Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 28 2019

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Проводи_паралімпійців_2018_80.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Nataliya Harach, Honored journalist of Ukraine, spokesperson of National Paralympic Committee. --JTs 16:27, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Sorry, too noisy and not sharp. --Steindy 20:52, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support I disagree Probably somewhat low DOF, but absolutely acceptable noise level and sharpness is good enough regarding the high resolution. Fortunately, this has not been damaged by excessive, blurring noise reduction. --Smial 09:35, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support per Smial. Pretty good headshot. Jacket is really dark, but that's OK. -- Ikan Kekek 05:39, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Steindy --Andrew J.Kurbiko 14:52, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support There are some little issues but IMO the quality is enough for QI --PantheraLeo1359531 19:39, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   ----Seven Pandas 12:40, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Mannersdorf_Rochusberg_49.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Objekt auf dem Rochusberg in Mannersdorf an der March (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 04:57, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality --Llez 05:26, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Problematic sky. --Tsungam 06:39, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
     Comment I do not understand why not only do I not recognize these mistakes, but others do not. I will edit the original of the photo today with another software and upload the new version to see if it is due to the post-processing software. --Manfred Kuzel 08:37, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
    ✓ Done
    New version uploaded. Ist the “Problematic sky” now OK?--Manfred Kuzel 15:52, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
    Yes. --Tsungam 08:48, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support OK. Na bitte, geht doch? --A.Savin 11:44, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Steindy 14:34, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support - Acceptable. -- Ikan Kekek 05:42, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 12:39, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Mannersdorf_Rochusberg_46.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Objekt auf dem Rochusberg in Mannersdorf an der March (Niederösterreich).. --Manfred Kuzel 04:57, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:18, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Problematic sky. --Tsungam 06:38, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
     Comment I do not understand why not only do I not recognize these mistakes, but others do not. I will edit the original of the photo today with another software and upload the new version to see if it is due to the post-processing software. --Manfred Kuzel 08:37, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
    ✓ Done New version uploaded. Ist the “Problematic sky” now OK?--Manfred Kuzel 16:06, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
    Yes. --Tsungam 08:51, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Actually... yes. What did you do?--Peulle 06:55, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Steindy 14:35, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support - Just a little noise in the sky, but definitely a solid QI. -- Ikan Kekek 05:43, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 12:38, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Ālī_Qāpū_in_blue_time.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Ālī_Qāpū palace By User:Amirpashaei --Hanooz 22:38, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good enough quality for a difficult night panorama. --Axel Tschentscher 06:15, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. Vignetting is too strong for me. --Milseburg 16:16, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
  •  Comment One of the situations where strong vignetting brings out the center. With less, the stars would be lost and the structures under the water would distract. -- Axel Tschentscher 06:31, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Very unsharp at the sides. Left side not vertical.--Ermell 19:34, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Unsharp corners and vignetting are expected for this kind of scene and time of day. But it seems to me that the colors (WB) are off: the sky looks a bit too purple. If this issue were corrected, I'd readily support the promotion of this image. Stoxastikos (talk) 17:20, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
  •  Comment ist it really 100 percent vignetting or (partly or completely) the light situation out there? Anyway this (lets call it vignetting) is imho absolutely no problem here. I would crop it a bit at top and bottom to focus more on the main object and having ma more panoramic format, but thats just personal taste. At the end I follow my previous speaker Stoxastikos here and would consider the unclear WB as a negative point. On the other hand we won't find out the correcht value and the lights in the shops look normal to me. So all together I would supportit, but what is that "thing"? See annotation. -- DerFussi 08:16, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 12:37, 27 October 2019 (UTC)