a photo). San Alipio portal is not even mentioned in the article about the basilica in :it:w, :fr:w, :en:w, :de:w. (which personally, I regret). Moreover, the description could be more complete (criterion 4. "Is fully described on the image page.") and mention that the represented scene is "la translation du corps de Saint Marc" and that it is located in the "tympan" (in French) of the portal. --Myrabella (talk) 06:42, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Scope changed from Category:San Marco (Venice) - Facade doors - 01 - Mosaics to San Alipio Portal of San Marco Basilica in Venice L'absence d'une mention du portail ne devrait pas être discriminatoire ; et même au contraire, promouvoir l'image pourrait inciter à la rédaction de cette mention (existant déjà sur w:de:Markusdom). J'ai complété la description et changé le titre du scope, bien qu'il redirige toujours à la catégorie. --Romanceor [parlons-en] 07:29, 10 September 2009 (UTC) VIC-scope-change tempkated added by H005 (talk) 18:57, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

  • Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".
  •  Support Thanks for your complements. The new scope is more precise than usally for buildings, but it seems OK to me on the model of living species, for which "sub-scopes may be proposed to illustrate a specific aspect", if "these show different and significant aspects of the species." It's the case here: this portal contents the only original mosaic to be found on the facade. In the category, File:BSM IMG 3878.JPG displays more architectural elements and File:Venice - St. Mark's Basilica – Lunetta 02.jpg focuses more on the mosaic itself, but the nominated image is a good balance between the two options, it is of high quality and it is well documented now. --Myrabella (talk) 23:51, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
  •  Support in new scope. meets all criteria, excellent qualty --George Chernilevsky (talk) 04:45, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
  •  Support Agree with Myrabella. Yann (talk) 08:57, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
  •  Support Reasonable scope IMHO. -- H005 (talk) 18:57, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
  •  Support Good scope, great picture. -- JovanCormac 15:34, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
Result: 5 support, 2 oppose =>
promoted. Lycaon (talk) 23:32, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Refusées[edit]

   

