Commons:Valued image candidates/Passiflora foetida 1.JPG

Passiflora foetida 1.JPG

promoted

Image
Nominated by	B.navez (talk) on 2008-08-31 13:02 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Passiflora foetida flower
Used in	Global usage
Review (criteria)	Comment Scope too narrow and not even really a close-up. IMO Even Passiflora foetida would do. Lycaon (talk) 18:31, 31 August 2008 (UTC)  Oppose Fails category 5: geolocation. Lycaon (talk) 18:32, 31 August 2008 (UTC) Scope changed from Passiflora foetida flower close-up to Passiflora foetida flower --B.navez (talk) 18:59, 31 August 2008 (UTC) Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn". Geolocation :  Done --B.navez (talk) 18:59, 31 August 2008 (UTC)  Support All criteria fulfilled, scope OK. Plenty (good ones) to choose from, but only one geolocated ;-). Lycaon (talk) 19:09, 31 August 2008 (UTC)  Oppose Sorry, I think that Image:P foetida flower.jpg is better. That image is not geocoded, but can still be cited as "better" under the VI rules: see Commons:Valued image value#Can a comparison be made with Commons images that would not themselves qualify as VIs?. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 20:16, 2 September 2008 (UTC)  Support Agree in principle with Michael, but in this case I actually sligthly, slightly, slightly prefer the nominated version relative to the alternative suggested my Michael and other close and good competitors. Future enegy is probably better spend in finding and photographing species we do not have here already;-) -- Slaunger (talk) 11:50, 4 September 2008 (UTC) Result: 2 support, 1 oppose => promoted. -- Eusebius (talk) 12:47, 7 September 2008 (UTC)