Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 26 2020

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Colégio_Marista_Arquidiocesano,_Metro_Santa_Cruz,_Sao_Paulo,_Brasil.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination This image was uploaded --Wilfredor 16:30, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Comment This looks wildly over-processed, and there are weird artefact smears in various places (for example just above the top of the building). Are you able to reprocess this so that the tone curve and noise reduction look natural? --Bobulous 19:38, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
  •  Question What is natural? --Wilfredor 02:15, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Very good quality/reality. Christmas nowadays is not "natural" anymore :-( --Moroder 06:10, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I really think this needs to go into discussion. To my eye, the artefacts in the sky alone rule this out of QI status. --Bobulous 16:46, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment I think it is close to be QI. The image is slightly tilted to the left (fixable). While the main parts are sharp I spotted some prominent unsharp areas on the left as well as at the roof. This might have caused the artefacts mentioned by Bobulous. --Augustgeyler (talk) 17:33, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose It is overprocessd with artifacts in the sky, halos around lights and areas sprinkled with small white dots (look at the right tree). Taking the original photo with a more careful processing would do. --KaiBorgeest 23:31, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sharpness missing, a lot of artifacts, noise, ... --XRay 09:13, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 10:35, 25 November 2020 (UTC)