View opposition
Nominated by:
Romanceor [parlons-en] on 2008-07-23 14:37 (UTC)
Scope:
Peanuts seller
Used in:
http://toolserver.org/~daniel/WikiSense/CheckUsage.php?i=Vendeuse_d'arachides.jpg&w=_100000
  •  Oppose - A very nice picture but not especially ilustrative of the scope -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 10:10, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Agree with Alves. --norro 18:58, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Result: 2 oppose
=> Declined. -- Slaunger (talk) 21:21, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View opposition
Nominated by:
Romanceor [parlons-en] on 2008-09-07 19:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Denis Podalydès
Used in:
cf. WikiSense
  •  Oppose The actor is here playing the role of another famous person (Sacha Guitry). This is incompatible with crit. 3, according to me. --Eusebius (talk) 14:56, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
Result: 1 oppose
=> Declined. -- Slaunger (talk) 19:38, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View opposition
Nominated by:
Romanceor [parlons-en] on 2009-05-30 15:57 (UTC)
Scope:
Brijuni national park
Used in:
cf. CheckUsage
  •  Oppose I skimmed the en article for the national park and even after doing that I still do not understand what I actually see in the image? One third is water, another third is sky and trees, then we have some beach, and some ruins half covered in shadow. Reading the image page does not help either, as it only mentions the national park. As I understand one of the things this national park is known for is traces from Roman settlements. Are these ruins the traces of the settlements? In conclusion I do not think it is a good illustration of the scope. As I understand there are quite some characteristics of this national park such as limestone quarries, pitoresque buildings, nature resorts. I am not sure exactly how a photo would look like which adequately illustrates the scope; perhaps an aerial shot? Anyway, I do not think the nominated image does its job. Sorry.--Slaunger (talk) 20:53, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Thank you for this very complete review. It is even more than complete. --Romanceor [parlons-en] 10:52, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
    •  Comment You're welcome. Nice to get positive feedback from a nominator when opposing a nomination. It is not so common. --Slaunger (talk) 12:24, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
Result: 0 support, 1 oppose =>
declined. --Slaunger (talk) 20:23, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View opposition
Nominated by:
Romanceor [parlons-en] on 2009-06-06 11:19 (UTC)
Scope:
Mathieu Granjon
Used in:
CheckUsage Tool (:w:ru/w:fr:Dub Incorporation)
  •  Oppose Not a suitably generic scope (criterion n° 2): insufficient notoriety of this guitarist member of a French reggae group. Only one echo in fr:wp, which refers to the article about the group, and he is not even mentioned in the main text, only in the infobox... --Myrabella (talk) 15:56, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
Result: 0 support, 1 oppose =>
declined. Lycaon (talk) 09:31, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View opposition
Nominated by:
Romanceor [parlons-en] on 2009-06-18 15:37 (UTC)
Scope:
Amadou Bagayoko
Used in:
cf. WikiSense
  •  Comment Nice shot of a musician in close proximity with his audience, but it seems to me that the scope isn't relevant enough for VI. I was wondering who this performer could be, and then I found : of course, he is one half of the duo "Amadou & Mariam"! That's the problem: the pair is well-known, with articles in different Wikipedias, but it is not the case for each of them individually. He isn't notable enough (or at least, not yet) for a suitable VI scope, IMO. --Myrabella (talk) 12:59, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
    •  Comment I underdstand quite well you opinion but I don't see in what criteria is the one you're talking about... --Romanceor [parlons-en] 09:23, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
      •  Comment N° 2. "Is nominated as being the most valuable within a suitably generic scope." + in the page Commons:Valued image scope, cf. Examples of suitable scopes, n°5 "A portrait of a notable person, like Juan Carlos I of Spain" + § Links in the scope (even if links are not compulsory, this paragraph helps to understand). Regards, --Myrabella (talk) 14:28, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not a suitably generic scope, see the discussion above. --Myrabella (talk) 08:12, 26

June 2009 (UTC)

  •  Oppose, per criteria 3, as my eye is not attracted by Amadou but by the assistance. --Dereckson (talk) 13:26, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
Result: 0 support, 2 oppose =>
declined. Lycaon (talk) 18:53, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)
   
  • Altiplano Chileno
View opposition
Nominated by:
Romanceor [parlons-en] on 2009-06-06 11:11 (UTC)
Description: Seven complementary views of Chilean Altiplano, which illustrates the diversity of the colours and textures of this landscape.
VISC of:
Chilean Altiplano
Used in:
(w:fr:Altiplano)
*  Question Is some of those image can technically be combined in a panorama using a software like hugin? If so, adding a panorama to this set would increase the value, wouldn't it? --Dereckson (talk) 13:31, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
    • No, there are no panoramas possible ; if you look close, you'll see the same volcano is on allmost every picture... In fact was more thinking about illustrating the diversity of colours and textures of the Chilean Altiplano. --Romanceor [parlons-en] 13:40, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
  •  Comment Not geocoded. HBR (talk) 13:17, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Fails criterion 5 (geocoding). Lycaon (talk) 12:01, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Result: 0 support, 1 oppose =>
declined. Rastaman3000 (talk) 17:39, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)
   

View opposition
Nominated by:
Romanceor [parlons-en] on 2009-10-08 17:18 (UTC)
Scope:
Griots
Used in:
cf. ToolServer

 Oppose Apart from the missing geocode, I do not think that just the head of a single person is suitable to illustrate the scope sufficiently. I'd expect several people or at least the entire person with their full clothes in execution of their job. Also, the scope should be "Griots", not "Category:Griots". It's a fascinating photo nonetheless. -- H005 20:34, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

Result: 0 support, 1 oppose =>
declined. Yann (talk) 10:26, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Romanceor/VI&oldid=41386141"