Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 31 2023

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

==[edit]

  • Nomination A-Final Men at the 48th Hallorenpokal in diving in Halle (Saale) on 5 February 2023. By User:DerHexer --Augustgeyler 08:57, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Leg cropped off. --BigDom 16:11, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment I think this image is well composed and would like to ask for more opinions. --Augustgeyler 20:32, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Weak oppose I think the crop is not a problem, and the composition is good. However, the depth of field is very low, and it looks like the focus is on the boy's torso, not his face. -- Jakubhal 09:42, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Crop --Tagooty 09:45, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose because of the crop and the color -- Spurzem 12:53, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 06:40, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

File:Clove_close_up.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Macro image of the dried Clove bud --sanjay_ach 19:53, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:32, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
  • I agree it is good quality, but I think it would look better symmetrically cropped. --BigDom 16:45, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
    • Not sure if @BigDom: is opposing or only commenting, so moved to CR. Note that QICvote's "Comment" changed "Promotion" to "Review" which is not the correct flow. --Tagooty 08:45, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
      • Definitely not opposing, it's a great macro shot. I just don't get why it's not in the middle. Never intended it to come to CR, it was just a comment in case the uploader wanted to fix it. BigDom (talk) 06:53, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
        • Just would like to add my thought here while taking the picture. The reason why it's not in the middle is to give a perspective view from the bud end so that the viewer can see the complex details from that end. Hope that helps. --sanjay_ach 14:45, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
          • Sorry, I meant the middle of the frame symmetrically, rather than the big white space on the left. The perspective is good. -- BigDom (talk) 15:41, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
            • Ah got what you meant. Make sense. Fixed in new version. Hope this is fine now. -- sanjay_ach 12:57, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support I hope he wasn't opposing. Amazing closeup. -- Ikan Kekek 06:45, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Looks ok. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:16, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 06:40, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

File:2022-05-21_50._Internationales_Dixieland_Festival_Dresden_1DX_1526_by_Stepro.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination 50th International Dixieland Festival Dresden: Dresdner Jazzmeile, Terrence Ngassa & The new Louis Armstrong Band (Kamerun). By --Stepro 19:17, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Question Visible chromatic aberration on arms. Can you correct it, please? --LexKurochkin 13:17, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done Thanks, I fixed it (hope so). --Stepro 22:51, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Half done @Stepro: Better, but, please pay attention to magenta CA on his right sleeve --LexKurochkin 08:32, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Neutral Let's discuss --LexKurochkin 12:51, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment I can't fix that easily. I also don't know if that's CA or from the colored stage lights. --Stepro 15:25, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment I have no doubt that that's a magenta CA border on part of the top of his sleeve. -- Ikan Kekek 06:43, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
  • Weak  Support. It's a pity that the left hand is slight cropped. But otherwise it is good for me. -- Spurzem 20:30, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment There's CA on the instrument also. Try reducing the saturation of Aqua color. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:18, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 06:40, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

File:Penne_Arrabbiata.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Penne all'arrabbiata --PetarM 06:49, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Insufficient quality: the mobile phone hasn't quite been able to capture the level of detail needed, IMO. --Peulle 06:59, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support I see plenty of detail at larger than life size, so I think your standards are too demanding. -- Ikan Kekek 19:01, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support. Good quality. I've the impression that more and more people are judging by the camera which was used to take the photos. -- Spurzem 10:00, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment I've been wondering about that, too - both ways, though. I've seen some comments suggesting that cellphone pictures might be fairly judged at a lower standard than DSLR pictures. We should just judge what we're seeing. I'd add, though, that this is not "100% sharp minute detail candidates," just "Quality image candidates." If our standard becomes that we not only have to see the ribs on the penne clearly but that they must be 100% sharp at larger than life size, what in the world are we doing? -- Ikan Kekek 17:43, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose With Peulle. --August Geyler (talk) 15:09, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Good enough for QI for me --Kritzolina 17:45, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support per Ikan Kekek. BigDom 17:52, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The crop isn't very good and there are some blurred areas. --Sebring12Hrs 20:15, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose unfortunately per Sebring12Hrs. --MB-one 12:22, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Question An entire dish doesn't have to all be equally sharp, does it? -- Ikan Kekek 20:24, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose – dislike the top right and the poor crop. --SHB2000 10:49, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Weak oppose Per others. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:21, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment IMO, the crop is good. We see the whole pasta dish. We don't need to see the whole bowl. -- Ikan Kekek 06:45, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 6 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 06:39, 30 May 2023 (UTC)