Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 25 2023

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Japanischer_Ahorn_--_2023_--_9280.jpg[edit]

  • But QI guidelines mention "unnecessary or inappropriate use of artistic filters and effects" leading to "images have little resemblance with reality" as an issue. They also state that "motion blur should have a purpose, most often to emphasize motion" - while the "purpose" of motion blur in this picture is an artistic effect; it does not resemble reality or create an illusion of reality (like motion blur of a fast-moving object does). So from my point of view this is an interesting picture but not a QI. --Plozessor 06:32, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • But that category is for featured pictures, which is something else than QI. And in my opinion, a picture that is intentionally blurred is still blurred, thus not a QI. Let's see what other say though. --Plozessor 10:05, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --XRay 19:58, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]