Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 19 2020

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:WikiCon_2018,_St._Gallen_(1Y7A2292).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Delivery van of Swiss Post in St. Gallen --MB-one 07:20, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Comment I'm concerned about the background being blurry. The van doesn't look centred. --Vincent60030 07:43, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Extremely unfavorable lighting. In the front part of the roof, the vehicle is much too light and too dark in the rear. That's no QI. -- Spurzem 09:50, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Spurzem. --Palauenc05 15:36, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I'm not too bothered by the shadow, I'm more concerned by the lack of sharpness (e.g. the "Renault trucks" badge).--Peulle 06:38, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
IMHO the shadow on the truck is really good --Berthold Werner 07:58, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
@Berthold Werner: Do you really think so? I can not imagine that. -- Spurzem 12:30, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Looks like an arrow in driving direction, could have been the idea of the designer. --Berthold Werner 14:12, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 09:43, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Tomahawk_Steak_2hrs_smoked.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Tomahawk Steak after 2hrs of Smoking and quick Searing. --Flo2323 20:32, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Mostly blurred; insufficient depth of field. -- Ikan Kekek 22:10, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support The steak is in focus --Dktue 23:40, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment A little patch of it on the left is. That's not enough, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek 01:50, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I agree. While using DoF like this to blur out background elements is certainly a valid composition method, I feel like most of the actual subject (the steak) should be in focus.--Peulle 06:46, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I could not say that the steak is in focus enough. Further the knife (?) in front disturbs. No QI for me. -- Spurzem 19:23, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 06:56, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Dülmen,_Kirchspiel,_ehem._Sondermunitionslager_Visbeck,_Bereich_der_US_Army_--_2020_--_8389.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Area of the US army at the special ammunition depot in the Dernekamp hamlet, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:53, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:03, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Technically well made, this picture is not well composed – very much foreground and close to no view of main object --Augustgeyler 23:23, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
  • The shelter is slightly raised and the grass overgrows it. It would not make sense to take this significant part out.--XRay 05:41, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality and per the photographer. -- Ikan Kekek 09:30, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Good for me -- Spurzem 21:38, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Vincent60030 18:21, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Furillen_August_2020_16.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Site of former limestone industry on the island Furillen (Gotland). --ArildV 07:48, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Oppose Lacks sharpness, sorry --Poco a poco 10:45, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
     Support Sharpness can hardly be better. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 11:48, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
     Support Sharpness seems fine to me --MB-one 16:55, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Good composition and sharpness is OK with me. -- Ikan Kekek 06:07, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment probably perspective correction slightly overdone. -- Smial 09:22, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose It is not sharp enough. --Augustgeyler 23:28, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support I wonder if some reviewers have an unsharp monitor --Moroder 23:36, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment I recommend not to blame others monitors but to analyze this picture in full scale with a calibrated 2K (better 4K) monitor. Then we will find that the objective sharpness is not the same as our personal taste. --Augustgeyler 10:22, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Vincent60030 07:13, 18 September 2020 (UTC)