Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 18 2023

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Patio_de_la_iglesia_de_San_Agustín,_Manila,_Filipinas,_2023-08-27,_DD_115.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination San Agustin Church courtyard, Manila, Philippines --Poco a poco 16:59, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose The depth of field is lacking with the consequence that many important elements of the image are not sharp at the full resolution. I think that a tripod is required under these circumstances to achieve a quality shot. --AFBorchert 09:27, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
    •  Comment I disagree, big file, detail level good IMHO, please, let's discuss --Poco a poco 20:29, 14 October 2023 (UTC).
      • Ok but I wonder why is the fountain and the vegetation around it much more crisp than the façade of the building which appears to be the main subject? And at f/10 this is in my opinion unfortunate for the façade left and right of the centre and the roof. --AFBorchert 04:31, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
        • I focused on the fountain, so that's why it's like this. And that's consistent with the subject, which is the courtyard not the wall. I also consider that DoF is pretty good and the wall has an acceptable sharpness anyhow. Poco a poco 06:59, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 06:44, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

File:Olympus_μ_mju_II_2.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Olympus μ mju II - grey, renominated, most issues have been addressed. --多多123 10:22, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline  Question What's the transparent stuff up left (marked)? --MB-one 12:40, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
    @MB-one: Second left is the shutter, I believe the left switch is to lock in place the photograph tape. --多多123 10:43, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
     Support If it's part of the camera, good quality --MB-one 17:52, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
     Weak oppose I think, here must be applied antidust filter or manual editing for hide a real dust on the object. --Kirill Borisenko 20:35, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I'm afraid there is still too much noise. This doesn't look good at full resolution. --AFBorchert 05:51, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 06:43, 17 October 2023 (UTC)