Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 19 2023

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Mysuru_Rail_Museum_-_Maharani_Saloon_-_Corridor.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Mysuru Rail Museum - Corridor of Maharani Saloon --Imehling 07:56, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Weak oppose Would have been better with higher f-number, now there's only a small sharp area ... --Plozessor 18:18, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment Yes, but it was too dark for that and I had no tripod with me. --Imehling 09:46, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
     Oppose Nice scene but execution and post processing could have been better. Most of the image is not sharp. --Jay.Jarosz 20:26, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
  •  Weak support. Low DOF in full resolution, but acceptable for an a4 size print. --Smial 08:23, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Yeah, I don't think this one was successful, sorry.--Peulle 09:22, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Too dark and a bit unsharp and noisy. You probably couldn't have done better, so it's not your fault, but the result is not quite a QI to me. -- Ikan Kekek 20:30, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --C messier 20:07, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Suleiman_mosque_Istanbul_July_2022-19.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Exterior of the Suleyman Mosque, Istanbul -- Alvesgaspar 14:06, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Support Good quality. --XRay 15:38, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
     Oppose The shadows seem too dark (shadow clipping?). Also there's perspective warp / distortion (see minarets for example) --Jay.Jarosz 16:49, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Towers are a bit distorted by the perspective correction, but I like the composition. Shadow aren't too dark to me. --Sebring12Hrs 13:23, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Shadows are too dark, towers are distorted, that would probably be acceptable if the overall quality was better. But the majority of the mosque is not really sharp. If the shadows are brightened, the picture is slightly vertically compressed (to reduce the distortion) and maybe if it is a bit sharpened, I might support it. --Plozessor 16:54, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Shadows are acceptable, but the distortion isn't. --Milseburg 19:42, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose because of the pitch black shadows. -- Ikan Kekek 20:34, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --C messier 16:59, 18 November 2023 (UTC)