Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 12 2015

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:15-11-01-Kaninchenwerder-RalfR-WMA_3309.jpg[edit]

 I withdraw my nomination schon jetzt total verzerrt, habe das Bild auf die Ursprungsversion zurückgesetzt. Zu viel Manipulation. --Ralf Roleček 10:48, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline?   --Hubertl 08:34, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:15-01-18-Lounge-Berlin-RalfR-DSCF1204-06.jpg[edit]

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → More votes?   --Hubertl 07:39, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:28 Franka Street, Lviv (01).jpg[edit]

I photographed many times this mascaron. When the light is more frontal, all mask becomes crushed by similar in size small details. I intentionally photographed so that was formed several larger shadows (so now there are large and small). Note - details in shadows are visible.--Aeou 15:32, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
have you taken photos with cloudy sky? Usualy it gives better results --Elrond 20:07, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I did. But then it was too cloudy. Not very good too. I'll try again. Now I better withdraw this nomination.--Aeou 11:23, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Your opinion is up to you, but the contrast is nevertheless very harsh. --Elrond 20:07, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You're right, Elrond. But in the end these QI decisions are all about opinion. --Clemens Stockner 11:10, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Hubertl 00:18, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Trier, Liebfrauenkirche -- 2015 -- 6149.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Cathedral of St. Peter, Trier, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany --XRay 03:53, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:03, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment Wrong discription and filename. This is not the cathedral but the church of our lady. --Berthold Werner 18:59, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
  • ✓ Fixed Sorry. Descriptiion, name and EXIF data are now correct. Thanks for your informatiion.--XRay 08:32, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support --Hubertl 09:53, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 08:55, 11 November 2015 (UTC)