Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 23 2023

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Rottweil,_Schwarzes_Tor_IMG_4899_2023-05-01_12.44.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Rottweil-Germany, town gate: Schwarzes Tor --Michielverbeek 07:44, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose White balance is unnatural (too brownish/yellowish). I'm open to changing my vote if this is corrected. --Jay.Jarosz 19:45, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
I have ✓ Done a whitebalance improvement, more blue and less yellow --Michielverbeek 07:52, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
I change to nomination for getting a 2nd review and yes the sky was very grey that day --Michielverbeek 06:55, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
You can't change "Declined" to "Nomination". Changed it to "Discuss" now. --Plozessor 07:26, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
  •  Weak oppose Sharpness is just about acceptable, but it is too dark overall. Should not be hard to increase exposure or brighten the shadows in raw conversion or processing. --Plozessor 05:51, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment Another version, ✓ Done increase brightness --Michielverbeek 07:57, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. The issue isn't sharpness or brightness, but at worst, the noise. --Sebring12Hrs 12:31, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 08:16, 22 November 2023 (UTC)