Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 16 2015

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Luzern-1180494.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Kapellbrücke of Lucerne/Switzerland --Ermell 13:29, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment Please remove the dust spots in the sky --Rolf H. 15:06, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
     Comment
    The dust spots are birds.--Ermell 22:25, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose This many birds are blurred and look like dust - but i think we need a discussion --Rolf H. 9:23, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
     Comment Well they don't look like birds to me. Charlesjsharp 17:58, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
     Comment Aren´t these double winged Piggy banks, typical for switzerland? --Hubertl 00:26, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
     Comment No, certainly not, the double-winged piggy banks (Porcellum duplexalatum helvetii) can only be found in Zurich. Charlesjsharp 10:52, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
     Comment Thanks, I didn´t know this before! --Hubertl 12:16, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done All dusts pots and birds removed. Have to admit that they look disturbing.--Ermell 15:09, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
  • now  Support - Thanks for the work! --Rolf H. (talk) 15:24, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support --SKas 14:44, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Good enough although there are signs of oversharpening and (maybe) over denoising in the backgroud. Alvesgaspar 10:55, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 08:55, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Living Colour Graz 2010.JPG[edit]

  • Nomination Living Colour at a concert in Graz 2010. --Clemens Stockner 14:54, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose For all of the good things about this photo, the crop is awkward: not enough at the bottom and too much empty space above. ROT. -- RaboKarbakian 00:19, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment I understand your objections, but with more room at the bottom there would have been a lot of heads spoiling it. --Clemens Stockner 10:10, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment The bottom crop is not that bad ... it is quite usual to crop six inches above the knees. --Cccefalon 17:29, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Crop, which just fits the size requirements. A dominant eye (maybe "the dominant eye") is in the center and the image itself is almost 2/3 musician and 1/3 "smoke and lights". -- RaboKarbakian 14:11, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
 Comment The new crop is not working ... --Cccefalon 17:30, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
 Comment Do you mean it is not showing or that you don't like it? -- RaboKarbakian 00:17, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Unsharp, chromatic aberrations, why two files ? --Jebulon 19:37, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
 Comment I uploaded the crop I suggested. -- RaboKarbakian 06:13, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
 Comment You should not ! This is very confusing ! Please chose one, or nominate separately ! Which picture should we vote for ?--Jebulon 12:34, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
 Comment This is not historically an unusual practice. I opposed the original, which caused it to be sent to CR and supported the crop, as I noted. Has not been a problem and it is interesting to see the changes. -- RaboKarbakian 16:46, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose this composition is not eligable for me, as cccefalon. --Hubertl 07:36, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Jean11 08:58, 15 November 2015 (UTC)