Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 03 2015

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Gesù_e_Maria_(Rome)_-_Interior.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Gesù e Maria (Rome) - Interior --Livioandronico2013 07:44, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Wrong and oversaturated colours. Look here, here and here. --Code 07:49, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
    Others please --Livioandronico2013 07:50, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Overprocessed. -- Smial 00:44, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Livioandronico2013 13:55, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

File:San_Giacomo_in_Augusta_(Rome)_-_Interior.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination San Giacomo in Augusta (Rome) - Interior --Livioandronico2013 07:57, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose The colours are completely unnatural, look here, here and here. --Code 09:09, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Others please --Livioandronico2013 10:32, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Livio, can you tell us how you process your HDRs? I have to agree that it looks very unrealistic right now (much too red), but I think that it can be corrected. Do you use the HDR of Photoshop (PS has problems with reds)? Can you try to redo the tonemapping? --DXR 13:09, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
  • @DXR: Er beantwortet zwar unsere Fragen nicht, hat jetzt aber eine neue Version hochgeladen, bei der die Farben normal aussehen. Komisches Verhalten. --Code 12:40, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Maybe uploading another version without answer to your question is a strange behaviour, but is it really fair to comment this in your own native language, and not in English ? Was denken Sie darüber ? --Jebulon 04:51, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Overprocessed. -- Smial 08:24, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Livioandronico2013 13:55, 2 September 2015 (UTC)