Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 02 2020

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:2015_Kraków,_Wawel,_Baszta_Sandomierska_04.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Sandomierz Tower. Wawel. Kraków, Lesser Poland Voivodeship, Poland. --Halavar 10:02, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Comment I think there is not enough sharpness. --Augustgeyler 14:22, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done New fixed version uploaded. Please take a look again. --Halavar 17:58, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
  •  Weak support The roof got sharper, but still not as good as I'd expect. Let's discuss. --Augustgeyler 10:06, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Augustgeyler 11:32, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

File:2015_Kraków,_Wawel,_Baszta_Złodziejska_03.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Wawel Thief Tower. Kraków, Lesser Poland Voivodeship, Poland. --Halavar 12:28, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 12:48, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  •  weak contra I am unsure about the sharpness. At least at the roof it is not sharp enough. --Augustgeyler 14:45, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done New version uploaded. Sharpness mask added. Hope it's better now. --Halavar 00:48, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
  •  Neutral It is much better now.--Augustgeyler 09:07, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Jakubhal 16:05, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Augustgeyler 20:51, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

File:2015_Kraków,_Zamek_Królewski_na_Wawelu_06.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Wawel Royal Castle. Kraków, Lesser Poland Voivodeship, Poland. --Halavar 09:40, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Comment Good composition. Do you have a version with higher detail? --Augustgeyler 16:24, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment Sorry, I don't have. --Halavar 16:35, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 05:50, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose So I am sorry it is a very good composition but I think there is not enough detail. --Augustgeyler 14:45, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support enough details IMO. Christian Ferrer 07:10, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support per others. --Smial 09:21, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Augustgeyler 09:24, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Fuerte_de_San_Blas,_Ponta_Delgada,_isla_de_San_Miguel,_Azores,_Portugal,_2020-07-30,_DD_75.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Coastal artillery in Fort Saint Blaise, Ponta Delgada, São Miguel Island, Azores, Portugal --Poco a poco 10:20, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:45, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
  •  weak contra Poco, I am very sorry. Technically perfect image. I looked this over and over again. But after all I have to say that the composition does not work for me because to the gun barrel ending directly in that lamppost in the background. Please discuss! --Augustgeyler 22:42, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Sure, one could find fault with a couple of things in the composition - the crop on the right side is another - but it's good enough and certainly good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 06:43, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Good enough. --Smial 10:25, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment I improved the crop Poco a poco 19:31, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Augustgeyler 20:53, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Freedom_Monument_Latvia_07.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Base Sculptures of Latvian Freedom Monument facing Riga City Centre "For Fatherland and Freedom" --Scotch Mist 05:39, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose the very upper part of the main sculpture is cropped --Augustgeyler 17:50, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment This photograph was taken to highlight the sculptures at the base of the monument - you appear to be applying a highly personal view of QI which suggests you know better what photographs people should be taking - others can perhaps provide a more objective perspective as to whether this image meets QI criteria --Scotch Mist 18:04, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment I am sorry. But that's definitely not what I wanted to say. And of course I try to be as objective as possible. I see you would like to highlight the sculptures. Therefore it should be cropped a little more (or less) on top so that it becomes a clearer decision. --Augustgeyler 20:26, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment @Augustgeyler: My apologies as I have apparently misunderstood your opposition to this image - have now re-cropped and uploaded a new image for review - perhaps in general it may be better to advise your comments via an initial review rather than immediately oppose images that may still have merit for QI consideration (unless of course you have noted a fundamental issue that may not be readily addressed!:) --Scotch Mist 16:21, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment I agree to August. There is no balance in the composition, a small top and bottom crop would have been an improvement. Also IMO the building left in the background does not make the composition more beautiful. --Michielverbeek 09:33, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Unsuitable image orientation and too tight cropping at the top. --Smial 14:44, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment @Smial: Further to above comments please consider review of newly uploaded image - thanks --Scotch Mist 16:21, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
  •  Neutral Your edit improved it.--Augustgeyler 22:21, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support --Moroder 04:13, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support --Jakubhal 16:01, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Augustgeyler 20:54, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Grillige_boomstronk._Locatie,_Stuttebosch_in_de_lendevallei._27-08-2020._(actm.)_03.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Whimsical tree stump. Location, Stuttebosch in the lime valley. Friesland province. --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:51, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:01, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I am sorry. This motiv again is very difficult. The background and its colors are combining to hard with the main object. --Augustgeyler 22:14, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality to my eyes. -- Ikan Kekek 05:30, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support --Moroder 07:43, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Augustgeyler. --Fischer.H 17:11, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment I think a very little colour correction at the background could help.--Augustgeyler 10:27, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done. WB. correction Thank you for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan 17:46, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment Thank you. But I think the described problem did not improve significantly. --Augustgeyler 20:18, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promote?   --Augustgeyler 09:39, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

File:WLM_-_2020_-_Catedral-basílica_de_Nuestra_Señora_del_Pilar_-_02.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Cathedral-Basilica of Our Lady of the Pillar at night, north facade, Zaragoza, Aragon, Spain. --Moahim 06:56, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Comment Beautiful! Is this a panorama with cylindrical projection? (I ask, because the cathedral appers bent.) If yes, this should be noted in the image description. --Aristeas 08:24, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done Ok, I added a description --Moahim 09:51, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Thank you very much! Sorry for being so picky about the description, but without a hint one would could think that the facade of the church is curved ;–). --Aristeas 07:31, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Very nice image but obvious barrel distortion, that should be fixed --Poco a poco 09:19, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment I'll try to fix this, but not before monday. --Moahim 11:56, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done Geometry is fixed. --Moahim 19:48, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Definitely better, but I still see barrel distortion, I move therefore to  Neutral Poco a poco 13:21, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support --Moroder 03:46, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality and quite pretty. -- Ikan Kekek 10:30, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support --Fischer.H 17:28, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Augustgeyler 20:57, 1 October 2020 (UTC)