File:LAPD Cops Use Bean Bags, Taser and a Cruiser To Arrest Knife-Wielding Man.webm

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Original file(WebM audio/video file, VP9/Opus, length 10 min 26 s, 1,920 × 1,080 pixels, 1.17 Mbps overall, file size: 86.92 MB)

Captions

Captions

Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents

Summary[edit]

Description
English: Los Angeles, California — On February 8, 2023, at around 5:15 a.m., North Hollywood Area uniformed patrol officers responded to a radio call at the 5600 block of Denny Avenue for an “Assault with a Deadly Weapon” (ADW) suspect. The radio call indicated the suspect, later identified as Jonathan Mitrani, 31-years-old, was armed with a knife and under the influence of alcohol and narcotics. The officers arrived at the location and observed Mitrani, armed with a knife, standing next to a person on the sidewalk. The officers immediately gave verbal commands to Mitrani to drop the knife. Mitrani refused to comply with the commands and moved towards an officer resulting in the deployment of a TASER and Beanbag Shotgun. Both less lethal munitions were ineffective, and Mitrani ran south to Burbank Boulevard. The officers followed Mitrani, who was still armed with the knife, which resulted in a second and third deployment of the Beanbag Shotgun.

This again proved ineffective, and Mitrani ran back toward the officers. An additional TASER deployment was utilized again with no effect. At this time one officer drove his police vehicle approximately 3-5 miles per hour and intentionally struck Mitrani to stop his actions. Mitrani fell to the ground and immediately stood up, still holding the knife and ran directly at the officers. A takedown to the ground was conducted by one of the officers, and Mitrani was subsequently disarmed and taken into custody. Mitrani was transported to a local hospital by paramedics where he was treated for excessive vomiting as a result of intoxication and medically cleared for booking. Mitrani was booked on an open charge of ADW on a Police Officer with a Knife. One officer received abrasions to his left hand and both knees. A pocketknife with a four-inch blade was recovered at scene.

⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Special thanks to Shout-Out Supporters on Patreon: - Tish Brooklyn - Lisa Overly - 'T.L.S.' - Connor Davies - Paul Rohrbaugh - Nash Martin - 'Necko' - Gerardo Flores - Richard Vannieuwenhuyse - Rose Keyes - 'Popeyez' - 'DIY Solar Power with Will Prowse' - 'Roman1983' - Anthony Eufemio - 'Donkbot' - Gage Kissinger - Alex F - Eian Smith - 'HelloDarknessMyOldFriend' - 'coco Coco' - 'The Chocolate Thief' - 'Jacob from Wisconi' - 'gorey hole' - Joe ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

Support us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/PoliceActivity Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/Police_Activity

Timestamps: 0:00 - 911 Call 3:38 - Bodycam: Officer #1 4:29 - Bodycam: Officer #2 7:23 - Bodycam: Officer #3 8:31 - Bodycam: Officer #4

8:40 - Bodycam: Officer #5
Date
Source YouTube: LAPD Cops Use Bean Bags, Taser and a Cruiser To Arrest Knife-Wielding Man – View/save archived versions on archive.org and archive.today
Author LAPD.

Licensing[edit]

Public domain This file is a work of a Los Angeles Police Department officer or employee, taken or made as part of that person's official duties. As a work of a Californian government agency (either state or local) that was not created by an agency which state law has allowed to claim copyright, the file is in the public domain in the United States.
Records subject to disclosure under the Public Records Act

Pursuant to the California Public Records Act (Government Code § 6250 et seq.) "Public records" include "any writing containing information relating to the conduct of the public’s business prepared, owned, used, or retained by any state or local agency regardless of physical form or characteristics." (Cal. Gov't. Code § 6252(e).) notes that "[a]ll public records are subject to disclosure unless the Public Records Act expressly provides otherwise." County of Santa Clara v. CFAC California Government Code § 6254 lists categories of documents not subject to disclosure under the Public Records Act. In addition, computer software is not considered a public record, while data and statistics collected (whether collected knowingly or unknowingly) by a government authority whose powers derive from the laws of California are public records (such as license plate reader images) pursuant to EFF & ACLU of Southern California v. Los Angeles Police Department & Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department and are not exempt from disclosure and are public records.

Although the act only covers “writing,” the Act, pursuant to Government Code § 6252(g), states: “Writing” means any handwriting, typewriting, printing, photostating, photographing, photocopying, transmitting by electronic mail or facsimile, and every other means of recording upon any tangible thing any form of communication or representation, including letters, words, pictures, sounds, or symbols, or combinations thereof, and any record thereby created, regardless of the manner in which the record has been stored.

Agencies permitted to claim copyright

California's Constitution and its statutes do not permit any agency to claim copyright for "public records" unless authorized to do so by law. The following agencies are permitted to claim copyright and any works of these agencies should be assumed to be copyrighted outside of the United States without clear evidence to the contrary:

County of Santa Clara v. CFAC held that the State of California, or any government entity which derives its power from the State, cannot enforce a copyright in any record subject to the Public Records Act in the absence of another state statute giving it the authority to do so.
Note: Works that are considered "public records" but were not created by a state or municipal government agency may be copyrighted by their author; the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution prevents state law from overriding the author's right to copyright protection that is granted by federal law. For example, a state agency may post images online of the final appearance of a building under construction; while the images may have to be released by such agency since they are public records, their creator (eg. architecture/construction firm) retains copyright rights to the image unless the contract with the agency says otherwise. See: Government-in-the-Sunshine Manual: To what extent does federal law preempt state law regarding public inspection of records?.

Disclaimer: The information provided, especially the list of agencies permitted to claim copyright, may not be complete. Wikimedia Commons makes no guarantee of the adequacy or validity of this information in this template (see disclaimer).

Public domain

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current20:43, 18 May 202310 min 26 s, 1,920 × 1,080 (86.92 MB)Illegitimate Barrister (talk | contribs)Imported media from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pI0DEUPA7iE

The following page uses this file:

Transcode status

Update transcode status
Format Bitrate Download Status Encode time
VP9 1080P 1.64 Mbps Completed 21:04, 18 May 2023 18 min 44 s
Streaming 1080p (VP9) 1.54 Mbps Completed 22:59, 14 March 2024 8.0 s
VP9 720P 1.13 Mbps Completed 21:54, 18 May 2023 1 h 8 min 21 s
Streaming 720p (VP9) Not ready Unknown status
VP9 480P 721 kbps Completed 22:45, 18 May 2023 20 min 30 s
Streaming 480p (VP9) Not ready Unknown status
VP9 360P 483 kbps Completed 22:31, 18 May 2023 8 min 33 s
Streaming 360p (VP9) Not ready Unknown status
VP9 240P 330 kbps Completed 22:31, 18 May 2023 10 min 40 s
Streaming 240p (VP9) 232 kbps Completed 07:11, 13 January 2024 2.0 s
WebM 360P 590 kbps Completed 22:30, 18 May 2023 6 min 1 s
Streaming 144p (MJPEG) 1 Mbps Completed 18:39, 8 November 2023 34 s
Stereo (Opus) 97 kbps Completed 18:19, 8 November 2023 12 s
Stereo (MP3) 128 kbps Completed 18:26, 8 November 2023 20 s

Metadata