Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 28 2013

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Hampton Loade railway station MMB 02 5164.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination 5164 at Hampton Loade. Mattbuck 08:04, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose blurred --P e z i 18:22, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
    The head is in focus, the background is intentionally not. Mattbuck 23:09, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
    I see, 5164 is just a random number in the filename without any relationship to locomotive's number in the background ... --P e z i 13:33, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
    Would you prefer I change the QI description to "person leaning out of a train"? Because really, that is what you are arguing about. I've changed the image description, but I see no problem with the filename. Mattbuck 14:27, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
    You've categorised it to "GWR 5101 Class", therefore my assumption is, that the engine is (also) object of the pic. --P e z i 14:48, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
    I work on the basis that if X is in the picture, the picture should be in Category:X. Mattbuck 15:50, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
  •  Oppose weak compo --Vamps 15:54, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Brixner_Dom_Innenraum_1.JPG[edit]

  • Nomination Innenraum des Brixner Doms --Uoaei1 08:41, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion Blurry at corners, incorrect perspective. ( Oppose)--Mattbuck 22:51, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
    The focus is clear in the center, not in the corners. And I really do not see anything wrong with the perspective --Uoaei1 09:21, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Blurred at corners, perspective issues (right and left are leaning in) and bad composition oups, sorry this sentence is not very likeable --Christian Ferrer 18:57, 16 November 2013 (UTC) (not the same crop at right and at left) --Christian Ferrer 13:00, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality for me! The picture is very atmospheric and sharp enough for QI. The slight blur at the corners is due to the small focal distance of 18 mm and can be neglected. -- Spurzem 23:04, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
  •  Support Per Spurzem. --Cekli829 11:49, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
  •  Support A bit "soft", but it works for me.--Jebulon 11:07, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
  •  CommentNew version uploaded with perspective issues corrected --Uoaei1 (talk) 20:40, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → More votes?   --Cccefalon 05:42, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Vedla_capela_y_tubla_de_mur_La_Val_03.JPG[edit]

  • Nomination Barnhouse in stone and former chapel in Pastrogn, La Val - --Moroder 08:41, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Oppose Overexposed --Christian Ferrer 06:24, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
  •  Support can't see any overexposure (clouds are white but not burnt out) only one DS (see notice) --P e z i 20:16, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
✓ Done Fixed DS, thanks!--Moroder 19:02, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
  •  Support --Cayambe 08:35, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Cayambe 08:35, 24 November 2013 (UTC)