Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 16 2021

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Poststrasse_18_in_Kirchberg_an_der_Jagst.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Building at Poststraße 18 in Kirchberg an der Jagst, Baden-Württemberg, Germany. --Tournasol7 06:53, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:06, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree, washed out colours due to poor lighting conditions. Alvesgaspar 10:53, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support QI for me. -- Johann Jaritz 05:01, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Quite an OK photo, taken on a cloudy day. -- Ikan Kekek 14:45, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Alvesgaspar.--Jebulon 12:42, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Augustgeyler 07:11, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

File:Fumarolas_de_Furnas,_isla_de_San_Miguel,_Azores,_Portugal,_2020-07-29,_DD_68.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Fumarolas of Furnas, São Miguel Island, Azores, Portugal --Poco a poco 11:07, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose This is a cool subject, but the image is flat due to lack of lighting and the volcanic (spring?) field isn't fully in focus. --Prburley 15:12, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Sharpness is pretty good at 70%, so I think it's good enough and worth a discussion. -- Ikan Kekek 19:35, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support QI for me.--Ermell 19:17, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, almost a third of the picture is out of focus.--Jebulon 16:56, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support QI for me. -- Johann Jaritz 07:20, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Jebulon. Sorry. --Hillopo2018 09:46, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Nothing is out of focus, this is just edge blur on a so-so lens used on a 50 MP camera. None of this would be visible at 12 MP. --King of Hearts 20:01, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Good enough for QI for me --Kritzolina 17:30, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
  •  Comment Definitely per KoH. Affirming that this image is out of focus is setting the threshold damned high, and this coming from 3 reviewers, really disappointing to have to hear this. A big area of this huge file is in focus, at least up to the shore, which comprises the subject of the image. I will have to get my eyes checked in that case otherwise. Poco a poco 18:15, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Promoted   --Augustgeyler 17:45, 15 November 2021 (UTC)