Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 18 2016

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Super Moon, Quezon City Philippines November 14 2016, without text.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Monday, November 14, 2016 8:54 PM. By User:Shingoji2016 --Yann 23:02, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Grainy and lack of detail. Images should also not contain text. --Uoaei1 07:44, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment For an amateur photo, it is very good. The text can be removed. --Yann 09:58, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose (a) Shouldn't the text be removed prior to nomination? (b) Nice capture, but not QI technical quality to me. Hazy with fringes. Yeah, it's a high standard; maybe a majority will disagree in CR. -- Ikan Kekek 11:08, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose As Ikan Kekek--Lmbuga 15:22, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment I replaced the nom. by a version without text. Yann 16:43, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Too many artifacts visible, not a QI. --C messier 11:37, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 19:54, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Tombe_de_Charles_Galland,_cimetière_des_Rois,_Genève.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Tomb of Charles Galland, Kings Cemetery, Geneva. --Yann 15:42, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Insufficient quality: Not sharp. --Peulle 18:02, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Can I have another opinion please? Even at 6 Mpx I find it OK. --Yann 23:14, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose It's arguable, but I come out on the anti side for this one because nothing is sharp and the light also doesn't help. -- Ikan Kekek 03:20, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 09:13, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Tombe_d'Alexandre_Monnier,_cimetière_des_Rois,_Genève.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Tomb of Alexandre Monnier, Kings Cemetery, Geneva. --Yann 15:19, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Insufficient quality. Not very sharp up front. Sorry --Moroder 16:02, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Can I have another opinion please? Only the pin with the number if not sharp IMO. The inscription is very sharp. --Yann 23:14, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support I agree with your description. Good picture. -- Ikan Kekek 03:16, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per above, plus cyan color aberration. Alvesgaspar 18:53, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 19:52, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Refuge Alfred Wills-août 2016-11.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Refuge Alfred Wills (Haute-Savoie).
    --B-noa 07:55, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 10:50, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, same problem as the one below: unsharp, chromatic aberrations. Typical out-of-camera jpg. Only the development of raw files does it --A.Savin 02:44, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per A.Savin. --Basotxerri 16:17, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 19:51, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Refuge Alfred Wills-août 2016-9.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Refuge Alfred Wills (Haute-Savoie).
    --B-noa 07:55, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support A beautiful panorama --Michielverbeek 08:08, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Yes; but not QI quality: too soft, chromatic aberrations --A.Savin 02:41, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per A.Savin. --Basotxerri 16:17, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 19:50, 17 November 2016 (UTC)