Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 08 2017

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Château_de_La_Roche_(Saint-Priest-la-Roche)_(2).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination The Château de La Roche is a restored castle situated in the commune of Saint-Priest-la-Roche in the Loire département of France, 20 km from Roanne. The castle stands on an island in the lake formed by the Villerest dam. --Nunux34 09:22, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose IMO not a good composition because the sun is not shining on the castle, too much shadows. --Michielverbeek 22:15, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support I disagree. The illumination is good enough. We see from northwest to the castle. It´s very normal, that there is shadow, if you want show this side. But it could be sharper. --Milseburg 23:28, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support - The shadows are fine and the castle is sharp enough, considering the file size. I don't understand the concept that a photo just can't be decent if the facade depicted is in shadow, surrounded by light. It's a rather striking look, in fact. -- Ikan Kekek 08:01, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 13:11, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Schloss_Augustusburg,_Southern_Facade,_November_2017_-02.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination The southern facade of Schloss Augustusburg. --Martin Falbisoner 20:16, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Milseburg 20:27, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
  • I am wondering if an effect was used on the water and on the grass. --RaboKarbakian 03:32, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support - Very good quality. RaboKarbakian, I think perhaps you didn't understand that you can ask a question without changing the status of the nomination to "Discuss". I can't see a good reason for this file to be in Consensual Review, but perhaps you can. Do you object to something, of had you just wanted to ask Martin a question? -- Ikan Kekek 08:05, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support--Ermell 07:41, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support--Tournasol7 00:14, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 08:33, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Vitoria - Portal de Betoño 01.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Portal de Betoño Street in August. Vitoria-Gasteiz, Basque Country, Spain (was nominated a few days ago but without result) --Basotxerri 17:59, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Sorry, but I am not really impressed by the composition. In the front I see shadows from the trees and the sunny parts looks overprocessed. It might be a serious improvement if you reduce the contrast.--Michielverbeek 18:56, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support I don't mind the shadows. It looks realistic to an avenue. The motif comes better on a sunny day with necessarily shadows than on a grey and cloudy day without them. Michielverbeek, feel free to oppose. --Milseburg 17:27, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support - I have no idea whether the sunny parts in the background are overprocessed; what I see is that they just look less sharp, which is normal. As for the shadows, I quite like their shapes on the road along with the trees lining it, and I find this composition much more interesting than if the entire road stretched in full light in front of us. -- Ikan Kekek 08:13, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support OK. Shadows are heavy, but is also beautiful again.--Famberhorst 16:42, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 13:12, 7 November 2017 (UTC)